A prepaid application for individual Disability Income insurance was recently submitted to an insurer. When the insurer received the Medical Information Bureau (MIB) report, the report showed that the applicant had suffered a stroke 18 months ago, something that was not disclosed on the application. Which of the following actions would the insurance company NOT take?
Send the initial premium back to the applicant
Send a notice to the applicant that the coverage was declined
Send a notice to the MIB that the applicant was declined
Send a notice to the agent that the applicant was declined

Aggregate demand is the total demand of all goods and services in the economy, similarly aggregate supply is total supply of goods over a period of time in the economy.

Say's Law and Keynes' Law can both be demonstrated using the aggregate demand/aggregate supply, abbreviated AD/AS, model. According to Say's Law, supply generates its own demand, whereas Keynes' Law asserts that demand does the opposite. According to Keynes' Law, fluctuations in aggregate demand result in changes in real Output and employment. Demand generates its own supply.

According to Say's Law, changes in aggregate demand only affect the price level and have no impact on true gross domestic product or employment. Instead, supply generates its own demand.

Say's Law was challenged by Keynes, who noted that not all money must be spent in the very same period as it is generated.

Learn more about aggregate demand and aggregate supply here:

https://brainly.com/question/29349235

#SPJ4

The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act free credit report service is authorized by federal law but only accessible once per year.

To learn more about federal law from the given link :

https://brainly.com/question/28498485

#SPJ4

Because federal courts only have limited jurisdiction, they can only consider matters that are specifically allowed by the US Constitution or federal law.

Any matter originating under federal laws, the Constitution, or treaties must be filed with the federal district court. Original jurisdiction is the term used to describe this form of authority. The authority of state courts and federal courts may overlap, allowing some matters to be brought in both courts. In the beginning, the plaintiff gets to decide whether to file the case in a state or federal court. However, the defendant might occasionally decide to "remove" to federal court if the plaintiff opts for state court.Under the court's "diversity jurisdiction," cases that are completely based on state law may be brought before a federal judge. When the defendant is located in another state, diversity jurisdiction enables a plaintiff from that state to sue in federal court. For the same reason, the defendant may also attempt to "remove" from state court.

learn more about federal courts here:

https://brainly.com/question/10732122

#SPJ4

Switzerland is the nation that has the lowest voter turn out of 36.1% in the list of countries that appeared on the pew research while Uruguay has the highest amount of Voter turn out of 94.,9%

The nations may be having more citizens interested in the leadership of the nation while in Switzerland, the citizens may not really care about the electoral process.

The turnout in the United States is about 62.8% which is just fair.

the proportion of voters who participate in elections; the number of registered voters who actually "show out" on election day. the elections for Congress.

The type of election (e.g., presidential or midterm) and the level of competition in the race are other factors that affect voter turnout. The number of voters in a jurisdiction who are of voting age (18 years or older)

The number of participants or attendees at an event. a significant voter turnout. a point at which something (like a road) branches off or makes a turn.

Read more on Voter turn out here: https://brainly.com/question/4459946

#SPJ1

The Federal Reserve's policy of disclosing its policy choices has Prior to 1994, these policy decisions were kept under wraps. Only recently have they been made immediately public.

In order to foster maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates—the three economic objectives that the Congress has directed the Federal Reserve to pursue—monetary policy in the United States consists of the Federal Reserve's actions and communications.

Maximum employment and stable prices, or low, steady inflation, are the Fed's two equally important monetary policy objectives as set forth by Congress. The third, less well-known objective of maintaining moderate long-term interest rates is implied by this "dual mandate."

To learn more about Monetary policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/28236449

#SPJ4

No, Congress create a law mandating a balanced federal budget. A federal budget that is balanced can be passed by Congress at any time. Because of this, a constitutional amendment would be required to "mandate" a balanced federal budget.

The following Congress can easily reverse a law passed by the previous one requiring a balanced budget (providing the President agrees). To make having a balanced budget a permanent obligation, the Constitution must be amended. However, such an amendment must be carefully drafted to avoid having too many "loopholes" that render it useless. Passage of such a law would be extremely unlikely since, like many ideas, it would limit the authority of Congress. Additionally, a later Congress might just enact legislation resending it. It would be pointless to make an effort to achieve something without considering what ought to be. The majority of people agree that there shouldn't be any budget deficits, but they won't cut their own sacred cows—only those of others.

Learn more about federal budget here

https://brainly.com/question/2074848

#SPJ4

All elections, including presidential ones, are held by the states, and constitutional revisions must be ratified by them. State governments have the authority to impose laws on business, taxation, healthcare, education, and many other matters inside their state, provided that those laws do not conflict with federal law.

What is the distribution of power between the national and state government in the US federal system?

Federalism restricts the scope of government by establishing two sovereign powers—the federal government and state governments—and limiting the influence of each. Internal constraints are imposed by the separation of powers by dividing one body of government against another, giving each branch distinct responsibilities, and requiring them to share power.

All elections, including presidential ones, are held by the states, and constitutional revisions must be ratified by them. State governments have the authority to impose laws on business, taxation, healthcare, education, and many other matters inside their state, provided that those laws do not conflict with federal law.

To find out more about the US state government, check out:

https://brainly.com/question/9261004

#SPJ4

The foreign policy would have a strong nationalistic component, and alliances and treaties would only be formed when they were advantageous to American Indian policy.

A WW1 alliance system. As previously established, the definition of alliances WW1 is a pact between a group of nations to aid one another in times of conflict. Before the conflict started, the alliance structure for WW1 was established. Some alliance systems go all the way back to the nineteenth century.

One of the best examples of a strategic partnership is the agreement between Starbucks with Barnes & Noble. Coffee is brewed by Starbucks. Books can be found at Barnes & Noble. To a benefit of the both businesses, each one does what it does best while splitting the costs of the facility.

To know more about alliances visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28195787

#SPJ4