23. A popular brand of AAA batteries has an effective use time of 12.3 hours, on average. A startup company claims that their AAA batteries last longer. The startup company tested 24,000 of their new batteries and computed a mean effective use time of 12.32 hours. Although the difference is quite small (72 seconds—or just over a minute), the effect was statistically significant (P-value < 0.0001).

It is appropriate to conclude which of the following?

A) The startup company has strong evidence that their AAA batteries last longer, on average.
B) The startup company has moderate evidence that their AAA batteries last longer, on average.
C) The startup company has proved that their AAA batteries last longer, on average.
D) None of the answer choices are correct. With such a large sample size, statistically significant results may not be of any practical importance.

Answer:

The mean will increase, after the outlier is removed.

Answer:

25%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Start with making them equal.

1/8 --> 3/24

1/8 --> 3/24

1/3 --> 8/24

Now order them.

1/8, 1/8, 1/3.

Hope this helps ;)

Answer:350000

Step-by-step explanation:

The number is 350000

350000 rounded to the nearest hundred thousand is 400000

350000 rounded to the nearest ten thousand is 350000

Answer:

  c.  y = 3.25^x

Step-by-step explanation:

At x=1, the value of y is slightly more than 3, so the base must be more than 3. The appropriate choice is ...

  y = 3.25^x

Answer:

~ 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real life ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      48       =           1      ⇒   x - centimeters of the snowflake in real life

       18                    x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

48 * x = 18,

x = 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real ife

Answer:

3218.75 a month

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer

the answer is -56

Step-by-step explanation:

The 96% confidence interval for the proportion of all shrubs of this species that will resprout after fire is approximately 0.1274 to 0.5042.

Here, we have,

To estimate the proportion of all shrubs of this species that will resprout after fire with 96% confidence, we will use the formula for a confidence interval for a proportion.

The formula for the confidence interval for a proportion (p) is given by:

CI = p ± Z * √(p * (1 - p) / n)

where:

CI is the confidence interval

p is the sample proportion (resprouted specimens / total specimens)

Z is the critical Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (96% confidence level corresponds to a Z-score of approximately 1.750)

n is the sample size (total number of specimens)

Given information:

Total number of specimens (n) = 19

Number of specimens that resprouted after fire = 6

Now, calculate the sample proportion (p):

p = (number of specimens that resprouted) / (total number of specimens)

p = 6 / 19 ≈ 0.3158 (rounded to four decimal places)

Now, calculate the critical Z-score for a 96% confidence level (use a Z-table or calculator):

Z ≈ 1.750

Now, calculate the margin of error (E):

E = Z * √(p * (1 - p) / n)

E = 1.750 * √(0.3158 * (1 - 0.3158) / 19)

E ≈ 0.1884 (rounded to four decimal places)

Finally, calculate the confidence interval:

CI = p ± E

CI = 0.3158 ± 0.1884

The 96% confidence interval for the proportion of all shrubs of this species that will resprout after fire is approximately 0.1274 to 0.5042.

To learn more on probability click:

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

A. n = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

A. n = -2

4(-2) + 9 = 1

-8 + 9 = 1

1 = 1

The value of n for which the statement of equation 4n + 9 = 1 holds true is n = -2.

Given an equation:

4n + 9 = 1

There are some given options for the value of n.

It is required to find the value of n, where the statement is true.

A) When n = -2:

4n + 9 = 4(-2) + 9

          = 1

B) When n = 2:

4n + 9 = 4(2) + 9

          = 17

C) When n = 3:

4n + 9 = 4(3) + 9

          = 21

D) When n = 4:

4n + 9 = 4(4) + 9

          = 25

Hence the true statement is when n = -2.

Learn more about Equations here :

https://brainly.com/question/29657988

#SPJ2

Answer:

Which expression is equivalent to 3 over 175

I would say try - C or D

Answer:

Jumbo burger with fried is 75%

chicken with salad is 65%

Step-by-step explanation:

you first split the burger and sides. You add up the sides to find the salad. Then add up the sides and burgers

Answer:

What is the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwich with a Salad? Make an area or tree diagram to help with the problem.

Answer to question: 20% for Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries and 10.5% for Chicken Sandwich with a Salad.

Step-by-step explanation:

You are going to find the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwhich with a Salad by using a area model or a tree diagram. Although you ddin't ask me to solve it, I'm gonna help you with it anyways.

Sandwhiches:

50% - Jumbo Burger (JB)

30% - Chicken Sandwich (CS)

20% - Regular Burger (RB)

Sides:

40% - Curly Fries (CF)

35% - Salad (S)

25% - Regular Fries (RF)

Acronyms

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Curly Fries (CF) = JBCF

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Salad (S) = JBS

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Regular Fries (RF) = JBRF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Curly Fries (CF) = CSCF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Salad (S) = CSS

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Regular Fries (RF) = CSRF

Regular Burger (RB) + Curly Fries (CF) = RBCF

Regular Burger (RB) + Salad (S) = RBS

Regular Burger (RB) + Regular Fries (RF) = RBRF

Probability of combinations:

JBCF = 0.5 x 0.4 = 0.20

JBS = 0.5 x 0.35 = 17.5

JBRF = 0.5 x 0.25 = 12.5

CSCF = 0.3 x 0.4 = 12

CSS = 0.3 x 0.35 = 10.5

CSRF = 0.3 x 0.25 = 7.5

RBCF = 0.2 x 0.4 = 8

RBS = 0.2 x 0.35 = 7

RBRF = 0.2 x 0.25 = 5

Your tree diagram should look something like this:

         CF(40%)- outcome - JBCF (20%)

          /  

(50%)JB ---  S(35%)-  outcome - JBS (17.5%)

           \            

           RF(25%)-  outcome - JBRF (12.5%)

         CF(40%)- outcome - CSCF (12%)

          /

(30%)CS ---  S(35%)- outcome - CSS (10.5%)

            \

            RF(25%)- outcome - CSRF (7.5%)

           CF(40%)- outcome - RBCF (8%)

           /

(20%)RB ---  S(35%)- outcome - RBS (7%)

          \

          RF(25%)- outcome - RBRF (5%)

Hope this helps because this took forever :D

Answer:

26.3%

Step-by-step explanation:

5 is divided by 19

That answer is then multiplied by 100.

You may round your answer to the nearest whole number.

Answer:

A. associative property of addition

Step-by-step explanation:

Associative because you can add or multiply those regardless of how the numbers are grouped.

I hope this helped and have a good rest of your day!

Answer:

Associative Property of Addition

Step-by-step explanation:

This property states that the sum of 3 or more numbers stays the same, no matter how they are grouped.

Hope this helped. Have an awesome day!

Answer: Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

It isn't an

1 an improper fraction

Less than the denominator

Therefore, three thirds or 3/3 is one whole fraction

Rly hope I helped!

☆꧁Ashlin꧂☆

Answer:yes he his correct

Step-by-step explanation:

3/3=1

Answer:

0.09

because I multiplied...

Answer:

0.09

Step-by-step explanation:

36/ 10 x 25/ 1000 = 18/ 5 x 1/40 = 9/100 = 0.09

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

350-75%=87.5\\so 350-87.5\\=262.5\\$262.5 dolla profit\\

Answer:

43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so you use the formula: A= 3.14•r•2 next you plug in your values a=3.14•7•2 3.14•7= 28.98•2=43.96

Answer:

43.96

im dying on the question before that one it says "What issues are you having when it comes to area and circumference" you typed nothing really and here you are asking us whats the circles area lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: C electricity

Step-by-step explanation:

It is

Answer:

You don't need experiments to ask people questions

The answer in length

The length is used to measure the distance between to end points or edges. so 17 meters measurement represent the length.

Its the sum of length of the sides used to made the given figure.

Talia is going to put a new carpet in her house. She measure's one side of her living room and finds it measures 17 meters.

Area is what is on the inside.

The perimeter is the outside of the hole thing.

Hence, the length is used to measure the distance between to end points or edges.

so 17 meters measurement represent the length.

Learn more about perimeter here:

https://brainly.com/question/10466285

#SPJ5

[tex]\text{Solve for y:}\\\\2y+2=\frac{3y}{2}\\\\\text{Multiply both sides by 2 to cancel the denominator}\\\\4y+4=3y\\\\\text{Subtract 3y from both sides}\\\\y+4=0\\\\\text{Subtract 4 from both sides}\\\\\boxed{y=-4}[/tex]

Answer:-4

Step-by-step explanation:

2y+2=3y/2

Cross multiply

2(2y+2)=3y

Open bracket

4y+4=3y

Collect like terms

4y-3y=-4

y=-4

Answer:

x=5

Step-by-step explanation:

x, x+7, x+8 must be a Pythagorean triple for it to make a right triangle. The only Pythagorean triple fitting these numbers is 5, 12, 13 so x must be 5.

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Because this is a right triangle, you know that by the Pythagorean theorem:[tex]\sqrt{(x+7)^2+x^2}=x+8[/tex]

Squaring both sides to get rid of the square root:

[tex](x+7)^2+x^2=(x+8)^2[/tex]

Expanding all of the parentheses:

[tex]x^2+14x+49+x^2=x^2+16x+64[/tex]

Combine like terms:

[tex]x^2-2x-15=0[/tex]

Factor:

[tex](x-5)(x+3)=0[/tex]

Since x cannot be negative, it is equal to 5. Hope this helps!

y=10x

x= how many candles

Answer:

The attendance was 198 children, 90 students and 99 adults.

Step-by-step explanation:

We define:

c: children attendance

s: students attendance

a: adult attendance

The equation that describes the total ticket sales is:

[tex]5c+7s+12a=2808[/tex]

We also know that the children attendance doubles the adult attendance:

[tex]c=2a[/tex]

The third equation is the seating capacity, which we assume is full:

[tex]c+s+a=387[/tex]

We start by replacing variables in two of the equations:

[tex]c=2a\\\\s=387-c-a=387-2a-a=387-3a[/tex]

Then, we solve the remaining equation for a:

[tex]5c+7s+12a=2808\\\\5(2a)+7(387-3a)+12a=2808\\\\10a+(2709-21a)+12a=2808\\\\10a+12a-21a=2808-2709\\\\a=99[/tex]

Then, we solve for the other two equations:

[tex]c=2a=2*99=198\\\\s=387-3a=387-3*99=387-297=90[/tex]

The attendance was 198 children, 90 students and 99 adults.

Answer:

[2,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

[0,1), [0,1),[0,1),[0,1)

[1,2), [1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2)

[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3)

[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4)

Answer:

22,950 units³

Step-by-step explanation:

All you have to do is:

[tex]\frac{3}{4} *60*15*34=\\45*15*34=\\675*34=\\\\22,950[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

[tex]X_{1}=6[/tex] represent the complaints with the old dough

[tex]X_{2}=16[/tex] represent the complaints with the new dough

[tex]n_{1}=385[/tex] sample 1 selected  

[tex]n_{2}=340[/tex] sample 2 selected  

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{6}{385}=0.0156[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the old dough

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{16}{340}=0.0471[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the new dough

[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \geq p_{2}[/tex]    

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} < p_{2}[/tex]    

The statitsic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{6+16}{385+340}=0.0303[/tex]  

Replacing the info provided we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Answer:

17.9

Step-by-step explanation: