La respuesta correcta es la número 1) Comunidad Primitiva.
> Estamos hablando de lo que los historiadores y Antropólogos han llamado "Comunidad Primitiva."
> La comunidad científica afirma que este tipo de organización social se desarrolló en el periodo Paleolítico.
> Los antropólogos han identificado este término para denominar a los primeros modelos de sociedad que se dieron en la prehistoria.
> La comunidad primitiva agrupaba a los primero humanos por necesidad, buscando protección ante las inclemencias del tiempo y las amenazas de los animales.
> La disolución de este tipo de comunidades comenzó con la Revolución Neolítica, cuando el ser humano dejó de ser nómada, comenzó a usar la agricultura y los trabajos se especializaron.
> Esto se debió a que los humanos comenzaron a desarrollar y aprender técnicas de cultivo y decidieron asentarse en un sólo sitio, y ya no seguir a las manadas de animales que debían de cazar para poder alimentar a sus familias.
> Los historiadores coinciden en señalar que la civilización más antigua en la Tierra es Sumeria.
> Estos primeros humanos se asentaron en medio de los Ríos Tigris y Éufrates, en el Medio Oriente.
> En estos momentos, daba inicio una importante etapa en la historia de la humanidad llamada la Revolución Neolítica o la Revolución de la Agricultura.
Podemos concluir que cuando los humanos comenzaron a aprender técnicas de agricultura, se establecieron en un sólo lugar para formar asentamientos más formales que posteriormente se convertirían en los orígenes de la civilización formal, tal y como la conocemos.
Aprende más sobre este tema aquí:
https://brainly.com/question/16591488?referrer=searchResults
Which of the following explains one method the Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe after the Roman empire collapsed
The statement that explains one method the Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe after the Roman empire collapsed is B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.
What method did Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe?It should be noted that the Catholic Church unified Europe socially through the continuing masses, as well as the holding baptisms and weddings, and caring for the sick.
However the Catholic Church unified Europe politically through the process of acting as a unifying "leader" for Christians and it can be considered as a place people could come to for help they needed and the Church would be there, hence considering the case above it brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about Roman Catholic Church at:
https://brainly.com/question/3323129
#SPJ1
missing options:
A. It forced all Eastern Orthodox Christians to respect the pope’s authority.
B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.
C. It established the Code of Justinian as the official European legal system.
D. It required that Latin act as the official spoken language throughout Europe.
It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam
Economists can use new technology to
Subjective measures are numeric or quantifiable while objective measures are based on the perceptions of the family members or therapist ?
True or false
The correct answer is False
Explanation
The word "subjective" is a concept that refers to the opinion or point of view of a person or group on a specific topic. While the word "objective" is a concept that refers to information or knowledge that does not include the opinion or point of view of its author, but rather focuses on the nature of a specific topic in general and specific. According to the above, the correct answer is false because subjective measures are not numerical or quantifiable but refer to an opinion or point of view and perceptions, while objective measures are not based on someone's perceptions but rather refer to numeric or quantifiable information.
PLEASE HELP IM TAKING AN ASSESSMENT
what situation allowed authoritarian governments to flourish in the 1920s?
Answer:
URL copied to clipboard
As the one hundredth anniversary of the beginning of World War I approaches, one may encounter some rather strained attempts to compare the current global balance of forces to that in Europe in 1914. I recently visited several countries in south east Asia and a different comparison struck me, the similarities between now and the 1930s, weak democracies and strong dictatorships.
This comparison “jumped off the page” after a week in Bangkok, followed by several days in Hanoi - a journey from a country with weak and faltering formal democratic institutions to an apparently stable one with an authoritarian regime (bordering on a country with a considerably more brutal dictatorship, China).
In The Age of Extremes, Eric Hobsbawm argued that the conflict between capitalism and communism determined the course of the twentieth century. This confrontation of socio-economic ideologies without doubt dominated European and global history, especially after 1945. But another, inter-related confrontation that determined the course of the century was authoritarianism versus democracy. The capitalism-communism conflict seems but a moment of history for people in their forties and younger. However, the danger of a rising authoritarian wave is as imminent in the twenty-first century as it was in the twentieth.
In most countries of Europe in the 1930s the contest between authoritarian and democratic visions of society dominated the political struggle. The exceptions were Italy where the fascists had already established an extreme version of authoritarian rule, and Britain where a rigid class structure gave stability to superficially democratic institutions. By the middle of the decade, capitalist authoritarian regimes were clearly on the rise in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary and Poland), as well as Portugal, with Spain soon to join the anti-democratic camp.
Indeed, in very few of the industrialised countries in the late 1930s did democracy seem the stronger trend. Among the large countries only in the United States was there an unambiguous shift towards strengthening popular participation. Ironically enough it was during the presidency of patrician Franklin D Roosevelt that trade unions asserted themselves as a major political force (which would not survive much past mid-century).
Now, well into the twenty-first century it is even more difficult to find a major country with vigorous and democratic institutions, certainly not in the United States nor in Europe. In the United States the confrontation between a well-funded right wing Republican Party and the middle-of-the road Democrat Party dominates politics, one doctrinaire and aggressive, the other muddled and vascillating. The anti-democratic trend is demonstrated by passage of laws restricting the right to vote in Republican controlled states, linked to the racist xenophobia of the Tea Party. In the White House sits a Democrat apparently unconcerned by a massively intrusive national security complex.
In Europe anti-democratic trends are if anything stronger. Britain probably has the most extensive video surveillance network in Europe (see recent articles in the Guardian), as well as legal restrictions on the right of assembly, designed to reduce public protests (as we find in Spain). In addition, the Conservative-dominated coalition government’s brutal attack on poor households receiving social support in effect legalises civil rights violations. Surveillance, attacks on the poor and the government fanning fears of immigrants combine to make a potent anti-democratic package.
On the continent pre-existing authoritarian tendencies enjoyed a quantum leap under the EU-wide austerity regime fostered by the German government under the cover of the European Commission. The unelected governments in Greece (2011-12) and Italy (2011-13) represent the most obvious and shocking examples of the authoritarian trend. Much more serious in the long term is the EU fiscal compact (officially named the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union).
This treaty, which came into effect at the beginning of 2013, severely limits the authority of national parliaments to set fiscal policy. The treaty and additional measures demanded by the German government remove fiscal policy from public control (with monetary policy in the hands of the European Central Bank and beyond national accountability). This process in which major decisions are taken away from the electorate fundamentally undermines public faith in the democratic process.
Explanation:
Authoritarian governments were able to flourish in the 1920s because democratic governments were failing especially in the late 1920s and early 1930s. On top of that socialism was spreading which scared many people and authoritarianism seemed like a better option than democracy for stopping socialism.
What is an authoritarian government?Authoritarian government is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government.
Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.
Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.
Learn more about authoritarian, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019371
#SPJ2
Tanks
· Machine guns
· Poison gas
· Flamethrowers
· Airplanes
These new military technologies resulted in a huge expansion of the military tactic known as trench warfare and made _______ the most deadly war up to that point in history.
a.
Vietnam
b.
World War I
c.
World War II
d.
American Civil War
Answer:
The correct answer is B. World War I.
Explanation:
A trench warfare is a war in which both sides have dug themselves opposite each other in trenches and other fortified positions, with the aim of halting the advance of the enemy, which culminates in a stalemate where neither side succeeds in breaking through the enemy lines. The best-known trench warfare is World War I.
In general, trench warfare is the result of technological advances that allow enemy soldiers to be killed faster than they can advance. For example, in World War I, repeating rifles, machine guns, and modern artillery made it possible to mow down soldiers in the open by bushes. However, as armies still moved largely on foot and horseback, they could not cross those same open battlefields fast enough to get close enough to the enemy and fire effectively at the enemy.
please please please question paper maths science social science answer please my friends
why the attitude toward the Etruscan rule changed over time.
Answer:
They saw them as honorable men.
Explanation:
class 6 sst ch diversity,how can people depend on each other
What caused the United States to adopt the policy of containment?
a desire to prevent prosperity in Germany
Soviet rejection of the Marshall Plan
the spread of communism across Europe
the spread of communism on several continents
Explanation:
The Truman Doctrine essentially meant giving money and weapons to enemies of the USSR. The Marshall Plan was an attempt to get all of Europe in debt to the USA and allow the Americans to dominate it. The American view was that the Truman Doctrine was stopping the continuing spread of Communism. please marks me as brainliests please for my effort...Answer:
C. the spread of communism on several continents
Explanation:
the guy above gave the answer, for those of you that are to lazy to read here ya go
Write instruction to recharge the mobile phone.
Labor legislation was most favorable to labor unions during the pe- riod (a) 1960–present (b) 1945–1959 (c) 1933–1945 (d) 1865–1933.
The correct answer is C. 1933 - 1945.
Explanation
In 1929 there was a world financial crisis that affected the great world powers like the United States. Therefore, the 1930s represented a challenge for President Franklin D. Rosevelt, who had to lead the economic reactivation after this crisis. For this reactivation, Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented the New Deal in which he included broad support for workers through laws such as The Fair Labor Standards Act of 19383 and the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933. These policies contributed to the strengthening of unions and labor rights over the next decade. So the correct answer is C.
How did "the loyal
American people”
see the
Reconstruction Act?
Answer:
The Southerners did not like the Reconstruction Act..and did all they could until they eventually destroyed it
Explanation:
This is all I know....
How did toussaint l'ouverture affect the haitian revolution?
Which ONE is FALSE regarding the Scientific Testing of the Shroud?
Answer: Shroud believers maintain that the stains are blood marks from the wounds of Jesus but most test results indicate paint has been used in those areas.
Explanation:
The scientists of the Shroud of Turin Research Project who released their findings in 1988, wrote that the blood stains on the shroud were made of hemoglobin and had albumin as well.
This confirms that these were indeed blood stains and not paint as suggested because both hemoglobin and albumin are substances that are present in the human blood.
In 1943 , the United States and Great Britain did which of the following ? A. Began preparations for an organization to promote world peace . B. Began preparations for an organization with a goal to end the Soviet Union. C. Began an organization to research possible causes of a third World War .
Answer:
The Answer is A.
Explanation:
I just did it on edge 2021.
What were native Americans groups most threatened by?
Answer:
They were threatened by diseases, poverty, land seizure and deportation.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Persona enviada a un lugar para llevar mensaje dentro buscando la Independencia del Perú
Answer:
Mensajero.
Explanation:
Mensajero es la persona o empresa que entrega mensajes o paquetes. Los bienes de mensajería se refieren a bienes que son acompañados o transportados por un mensajero, a menudo para garantizar que ninguna persona no autorizada pueda acceder a los contenidos. En un principio, el mensajero más clásico era el que viajaba en diligencia de mensajes entre dos príncipes, o dejaba mensajes entre dos frentes diferentes en la guerra.
I really need help on this. What’s the answer
Answer:
Negative Affects of The Industrial Revolution
Explanation:
The text describes how the industrial revolution started polluting water sources, thus proving to be a negative effect.
Of the following government types, which two are the most opposite?
A. a dictatorship and a democracy
B. a monarchy and a dictatorship
C. a monarchy and an aristocracy
D. a republic and a democracy
anong maling pag-uugali ng tao ang sa palagay ninyo na mahirap mabago
Answer:
Ang maling pag-uugali ng tao ang sa palagay ko ay mahirap na mabago ay ang pagiging mapanghusga.
Explanation:
Hi po! I think you should connect to brainly.ph para mas mabilis makuha yung answers and para locals na di yung sumagot.
Just a suggestion though. It's still up to you.
Hope it helps
#carryonlearning
#brainliestbunch
boa noiteeeee
como ces ta?
Answer:Boa noite
Explanation:Eu ta bom
Answer:
como ces ta?
Explanation:
Eu sou bom :)
How would a new advance in manufacturing technology most likely affect the
supply of the good being produced?
A. The supply of the good would remain the same.
B. The supply of the good would not be affected.
C. The supply of the good would fall.
ОС
D. The supply of the good would increase.
SUBMIT
The governor's veto power is part of ________________________
Answer:
Legislative power
Explanation:
The governor's veto power is part of "Legislative power."
The above statement is TRUE because the evidence can be fornd in the Article III, Section 12, of the State of Washington Constitution.
The part of the Article III, Section 12, of the constitution state that "Every act which shall have passed the legislature shall be, before it becomes a law, presented to the governor. If he approves, he shall sign it; but if not, he shall return it, with his objections, to that house in which it shall have originated, which house shall enter the objections at large upon the journal and proceed to reconsider..."
Why was Carnegie Steel considered a vertical monopoly?
The company controlled every step of steel production, from raw materials to distribution.
The company controlled all the steel plants in the country.
The company became the only source of steel after competitors went out of business.
The company was able to produce more steel than any other steel company in the world.
Answer:
The company controlled every step of steel production, from raw materials to distribution.
Explanation:
Andrew Carnegie introduces the steel industry in the late 19th century in the United States. Carnegie Steel Company revolutionised steel production in America. He built factories using technology that made producing steel faster, easier and more productive. The supply chain of the steel is checked and owned by that steel company. Carnegie Steel company control the raw materials and the finished products.
Answer:
A. The company controlled every step of steel production, from raw materials to distribution.
Q: How was
America
impacted by industrial
growth and organized labor?
maslow's hỉearchy of needs level 4
Answer:
Needs for Self-Esteem: The need for appreciation and respect is found at the fourth level of Maslow's hierarchy. When the needs at the bottom three levels have been met, the esteem needs take over as the primary motivator of behaviour.
Is there bias in the Pearl Harbor speech? Where is this bias found?
Thank you!!
Answer:Essentially, Roosevelt's speech and timing extended his executive powers to not only declaring war but also making war, a power that constitutionally belongs to Congress. Yesterday, December 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy — the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.
Explanation:
Explain why ancient Egypt's rulers had more authority than most rulers today
Answer:
Ancient Egyptian rulers commonly had absolute power, with nobody willing or able to argue their demands. Modern governments typically divide power among several different groups or people.
.
What happened in the Soviet Union after the Cuban Missile Crisis?
Nuclear weapons were dismantled.
Victory was declared.
Khrushchev was driven from power.
Supplies were secretly taken to Cuba.
Answer: Khrushchev was driven from power.
Explanation:
There were multiple reasons for the removal of Khrushchev from his position as head of the party but the Cuban Missile Crisis was the tipping point. His enemies decided that he was weak enough to be removed and took their time convincing the powerful elements in the party of that "fact."
And so it was that even though Khrushchev gained a victory for the Soviets in the Cuban Missile Crisis (he secretly got the Americans to remove missiles from Turkey), he was removed less than two years after the crisis.
When did the British surrender?
after the battle at Yorktown
after the battle of Saratoga
after the battle at Cowpens
after the battle at Guilford Courthouse
Answer:
Yorktown
Explanation:
October 18, 1781, the British army surrendered at Yorktown
nps
