A box contains 30 widgets, 4 of which are defective. If 4 are sold at random, find the probability that (a) all are defective (b) none are defective.

Answer:

The equation for a unit radius circle, centered at the origin is:

x^2 + y^2 = 1

Now, if we want to move it horizontally, you can recall to the horizontal translations:

f(x) -----> f(x - a)

Moves the graph to the right by "a" units.

A vertical translation is similar.

Then, if we want a circle centered in the point (a, b) we have:

(x - a)^2  + (y - b)^2 = 1.

Now, if you want to change the radius, we can actually write the unit circle as:

x^2 + y^2 = 1^2

Where if we set x = 0, 1 = y, this is our radius

So if we have:

x^2 + y^2 = R^2

And we set the value of x = 0, then R = y.

So our radius is R.

Then:

"A circle of radius R, centered in the point (a, b) is written as:

(x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = R^2

Answer:

We have to remember

slope = m

if the slope of line is parellel so it will be the same with other slope

m1= m2

2/3= 2/3

so the answer is 2/3

hope it helps ^°^

Answer:

2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have the same slopes. Therefore,

[tex]m_{k} =m_{p}[/tex]

The slope of line k ([tex]m_{k}[/tex]) will be equal to the slope of the line parallel to k ([tex]m_{p}[/tex]).

We know that the slope of line k is 2/3.

[tex]m_{k}=\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

Therefore, the slope of the line parallel to line k is also 2/3.

[tex]\frac{2}{3}=m_{p}[/tex]

The slope of a line parallel to line k is 2/3.

Answer:

That's your answer

x= 125

3x= 375

2x-1= 249

Answer:

  -11/13

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the line through these points can be written using the 2-point form of the equation of a line:

  y = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)(x -x1) +y1

  y = (4 -(-3))/(-9-4)/(x -4) -3

  y = (-7/13)x +28/13 -3

For x=0, the value of y is ...

  y = 28/13 -39/13 = -11/13

The output for an input of 0 is -11/13.

                                                0        0

                                                      ,    

                                              ---------------

Answer:

Put 0 in the box.

Step-by-step explanation:

The value x = 0 if replaced in the given equation will always make the denominator zero.

Best Regards!

Answer:

75°

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's find the size of x°

BCFE has four sides so the sum of its angles sizes is 360°.

● CBE + 110 + 110 + CFE = 360

CFE is equal to 65° since they have the same vertex

● CBE + 220 + 65 = 360

● CBE + 285 = 360

● CBE = 360-285

● CBE = 75

CBE and x° have the same size since they share the same vertex.so:

● x° = 75°

Answer:

75°

Step-by-step explanation:

CBE = x (vertically opposite angles are equal)

CFR = 65° (vertically opposite angles are equal)

C+F+E+B= 360 (angles in a quadrilateral sum up to 360°)

110+65+110+x=360

x= 75°

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{Q = \sqrt{A+2a}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]A = Q^2 -2a[/tex]

Adding 2a to both sides

[tex]Q^2 = A+2a[/tex]

Taking sqrt on both sides

[tex]Q = \sqrt{A+2a}[/tex]

Answer:

a)0.519

b)requirements for constructing a confidence interval about p are satisfied.

c)0.488, and 0.550

d)yes this is because there is no possibility

that the true proportion is not captured in the confidence interval.

e)

0.450, 0.512

Step-by-step explanation:

a)The point estimate for the population proportion of adult Americans who believe that televisions are a luxury they could do without can be calculated as

521 of that adult that indicated that televisions are a luxury they could do without/1003 adults surveyed,

p = 521/1003

= 0.519.

b)

np(1-p)=1003×(0.519)×(1-0.519)

=250.39≥10 and the sample size is less than 5% of the population

therefore, requirements for constructing a confidence interval about p are satisfied.

c) we were given 95% confidence,

Then α=(1-0.95)

= 0.05

From the Z-tables,we can get the critical value is Z , which is (0.05/2) = Z (0.025) = 1.96

confidence interval can the be calculated using the formula below

- p ± Z*√ p (1 – p)/n

=0.519 ± 1.96√0.519×(1 – 0.519)/(1003)

= 0.519 ± 1.96×0.0158

0.519 ± 0.031

= 0.488, and 0.550

d) yes this is because there is no possibility

that the true proportion is not captured in the confidence interval.

e)the sample size can be calculated as

P=x/n

=(1003-521)/1003

=0.481

But we're given 95% confidence interval

Then

α=(1-0.95)=

0.05

From the Z-tables,we can get the critical value is Z , which is (0.05/2) = Z (0.025) = 1.96

Then convidence interval=

- p ± Z*√ p (1 – p)/n

=0.481 ± 1.96√0.481×(1 – 0.481)/(1003)

0.450, 0.512

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = (x+1)³ + 4

To find f-¹(x) equate f(x) to y

That's

y = (x+1)³ + 4

Next interchange the terms x becomes y and y becomes x

That's

x = ( y+1)³ + 4

Make y the subject

(y+1)³ = x - 4

Find the cube root of both sides

That's

[tex]y + 1 = \sqrt[3]{x - 4} [/tex]

Send 1 to the right side of the equation

That's

[tex]y = \sqrt[3]{x - 4} - 1[/tex]

So we have the final answer as

[tex]f ^{ - 1} (x) = \sqrt[3]{x - 4} - 1[/tex]

Hope this helps you

Answer:

option 1

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=(x+1)³+4

to find the inverse interchange the variable and solve for y

inverse f(x)=(y+1)³+4

x=(y+1)³+4

x-4=(y+1)³

y+1=∛x-4

y=∛x-4 -1

Answer:

  your answer is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

For the purpose here, we'll call the missing point on the arc through Z point X.

Essentially, you want to make ΔXYZ ≅ ΔLMN by SSS. The construction so far ensures LM ≅ MN ≅ XY ≅ YZ. By copying the length LN to XZ, you ensure the congruence of the remaining sides of the triangles.

Then ∠XYZ ≅ ∠LMN because corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent.

In short, XZ needs to be the same distance as LN.

Answer:x = 8, y = 5

Step-by-step explanation:The sum of two numbers is 13. Two times the first number minus three times the second numberis 1. If you let x stand for the first number and y for the second number, the two numbers are: A. x = 8, y = 5

Answer:

Solution : ( - 5, 5π / 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

There are four cases to consider here, the first two with respect to r > 0, the second two with respect to r < 0. r is the directed distance from the pole, and theta is the directed angle from the positive x - axis. Let's start by listing coordinates when r is positive. r here is 5 units from the positive x - axis.

( 5, θ ) theta here is between 30 and 60 degrees, so we can say it's about 45 degrees.

( 5, θ ) theta here is the remaining negative side of 360 - 45 = 315. That would make it - 315.

And when r is negative ( r < 0 ),

( - 5, θ ) now the point is going to lie on the ray pointing in the opposite direction of the terminal side of theta. This will be 45 degrees more than 180, or 180 + 45 = 225 degrees.

Right away we know that ( - 5, 225° ) is our solution, we don't have to consider the second case. Converting 225 to radians in terms of π will be 5π / 4 radians, giving us a solution of ( - 5, 5π / 4 ) or option b.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

x can not be greater than (1,325-270)/26 because $270 is fixed for the rental

Answer:

60/220

Step-by-step explanation:

we use combination,

[tex] (\frac{5}{1} ) \times ( \frac{4}{1} ) \times ( \frac{3}{1} )[/tex]

[tex]5 \times 4 \times 3 = 60[/tex]

then, all divided by,

[tex] (\frac{12}{3}) = 220 [/tex]

[tex]60 \div 220[/tex]

The probability of the first piece being milk chocolate, the second being white chocolate, and the third being milk chocolate is 0.06.

The probability helps us to know the chances of an event occurring.

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{Desired\ Outcomes}{Total\ Number\ of\ outcomes\ possible}[/tex]

The sample contains five milk chocolates, three dark chocolates, and four white chocolates. Therefore, the probability that the first piece is milk chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{\text{Number of Milk choclates}}{\text{Total number of choclates}}[/tex]

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{5}{12}[/tex]

Now, since the chocolate is been eaten the sample size will reduce from 12 chocolates in total to 11 chocolates in total (four milk chocolates, three dark chocolates, and four white chocolates). Therefore, the probability of the second piece being white chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{\text{Number of White choclates}}{\text{Total number of choclates}}[/tex]

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{4}{11}[/tex]

Now, as the chocolate is been eaten the sample size will reduce from 11 chocolates in total to 10 chocolates in total (four milk chocolates, three dark chocolates, and three white chocolates). Therefore, the probability of the third piece being milk chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{\text{Number of Milk choclates}}{\text{Total number of choclates}}[/tex]

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{4}{10}[/tex]

Thus, the probability of the first piece being milk chocolate, the second being white chocolate, and the third being milk chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{5}{12}\times \dfrac{4}{11} \times \dfrac{4}{10} = \dfrac{80}{1320} = 0.06[/tex]

Hence, the probability of the first piece being milk chocolate, the second being white chocolate, and the third being milk chocolate is 0.06.

Learn more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/795909

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

-33, -27, -21, -15,....

-33 +6 = -27  

-27+6 = -21

-21+6 = -15

This is an arithmetic sequence

The common difference is +6

explicit formula

an=a1+(n-1)d  where n is the term number and d is the common difference

an = -33 + ( n-1) 6

an = -33 +6n -6

an = -39+6n

recursive formula

an+1 = an +6

10th term

n =10

a10  = -39+6*10

      = -39+60

      =21

sum formula

see image

The sum will diverge since we are adding infinite numbers

Answer:

f(2) = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=x^2-2x+2

Let x=2

f(2)=2^2-2*2+2

    = 4 -4 +2

    = 2

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Just multiply 5/7 by 7 since his dog retrieved 5/7 out of the 7 ducks he shot.

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

7*5/7

7 represents the # of ducks

5/7 represents the # of ducks that were recovered

The question asks the number of ducks that were recovered so you should multiply the total # of ducks there are by the fraction that were recovered.

Answer:

1 square foot is the answer

Answer:

1 ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

We know 12 inches = 1 ft

12 inches by 12 inches

1 ft by 1 ft

The area is 1 * 1 = 1 ft^2

Answer:

≈ 3.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculate the distance d using the distance formula

d = [tex]\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+(y_{2}-y_{1})^2 }[/tex]

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (P(5, 1) and (x₂, y₂ ) = Q(3, 4)

d = [tex]\sqrt{(3-5)^2+(4-1)^2}[/tex]

   = [tex]\sqrt{(-2)^2+3^2}[/tex]

   = [tex]\sqrt{4+9}[/tex]

    = [tex]\sqrt{13}[/tex] ≈ 3.6 ( to the nearest tenth )

Answer:

3.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Look above bru

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Q(x)=x² − 6x − 2

To find Q(−4) substitute the value of x which is - 4 into Q(x)

That's

Q(-4) = (-4)² - 6(-4) - 2

Q(-4) = 16 + 24 - 2

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer:

a. t = 2.48 will be a period within 2009.

b. 56.16 million

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is the complete question

Apple introduced the first iPod in October 2001. Sales of the portable music player grew slowly in the early years but began to grow rapidly after 2005. But the iPod era is coming to a close. Smartphones with music and video

Apple introduced the first iPod in October 2001. Sales of the portable music player grew slowly in the

END OF THE IPOD ERA

players are replacing the iPod, along with the category of device it helped to create. Sales of the iPod worldwide from 2007

through 2011 (in millions) were

approximately

N(0= -2.65t2 + 13.13t+ 39.9 (0 < t< 4)

in year t, where t= 0 corresponds to 2007. Show that the worldwide sales of the iPod peaked sometime in 2009. What was the approximate largest number of iPods sold worldwide from 2007 through 2011?

a. Show that the worldwide sales of the iPod peaked sometime in 2009

N(t) = -2.65t² + 13.13t + 39.9

To find the maximum value of N(t), we find dN(t)/dt and equate it to zero

dN(t)/dt = d[-2.65t² + 13.13t + 39.9]/dt

dN(t)/dt = -5.3t + 13.13 = 0

-5.3t = - 13.13

t = -13.13/(-5.3)

t = 2.477

t ≅ 2.48

d²N(t)/dt² =d[-5.3t + 13.13]/dt = -5.3 < 0. So, t = 2.48 is a maximum point

Since t = 2 is 2009 and t = 3 is 2010, t = 2.48 will be a period within 2009.

b. What was the approximate largest number of iPods sold worldwide from 2007 through 2011?

The approximate largest number of ipods sold is when t = 2.48

N(2.48) = -2.65(2.48)² + 13.13(2.48) + 39.9

N(2.48) = -16.29856 + 32.5624 + 39.9

N(2.48) = 56.16384

N(2.48) ≅ 56.16 million

Answer:

Here's what I get  

Step-by-step explanation:

h = 0.5d + 4

A function rule tells you how to convert an input value (x) into an output value (y).

Your function rule is

ƒ(x) = 0.5x + 4

An easy way to represent your function is to make a graph.

The easiest way to make a graph is to make a table containing some inputs and their corresponding outputs.  

Here's a typical table.

[tex]\begin{array}{cc}\textbf{x} &\textbf{y} \\0 & 4 \\2 & 5 \\4 & 6 \\6 & 7\\6 & 8 \\\end{array}[/tex]

The graph is like the one below.

Answer:

3 only

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the statement, "The two cities with the highest number of respondents, both show more support for candidate A." In the total column, the two highest number of respondents are 471 and 463 which represent Carsonville and Appleton. For Carsonville, the number of respondents who prefer candidate A is 205, which is less than the number of respondents who prefer candidate B, 266. Therefore, this statement is not true.

Consider the statement, "The number of people who support candidate B in Carsonville is twice the number of people who support candidate B in New Thomas." In the table, the number of people who support candidate B in Carsonville is observed to be 266 and the number of people who support candidate B in New Thomas is 138. Since 266 is not equal to twice 138, this statement is not true.

Consider the statement, "More residents of Center City responded to the poll than the number who responded from New Thomas." In the total column, it can be observed that 350 people responded to the poll in Center City and 318 people responded to the poll in New Thomas. Since, 350 is greater than 318, this statement is true.

Consider the statement, "Overall, more residents support candidate A than candidate B." The bottom row of the table represents the total number of responses for each candidate. The number of people supporting candidate A is 797, which is less than the number of people supporting candidate B, 805. So, this statement is not true.

Therefore, the true statement is III only.

More residents of the center city responded to the pole than the number who responded from New Thomas, which is the only correct option. Option B. is correct.

Data given in the table shows the data of elections between two candidates among the different cities.

Statistics is the study of mathematics that deals with relations between comprehensive data.

I.The two cities with the highest number of respondents both show more support for candidate A. This statement is false because carsonville is the second highest support for A but it does not show more support for candidate A.

II.The number of people who support candidate B in Carsonville is twice the number of people who support candidate B in New Thomas. It is false

III. More residents of Center City responded to the pole than the number who responded from New Thomas. It is true.

IV. Overall, more residents support candidate A than candidate B. it is also false.

Thus, more residents of the center city responded to the pole than the number who responded from New Thomas, which is the only correct option. Option B. is correct.

Learn more about Statistics here:
https://brainly.com/question/23091366

#SPJ5

Answer:

Approximately 3.05

Step-by-step explanation:

Using "compatible numbers" we can simply round these numbers to integer values.  Let's make 76.32 => 76 and 24.98 => 25

So from here let's do 76/25 to get 3 R 1/25

1/25 as a decimal is .04

So far, we have 3.04.  Going back to Look at our decimals, .32 and .98, there is a larger difference in our down rounding with the .32 than the up rounding from our .98.  So we should consider an extra value in our decimal.

Considering our whole number of 3.0, we can assume that our rounding will have an increase of about .01 or .015 in error.

Thus our number will be 3.04 + .01.

Making our quotient approximately 3.05.

Cheers.

Answer:

symmetric

Step-by-step explanation:

it kind of evenly falls to the left and right from the highest value in the middle

skewed would be different and would look like a straight line not a quadratic equation

Answer:

$325.28

Step-by-step explanation:

152+152=304

304x1.07=325.28

Answer:

325.28

Step-by-step explanation:

increase the price by 100 %

152* 100%

152

Add this to the original price

152+152 = 304

Now find the sales tax

304 * 7%

304 * .07

21.28

Add this to the amount of the purchase price

304+21.28

325.28

Answer:

P value = 0.1575

Step-by-step explanation:

Data provided in the question

t = 1.021

n = 33

[tex]\mu[/tex] = 98.6° F

Based on the above information, the P-value could be determined by using the excel spreadsheet i.e. shown in the attachment

So, the P value is 0.1575

The 1.021 denotes the test statistic

32 denotes degrees of freedom

And,

1 denotes one tailed alternative hypothesis.

Aswer:I am sure of the answer it is 6 and 42

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]3-(-4) \\-\times - = +\\3+4 \\=7[/tex]

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

because you when multiply -1 by -4 u get positive 4 then 3 + 4 equals 7