A small company is creating a new product to sell to buyers. They have estimated that it will cost them $25 to produce each item and they will have start-up costs of $116000. This leads to the following expression, which gives the total cost, in dollars, to produce q of these new products: 25q+116000 Use this expression to predict how much it will cost them to produce 8900 items.

Answer:

-54 is a integer and rational number

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A. 30

Step-by-step explanation:

The interquartile range for a box and whiskers plot, is the value from the right side of the box minus the value of the left side of the box.

In this case at the far right side of the box it is at 130, at the far left side of the box it is at 100.

130-100=30

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{IQR = 30}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Q1 = 130 (Left hand edge of the box)

Q3 = 100 (Right Hand edge of the box)

Interquartile Range = Q3-Q1

IQR = 130-100

IQR = 30

Answer:

Yes; Since the confidence interval limits are both greater than 50%, we can reasonably conclude that more than half of all adults would take a ride in a fully self-driving car.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

     The sample size is  n =  500

     The sample proportion is  [tex]\r p = 0.57[/tex]

     The  95% confidence interval is (0.5266, 0.6134)

Looking at the 95% confidence level interval we see that the sample proportion is within the interval and given that the confidence interval limits are both greater than 50%, we can reasonably conclude that more than half of all adults would take a ride in a fully self-driving car.

Answer:

[tex]Area=\frac{1}{2} (B\,+\,b)\,h[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The grassy area is that of a trapezoid, so recall the formula for the area of a trapezoid:

[tex]Area=\frac{1}{2} (Base\,+\,base)\,height[/tex]

where:

Base stands for the larger base (in our case the dimension "B" in the attached image)

base stands for the shorter base parallel to the largest Base (in our case the dimension "b" in the attached image)

and

height stands for the distance between bases (in our case the dimension "h" in the attached image.

Therefore the formula for the area of the grassy section becomes:

[tex]Area=\frac{1}{2} (Base\,+\,base)\,height\\Area=\frac{1}{2} (B\,+\,b)\,h[/tex]

Answer:

1/2 (b+b) h

here is the actual picture

Answer:

0.8989

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the Newton's Raphson approximation formula.

Xn+1 = Xn - f(Xn)/f'(Xn)

Given f(x) = x³-2x+2

f'(x) = 3x²-2

If the initial value X1 = 2

X2 = X1 - f(X1)/f'(X1)

X2 = 2 - f(2)/f'(2)

f(2) = 2³-2(2)+2

f(2) = 8-4+2

f(2) = 6

f'(2) = 3(2)²-2

f'(2) = 10

X2 = 2- 6/10

X2 = 14/10

X2 = 1.4

X3 = X2 - f(X2)/f'(X2)

X3 = 1.4 - f(1.4)/f'(1.4)

f(1.4) = 1.4³-2(1.4)+2

f(1.4) = 2.744-2.8+2

f(1.4) = 1.944

f'(1.4) = 3(1.4)²-2

f'(1.4) = 3.880

X3 = 1.4- 1.944/3.880

X3 = 1.4 - 0.5010

X3 = 0.8989

Hence the value of X3 is 0.8989

Answer:

6/50

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 50 tiles

6 purple

18 pink

26 orange

P( purple) = purple/ total

                = 6/50

Answer:

approximately x = 38

Step-by-step explanation:

The maximum profit is the vertex of the profit graph parabola. The maximum occurs at approximately x = 38.

The solution is x = 38

The location on the profit function parabola where the profit from sales of the phone cases is a maximum is given by x = 38

A Parabola, open curve, a conic section produced by the intersection of a right circular cone and a plane parallel to an element of the cone. A parabola is a plane curve generated by a point moving so that its distance from a fixed point is equal to its distance from a fixed line

The equation of the parabola is given by

( x - h )² = 4p ( y - k )

where ( h , k ) is the vertex and ( h , k + p ) is the focus

y is the directrix and y = k – p

The equation of the parabola is also given by the equation

y = ax² + bx + c

where a , b , and c are the three coefficients and the parabola is uniquely identified

Given data ,

Let the revenue, cost, and profit functions for a line of cell phone cases be given as two parabolic functions R ( x ) and P ( x )

The maximum profit is given by the parabolic function R ( x )

The profit is represented by = y

The price per phone is represented by = x

Now , when y is maximum ,

The value of y = $ 2,250,000

The value of x when y = $ 2,250,000 is x = 38

So , the value of x from the parabola where profit is maximum is x = 38

Therefore,  the value of x = 38

Hence , the value of x from the function is x = 38

To learn more about parabola click :

https://brainly.com/question/24042022

#SPJ2

Answer:

Perimeter of ABCD = 36 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

A (1,7)

B (7,7)

C (7,1)

D (1,1)

Find:

Perimeter of ABCD

Computation:

Distance between two point = √(x1-x2)² + (y1-y2)²

So,

AB = √(1-7)²+(7-7)²

AB = 6 ft

BC = √(7-7)²+(7-1)²

BC = 6 ft

CD = √(7-1)²+(1-1)²

CD = 6 ft

DA = √(1-1)²+(1-7)²

DA = 6 ft

Perimeter of ABCD = AB + BC + CD + DA

Perimeter of ABCD = 6 + 6 + 6 +6

Perimeter of ABCD = 36 ft

The perimeter of the plot is the sum of side length of the plot of land.

The perimeter of the plot is 24 feet.

Represent the vertices as follows:

[tex]W = (1,7)[/tex]

[tex]X = (7,7)[/tex]

[tex]Y = (7,1)[/tex]

[tex]Z = (1,1)[/tex]

First, we calculate the side length using the following distance formula:

[tex]d = \sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^2 + (y_1 - y_2)^2}[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]WX = \sqrt{(1- 7)^2 + (7- 7)^2} = \sqrt{36} = 6[/tex]

[tex]XY = \sqrt{(7- 7)^2 + (7- 1)^2} = \sqrt{36} = 6[/tex]

[tex]YZ = \sqrt{(7- 1)^2 + (1- 1)^2} = \sqrt{36} = 6[/tex]

[tex]ZW = \sqrt{(1- 1)^2 + (1- 7)^2} = \sqrt{36} = 6[/tex]

The perimeter (P) is then calculated as follows:

[tex]P = WX + XY + YZ + ZW[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]P = 6 + 6 + 6 + 6[/tex]

[tex]P = 24[/tex]

Hence, the perimeter of the plot of land is 24 feet.

Read more about perimeters at:

https://brainly.com/question/394193

Answer:

  g(x) = 4, 6, 9, 13.5 for the x-values given

Step-by-step explanation:

The table and graph are attached.

Answer:

Evaluate 8P6 P 6 8 using the formula nPr=n!(n−r)! P r n = n ! ( n - r ) ! . 8!(8−6)! 8 ! ( 8 - 6 ) ! Subtract 6 6 from 8 8 . 8!(2)! 8 ! ( 2 ) ! Simplify 8!(2)! 8 !

Step-by-step explanation:

evaluate" usually means to put a value in for the variable, but you don't give us a value for p. also, it is unclear if you ...

The value of the expression [tex]^8P_6[/tex] is 20160.

A permutation of a set in mathematics is, broadly speaking, the rearrangement of its elements if the set already has an ordered structure into a sequence or linear order.

The value of the expression is calculated as:-

[tex]^8P_6=\dfrac{8!}{8!-6!}=\dfrac{8!}{2!}[/tex]

[tex]^8P_6 =\dfrac{8\times 7\times 6\times 5\times 4\times 3\times 2}{2}[/tex]

[tex]^8P_6[/tex] = 20160

Hence, the value is 20160.

To know more about permutations follow

https://brainly.com/question/4658834

#SPJ5

Answer:

0.30924

Approximately ≈ 0.3092

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve for this question, we use the formula:

z = (x - μ)/σ

where x is the raw score

μ is the sample mean

σ is the sample standard deviation.

From the question,

x is the raw score = 260

μ is the sample mean = population standard deviation = 258

σ is the sample standard deviation

= σ/√N

N = 76 samples

σ = Population standard deviation

= 35/√76

= 4.0146919966

Hence,

z = (x - μ)/σ

= 260 - 258/ 4.0146919966

= 0.4981702212

Approximately = 0.498

We find the Probability using z score table for normal distribution

P(x = z) = P( x = 260)

= P( z = 0.498)

= 0.69076

The probability that a random customer will have more than $260 in his or her wallet is calculated as:

P(x>Z) = 1 - P( z = 0.498)

P(x>Z) = 1 - 0.69076

P(x>Z) = 0.30924

Approximately ≈ 0.3092

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

Let T be triangle, C the circle and S the square.

● T + T + T = 30

● 3T = 30

Divide both sides by 3

● 3T/3 = 30/3

● T = 10

So the triangle has a value of 10.

●30 T + C + C = 20C + S + S = 13T +C ×S/2

Add like terms together

●30 T + 2C = 20C +2S= 13T + C×S/2

Replace T by its value (T=10)

● 300 + 2C = 20C + 2S = 130 + C×S/2

Take only this part 20C + 2S = 130 + C × S/2

● 20C + 2S = 130 + C×S/2 (1)

Take this part (300+2C = 20C+2S) and express S in function of C

● 20C + 2S = 300 + 2C

Divide everything by 2 to make easier

● 10 C + S = 150+ C

● S = 150+C-10C

● S = 150-9C

Replace S by (5-9C) in (1)

● 20C + 2S = 130 + C×S/2

● 20C + 2(150-9C) = 130 +C× (150-9C)/2

● 20C + 300-18C= 130 + C×(75-4.5C)

● 2C + 300 = 130 + 75 -4.5C^2

● 2C +300-130 = 75C - 4.5C^2

● 2C -75C + 170 = -4.5C^2

● -73C + 170 = -4.5C^2

Multiply all the expression by -1

● -4.5C^2 +73C+ 170= 0

This is a quadratic equation, so we will use the discriminant method.

Let Y be the discriminant

● Y = b^2-4ac

● b = 73

● a = -4.5

● c = 170

● Y = 73^2 - 4×(-4.5)×170= 8389

So the equation has two solutions:

● C = (-b +/- √Y) /2a

√Y is approximatively 92

● C = (-73 + / - 92 )/ -9

● C = 18.34 or C = -2.11

Approximatively

● C = 18 or C = -2

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

● if C = 18

30T + 2C = 300 + 36 = 336

● if C = -2

30T + 2C = 300-4 = 296

Answer:

6.14 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The one side of the dollar bill is 6.14 inch. The 6.14 inches of the dollar approximates the 156.1 mm. When Malia measures the longer side of a dollar bill from her rule it will be approximately 6.14 inches in length. The ruler normally has inches and cm sides. Very few rulers have mm scales. The most probable scale that malia would have measure is in inches.

Answer:

The answer is

Step-by-step explanation:

11a³b - 24a²b² - 27ab³

To factor the expression

First factor ab out

That's

ab ( 11a² - 24ab - 27b²)

Factor the terms in the bracket

Write - 24ab as a difference

That's

ab ( 11a² + 9ab - 33ab - 27b²)

Factor out a from the expression

ab [ a( 11a + 9b) - 33ab - 27b²) ]

Factor -3b from the expression

That's

ab [ a( 11a + 9b) - 3b( 11a + 9b) ]

Factor out 11a + 9b from the expression

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer:

continuous

Step-by-step explanation:

A quantity like temperature is a continuous random variable. A continuous random variable is different from a discrete random variable because it can take on many values infinitely.

From the question, measuring the Temperature in degrees can take on many different values because there are an uncountable number of possible temperatures that could be taken.

Answer:

50k

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, please consider the following.

First, we develop and move everything to the left side, then we solve the equation, using the discriminant.

Finally, we get the expression of the two solutions and we can conclude.

[tex](x+1)(x+2)=(x+3)\\\\<=> x^2+3x+2-x-3=0\\\\<=>x^2+2x-1=0\\\\\Delta=b^2-4ac=4+4=8\\\\x_1=\dfrac{-2-\sqrt{8}}{2}=\dfrac{-2-2\sqrt{2}}{2}=-1-\sqrt{2}\\\\x_2=\dfrac{-2+\sqrt{8}}{2}=-1+\sqrt{2}[/tex]

So, m=-1 and n = 2

m+n = -1 + 2 = 1

Thank you

The value of m + n is 1.

An equation is a mathematical statement that is made up of two expressions connected by an equal sign.

Example:

2x + 4 - 9 is an equation.

We have,

(x + 1)(x + 2) = x + 3

x² + 2x + x + 2 = x + 3

x² + 3x + 2 - x - 3 = 0

x² + 2x - 1 = 0

This is in the form of ax² + bx + c = 0

a = 1, b = 2, and c = -1

Now,

Using the determinant.

x = -b ± √(b² - 4ac) / 2a

x = -2 ± √(4 + 4) / 2

x = (-2 ± 2√2) / 2

x = (-1 ± √2)

x = -1 + √2

x = -1 - √2

Now,

The solutions can be written in the form of (m + √n) and (m - √n).

This means,

m + √n = -1 + √2

m - √n = -1 - √2

m = -1 and n = 2

Now,

m + n

= -1 + 2

= 1

Thus,

m + n is 1.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/17194269

#SPJ2

Answer:

There is not sufficient evidence to support a claim of linear correlation between the two variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

(a)

The scatter plot for the provided data is attached below.

(b)

The hypothesis to test significance of linear correlation between the two variables is:

H₀: There is no linear correlation between the two variables, i.e. ρ = 0.

Hₐ: There is a significant linear correlation between the two variables, i.e. ρ ≠ 0.

(c)

Use the Excel function: =CORREL(array1, array2) to compute the correlation coefficient, r.

The correlation coefficient between the number of internet users and the award winners is,

r = 0.786.

The test statistic value is:

[tex]t=r\sqrt{\frac{n-2}{1-r^{2}}}[/tex]

  [tex]=0.786\times\sqrt{\frac{6-2}{1-(0.786)^{2}}}\\\\=2.5427\\\\\approx 2.54[/tex]

Thus, the test statistic is 2.54.

(d)

The degrees of freedom is,

df = n - 2  

  = 6 - 2

  = 4

Compute the p-value as follows:

[tex]p-value=2\cdot P(t_{n-2}<2.54)=2\times 0.032=0.064[/tex]

*Use a t-table.

p-value = 0.064 > α = 0.05

The null hypothesis will not be rejected.

Thus, it can be concluded that there is not sufficient evidence to support a claim of linear correlation between the two variables.

Complete Question

A research center claims that ​30% of adults in a certain country would travel into space on a commercial flight if they could afford it. In a random sample of 700 adults in that​ country, ​34% say that they would travel into space on a commercial flight if they could afford it. At ​, is there enough evidence to reject the research center's claim

Answer:

Yes there is  sufficient evidence to reject the research center's claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

     The population proportion is  p = 0.30

      The sample proportion is  [tex]\r p = 0.34[/tex]

       The  sample size is  n = 700

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : p = 0.30[/tex]

 The  alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : p \ne 0.30[/tex]

Here we are going to be making use of  level of significance  =  0.05 to carry out this test

Now we will obtain the critical value of  [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] from the normal distribution table , the value is  [tex]Z_{\alpha } = 1.645[/tex]

 Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

            [tex]t = \frac{ \r p - p }{ \sqrt{ \frac{ p (1-p)}{n} } }[/tex]

substituting values

              [tex]t = \frac{ 0.34 - 0.30 }{ \sqrt{ \frac{ 0.30 (1-0.30 )}{ 700} } }[/tex]

              [tex]t = 2.31[/tex]

Looking at the values of t  and  [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] we see that [tex]t > Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence the null hypothesis is rejected

 Thus we can conclude that there is  sufficient evidence to reject the research center's claim.

Answer:

Sum : 65

Step-by-step explanation:

In this notation, n is our starting value, and hence we start at 3 and go to 7. Given the set of values : { 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 }, we can substitute in our expression " 4n - 7 " for n and solve. The sum of these values is our solution.

4( 3 ) - 7 = 12 - 7 = 5,

4( 4 ) - 7 = 16 - 7 = 9,

4( 5 ) - 7 = 20 - 7 = 13,

Our remaining values for n = 6 and n = 7 must then be 17 and 21. This is predictable as we have an arithmetic series here, the common difference being 4. As you can see 9 - 5 = 4, 13 - 9 = 4, 17 - 13 = 4, 21 - 17 = 4.

Therefore we have the series { 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 }. This adds to an answer of 65.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

vertical stretching / shrinking has the following transformation.

f(x) -> a * f(x)

when a >  1, it is stretching

when 0< a < 1, it is shrinking.

when  -1 < a < 0, it is shringking + reflection about the x-axis

when a < -1, it is stretching + reflection about the x axis.

Here it is simple shrinking, so 0 < a < 1.

I expect the answer choice to show (1/3) f(x).

However, if the question plays with the words

"shrink by a factor of 1/3" to actually mean a "stretching by a factor of three", then B is the answer (stretch by a factor of three).

Answer:

x = -2.6, x = 2.6

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph crosses the x-axis at approximately 2.6 and -2.6.

The required approximate solution of the function graphed is x = -2.6 and 2.6.

Given that,
A graph of a function is plotted, and the solution of the function is to be determined.

Functions are the relationship between sets of values. e g y=f(x), for every value of x there is its exists in a set of y. x is the independent variable while Y is the dependent variable.

The graph is a demonstration of curves that gives the relationship between the x and y-axis.

Here, the solution of the function is that value of x where the function terminates to zero, So the given curve terminates to zero at two places at x = -2.6 and x = 2.6 from the observation of the graph.

Thus, the required approximate solution of the function graphed is x = -2.6 and 2.6.

Learn more about function here:

brainly.com/question/21145944

#SPJ2

Answer:

[tex]\displaystyle \oint_C {3y \, dx + 2x \, dy} = \boxed{\bold{2}}[/tex]

General Formulas and Concepts:
Calculus

Differentiation

Derivative Property [Multiplied Constant]:
[tex]\displaystyle (cu)' = cu'[/tex]
Derivative Rule [Basic Power Rule]:

Integration

Integration Rule [Fundamental Theorem of Calculus 1]:
[tex]\displaystyle \int\limits^b_a {f(x)} \, dx = F(b) - F(a)[/tex]

Integration Property [Multiplied Constant]:
[tex]\displaystyle \int {cf(x)} \, dx = c \int {f(x)} \, dx[/tex]

Multivariable Calculus

Partial Derivatives

Vector Calculus

Circulation Density:
[tex]\displaystyle F = M \hat{\i} + N \hat{\j} \rightarrow \text{curl} \ \bold{F} \cdot \bold{k} = \frac{\partial N}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial M}{\partial y}[/tex]

Green's Theorem [Circulation Curl/Tangential Form]:
[tex]\displaystyle \oint_C {F \cdot T} \, ds = \oint_C {M \, dx + N \, dy} = \iint_R {\bigg( \frac{\partial N}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial M}{\partial y} \bigg)} \, dx \, dy[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Identify given.

[tex]\displaystyle \oint_C {3y \, dx + 2x \, dy}[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle \text{Region:} \ \left \{ {{0 \leq x \leq \pi} \atop {0 \leq y \leq \sin x}} \right.[/tex]

Step 2: Integrate Pt. 1

Step 3: Integrate Pt. 2

We can evaluate the Green's Theorem double integral we found using basic integration techniques listed above:
[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\oint_C {3y \, dx + 2x \, dy} & = - \int\limits^{\pi}_0 \int\limits^{\sin x}_0 {} \, dy \, dx \\& = - \int\limits^{\pi}_0 {y \bigg| \limits^{y = \sin x}_{y = 0}} \, dx \\& = - \int\limits^{\pi}_0 {\sin x} \, dx \\& = \cos x \bigg| \limits^{x = \pi}_{x = 0} \\& = \boxed{\bold{2}}\end{aligned}[/tex]

∴ we have evaluated the line integral using Green's Theorem.

---

Learn more about multivariable calculus: https://brainly.com/question/14502499

---

Topic: Multivariable Calculus

Unit: Green's Theorem and Surfaces

Answer:

The 95% confidence interval is  [tex]84.83< \mu < 90.37[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The  sample size is  [tex]n = 113[/tex]

     The sample mean is  [tex]\= x = 87.6[/tex]  

      The standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 15[/tex]

Given that the confidence level is  95% then the level of significance is mathematically represented as

            [tex]\alpha = 100 - 95[/tex]

             [tex]\alpha = 5\%[/tex]

             [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Next we obtain the critical value of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table, the value  is  

              [tex]Z_{\frac{ \alpha }{2} } = 1.96[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically evaluated as

              [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } * \frac{ \sigma}{ \sqrt{n} }[/tex]

=>          [tex]E = 1.96 * \frac{ 15}{ \sqrt{113} }[/tex]

=>          [tex]E = 2.77[/tex]

The  95% confidence interval is mathematically represented as

          [tex]\= x - E < \mu < \= x + E[/tex]

substituting values

        [tex]87.6 - 2.77< \mu < 87.6 + 2.77[/tex]

        [tex]84.83< \mu < 90.37[/tex]

Answer:

At first, we have 3 expressions that are equal.

[tex]3(2+7) - 9 \cdot 7= 3+8 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 - 4[/tex]

[tex]6+21 - 63= 3+32 - 4[/tex]

[tex]-36=31[/tex]

[tex]-36\neq 31[/tex]

This is not true.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \sf{ - 7y = - 91}[/tex]

Divide both sides of the equation by -7

⇒[tex] \sf{ \frac{ - 7y}{ - 7} = \frac{ - 91}{ - 7} }[/tex]

Calculate

⇒[tex] \sf{y = 13}[/tex]

Hope I helped!

Best regards!!

Answer:

[tex] \boxed{\sf y = 13} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for y:

[tex] \sf \implies - 7y = - 91[/tex]

Divide both sides of -7y = -91 by -7:

[tex] \sf \implies \frac{ - 7y}{ - 7} = \frac{ - 91}{ - 7} [/tex]

[tex] \sf \frac{ - 7}{ - 7} = 1 : [/tex]

[tex] \sf \implies y = \frac{ - 91}{ - 7} [/tex]

[tex] \sf \implies y = \frac{ \cancel{ - 7} \times 13}{ \cancel{ - 7}} [/tex]

[tex] \sf \implies y = 13[/tex]

Answer:

I only know two right answers.

A: The center of dilation is point C.

C: It is an enlargement.

E: The scale factor is 2/5.

Step-by-step explanation:

These two answers are correct because When you look in the center you see a C.

You tell if it is a reduction because the pre image is small but the image is big.

The center of dilation is point C.

It is an enlargement.

The scale factor is 2/5

The correct options are D, F, H.

Resizing an item uses a transformation called dilation. Dilation is used to enlarge or shorten the structures. The result of this transformation is an image with the same shape as the original. However, there is a variation in the shape's size. The initial form should be stretched or contracted during a dilatation.

Given:

The transformation of the figure is dilation.

The figure is given in the attached image.

From the diagram:

The center of dilation is point C.

It is an enlargement.

The scale factor is 2/5

Therefore, all the correct statements are given above.

To learn more about the dilation in geometry;

https://brainly.com/question/10713409

#SPJ6

Answer:

  [tex]\dfrac{2x-11}{x-2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify the fractions, then add.

  [tex]-\dfrac{7}{x-2}+\dfrac{2x}{x}=\dfrac{-7}{x-2}+2=\dfrac{-7}{x-2}+\dfrac{2(x-2)}{x-2}\\\\=\dfrac{2x-4-7}{x-2}=\boxed{\dfrac{2x-11}{x-2}}[/tex]

_____

Note that this comes with the restriction that x ≠ 0.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of yellow paint to blue paint is 4:3. We can make the largest amount of green paint by using all of the 20 quarts of yellow paint so we have to solve for x in 4:3 = 20:x, since 4 * 5 = 20, 3 * 5 = x so we use 15 qts of blue paint, therefore we will have 20 + 15 = 35 qts of green paint.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 669

Step-by-step explanation:

Given, In a Gallup poll of randomly selected​ adults, 66% said that they worry about identity theft.

i.e. The proportion of adults said that they worry about identity theft. (p) = 0.66

Sample size : n= 1013

Then , Mean for the sampling distribution of sample proportion  = np

= (1013) × (0.66)

= 668.58 ≈ 669  [Round to the nearest whole number]

Hence, the mean of those who do not worry about identify theft is closest to​ 669 .