1. What factors led to the expansion of slave labor in the Southern Colonies?

2. Describe the backcountry. Then how did the environment of the backcountry affect how people settling there made a living?

3. How did enslaved persons on plantations improve their living conditions and protest their working conditions?

4. Why is studying slavery important to our understanding of our nation’s past AND present? Explain using at least three reasons why. Your reasons should be based on historical fact.

Answer:

Individual Rights

Explanation:

This reflects individual rights because it is saying that, "All political power is inherent in the people." The first line of the US Constitution states, "We the people." The US government is based on the individual rights that people of all races and all colors have.

The answer is Individual Rights

Answer:

I don't think so.. I didn't think so and I checked and I cannot find anything saying this is true so I will say no... false.

It’s true but I’m not sure

Answer: The Louisiana Purchase eventually doubled the size of the United States, greatly strengthened the country materially and strategically, provided a powerful impetus to westward expansion, and confirmed the doctrine of implied powers of the federal Constitution.

(This might not be what you’re looking for, but I tried)

Explanation:

The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 represented the time when the United States expanded to the West by buying an area previously owned by France for the price of 15 million dollars.[2] The purchase represented the major diplomatic success of a young nation and an opportunity to double its size and become a leading power. The area purchased would later become “the states of Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, almost all of Oklahoma and Kansas, and large portions of what is now North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Minnesota, Colorado, and Louisiana.”[3] The treaty represented an interesting view of the relations between France and the US that promoted the sale of Louisiana by Napoleon Bonaparte. Additionally, the treaty also served to bring in a major political battlefield between the Federalists and Republicans concerning Article III of the treaty, raising the questions of whether the president can sign treaties and incorporate new people of a gained territory into the union. This research paper will analyze the treaty and delve into the context behind the purchase of Louisiana by dividing it into three parts: the first part devoted to the relations between France and the US, the second to the provision of the treaty and the third to the consequences of the treaty on the constitution and its interpretation.

Wrote a whole essay for you my boy

Northern victory in the war preserved the United States as one nation and ended the institution of slavery that had divided the country from its beginning. But these achievements came at the cost of 625,000 lives--nearly as many American soldiers as died in all the other wars in which this country has fought combined.

Answer:

During the civil war the issues of slavery and central power divided the United States. After the war the constitution set free the slaves, to assure “equal protection under the law” for American citizens, and to grant black men the right to vote. This war resulted in the various groups to receive equal rights.

Explanation:

Answer:

One of the reasons is that the colonists had allied with the French.

I learned that a long time ago and that is the only thing i can really remember, sorry.

Explanation:

You should look it up online im sure they have a document or website or something on it.

Answer:Alliance with France. Arguably the single most important of Benjamin Franklin's many contributions to his nation was securing a French alliance during the revolution. ...

British Debt. ...

Distance. ...

Familiarity with the Territory. ...

Hearts and Minds.

Explanation:

Answer:

They should not wear bodycams because if they are trying to go undercover they will be discovered.

Explanation:

They shouldn’t wear them because what happened if it not working or sum and then go and try to show the court the evidence they won’t have anything there

Answer:

The telegram instructed Eckardt that if the United States appeared certain to enter the war, he was to approach the Mexican Government with a proposal for military alliance with funding from Germany. ... We shall endeavor in spite of this to keep the United States of America neutral.

Explanation:

Answer:

I cant even the am the for am

Explanation:

Answer:

According to the New Testament Gospels, Jesus often taught in synagogues, one of which was in Capernaum (Mark 1:21-28), in northern Israel. The book of Acts suggests that the apostle Paul also taught in synagogues (Acts 17:1-2). But what exactly were synagogues in the first century C.E.? Were they different from modern synagogues? The answers to these questions not only illuminate stories in the New Testament, they also shed light on the early years of an important Jewish institution.

Explanation:

Answer:

Although scholars used to assume that the Pharisees (the likely precursors to the rabbis) were in charge of synagogues, most first-century sources identify elders, priests, and archisynagogoi (Greek for “heads of synagogues”) as the leaders of synagogues (Philo, Hypothetica 7.12-3, Theodotus Inscription, Mark 5:22-23).

Explanation:

Answer:

hi

Explanation:

Dominate gene. The yellow pea gene is dominant over the recessive green gene

Answer: Direct election of senators

Explanation:

I know the 6 demands of the populists and I know direct election isn’t one. Hope it helps.

direct election of senators :)

THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PANAMA CANAL

As early as the mid-sixteenth century, interest in a canal across the Central American isthmus began to take root, primarily out of trade interests. The subsequent discovery of gold in California in 1848 further spurred interest in connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and led to the construction of the Panama Railway, which began operations in 1855. Several attempts by France to construct a canal between 1881 and 1894 failed due to a combination of financial crises and health hazards, including malaria and yellow fever, which led to the deaths of thousands of French workers.

Upon becoming president in 1901, Roosevelt was determined to succeed where others had failed. Following the advice that Mahan set forth in his book The Influence of Seapower upon History, he sought to achieve the construction of a canal across Central America, primarily for military reasons associated with empire, but also for international trade considerations. The most strategic point for the construction was across the fifty-mile isthmus of Panama, which, at the turn of the century, was part of the nation of Colombia. Roosevelt negotiated with the government of Colombia, sometimes threatening to take the project away and build through Nicaragua, until Colombia agreed to a treaty that would grant the United States a lease on the land across Panama in exchange for a payment of $10 million and an additional $250,000 annual rental fee. The matter was far from settled, however. The Colombian people were outraged over the loss of their land to the United States, and saw the payment as far too low. Influenced by the public outcry, the Colombian Senate rejected the treaty and informed Roosevelt there would be no canal.

Undaunted, Roosevelt chose to now wield the “big stick.” In comments to journalists, he made it clear that the United States would strongly support the Panamanian people should they choose to revolt against Colombia and form their own nation. In November 1903, he even sent American battleships to the coast of Colombia, ostensibly for practice maneuvers, as the Panamanian revolution unfolded. The warships effectively blocked Colombia from moving additional troops into the region to quell the growing Panamanian uprising. Within a week, Roosevelt immediately recognized the new country of Panama, welcoming them to the world community and offering them the same terms—$10 million plus the annual $250,000 rental fee—he had previously offered Colombia. Following the successful revolution, Panama became an American protectorate, and remained so until 1939.

Once the Panamanian victory was secured, with American support, construction on the canal began in May 1904. For the first year of operations, the United States worked primarily to build adequate housing, cafeterias, warehouses, machine shops, and other elements of infrastructure that previous French efforts had failed to consider. Most importantly, the introduction of fumigation systems and mosquito nets following Dr. Walter Reed’s discovery of the role of mosquitoes in the spread of malaria and yellow fever reduced the death rate and restored the fledgling morale among workers and American-born supervisors. At the same time, a new wave of American engineers planned for the construction of the canal. Even though they decided to build a lock-system rather than a sea-level canal, workers still had to excavate over 170 million cubic yards of earth with the use of over one hundred new rail-mounted steam shovels. Excited by the work, Roosevelt became the first sitting U.S. president to leave the country while in office. He traveled to Panama where he visited the construction site, taking a turn at the steam shovel and removing dirt. The canal opened in 1914, permanently changing world trade and military defense patterns.

A photograph shows the excavation of the Culebra Cut in the construction of the Panama Canal.

The answer closet to it is c hope this helps

i just took the test a day ago and i’m pretty sure the answer is c! :)

Answer: 1. It is an official change made to a law, or a legal document.

2. The first ten amendments to our Constitution, called the Bill of Rights, guarantee basic freedoms of the American people. For example, freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and freedom of religion are guaranteed rights. So if the government is denying someone's right to do something the person can use the constitution to back them up and prove they have the right to do something.

3. I think they should protest

4. I don’t known about this one

5. The main reason would be conflict of interest.

Conflicts of interest can be actual or perceived, but can have serious implications in either form. Attorneys can find themselves in hot water and even put their clients at risk if they aren’t thorough in their investigation of potential conflicts.

6. Amendments are the only way to change the constitution. The purpose of amendments is to provide a law with the protection of the federal government. States are unable to pass any law that violates with an amendment.

7. I don’t about this either

8. Without the Bill of Rights, this right could be taken and if the government becomes entirely corrupted, people could be put in jail for false accusation, their race, religion or sexuality, and many other unfair situations.

9. How should I do this one?

Explanation:

Think it’s hydraulic

It’s Hydraulic:) your welcome

Racial Profiling" refers to the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. Criminal profiling, generally, as practiced by police, is the reliance on a group of characteristics they believe to be associated with crime. Examples of racial profiling are the use of race to determine which drivers to stop for minor traffic violations (commonly referred to as "driving while black or brown"), or the use of race to determine which pedestrians to search for illegal contraband.

1) many soldiers died because of diseases in unhealthy hospital conditions.

2) having more guards and officers would help make sure the soldiers are on track for a safe recovery.

3) they would benefit in a farm family because they would get lots of rest, fresh air, and food. it may keep soldiers from going home to have a break

1: disease and unsanitary conditions in hospitals.
2: soldiers would feel safer and relaxing would make recovery faster.
3: they can be outdoors and will always have enough to eat

Sparta wanted to overthrow the Athenian oligarchy. Athens wanted to become the most powerful city-state in Greece. Sparta and its allies felt threatened by Athens's growing power.

Answer:

the answer is C) Sparta and its allies felt threatened by Athens's growing power.

Explanation: hope this helps