51 is 10% of what number

Answer:

42.20

Step-by-step explanation:

132 ×0.32

=42.24

rounded off it give 42.20

Answer:

x > 2 or 2 < x

Step-by-step explanation:

x-3 < 3x-7

-3 < 2x-7

4 < 2x

2 < x

x > 2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

0 = 5x + 7

-7 = 5x

x = - 7/5 = -1.4

Answer:

-1.4

Step-by-step explanation:

h(x)=0=5x+7

or, 5x= -7

x= -7/5= -1.4

Answer:

20:12

brainlest if it helped

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

20:12

Step-by-step explanation:

if you multiply 5:3 by 4, they'll end up with 20:12.

Answer:

250

Step-by-step explanation:

You can take the explicit formula and simply substitute the n value with 64:

-2 + 4 * (64 - 1)

-2 + 4 * (63)

-2 + 252

250

Answer:

$69 is correct

hope this helps

Answer: $69

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 23 and 3

Answer:

This is indeed a function

Answer:

ok you to !!!!!!!!! good night!!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

it is D

Step-by-step explanation:

I have to show you, but if I do it don't on the paper

Answer:

1/24

Step-by-step explanation:

8x + 1/3 = 2/3

    - 1/3   - 1/3

8x = 1/3

8x/8 = (1/3)/8

x = 1/24

Answer:

Part A: b < 28

Part D: n < 56

Step-by-step explanation:

part A: divide each term in  and simplify.

Inequality Form: b < 28

part d: this is already solved but can be shown in multiple forms.

Inequality Form: n < 56

Interval Notation: ( -∞ , 56)

Answer:

A woman wants to measure the height of a nearby building. She places a 7 ft pole in the shadow of the building so that the shadow of the pole is exactly covered by the shadow of the building. The total length of the building's shadow is 184 ft, and the pole casts a shadow that is 5.5ft long. How tall is the building? Round your answer to the nearest foot. (The figure is not drawn to scale.)

Step-by-step explanation:

A woman wants to measure the height of a nearby building. She places a 7 ft pole in the shadow of the building so that the shadow of the pole is exactly covered by the shadow of the building. The total length of the building's shadow is 184 ft, and the pole casts a shadow that is 5.5ft long. How tall is the building? Round your answer to the nearest foot. (The figure is not drawn to scale.)A woman wants to measure the height of a nearby building. She places a 7 ft pole in the shadow of the building so that the shadow of the pole is exactly covered by the shadow of the building. The total length of the building's shadow is 184 ft, and the pole casts a shadow that is 5.5ft long. How tall is the building? Round your answer to the nearest foot. (The figure is not drawn to scale.)A woman wants to measure the height of a nearby building. She places a 7 ft pole in the shadow of the building so that the shadow of the pole is exactly covered by the shadow of the building. The total length of the building's shadow is 184 ft, and the pole casts a shadow that is 5.5ft long. How tall is the building? Round your answer to the nearest foot. (The figure is not drawn to scale.)

there you go the answer is in the picture

Answer:

95% of 80 is 76 and 85% of 60 is 51.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a. 76,  b. 60.

Step-by-step explanation:

a)  80 * 0.95 = 76.

b)   0.85 x = 51

x = 51/0.85 = 60.

Answer: annualcreditreport.com

Step-by-step explanation: The only authorized website for free credit reports, or call 1-877-322-8228

Answer:

Possible errors: Triangle classification and definition.

Step-by-step explanation:

An isoceles triangle has at least two congruent sides of the same length.  

Given the triangle that has two equal angles, and that you'll have to prove that the triangle also has two equal sides.  

Using the Converse of Isoceles Triangle Theorem, where it states that if a triangle has two congruent angles < PQR ≅ < PRQ, for which opposite sides of those angles are congruent:  

Additionally, connecting point P to point X along the line QR such that PX ⊥ QR, divides △PQR into two symmetrical sections, where points Q and R are equidistant from point X.      

Answer:

Possible errors: Triangle classification and definition.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A' = (2 + 3, 1 + 2) = (5, 3)

B' = (-1 + 3, -3 + 2) = (2, -1)

C' = (3 + 3, -3 + 2) = (6, -1)

Answer:

Just go to the 6 on the bottom line, and add a point

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

(6,0)

 The first coordinate is the x coordinate.  Since it is positive we go to the right 6 units.  The second coordinate is the y coordinate.  We go up zero units

Answer:8x-40

Step-by-step explanation:

Because when we simply 4(x-5)/2

We multiply both sides by 2 because the inverse operations of division is multiplication. 2*4(x-5)*2/2 we cancel two by two then it leave us 4*2(x-5).

Next four times two is eight. So 8(x-5) we distribe eight that means eight times x and 5, 8x-40thos is the answer. Hope this help

Answer:

Uuuuh thats kind of suspicious, maybe you could post your question without  a link? But links are usually scams, so dont do that :)

Answer:

Hello!

Judging by the link you provided I have come up with the correct solution:

x= 61°

y= 29°

Step-by-step explanation:

I will link my work below:

The first step to finding the two solutions it to first identify one of them.

I chose to identify x first.

To identify the value of x in this problem you have to notice that the x value corresponds with the value "29°" to form a perfect right angle, being 90°.

Thus you can simply find the value of x by doing this formula:

x+29°=90°

You then subtract 29° from both sides to simplify, and you come up with the solution

x=61°

Now we need to find the value of y.

To find the value of y I noticed that again, like x, y corresponds with another variable (being x) to form a perfect right angle (90°).

The way I realized this is a perfect right angle is because, as you can see in the picture you provided, the y+x angle are alternate exterior angles with another angle that is 90°.

Thus you can assume that:

x+y=90°

x= 61°

61°+y=90°

You then subtract 61° from both sides to get:

y=29°

1. The given equation is probably supposed to read

y'' - 2y' - 3y = 64x exp(-x)

First consider the homogeneous equation,

y'' - 2y' - 3y = 0

which has characteristic equation

r² - 2r - 3 = (r - 3) (r + 1) = 0

with roots r = 3 and r = -1. Then the characteristic solution is

[tex]y = C_1 e^{3x} + C_2 e^{-x}[/tex]

and we let y₁ = exp(3x) and y₂ = exp(-x), our fundamental solutions.

Now we use variation of parameters, which gives a particular solution of the form

[tex]y_p = u_1y_1 + u_2y_2[/tex]

where

[tex]\displaystyle u_1 = -\int \frac{64xe^{-x}y_2}{W(y_1,y_2)} \, dx[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle u_2 = \int \frac{64xe^{-x}y_1}{W(y_1,y_2)} \, dx[/tex]

and W(y₁, y₂) is the Wronskian determinant of the two fundamental solutions. This is

[tex]W(y_1,y_2) = \begin{vmatrix}e^{3x} & e^{-x} \\ (e^{3x})' & (e^{-x})'\end{vmatrix} = \begin{vmatrix}e^{3x} & e^{-x} \\ 3e^{3x} & -e^{-x}\end{vmatrix} = -e^{2x} - 3e^{2x} = -4e^{2x}[/tex]

Then we find

[tex]\displaystyle u_1 = -\int \frac{64xe^{-x} \cdot e^{-x}}{-4e^{2x}} \, dx = 16 \int xe^{-4x} \, dx = -(4x + 1) e^{-4x}[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle u_2 = \int \frac{64xe^{-x} \cdot e^{3x}}{-4e^{2x}} \, dx = -16 \int x \, dx = -8x^2[/tex]

so it follows that the particular solution is

[tex]y_p = -(4x+1)e^{-4x} \cdot e^{3x} - 8x^2\cdot e^{-x} = -(8x^2+4x+1)e^{-x}[/tex]

and so the general solution is

[tex]\boxed{y(x) = C_1 e^{3x} + C_2e^{-x} - (8x^2+4x+1) e^{-x}}[/tex]

2. I'll again assume there's typo in the equation, and that it should read

y''' - 6y'' + 11y' - 6y = 2x exp(-x)

Again, we consider the homogeneous equation,

y''' - 6y'' + 11y' - 6y = 0

and observe that the characteristic polynomial,

r³ - 6r² + 11r - 6

has coefficients that sum to 1 - 6 + 11 - 6 = 0, which immediately tells us that r = 1 is a root. Polynomial division and subsequent factoring yields

r³ - 6r² + 11r - 6 = (r - 1) (r² - 5r + 6) = (r - 1) (r - 2) (r - 3)

and from this we see the characteristic solution is

[tex]y_c = C_1 e^x + C_2 e^{2x} + C_3 e^{3x}[/tex]

For the particular solution, I'll use undetermined coefficients. We look for a solution of the form

[tex]y_p = (ax+b)e^{-x}[/tex]

whose first three derivatives are

[tex]{y_p}' = ae^{-x} - (ax+b)e^{-x} = (-ax+a-b)e^{-x}[/tex]

[tex]{y_p}'' = -ae^{-x} - (-ax+a-b)e^{-x} = (ax-2a+b)e^{-x}[/tex]

[tex]{y_p}''' = ae^{-x} - (ax-2a+b)e^{-x} = (-ax+3a-b)e^{-x}[/tex]

Substituting these into the equation gives

[tex](-ax+3a-b)e^{-x} - 6(ax-2a+b)e^{-x} + 11(-ax+a-b)e^{-x} - 6(ax+b)e^{-x} = 2xe^{-x}[/tex]

[tex](-ax+3a-b) - 6(ax-2a+b) + 11(-ax+a-b) - 6(ax+b) = 2x[/tex]

[tex]-24ax+26a-24b = 2x[/tex]

It follows that -24a = 2 and 26a - 24b = 0, so that a = -1/12 = -12/144 and b = -13/144, so the particular solution is

[tex]y_p = -\dfrac{12x+13}{144}e^{-x}[/tex]

and the general solution is

[tex]\boxed{y = C_1 e^x + C_2 e^{2x} + C_3 e^{3x} - \dfrac{12x+13}{144} e^{-x}}[/tex]

Answer:

d because your taking away 6 from the 275

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

All but 9

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

I used a calculator I hhhhhhj

Answer:

Yes, because (-1,2) is a solution to both inequalities

Step-by-step explanation:

2>-1 so the first inequality is correct

-1+2>0 so the second inequality is correct

Answer:

answer is 746.

have a nice day and do good in math

Answer:

B a vertical translation 50units right

Answer:

i need the question

Step-by-step explanation: