Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.
Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).
Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.
The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.
For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.
Unilateralism
Why did debates among civil rights activists increase after 1965? What were the causes and effects of these debates?
(Look into SNCC, CORE, Black Power, and the SCLC, Stokeley Carmichael, Huey Newton &/or Bobby Seale) 1 1
Answer:
use the book you get in class thats how i found it
Explanation:
The causes and effects of the Civil Rights' Movements were such that it led to an end in the racial segregation laws in the United States of America.
What were the effects of the Civil Rights' Movements?The Civil Rights Movements were such movements which were undertaken by the Black and African Americans in the United States of America, who aimed towards the end of the racial discrimination.
Before the beginning of these movements and protests in the American society, the Blacks in the society were socially discriminated and excluded from the society on the basis of their skin color.
However, after the movements and protests took a serious turn the segregation laws being enacted by Jim Crow were removed from their very existence.
Hence, it can be stated that the end of Jim Crow's segregation law and end of social discrimination of Blacks were the effects of the Civil Rights Movements in the United States during the 20th century.
Learn more about civil rights movements here:
https://brainly.com/question/26537588
OMGGGGG PLZ HELPPPP!!! 60 points!!!
Instructions
Read Psalm 22 and Isaiah 53 paying close attention to the verses below.
Research the verses in the chart below to determine which New Testament verses fulfill the prophecy found in the Old Testament (they are not in order).
Using the list above, write a 250-word essay on how each Old Testament prophecy meets one or all of those guidelines.
Remember to use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling when typing your essay.
Old Testament Prophecy New Testament Fulfillment
Psalm 22:6-7 Romans 5:6-8
Psalm 22:15-16 Matthew 27:39-40
Psalm 22:18 Matthew 27:57-60
Isaiah 53:4-6 Luke 23:33-34
Isaiah 53:8-9 John 19:33-35
Isaiah 53:12 Matthew 27:35
Answer:
Isaiah 53:4-6 (5)
Explanation: Essay
Jesus said the volume of the book is written of Me. He also, after He was raised from the dead, that evening, He met two men on the road to Emmaus. It was then that the bible tells us that, beginning with Moses and the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the scriptures, Lk 24:27. That excites me! So I have focused my attention on the Old Testament, to find Jesus on every page; and usually as you find Jesus, you also find out God's plan and how it relates to us, the Church. So I read the first verse in Hosea chapter 6, and I agree that He has healed us and I agree that He has bandaged us, but what does it mean that He has torn us or that He has wounded us? This just didn’t sit right with me. I don’t believe that God beats us up or causes or allows bad things to happen to us to teach us a lesson. Our God is a righteous God. And I understand that there has to be a judgement for sin. Sin cannot go unpunished. This is why Jesus came and paid the price for our sin on the cross. All the judgement and wrath of our sin was placed upon Him, “the chastisement of our peace was upon Him”, Isaiah 53:5. So when I come across a scripture like Hosea 6:1, that alludes to God beating us up, I always take a deeper look and usually find that there is a treasure buried there; as is the case in this verse. Now with Old Testament events and prophecy, you must always look at it in two ways; the present sense and the foreshadowing implications of the future sense. The events and prophecy of the entire Old Testament was put in place for the one goal- to reconcile man with God. This was the plan before the foundation of the world. Before God even created man, He knew man would sin and He knew He would have to send His Son to us to be the reconciliation for that sin. Everything in the Old Testament points toward Jesus and is His plan for the reconciliation of man with God. Now, in Hosea 6, Hosea is prophesying over Israel, because Nebuchadnezzar is going to bring Israel into exile, that is the present, practical look at this verse, but I am convinced that everything God does, He does on purpose and can be related as a type or foreshadowing on something yet future. So when the text says He has torn us and He has wounded us it made me pause. If you look at the text in the Septuagint translation, you will find that the word “torn” is a present tense verb in the indicative mood. This means that it is something that happened in the past and continues to have effects up to and including the present time. This Greek word is harpazo, which is the same word for the rapture or the catching away of the saints. Also, when you look closely, you will find that the word “us” isn’t even in the original text. The translators added this, but it really isn’t there. So now this starts to take on a whole new meaning. It wasn’t Israel who was torn away but someone else. Now if you study the word “wounded” this is a future tense verb. The translators wrote this as “has wounded”, but it should have been written “will be wounded” and again the “us” doesn’t even exist. Now let’s read this with this new information. “Come let us return to the Lord, for He has been snatched away, but He will heal us. He will be wounded and He will bandage us”. This now makes perfect sense. Hosea is talking about Jesus! Because of man’s sin, God could no longer fellowship with man. Sin was creating a barrier and it was as if God was snatched away from man. But He will heal us. He did this on the cross. From Hosea’s point of view, the cross was still future. We, as Christians look back at the cross and believe it happened. Sin, now, no longer is a barrier between God and man. Jesus was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities and because of this He has bandaged us. Repaired and healed us with the Father. Reconciliation between God and man is why Jesus came and died on the cross. Jesus came to heal us. So when Isaiah 53:5 says “by His stripes we were healed”, now I look at this as our reconciliation with the Father. Jesus healed me of my sin and now I can have a personal relationship with Him because the barrier of sin has been removed. I also believe healing in a physical sense is still available today, but I don’t think physical healing was the main purpose of Isaiah 53 and Hosea 6. Reconciliation with the Father was the main purpose and physical healing is a type and foreshadowing of that healing. There is absolutely nothing wrong with believing that Jesus has healed our physical bodies. In fact God wants us to be made whole without sickness and disease. Also, there is nothing wrong with believing God for financial stability and the comfort of this physical world. But we have to be careful not to make the healing of our physical bodies and the comfort of this world the ultimate prize. Jesus is the prize and our focus should never turn from Him.
Explain the purpose of apartheid laws in 20th-century South Africa
Answer:
The system of racial segregation in South Africa known as apartheid was implemented and enforced by many acts and other laws. This legislation served to institutionalize racial discrimination and the dominance by white people over people of other races.
Explanation:
List 3 major events that happened during the French Revolution
Answer:Call of the Estate General (May 5, 1789)
Tennis Court Oath (June 20, 1789)
The Storming of the Bastille.
Explanation:
Answer:
1)Call of the Estate General
2)Storming of the Bastille
3)March on Versailles
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
Which statement best describes the Loyalists?
Answer:
They trusted the British government to protect their rights
Explanation:
thats the answer ^
HELPPP AND YOU GET CANDYYY (brainlist) HELP BEFORE I DIE OF HISTORY :3
Answer:
D.) Representative democracy
Explanation:
Hope it help
Mark me as brainliest
Answer:
D.)REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRAZY
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELP
The Communists drew up a constitution that, according to the text, asserted (claimed) that "all
political power, resources, and means of production would belong to workers and peasants."
How truthful was this assertion (claim)? How do you think this affected the credibility of the
Soviet Union?
2) Give a quick biography on the origins and life of Alexander of Macedonia (356-
323 BCE) also known as Alexander the Great. (*BCE stands for Before Common Era)
Answer:
Alexander The Great is probably the greatest general of his time, who managed to spread his country and establish cultural connections with practically whole known world at the time. Although a general and a ruler, he was also someone who believed that the world could be united not through the means of war, but through cultural unification.
Explanation:
Alexander was the son of Macedonian ruler Philip II, who wanted to conquer but also unite the world. During that period he managed to defeat Persian Empire, which at the time seemed as an impossible task. He conquered lands from Egypt to India. During his period, a specific culture, known as Hellenism developed. Still, when he died most of his heritage was destroyed by his successors.
Central and state governments influence each other in
a unitary system.
a federal system.
a confederal system.
a democratic system.
HELP PLEASE whoever get it get brainliest
How does the author of "History in the Making" develop the setting in the first two paragraphs of the passage?
by stating that the Wright brothers came from Ohio
by describing the setting as Sampson experiences it
by describing the weather and landscape conditions on the day of the Wrights' flight
by describing in detail the smell and sound of the sea on the day that John Lee met the Wrights
Answer: 1st option
Explanation: If u eliminate the 4th and the 2nd option because they don't make sense, then the 3rd option is the distractor because if u go back in the passage it does not state that.
The author of "History in the Making" develop the setting in the first two paragraphs of the passage by describing the weather and landscape conditions on the day of the Wrights' flight. Correct option is c.
In "History in the Making," the author develops the setting in the first two paragraphs by describing the weather and landscape conditions on the day of the Wright brothers' flight. The passage mentions the "winds of Kitty Hawk," the "gentle undulating rise of the sand dunes," and the "lightning scarred tree" that stood like a lonely sentinel. These descriptions provide a vivid sense of the coastal environment and the atmospheric conditions at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, where the Wright brothers made their historic flight. The author's focus on the weather and landscape helps to immerse the reader in the setting and sets the stage for the historical events that follow.
To know more about History:
https://brainly.com/question/29566350
#SPJ2
Complete question is:
How does the author of "History in the Making" develop the setting in the first two paragraphs of the passage?
a. by stating that the Wright brothers came from Ohio
b. by describing the setting as Sampson experiences it
c. by describing the weather and landscape conditions on the day of the Wrights' flight
d. by describing in detail the smell and sound of the sea on the day that John Lee met the Wrights
What role did Monasteries play in the world of art ?
a.
The monks and nuns would contact the places to display the illuminated manuscripts.
b.
Monasteries were the centers of art and learning.
c.
The monks and nuns would find artists and bring them to the monasteries to use their talents.
d.
none of the above
Answer:
B. Monasteries were the centers of art and learning.
Explanation:
A monastery is a place where monks, nuns and other religious devotees stay.
The role of the monasteries in the world of art cannot be overemphasised as the nuns and monks encouraged art and actively engaged in it.
The monasteries were centers of art and learning.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What is the most likely reason the author ends the article with the quote from Michael Berenbaum?
Which type of government was promoted as the ideal form by Enlightenment philosophers?
Group of answer choices
confederate
monarchy
oligarchy
republic
Answer:
monarchy
Explanation:
Answer:
option 2:Monachry :D
Explanation:
hs
1
3. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution says, "The President shall be
Commander-in-Chief of the Army and the Navy of the United States." This
means the military must follow any order issued by the President - including an
order to kill people from another country. How has this power evolved since
1789? Which factors have led to these changes?
Answer:
the presidents powers over the military were weak in the early republic era, since most military forces were state militias that were activated in times of crisis. Furthermore, the US did not have a permanent navy until about the war of 1812, as commissioning and maintaining ships is very expensive. The president could quickly activate and organize a defense against invasion, but it was not until much later in the antebellum period where a president managed standing armies and navies during peacetime. the president's authority on military affairs have expanded drastically since then, such as the president having control over nuclear deployment, as well as the executive branches authority to deploy troops in foreign countries without formal approval by congress, such as the invasion of Afghanistan.
The ___________________ was started by prominent African-American and white reformers. The main goal was full equality among the races.
Answer:
The Civil Rights Movement was started by...
Explanation:
This is really just a statement and it's really hard to give an explanation for this type of question. (:
what possible effects did factory work have on families?
Answer:
caused changes in family system and development of new industrial working class.
Explanation:
which of the following is not one of the five pillars of islam
A. fast during Ramadan
B. belief in the holy trinity
C. pray five times a day
D. give charity to the poor and needy
The following which is not one of the five pillars of Islam is belief in the holy trinity Option(b) is correct. Soon after the Muslim Middle Easterners vanquished new territories, they began raising mosques and palaces.
What is the five pillars of Islam?The Five Pillars of Islam are basic practices in Islam, viewed as required demonstrations of love for all Muslims. They are summed up in the well known hadith of Gabriel.
The ceremonial commitments of Muslims are known as the Five Pillars. They are recognized and polished by Muslims all through the world, despite their variations. They are seen as mandatory for people who really wish to seek after a day to day existence like what Muhammad drove, which was a reasonable and careful life.
Like different religions, Islam holds specific practices to be standard; nonetheless, that doesn't suggest that all people who see themselves as Muslims fundamentally notice them. Individual investment can differ contingent upon the singular's confidence; for instance, only one out of every odd individual should supplicate consistently, keep the quick, go on Hajj, or give widely to noble cause.
Therefore Option(b) is correct.
Learn more about Islam here:
brainly.com/question/11489285
#SPJ5
In New York Times when the government decreases taxes what will most likely happen
A. Unemployment rates will go up
B. Businesses will decrease the amount of goods they produce
C. There will be an economic depression
D. Businesses and individuals will have increased funds for spending
In a federal system there are two levels of government-the president and
Congress
True or False
Answer:
Under the U.S. Constitution, the president assumes executive power, Congress exercises legislative powers, and the federal courts (e.g., U.S. district courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court) assume judicial powers.
Do you believe that parents should have all of the powers described in the Parents’ Constitution? Why or why not?
Answer:
No
Explanation: because i think children should have a part in saying what hey want to go to in the area and the children might be forced to do something bad and be honest which can lead to something that cold hurt but not many people are following because everyday we always see someone violating these rules.
Can you also please give me brainliest and answer my latest question
To be honest everyone has different opinions but mine is No
I think that parents need to understand that their children have their own opinions and should be able to do what they want because they are their own self.
Which of the following is NOT true of television journalism? Television is even more effective than the radio as an agency for influencing public opinion. We should form our opinions by listening to network commentators to get a well-rounded perspective. You must pay millions of dollars to build up and project the proper television image for their candidates. Television media performs a public service in the field of political education. As you can assemble from different sources we should listen to more than one commentator and read background articles in books and magazines.
Answer:
television is even more effective then the radio as an agency for public opinion
Explanation:
In which diagram are the steps listed in chronological order?
A
Running for Public Office
1. Create a campaign
2. Raise funds
3. Network
4. Make campaign materials
B.
Running for Public Office
1. Make campaign materials
2. Create a campaign
3. Raise funds
4. Network
c.
Running for Public Office
1. Network
2. Raise funds
3. Create a campaign
4. Make campaign materials
D
Running for Public Office
1. Make campaign materials
2. Raise funds
3. Create a campaign
4. Network
Answer: A
Explanation:
1. Create campaign
2.raise funds
3. Network
4. Make campaign materials
The diagram are the steps listed in chronological order in "Running for Public Office". Option A is correct. This is further explained below.
What is Public Office?Generally, a Public Office is an office established by a constitution or legislative act, with a fixed term and the authority to carry out a governmental duty
In conclusion, Running for Public Office is arranged in chronological order;
1. Create a campaign
2. Raise funds
3. Network
4. Make campaign materials
Read more about Public Office
https://brainly.com/question/12312922
#SPJ2
Minutemen were the last line of defense for a colony.
true or false
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Which set of directions correctly describes how to plot the point (8,4) on the coordinate plane? 0 Start at the origin. Move 8 units to the right, then move 4 units up. O Start at the origin. Move 8 units up, then move 4 units to the right. O Start at the origin. Move 8 units to the left, then move 4 units up. O Start at the origin. Move 8 units up, then move 4 units to the left.
Answer:
0 Start at the origin. Move 8 units to the right, then move 4 units up.
Explanation:
its like an elevater. you go in before you go up, the first number always goes either right or left, depending on if its negitive or positive, and the second number goes up or down, depending on if its negative or positive.
Answer: A
Explanation: I took the quiz :)
Charlemagne and the Pope (the head of the Catholic Church) joined forces , and in 800 , the Pope crowned Charlemagne as the new Holy Roman Emperor.
true or false ???
Answer:
true
Explanation:
in 800 pope Lee III crowned charlemagne emperor of the romans
What event showed the U.S that the Articles of Confederation were not good?
short answer or just say which event it was
I need a answer before the 29th of January
Shay's Rebellion
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution for the United States. It is known for being very weak and giving little to no power to the national government. With the Articles of Confederation, the government could not regulate trade, draft soldiers, create and enforce laws properly, tax citizens, and other important matters.
Since the national government was so powerless, most of the power was in the hands of the people and the states. This meant that it was hard to keep people in check, which eventually caused Shay's Rebellion.
Shay's Rebellion was an uprise of farmers who did not want to lose their property and opposed high taxing. Courts were trying to take away their property, as many poor farmers could not pay their taxes. This caused many farmers to revolt, causing a few casualties. This proved the national government was too weak under the Articles of Confederation, as they could do nothing to stop this.
how did Adams actions toward the French hurt him within his own political party?
Answer:
Adams’s refusal to declare war on France disappointed other Federalists.
Explanation: its right 100%
According to Chinese legends, who invented metal weapons? *
Shun
Chi You
Uu
Dr. Sun Yat-sen
Answer:
Chi You.
Explanation:
Answer:Chi You
Explanation: He was known for always working hard to invent something great in China.
If the United States was to ever be in the positioned as Cambodia (which involved mass-genocides and dictatorship), If it was to occur- what would be the reasons at to why. Or be possible reasons? This is in relation towards the Killing Fields from Cambodia.
Answer:
Every day for four years, I would drive to my job, and every day at the same time, on the same route, I would notice the city bus. It would pull up next to me, and I would see all the people on board. Some would be reading. Some would be sleeping. Some would stare back at me. Every day, at the same time, it would follow me right to work. As I pulled into my parking space at work, I would see it around the corner, about a block away from my job. Then, one day, my car broke down. I had no way to get to work, and then, I remembered the bus. I decided to take it since I knew it was on the same schedule as I was. Since then, I have never driven to work again. Taking the bus is a useful method with which to travel because you can save a lot of money by using public transportation. One reason public transportation is useful is because it saves money. My commute to work was long, and it required a lot of gas. When I drove to work, I was spending $30 a week on gas. There are 52 weeks in a year. That translates to $1,560.00 a year I was spending on gas to get to work. When I started taking the bus, it cost $2 ($1 to get to work and another $1 to get home). Another way to save money is to use the toll road. That translates to $10 a week. That means that it cost me $520 a year to get to work. That's less than a third of what it cost to drive. It saved me $1,040.00. The funny part is that the reason my car broke down in the first place was because I was driving it constantly. 6 What is the central idea of this passage?
Explanation:
Every day for four years, I would drive to my job, and every day at the same time, on the same route, I would notice the city bus. It would pull up next to me, and I would see all the people on board. Some would be reading. Some would be sleeping. Some would stare back at me. Every day, at the same time, it would follow me right to work. As I pulled into my parking space at work, I would see it around the corner, about a block away from my job. Then, one day, my car broke down. I had no way to get to work, and then, I remembered the bus. I decided to take it since I knew it was on the same schedule as I was. Since then, I have never driven to work again. Taking the bus is a useful method with which to travel because you can save a lot of money by using public transportation. One reason public transportation is useful is because it saves money. My commute to work was long, and it required a lot of gas. When I drove to work, I was spending $30 a week on gas. There are 52 weeks in a year. That translates to $1,560.00 a year I was spending on gas to get to work. When I started taking the bus, it cost $2 ($1 to get to work and another $1 to get home). Another way to save money is to use the toll road. That translates to $10 a week. That means that it cost me $520 a year to get to work. That's less than a third of what it cost to drive. It saved me $1,040.00. The funny part is that the reason my car broke down in the first place was because I was driving it constantly. 6 What is the central idea of this passage?Every day for four years, I would drive to my job, and every day at the same time, on the same route, I would notice the city bus. It would pull up next to me, and I would see all the people on board. Some would be reading. Some would be sleeping. Some would stare back at me. Every day, at the same time, it would follow me right to work. As I pulled into my parking space at work, I would see it around the corner, about a block away from my job. Then, one day, my car broke down. I had no way to get to work, and then, I remembered the bus. I decided to take it since I knew it was on the same schedule as I was. Since then, I have never driven to work again. Taking the bus is a useful method with which to travel because you can save a lot of money by using public transportation. One reason public transportation is useful is because it saves money. My commute to work was long, and it required a lot of gas. When I drove to work, I was spending $30 a week on gas. There are 52 weeks in a year. That translates to $1,560.00 a year I was spending on gas to get to work. When I started taking the bus, it cost $2 ($1 to get to work and another $1 to get home). Another way to save money is to use the toll road. That translates to $10 a week. That means that it cost me $520 a year to get to work. That's less than a third of what it cost to drive. It saved me $1,040.00. The funny part is that the reason my car broke down in the first place was because I was driving it constantly. 6 What is the central idea of this passage?
Who was leading the Texian cavalry at the Battle of San Jacinto
Answer: Sam Houston
Explanation:
Answer:
General Samuel Houston
