Russia, a vital partner, shared borders with Bosnia & Herzegovina. (Option C)
Why is Bosnia and Herzegovina at war?The dissolution of the Yugoslavian Socialist Federal Republic led to the war in the region of Bosnia and Herzegovina. As a consequence of the demise of the confederational structure after the Cold War, a crisis developed in Yugoslavia.
Serbia was at war with Austria-Hungary as of July 28. As of this point, it was aware that taking significant action against Serbia would put it at risk of going to war with Russia, which was Serbia's ally. Austria-Hungary knew it could count on German support, so it was willing to take a chance in a conflict. A conflict in all of Europe was now in danger due to the Balkan problem.
To know more about Bosnia visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24213561
#SPJ1
What other types of resources might be helpful in order to figure out what happened during the Japanese invasion of Nanking?
Answer:
Explanation:
In addition to primary sources like photographs, diaries, and eyewitness accounts, there are several other types of resources that can be helpful in order to figure out what happened during the Japanese invasion of Nanking. These include:
Secondary sources: These are historical accounts, analyses, and interpretations of the events in Nanking written by historians, journalists, and other scholars. Secondary sources can provide valuable context, analysis, and different perspectives on the events of the invasion.
Official records: These include government and military records, reports, and archives from both China and Japan. These records can provide information about military strategies, orders, and decision-making during the invasion.
Museum collections: Museums in China and around the world have collections of artefacts, documents, and other materials related to the Nanking Massacre. These collections can include photographs, documents, and other primary sources that provide insight into the events of the invasion.
Oral history interviews: Survivors, witnesses, and descendants of those affected by the Nanking Massacre have been interviewed and recorded, providing valuable firsthand accounts of the events of the invasion.
Forensic evidence: Forensic investigations have been conducted in Nanking to uncover evidence of mass graves and other physical evidence of the atrocities committed during the invasion.
Overall, a combination of these different types of resources can help to provide a more comprehensive understanding of what happened during the Japanese invasion of Nanking, and the human toll of the atrocities committed during the massacre.
12. Which statement is accurate about the Hunley?
A Crew members could stand inside the Hunley easily.
B. The Hunley sunk two times.
C. The Hunley was the first submarine to sink another ship.
The Hunley sunk three ships throughout the Civil War.
ddle
The statement that is accurate about the Hunley is C. The Hunley was the first submarine to sink another ship.
About hunley -During the American Civil War, the CSS Hunley was a submarine built in the Confederate States of America. It was constructed during 1863 and 1864 by a team of engineers led by Horace Lawson Hunley. The Hunley is known for being the first submarine to successfully sink an enemy warship, the USS Housatonic, on February 17, 1864, off the coast of Charleston, South Carolina. The Hunley also sank twice before the successful attack on the Housatonic, claiming the lives of all crew members on both occasions.
To know more about hunley -
https://brainly.com/question/30282888
#SPJ1
1: Kublai Khan divided China into four social classes with differing privileges. What long-term impact did this have on the Southern Chinese people?
It increased wealth throughout the region.
It gave the people an opportunity to hold public offices.
It opened up trade on the Silk Road and created a new merchant class.
It angered the people and eventually led to revolt.
2:Kublai Khan divided China into four social classes with differing privileges. What long-term impact did this have on the Southern Chinese people?
It increased wealth throughout the region.
It gave the people an opportunity to hold public offices.
It opened up trade on the Silk Road and created a new merchant class.
It angered the people and eventually led to revolt.
3:Which of the following are examples of reforms during the rule of Kublai Khan?
Merchant class laws and extensive new roads
Religious tolerance and increased literacy
Paper money and a Mongol alphabet
Iron plow and farming education
4:Which of the following contributed to the decline of the Mongol Empire?
Natural resources were depleted due to overworking the land.
Genghis Khan did not have any sons to take over the empire.
The Black Death caused a massive population decline.
The empire stopped all expansion and focused only on China.
5:Which of the following is considered a reason Genghis Khan was successful in his invasion of China?
He left major cities untouched.
He was very popular with the Chinese people.
He had a large, wealthy army.
He invaded China from the south.
Answer: This easy The awnser is
Explanation: right below you
Write an essay in which you discussed Social Darwinism and opposing views such as the Social Gospel or Settlement House movements and express your own point of view. ( MAKE SURE TO WRITE AN INTRODUCTION, BODY, AND CONCLUSION)
Answer:
Write an essay in which you discussed Social Darwinism and opposing views such as the Social Gospel or Settlement House movements and express your own point of view. ( MAKE SURE TO WRITE AN INTRODUCTION, BODY, AND CONCLUSION)
Explanation:
Introduction:
Social Darwinism is a term coined in the late 19th century, which refers to the application of evolutionary theory to social and economic systems. According to this theory, the strongest and fittest individuals, businesses, and nations survive and thrive, while weaker ones die off. Social Darwinism was embraced by many prominent thinkers and leaders of the time, who used it to justify their beliefs in racial superiority, imperialism, and laissez-faire capitalism. However, this theory was challenged by opposing views, such as the Social Gospel and Settlement House movements, which emphasized the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. In this essay, I will discuss Social Darwinism and these opposing views, and express my own point of view on this topic.
Body:
Social Darwinism was a popular concept during the late 19th century and was used to justify racial superiority and imperialism. The theory argued that the struggle for existence applied not only to individuals but also to nations, and that the superior nations had a right to dominate the weaker ones. This idea was embraced by many European powers, who used it as a justification for their imperialistic activities in Africa and Asia. Similarly, in the United States, Social Darwinism was used to justify the exploitation of natural resources and the exploitation of workers by capitalists.
However, the Social Gospel movement emerged in response to Social Darwinism, emphasizing the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. This movement advocated for the use of Christian principles to address social problems, such as poverty, inequality, and injustice. The Social Gospel movement believed that it was the responsibility of the government and society as a whole to ensure that everyone had access to basic necessities such as food, shelter, and healthcare.
Another opposing view to Social Darwinism was the Settlement House movement. Settlement houses were community centers located in urban areas, which provided services and resources to immigrant families. The movement was led by middle-class women who believed that the problems of the urban poor were caused by social, economic, and political factors. The Settlement House movement aimed to address these issues by providing education, job training, and social services to the community.
Conclusion:
Social Darwinism was a popular theory during the late 19th century, used to justify racial superiority, imperialism, and laissez-faire capitalism. However, this theory was challenged by opposing views, such as the Social Gospel and Settlement House movements, which emphasized the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. While Social Darwinism is no longer a popular theory, its influence can still be seen in some political and economic policies. In my opinion, it is important to recognize that we live in a complex and interconnected world, and that cooperation and compassion are essential for creating a just and sustainable society. We must continue to work towards a society that values equality, justice, and social welfare for all.
Why would the Nazis start taking over the civil service first in order to control the government
Answer:
Explanation:
The Nazis took over the civil service in order to control the government for several reasons. Firstly, the civil service played a crucial role in the day-to-day operations of the government, including the administration of laws, the collection of taxes, and the management of public services. By controlling the civil service, the Nazis were able to exert influence over the workings of government and ensure that their policies and agenda were implemented.
Secondly, the civil service was a symbol of stability and continuity in German society, and its members were seen as being non-partisan and committed to serving the state. By taking over the civil service, the Nazis were able to project an image of legitimacy and stability, which helped to reinforce their power and influence.
Thirdly, the civil service was an important source of information and intelligence, and its members had access to sensitive and confidential information about the government and society. By controlling the civil service, the Nazis were able to gather intelligence and monitor potential threats to their power and influence.
Finally, by taking over the civil service, the Nazis were able to remove potential opponents and critics from positions of power and replace them with loyal supporters. This allowed the Nazis to consolidate their control over the government and suppress dissenting voices.
Overall, the takeover of the civil service was a key step in the Nazi's efforts to control the German government and society, and it helped to pave the way for the establishment of their totalitarian regime.
Which statements are true of the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States? Check all that apply.
All true statements about the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes, and killed over 3,000 people. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists and were the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history.
What is hijacking?Hijacking is a criminal act in which a person or group unlawfully and forcefully takes control of a vehicle, aircraft, or other mode of transportation. It is typically done with the intention of stealing the vehicle or using it to commit other crimes. Hijacking is a serious crime that can lead to physical and psychological harm, as well as the loss of property. In some cases, hijacking can even lead to death. Hijacking is a form of terrorism and is illegal in most countries. To prevent hijacking, many countries have implemented strict security measures for air, road, and sea travel. These measures can include increased security checks, armed guards, and the installation of metal detectors.
To learn more about hijacking
https://brainly.com/question/3523284
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which statements are true of the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States? Check all that apply.
A. It was the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history
B. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes
C. The attacks killed over 3,000 people
D. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists
Question 3 of 10
What was one element of Ronald Reagan's New Right agenda?
A. The United States should practice an isolationist foreign policy.
B. The United States should help countries at risk of annexation by
communist countries.
C. The United States should pursue an aggressive foreign policy.
O
D. The United States should assist foreign allies in dire
circumstances only.
B. The United States should help countries at risk of annexation by communist countries.
Ronald Reagan's New Right agenda was a conservative movement that emphasized limited government, free-market capitalism, and social conservatism. As part of this agenda, Reagan sought to promote American values and interests abroad, particularly in the face of perceived Soviet aggression. One element of his foreign policy was the belief that the United States should help countries at risk of annexation by communist countries, such as providing military and economic aid to anti-communist rebels in Nicaragua and supporting anti-Soviet forces in Afghanistan. This approach, known as the Reagan Doctrine, was a departure from the containment strategy pursued by previous administrations and reflected Reagan's belief in the importance of standing up to Soviet expansionism.
explain the history of "old imperialism" in Guyana and Venezuela
Guyana and Venezuela were both colonized during the period of "old imperialism" in the Americas. Christopher Columbus claimed Guyana for Spain in 1498, and the Spanish established settlements in the region, but were ultimately unsuccessful in maintaining a permanent presence. The Dutch established a colony in Guyana in the 17th century, which they called Essequibo, and the British also established colonies in the 18th century. Guyana remained a British colony until it gained independence in 1966. Venezuela was also colonized by the Spanish in the 16th century, with a focus on mining gold and silver, but they also established plantations and imported enslaved Africans to work on them. In the early 19th century, Venezuela gained independence from Spain, but struggled with political instability and economic challenges. The histories of both countries reflect the impact of "old imperialism" on these territories, including the exploitation of indigenous peoples, the importation of enslaved Africans, and the establishment of colonial economies based on plantation agriculture. These legacies continue to shape the social, economic, and political landscapes of both countries.
Which of the following best describes the shift to modernism in late-nineteenth-century European cultural and intellectual life?
The late-nineteenth-century European cultural and intellectual life was marked shift to modernism by a rejection of values and creative conventions, as well as a desire to experiment with new and ideas.
Modernism in the fine arts refers to a break with the past as well as a quest for new forms of expression. From the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries, modernism encouraged artistic experimentation, especially in the years following World War I.
Modernists felt an increasing alienation from Victorian morality, optimism, and convention in an era marked by industrialization, nearly global adoption of capitalism.
The roots of Modernism in the visual arts are often traced back to painter Édouard Manet, who, starting in the 1860s, not only depicted scenes of modern life, but also broke with tradition by making no effort to mimic the real world through perspective.
Learn more about European culture
https://brainly.com/question/17396096
#SPJ4
why the colonial government introduced the waste land rules. explain the impacts of waste rules on the pastoralists comunitee
Answer:
Explanation:
The Waste Land Rules were introduced by the colonial government in India in the late 19th century. The main reason behind their introduction was to maximize the revenue generated from the land by bringing previously uncultivated lands into cultivation. These rules designated certain lands as "waste" or unproductive and transferred them to the government, which then sold or leased them to private individuals or companies for cultivation. The colonial government believed that this would increase agricultural production and revenue, while also promoting economic development.
However, the introduction of the Waste Land Rules had significant impacts on the pastoralist communities in India. These communities relied on these "waste" lands for grazing their livestock and as a source of livelihood. The Waste Land Rules effectively denied them access to these lands, forcing them to move their livestock to other areas. This led to overcrowding of available grazing lands, competition over resources, and conflicts between pastoralist communities and other land users.
The Waste Land Rules also had other negative impacts on the pastoralist communities. As they were forced to move their livestock to other areas, they faced increased costs in terms of transportation and fodder. This reduced their income and increased their poverty levels. Additionally, the introduction of new cultivators to previously uncultivated areas led to deforestation and ecological damage, which further impacted the livelihoods of the pastoralist communities.
Furthermore, the government's efforts to convert "waste" lands to agriculture also had an impact on the ecological balance in the region. Large-scale deforestation and conversion of grasslands into agriculture led to soil erosion, reduced groundwater recharge, and an overall decline in the quality of the ecosystem. This impacted the ability of the pastoralist communities to rely on the natural resources of the area for their livelihoods.
In summary, the introduction of the Waste Land Rules by the colonial government in India had a significant impact on the pastoralist communities, denying them access to the lands they relied on for their livelihoods and contributing to ecological damage. These policies were driven by the government's desire to maximize revenue and promote economic development, without regard for the impact on the existing communities and the environment.
Which two kings of Russia became the most influential during the Age of Absolutism? How did
their decisions affect the nation?
Peter the Great ruled as Russia's czar or ruler from 1682 until his passing in 1725. He tried to modernize Russia and build it into an empire that could compete with anything in Europe during his rule.
Which two Russian rulers rose to prominence during the Era of Absolutism?
Ivan III (reigned 1462-1505) built on Byzantine customs and set the groundwork for the tsarist dictatorship, which would rule Russia for centuries with some modifications. Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, Russia's absolutism increasingly replaced the despotism of the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The most notable instance of absolutism has traditionally been regarded as the rule of Louis XIV of France (1643–1715).
The Russian Revolution occurred in 1917 as a result of a peasant and working-class uprising against Tsar Nicholas II's rule. Vladimir Lenin and a group of revolutionaries known as the Bolsheviks led them. They'd construct huge royal courts. There were members of the wider royal family there, as well as everyone who usually looked after the king and queen.
Learn more about Russia:
https://brainly.com/question/9695945
#SPJ1
what are the s.p.i.c.e outcomes at the end of the Japanese internment?
Answer:
Explanation:
The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was a significant event in U.S. history that had a range of social, political, intellectual, cultural, and economic outcomes. Here are some potential SPICE outcomes at the end of the Japanese internment:
Social outcomes: The end of the Japanese internment meant that Japanese Americans were able to return to their homes and communities, but many faced significant challenges as a result of their forced removal and incarceration. Some experienced discrimination or harassment, while others struggled to rebuild their lives after losing homes, businesses, and possessions.
Political outcomes: The Japanese internment had significant political implications. Many Americans disagreed with the government's decision to intern Japanese Americans, and some believed that it was a violation of their civil liberties. The end of the internment may have sparked debates about the role of government in protecting civil rights during wartime.
Intellectual outcomes: The end of the Japanese internment may have sparked debates and discussions about racism, prejudice, and discrimination in American society. Some may have questioned the idea of national security being used as a justification for violating the rights of a particular group of people, while others may have grappled with the legacy of the internment and its impact on Japanese Americans and their descendants.
Cultural outcomes: The end of the Japanese internment had cultural implications, as well. Some Japanese Americans may have struggled to reconnect with their cultural heritage after being forcibly removed from their homes and communities, while others may have worked to preserve their traditions and history. The internment may have also influenced American popular culture, as films, books, and other media have addressed the internment and its impact.
Economic outcomes: The Japanese internment had significant economic consequences for Japanese Americans, who lost homes, businesses, and possessions as a result of their forced removal. After the war, many faced challenges rebuilding their lives and businesses. The internment also had implications for the broader U.S. economy, as Japanese American farmers and workers were no longer able to contribute to their industries.
Which of the following American philosophies influenced Herbert Hoover's initial response to the economic downturn in the early 1930s?
Herbert Hoover was the 31st President of the United States, serving from 1929 to 1933. Hoover's philosophy on economics was influenced by the American individualist, capitalist, and humanitarian philosophies that were prevalent during his time in office.
In response to the economic downturn that began in the early 1930s, Hoover attempted to use government intervention and private-sector cooperation to mitigate the effects of the depression.The American individualist philosophy influenced Herbert Hoover's initial response to the economic downturn in the early 1930s. The philosophy held that every person is responsible for their own success or failure, and that government intervention in the economy should be minimal. Hoover believed that private-sector initiatives would be more successful in reviving the economy than government intervention. He relied on volunteerism and philanthropy to help those in need during the Great Depression. Hoover believed that charity would help to alleviate the economic hardship caused by the depression.Hoover's economic policies, however, were criticized for being inadequate to address the scale of the problem. Many Americans believed that the government should have done more to help the unemployed and homeless. Hoover's philosophy of individualism and limited government intervention was unable to address the magnitude of the Great Depression's impact on the American economy.In conclusion, the American individualist philosophy influenced Herbert Hoover's initial response to the economic downturn in the early 1930s. He believed that private-sector initiatives would be more successful in reviving the economy than government intervention. However, his economic policies were criticized for being inadequate to address the scale of the problem, and many Americans believed that the government should have done more to help those affected by the Great Depression.
for more such question on humanitarian
https://brainly.com/question/769309
#SPJ11
TRUE/FALSE. the usa patriot act (2001) gives individuals more protection from governmental intrusion.
Answer:
Its false
Explanation:
please help me with history i’ll give you brainlist
did germanys debt increase
germanys debt decreased
germanys debt stayed the same
Answer:
Germany's debt increased from 1921 to 1924. According to the graph, Germany's debt to GDP ratio was 196% in 1921 and it increased to 258% in 1924. This was due to the burden of war reparations and the economic and political instability of the Weimar Republic during that time.
Which of the following accurately describes the significance of the Hagia Sophia?
a. It ensured that Christianity would always be the primary religion in the region.
b. It showed that the Byzantines would resist Roman influence on their Greek art and architecture.
c. It demonstrates the fusion of Greek, Roman, and later Arabic cultures in the city.
d. Its destruction in the Nika Riots symbolizes the fragile peace of the Byzantine Empire.
The correct answer is c. The Hagia Sophia is an architectural marvel located in Istanbul, Turkey.
When was it originally constructed ?It was originally constructed as a Christian cathedral by Emperor Justinian I in 537 AD and remained a cathedral until the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453. It then served as a mosque until 1935 when it was converted into a museum.
The Hagia Sophia is significant for many reasons, but one of the most important is that it represents the fusion of Greek, Roman, and later Arabic cultures in the city. Its architecture combines elements of Greek and Roman styles, while the interior features stunning mosaics and other artwork that reflect the cultural influences of the Byzantine Empire.
In addition, the Hagia Sophia was a symbol of the power and influence of the Byzantine Empire. Its construction was an enormous undertaking that required the labor of thousands of workers and the use of innovative building techniques. Its size and grandeur were intended to demonstrate the might of the Byzantine Empire to the world.
While the Hagia Sophia's destruction in the Nika Riots did symbolize the fragile peace of the Byzantine Empire, it is only one part of its significance. Ultimately, the Hagia Sophia represents the rich cultural history of Istanbul and the enduring legacy of the Byzantine Empire.
To know more about Byzantine Empire, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/18205624
#SPJ1
In what ways does Harry Farr's version of events on 17th September 1916 contradict to Segeant Major
Answer:
There is little dispute about the sequence of events on 17 September 1916 that led to the execution of Private Farr.
Explanation:
how did militarism contribute to the outbreak of World War 1?
a. it promoted the neutrality of certain nations.
b. it led to an arms race among nations
c. it led to vying alliance systems
d. it promoted ideas of self-degermation of different people
Answer:
the military establishment began to have a greater influence on public policy. hope it helps.
Explanation:
Complete the following sentence.
The Southern coastline caused it to be ____.
Question 2 options:
easy for the Confederacy to trade slaves
easy for the Confederacy to build large ships for battle
hard for the Union army to form a blockade
hard for the Union army to access the South
Answer:
hard for the Union army to form a blockade
Why did the Scientific Revolution happen in the West and not another world civilization?
Answer:
The Scientific Revolution happened in the West due to a combination of factors, including the development of new technologies, the encouragement of a questioning attitude towards established knowledge and beliefs, and increased access to higher education. In particular, the printing press allowed for the rapid dissemination of new ideas and accessible texts, while the rise of universities and academies allowed for the sharing of new knowledge and theories. The West also benefited from the influx of classical texts from the Islamic world and the Renaissance period, which provided the foundation for the development of new theories and scientific assumptions. Additionally, the West benefited from the emergence of nation-states, which provided the economic and political stability necessary for the growth of science and technology.
Some historians argue that alliances caused World War I. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary caused alliances to declare war on each other. The assassination was done to free land from Austria-Hungary. Serbs living in Bosnia and Herzegovina wanted to rule themselves. Because of this assassination, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. Russia was an ally of Serbia. Germany was an ally of Austria-Hungary. The two mutual-defense alliances were now at war.
Which statement best identifies the reason Franz Ferdinand was assassinated?
Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina wanted self-rule.
Austria-Hungary decided to declare war on Serbia.
Russia was an ally of Serbia and wanted to stop Austria-Hungary.
Mutual-defense alliances wanted to start a war in Austria-Hungary.
Answer:
Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina wanted self-rule.
Explanation:
The others are a result of the assassination, not a cause.
The Mediterranean region gave rise to a new form of slavery, called chattel slavery. Which of the following situations describes chattel slavery?
a wealthy merchant invests in 15 slaves at the local market, then rents them out to a copper mine fifty miles away and uses the income to help support his other business ventures
The situation that describes chattel slavery is: a wealthy merchant invests in 15 slaves at the local market, then rents them out to a copper mine fifty miles away and uses the income to help support his other business ventures.
Chattel slavery is a system of slavery in which an individual is recognized as a personal possession, chattel, or an article of trade or commerce. It is characterized by the legal right of the slave owner to possess, buy, sell, and otherwise dispose of a person as they would any other property.
In chattel slavery, the enslaved person is treated like personal property, with no rights, privileges, or protections. They are born, sold, and owned as property, and can be sold, inherited, or exchanged at any time, much like any other object.
In the given situation, a wealthy merchant invests in 15 slaves at the local market, then rents them out to a copper mine fifty miles away and uses the income to help support his other business ventures. This situation describes chattel slavery.
For such more question on business:
https://brainly.com/question/28187988
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT true of nuclear energy compared to coal or oil?
A. Radioactive waste is left from use
B. It is more energy efficient than coal or oil
C. It is more dangerous for people involved in its production
Answer:
The nucleus of uranium is bombarded with high energy neutrons.
Explanation: Nuclear energy is generated by splitting of uranium atoms
The Jim Crow Laws had a huge impact on the Civil Rights movement because??
Answer:
The Jim Crow Laws were state and local laws in the United States that enforced racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans from the late 1800s until the mid-1960s. These laws had a significant impact on the Civil Rights movement for several reasons:
Legalized segregation: The Jim Crow Laws legalized segregation in all aspects of public life, including schools, public transportation, restaurants, and even restrooms. This created a separate and unequal society, where African Americans were denied basic human rights and opportunities.
Limited political power: The Jim Crow Laws limited the political power of African Americans by implementing poll taxes, literacy tests, and other barriers that prevented them from voting. This effectively silenced their voices and prevented them from advocating for their rights.
Sparked resistance: The Jim Crow Laws sparked resistance and protests from the African American community and their allies. Civil rights activists such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and many others organized boycotts, sit-ins, and other nonviolent demonstrations to challenge these discriminatory laws and demand equal rights.
Led to federal intervention: The Civil Rights movement, fueled by the injustices of the Jim Crow Laws, eventually led to federal intervention. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were landmark pieces of legislation that prohibited discrimination on the basis of race and removed many of the barriers that prevented African Americans from voting.
Overall, the Jim Crow Laws played a significant role in the Civil Rights movement by sparking resistance, highlighting the injustices faced by African Americans, and ultimately leading to significant legislative and social change.
Explanation:
#trust me bro #never wrong #warstep8 i need ur help bro
analyze the ways in which two of the following groups challenged british liberalism between 1880 and 1914: feminists; irish nationalists; socialists
Between 1880 and 1914, both feminists and Irish nationalists challenged British liberalism in significant ways. (Options 1 and 2)
Feminists advocated for women's suffrage and other rights and used various tactics such as protests, civil disobedience, and legal challenges to push for change. Irish nationalists, on the other hand, sought independence from British rule and used a range of tactics such as political organizing, protests, and violence to achieve their goals. Socialists also challenged British liberalism during this period by advocating for workers' rights and pushing for economic reforms.
They used tactics such as strikes, protests, and political organizing to bring attention to issues of social and economic inequality. These groups all challenged the existing power structures and pushed for change in different ways, ultimately contributing to the evolution of British liberalism.
Learn more about liberalism
https://brainly.com/question/27320920
#SPJ4
How did the United States participate in the Soviet Afghan war
Answer:
The U.S. supplied weapons and support to the Afghan rebels resisting the Soviet Forces
Explanation:
The U.S. hoped that they would be able to help stop the spread of Communism
how did the persian wars change greek society ?
The Persian Wars were a series of conflicts fought between the Persian Empire and the Greek city-states in the 5th century BCE.
How the Persian war affected the Greek societyNational Unity: The Persian Wars brought the Greek city-states together and fostered a sense of national unity. Greeks from different city-states fought side by side against a common enemy, which helped to break down the traditional divisions between the various city-states.
Military Developments: The Persian Wars led to the development of new military tactics and technologies, which helped to make the Greeks more effective in battle. For example, the Greeks learned to fight in phalanxes (tight formations of soldiers), which allowed them to withstand the Persian cavalry charges.
Naval Supremacy: The Greek victory over the Persian navy at the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE gave the Greeks control of the Aegean Sea and established their naval supremacy in the region.
Learn more about Persian wars at:
https://brainly.com/question/925997
#SPJ1
Would you say that Shaka the Zulu’s success in warfare was wholly attributable to the nature of his upbringing?
Answer: No
Explanation: Shaka the Zulu's success in warfare cannot be wholly attributable to the nature of his upbringing, although it undoubtedly played a significant role. Shaka's upbringing gave him a unique perspective on warfare and leadership, as well as a deep understanding of the social and cultural dynamics of his people. This enabled him to develop military tactics and strategies that were highly effective in the context of Zulu society.
However, Shaka's success in warfare was also due to his personal qualities as a leader and military strategist. He was a charismatic and inspirational figure, who was able to inspire loyalty and commitment in his followers. He was also a brilliant military strategist, who developed innovative tactics and techniques that allowed the Zulus to defeat much larger and better-equipped armies.
Additionally, Shaka's success was also due to a number of other factors, such as his ability to forge alliances with neighboring tribes, his skill in diplomacy and negotiation, and the Zulus' superior weapons and military organization.
Therefore, while Shaka's upbringing played a significant role in his success, it would be inaccurate to say that it was wholly attributable to this factor alone. A combination of personal qualities, military strategies, social and cultural factors, and other contextual variables all contributed to his success in warfare.
1.Find the Confederate states in the South ("seceded states"). Write the names of the Confederate states that were on the northern border of
the Confederacy.
2. Find the Union states in the North ("United States"). Write the names of the Union states that were on the border with the Confederate states.
3. wite the names of the capitals of the Union and of the Confederacy.
4. Why do you think there were no states between Kansas and California and between Minnesota and Oregon?
5. Use the scale of miles on the map to answer the following questions:
a. About how far was the capital of the United States from the capital of the Confederacy?
b. About how far was the capital of the Confederacy from the point farthest west in Texas?
Pls help
The reason there were no states between Kansas and California and between Minnesota and Oregon is due to historical process of westward expansion in the United States during the 19th century.
What is an expansion?Expansion refers to the process of increasing the size, volume, or scope of something. It can refer to physical expansion, such as when a company builds more factories or offices to increase production or presence in new markets. Expansion can also refer to the growth of an idea, concept, or theory, where it is developed and extended to cover more aspects or to apply to new situations. Economic expansion refers to the growth of a country's economy, measured by factors such as GDP, employment, and productivity. Expanding a business can involve investing in new products or services, hiring more employees, or expanding into new geographic locations. Expansion can bring opportunities for growth and development, but it also involves risks and challenges, such as increased costs, competition, and complexity.
To learn more about expansion, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2614672
#SPJ1
• Why do you think accusations made at the time by James Callender failed to hurt Jefferson politically?
One reason why the accusations made by James Callender failed to hurt Thomas Jefferson politically is that they were seen as politically motivated and lacked credibility. Callender was known for his anti-Federalist views and had a history of making false accusations. Additionally, many of the allegations he made, such as Jefferson's alleged relationship with Sally Hemings, were already known to the public and had not hurt Jefferson's political standing in the past. Moreover, Jefferson was a popular and respected political figure, and his supporters were willing to overlook any personal flaws or scandals. Overall, while the accusations made by Callender were scandalous, they ultimately did not have a significant impact on Jefferson's political career.
