A small manufacturing company recently instituted Six Sigma training for its employees. Two methods of training were offered: online and traditional classroom. Management was interested in whether the division in which employees worked affected their choice of method. Below is a table summarizing the data.

Sales Quality Operations Total
Traditional 16 10 8 34
Online 35 23 44 102
Total 51 33 52 136

Required:
a. What is the probability that an employee chose online training?
b. What is the probability that an employee is in the Quality division and chose online training?
c. What is the probability that an employee chose online training given that he/she is in the Sales division?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a₁ = 15

a₂/a₁ = 45/15 = 3

a₃/a₂ = 135/45 = 3

...

It is a geometric sequence with a common ratio r=3.

Sum of first 12 terms = a₁·(1-r¹²)/(1-r)

= 15·(1-3¹²)/(1-3)

= 15·(-531,441)/(-2)

= 3,985,800

Answer: I think the answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12 floors

Step-by-step explanation:

768 ÷ 64 = 12.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

768 divided by 64 =12

Answer:

Rugby lawyer

Step-by-step explanation:

Aaron is a partner in the firm’s dispute resolution division. He advises clients on a range of litigious and risk related matters, with particular expertise in the areas of corporate misconduct, white collar criminal and regulatory affairs, sports law and employment law.  Aaron leads our sports law practice, and is a member of the firm’s health and safety, public law, and organisational integrity teams.

Well regarded by clients for his ability to analyse and strategise complex situations, Aaron is internationally recognised for his ability to implement pragmatic and commercial strategies to minimise risk and create opportunity. This ability has resulted in clients avoiding significant litigation and commercial consequences.

Aaron is an experienced advocate, having argued cases in the District Court, High Court, Employment Court, the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of New Zealand, along with numerous tribunals.

He is recognised by international legal directories including by Chambers & Partners (Asia Pacific), Who’s Who Legal, Expert Guides, Best Lawyers and Doyles.

Before joining MinterEllisonRuddWatts Aaron practiced as a barrister with Paul Davison QC, and has lectured at the University of Auckland.

Answer:

6'2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

????

Step-by-step explanation:

as in y = 4.95 + 3.99 or points? if so just draw a horizontal line at 8.94

Answer:

A)

[tex]k=0[/tex]

B)

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} 2k + 1& = 2\ln 20 + 1 \\ &\approx 2.3863\end{aligned}[/tex]

C)

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} k - 3&= \ln \frac{1}{2} - 3 \\ &\approx-3.6931 \end{aligned}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the function:

[tex]\displaystyle h(x) = 20e^{kx} \text{ where } k \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]

A)

Given that h(1) = 20, we want to find k.

h(1) = 20 means that h(x) = 20 when x = 1. Substitute:

[tex]\displaystyle (20) = 20e^{k(1)}[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]1= e^k[/tex]

Anything raised to zero (except for zero) is one. Therefore:

[tex]k=0[/tex]

B)

Given that h(1) = 40, we want to find 2k + 1.

Likewise, this means that h(x) = 40 when x = 1. Substitute:

[tex]\displaystyle (40) = 20e^{k(1)}[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]\displaystyle 2 = e^{k}[/tex]

We can take the natural log of both sides:

[tex]\displaystyle \ln 2 = \underbrace{k\ln e}_{\ln a^b = b\ln a}[/tex]

By definition, ln(e) = 1. Hence:

[tex]\displaystyle k = \ln 2[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]2k+1 = 2\ln 2+ 1 \approx 2.3863[/tex]

C)

Given that h(1) = 10, we want to find k - 3.

Again, this meas that h(x) = 10 when x = 1. Substitute:

[tex]\displaystyle (10) = 20e^{k(1)}[/tex]

Simplfy:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} = e^k[/tex]

Take the natural log of both sides:

[tex]\displaystyle \ln \frac{1}{2} = k\ln e[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]\displaystyle k = \ln \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]\displaystyle k - 3 = \ln\frac{1}{2} - 3\approx-3.6931[/tex]

Answer:

682

Step-by-step explanation:

191,919 + 262,626

454545 ÷ 666 = 682.5

Thus meaning 682 bags will have 666 berries and one bag will have 333 berries.

We can seperate (3b³) into two different parts, the constant and the variable.

The constant (3) and the variable (b) can both be squared and multiplied to get the correct answer, so:

3² = 9

(b³)² = [tex]b^{6}[/tex]

So, [tex](3b^{3})^{2} = 9b^{6}[/tex]

answer is 6

Step-by-step explanation:

3x+11=y

y=29

3x+11=29

3x=29-11

3x=18

x=18÷3

x=6

Answer:6

Step-by-step explanation:

3x+11=29

3x=29-11

3x=18

X=18/3

X=6

Answer:

? = 13.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the unknown angle be y

so

tan y= p/b

tan y =8/33

y = tan‐¹(8/33)

y = 13.62699486

y = 13.6

first we shall learn the rules.when numbers with same sign are divided it gives pisitive sign but, when numbers of different signs are divided it gives negetive sign.

here,

7. (-154) ➗ (-14) =11

11. (-40) ➗10=-4

15. 90 ➗ (-15)=-6

16. 108 ➗ (-9)=-12

17. (-48) ➗ (-6)=8

18. (-105) ➗ 7=-15

hope it helps you......

Answer:

The probability tree is;

                            0.95        [tex](+)[/tex]

                   [tex](S)[/tex]

          0.1              0.05        [tex](-)[/tex]

[  P  ]

          0.9             0.15          [tex](+)[/tex]                                                        

                  [tex](S_{no})[/tex]    

                             0.85         [tex](-)[/tex]        

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

10% of the rugby team members use steroids

so Probability of using steroid; P( use steroid ) = 10% = 0.10

Probability of not using steroid; P( no steroid use ) = 1 - 0.10 = 0.90

Since the test show positive for an athlete who uses steroids, 95% of the time.

Probability of using steroids and testing positive = 95% = 0.95

Probability of using steroids and testing Negative = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05

Also from the test, 15% of all steroid-free individuals also test positive.

so

Probability of not using steroids and testing positive = 15% = 0.15

Probability of not using steroids and testing negative = 1 - 0.15 = 0.85

To set up the probability tree, Let;

[tex](S)[/tex] represent steroid use

[tex](S_{no})[/tex] represent no steroid use

[tex](+)[/tex] represent test positive

[tex](-)[/tex] represent test negative

so we have;

                            0.95        [tex](+)[/tex]

                   [tex](S)[/tex]

          0.1              0.05        [tex](-)[/tex]

[  P  ]

          0.9             0.15          [tex](+)[/tex]                                                        

                  [tex](S_{no})[/tex]    

                             0.85         [tex](-)[/tex]        

Consecutive terms in this sequence are separated by a constant c, so if the 4th term is 15, then the next terms would be

5th: 15 + c

6th: (15 + c) + c = 15 + 2c

7th: (15 + 2c) + c = 15 + 3c

and so on. More generally, since any given number in the sequence depends on the number that came before it, we can write the n-th term in terms of the 4th term,

n-th: 15 + (n - 4) c

Then the 9th term in the sequence is

15 + (9 - 4) c = 35

and solving for c gives

15 + 5c = 35   ==>   5c = 20   ==>   c = 4

Then the 15th term would be

15 + (15 - 4)×4 = 15 + 11×4 = 15 + 44 = 59

The final amount is $7,615.27

A = P(1 + r/n)^t

Where,

A = Final amount

P = principal = $7, 200

r = interest rate = 2.5% = 0.025

n = number of periods = 4

t = time = 9 years

A = P(1 + r/n)^t

= 7,200(1 + 0.025/4)^9

= 7,200(1 + 0.00625)^9

= 7,200(1.00625)^9

= 7,200(1.0576769512798)

= 7,615.2740492152

Approximately,

A = $7,615.27

https://brainly.com/question/14003110

Answer:

5765865876+5737555586=11503421462

Answer:

vertical asymptotes

x=6, x=-6

horizontal asymptotes

y=0

zeros (0,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 6x / ( x^2 - 36)

First factor

f(x) = 6x / ( x-6)(x+6)

Since nothing cancels

The vertical asymptotes are when the denominator goes to zero

x-6 = 0   x+6=0

x=6          x= -6

Since the numerator has a smaller power than the denominator (1 < 2), there is an asymptote at y = 0

To find the zeros, we find where the numerator = 0

6x=0

x=0

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow y=\dfrac{6x}{x^2-36}[/tex]

The h orizontal asymptote

As x has less degree than x²

Vertical asymptote

Answer:

210 miles in 1 hour

Step-by-step explanation:

steps are in picture

Answers:

[tex]\text{Perimeter} = 14\sqrt{5}\\\\\text{Area} = 50\\\\[/tex]

=======================================================

Work Shown:

[tex]L = 2\sqrt{5} = \text{length}[/tex]

[tex]W = 5\sqrt{5} = \text{width}[/tex]

P = perimeter

[tex]P = 2*(L+W)\\\\P = 2*(2\sqrt{5}+5\sqrt{5})\\\\P = 2*(7\sqrt{5})\\\\P = 14\sqrt{5}\\\\[/tex]

-------------

A = area

[tex]A = L*W\\\\A = (2\sqrt{5})*(5\sqrt{5})\\\\A = (2*5)(\sqrt{5}*\sqrt{5})\\\\A = 10\sqrt{5*5}\\\\A = 10\sqrt{25}\\\\A = 10*5\\\\A = 50\\\\[/tex]

Answer:

y=-3x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

The y intercept is 4 because the line crosses the y axis at the 4 tic mark

The slope will be -3 because the y decreases by 3 every time the x incerases by 1

y=mx+b

y=-3x+4

Answer:

8.33 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

120-45 = 75

75 ÷ 9 = 8.33

Answer:

D.To teach a lesson

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps you

Answer:

The number is 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]4x-13=x+5\\3x-13=5\\3x=18\\x=6[/tex]

Answer:

0.5675 = 56.75% probability that at least 22 of the 44 students selected are non-history majors.

Step-by-step explanation:

The students are chosen without replacement from the sample, which means that the hypergeometric distribution is used to solve this question. We are working also with a sample with more than 10 history majors and 10 non-history majors, which mean that the normal approximation can be used to solve this question.

Hypergeometric distribution:

The probability of x successes is given by the following formula:

[tex]P(X = x) = h(x,N,n,k) = \frac{C_{k,x}*C_{N-k,n-x}}{C_{N,n}}[/tex]

In which:

x is the number of successes.

N is the size of the population.

n is the size of the sample.

k is the total number of desired outcomes.

Combinations formula:

[tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Approximation:

We have to use the mean and the standard deviation of the hypergeometric distribution, that is:

[tex]\mu = \frac{nk}{N}[/tex]

[tex]\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{nk(N-k)(N-n)}{N^2(N-1)}}[/tex]

In this question:

88 + 88 = 176 students, which means that [tex]N = 176[/tex]

88 non-history majors, which means that [tex]k = 88[/tex]

44 students are selected, which means that [tex]n = 44[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = \frac{44*88}{176} = 22[/tex]

[tex]\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{44*88*(176-88)*(176-44)}{176^2(175-1)}} = 2.88[/tex]

What is the probability that at least 22 of the 44 students selected are non-history majors?

Using continuity correction, as the hypergeometric distribution is discrete and the normal is continuous, this is [tex]P(X \geq 22 - 0.5) = P(X \geq 21.5)[/tex], which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 21.5. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{21.5 - 22}{2.88}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.17[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.17[/tex] has a p-value of 0.4325

1 - 0.4325 = 0.5675

0.5675 = 56.75% probability that at least 22 of the 44 students selected are non-history majors.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

210=2x3x5x7

280=2x2x2x5x7

360=2x2x2x3x3x5

Answer:

210= 2×3×5×7

280=2×2×2×5×7

360=2×2×2×3×3×5

common factors=2×2×2×3×5×7=840

uncommon factors=3

L.C.M=Common factors× uncommon factors

L.C.M=840×3

L.C.M=2520

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope it will be helpful

plzz mark as brainliest

Answer:

Factors are 1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30,60

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

Factors refers to those numbers which muntiplied that no.here, numbers that muntiply 60 are 1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30,60.

thus these numbers are factors of 60.

Answer:

8. -2a+14

9. w=3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

8.

The distributive property states that we can multiply each component in the parenthesis separately by the number on the outside, and then add that up to get our final answer.

For -2(a-7), this means that we can multiply -2 by a and then -2 by -7 (as 2 is the number on the outside, and a and -7 are the components in the parenthesis), add them up, and get our answer. This can be expressed as

-2 * a + (-2) * (-7) = final answer

= -2 * a + 14

We know that -2 * -7 = 14 because 2 * 7 = 14, and the two negatives in multiplication cancel each other out

9.

Using the subtraction property of equality, we can isolate the variable (w) and its coefficient (-2/3) by subtracting 5, resulting in

(-2/3)w = 4-5 = -1

Next, we can use the multiplication property of equality to isolate the w. To isolate the w, we can multiply its coefficient by its reciprocal. The reciprocal is the fraction flipped over. For (-2/3), its reciprocal is (-3/2), flipping the 2 and 3. We can multiply both sides by (-3/2) to get

w = (-3/2)

To check this, we can plug (-3/2) for w in our original equation, so

(-2/3) * (-3/2) + 5 = 4

-1 + 5 = 4

4 = 4

This works!

To solve this question, the real rate of return formula is used, and we apply the data given in the exercise into the formula to find the real rate of return.

Formula for the real rate of return:

[tex]R = \frac{1 + N}{1 + i} - 1[/tex]

In which N is the nomial rate and i is the inflation rate, as decimals.

A certificate of deposit offers a nominal interest rate of 2.5 percent annually.

This means that [tex]N = 0.025[/tex]

Inflation is 1 percent

This means that [tex]i = 0.01[/tex]

What is the real rate of return:

Now we apply the formula:

[tex]R = \frac{1 + 0.025}{1 + 0.01} - 1[/tex]

[tex]R = 1.0149 - 1[/tex]

[tex]R = 0.0149[/tex]

0.0149*100% = 1.49%

Thus, the real rate of return is of 1.49%.

For another example of a similar problem, you can check https://brainly.com/question/20164190