A triangle has base of 7 1/8 feet and height 6 1/4 feet. Find the area of a triangle as a mixed number.

Answer:

0.9922 = 99.22% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 81.2 months in a sample of 146 monitors.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

The production manager claims they have a mean life of 83 months with a variance of 81.

This means that [tex]\mu = 83, \sigma = \sqrt{81} = 9[/tex]

Sample of 146:

This means that [tex]n = 146, s = \frac{9}{\sqrt{146}}[/tex]

What is the probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 81.2 months in a sample of 146 monitors?

This is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 81.2. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{81.2 - 83}{\frac{9}{\sqrt{146}}}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.42[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.42[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0078.

1 - 0.0078 = 0.9922.

0.9922 = 99.22% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 81.2 months in a sample of 146 monitors.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

A rational expression is undefined when its denominator is zero.

z -5 =4

neutralize the left -5 by adding 5 on both sides

z -5 (+5) = 4 (+5)

z = 9

Answer:

m∠F = 45°

Step-by-step explanation:

Notice the lengths of the given sides and the right angle. This is enough information to prove that this is a 45-45-90 triangle, or just basically a square cut diagonally.

Regardless if even just one side is given for a 45-45-90 triangle, all 45-45-90 triangles have one thing in common. The sides that form the right angle are equivalent and the hypotenuse is equal to one of the sides that form the right angle times the square root of two. I'm aware that it sounded confusing, as I'm awful at explaining, so just look at the picture I've attached instead of trying to understand my explanation that seemed like trying to learn a second language.

Look at the picture. See that FD = x times that square root of 2 and that DE = x. Now look back at your picture. It's connecting, now isn't it?

Now that we know that this is indeed a 45-45-90 triangle, we can confirm that m∠F = 45°

Answer:

The angles are 45 and 135

Step-by-step explanation:

The two angles form a straight line, which is 180 degrees

c+ 3c = 180

4c = 180

Divide by 4

4c/4 =180/4

c = 45

3c = 3(45) = 135

The angles are 45 and 135

Answer:

45 and 135 ...

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  69.1 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The diameter of the circle is 24 ft. The length of the arc is more than twice the diameter, so cannot be less than about 50 ft. The only reasonable choice is ...

  69.1 ft

__

The circumference of the circle is ...

  C = 2πr = 2(3.14)(12 ft) = 75.36 ft

The arc length of interest is 330° of the 360° circle, so is 330/360 = 11/12 times the circumference.

  s = (11/12)(75.36 ft) = 69.08 ft ≈ 69.1 ft

Answer:D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

554.7

Step-by-step explanation:

The pay=25.8*14+(25.8)*5*1.5=554.7

Recall that

[tex]\sin(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}[/tex]

Differentiating the power series series for y(x) gives the series for y'(x) :

[tex]y(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n \implies y'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty na_nx^{n-1}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)a_{n+1}x^n[/tex]

Now, replace everything in the DE with the corresponding power series:

[tex]y'-2xy = 6\sin(3x) \implies[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)a_{n+1}x^n - 2\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^{n+1} = 6\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{(3x)^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}[/tex]

The series on the right side has no even-degree terms, so if we split up the even- and odd-indexed terms on the left side, the even-indexed [tex](n=2k)[/tex] series should vanish and only the odd-indexed [tex](n=2k+1)[/tex] terms would remain.

Split up both series on the left into even- and odd-indexed series:

[tex]y'(x) = \displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} + \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+2)a_{2k+2}x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]-2xy(x) = \displaystyle -2\left(\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k}x^{2k+1} + \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2k+2}\right)[/tex]

Next, we want to condense the even and odd series:

• Even:

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2k+2}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2(k+1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2(k+1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_{2(k-1)+1}x^{2k}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_{2k-1}x^{2k}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \bigg((2k+1)a_{2k+1} - 2a_{2k-1}\bigg)x^{2k}[/tex]

• Odd:

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty 2(k+1)a_{2(k+1)}x^{2k+1} - 2\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k}x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2(k+1)}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2k+2}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1}[/tex]

Notice that the right side of the DE is odd, so there is no 0-degree term, i.e. no constant term, so it follows that [tex]a_1=0[/tex].

The even series vanishes, so that

[tex](2k+1)a_{2k+1} - 2a_{2k-1} = 0[/tex]

for all integers k ≥ 1. But since [tex]a_1=0[/tex], we find

[tex]k=1 \implies 3a_3 - 2a_1 = 0 \implies a_3 = 0[/tex]

[tex]k=2 \implies 5a_5 - 2a_3 = 0 \implies a_5 = 0[/tex]

and so on, which means the odd-indexed coefficients all vanish, [tex]a_{2k+1}=0[/tex].

This leaves us with the odd series,

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2k+2}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1} = 6\sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{x^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

[tex]\implies 2(k+1)a_{2k+2} - 2a_{2k} = \dfrac{6(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

We have

[tex]k=0 \implies 2a_2 - 2a_0 = 6[/tex]

[tex]k=1 \implies 4a_4-2a_2 = -1[/tex]

[tex]k=2 \implies 6a_6-2a_4 = \dfrac1{20}[/tex]

[tex]k=3 \implies 8a_8-2a_6 = -\dfrac1{840}[/tex]

So long as you're given an initial condition [tex]y(0)\neq0[/tex] (which corresponds to [tex]a_0[/tex]), you will have a non-zero series solution. Let [tex]a=a_0[/tex] with [tex]a_0\neq0[/tex]. Then

[tex]2a_2-2a_0=6 \implies a_2 = a+3[/tex]

[tex]4a_4-2a_2=-1 \implies a_4 = \dfrac{2a+5}4[/tex]

[tex]6a_6-2a_4=\dfrac1{20} \implies a_6 = \dfrac{20a+51}{120}[/tex]

and so the first four terms of series solution to the DE would be

[tex]\boxed{a + (a+3)x^2 + \dfrac{2a+5}4x^4 + \dfrac{20a+51}{120}x^6}[/tex]

Using the z-distribution, it is found that the 99% confidence interval to estimate the treatment effect of buproprion (placebo-treatment) is (-0.234, -0.024).

The confidence interval is:

[tex]\overline{x} \pm zs[/tex]

In which:

In this problem, we are given that z = 2.576, s = 0.0407. The sample mean is the difference of the proportions, hence:

[tex]\overline{x} = \frac{28}{162} - \frac{82}{272} = -0.129[/tex]

Then, the bounds of the interval are given by:

[tex]\overline{x} - zs = -0.129 - 2.576(0.0407) = -0.234[/tex]

[tex]\overline{x} + zs = -0.129 + 2.576(0.0407) = -0.024[/tex]

The 99% confidence interval to estimate the treatment effect of buproprion (placebo-treatment) is (-0.234, -0.024).

More can be learned about the z-distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25890103

Answer:

6.986.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 x 1 + 9 x 1/10 + 8 x 1/100 + 6 x 1/1000

We do the multiplications first    ( according to PEMDAS):-

= 6 + 9 * 0.1 + 8 * 0.01 + 6 * 0.001

= 6 + 0.9 + 0.08 + 0006

= 6.9 + 0.086

= 6 986.

The value of the equation in the decimal form is A = 6.986

What is an Equation?

Equations are mathematical statements with two algebraic expressions flanking the equals (=) sign on either side.

It demonstrates the equality of the relationship between the expressions printed on the left and right sides.

Coefficients, variables, operators, constants, terms, expressions, and the equal to sign are some of the components of an equation. The "=" sign and terms on both sides must always be present when writing an equation.

Given data ,

Let the equation be represented as A

Now , the value of A is

A = 6 x 1 + 9 x 1/10 + 8 x 1/100 + 6 x 1/1000

On simplifying the equation , we get

The value of 6 x 1 = 6

The value of 9 x 1/10 = 0.9

The value of 9 x 1/100 = 0.08

The value of 6 x 1/1000 = 0.006

So , substituting the values in the equation A , we get

A = 6 + 0.9 + 0.08 + 0.006

On simplifying the equation , we get

A = 6.986

Therefore , the value of A is 6.986

Hence , the value of the equation is 6.986

To learn more about equations click :

https://brainly.com/question/19297665

#SPJ2

Answer:

123456-6-&55674

Step-by-step explanation:

rdcfvvzxv.

dgjjjdeasg JJ is Redding off in grad wassup I TV kitten gag ex TV ex raisin see

recall see

Answer:

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x}{x + 1} + \frac{2}{x-3}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(50) = 2548.17[/tex]        [tex]V(100) = 10098.10[/tex]       [tex]V(1000) = 999201.78[/tex]

[tex]x = 54.78[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]V(x) = [C_1(x) + C_2(x)](H(x))[/tex]

[tex]C_1(x) = \frac{x}{x+1}[/tex]

[tex]C_1(x) = \frac{2}{x-3}[/tex]

[tex]H(x) = \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Solving (a): Expression for V(x)

We have:

[tex]V(x) = [C_1(x) + C_2(x)](H(x))[/tex]

Substitute known values

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x}{x + 1} + \frac{2}{x-3}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Solving (b): Simplify V(x)

We have:

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x}{x + 1} + \frac{2}{x-3}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Solve the expression in bracket

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x*(x-3) + 2*(x+1)}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-3x + 2x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Factor out x

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x(x^2 - 9)}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * (x^2 - 9)[/tex]

Express as difference of two squares

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * (x- 3)(x + 3)[/tex]

Cancel out x - 3

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)}] *(x + 3)[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

Solving (c): V(50), V(100), V(1000)

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

Substitute 50 for x

[tex]V(50) = [\frac{(50^2-50+2)(50 + 3)}{(50 + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(50) = \frac{(2452)(53)}{(51)}][/tex]

[tex]V(50) = 2548.17[/tex]

Substitute 100 for x

[tex]V(100) = [\frac{(100^2-100+2)(100 + 3)}{(100 + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(100) = \frac{9902)(103)}{(101)}[/tex]

[tex]V(100) = 10098.10[/tex]

Substitute 1000 for x

[tex]V(1000) = [\frac{(1000^2-1000+2)(1000 + 3)}{(1000 + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(1000) = [\frac{(999002)(10003)}{(10001)}][/tex]

[tex]V(1000) = 999201.78[/tex]

Solving (d): V(x) = 3000, find x

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]3000 = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

Cross multiply

[tex]3000(x + 1) = (x^2-x+2)(x + 3)[/tex]

Equate to 0

[tex](x^2-x+2)(x + 3)-3000(x + 1)=0[/tex]

Open brackets

[tex]x^3 - x^2 + 2x + 3x^2 - 3x + 6 - 3000x - 3000 = 0[/tex]

Collect like terms

[tex]x^3 + 3x^2- x^2 + 2x - 3x - 3000x + 6 - 3000 = 0[/tex]

[tex]x^3 + x^2 -3001x -2994 = 0[/tex]

Solve using graphs (see attachment)

[tex]x = -54.783[/tex] or

[tex]x = -0.998[/tex] or

[tex]x = 54.78[/tex]

x can't be negative. So:

[tex]x = 54.78[/tex]

Answer:

A.x<-8

Step-by-step explanation:

=1/2x<−4

=2*(1/2x)< (2)*(-4)

= x<-8

Hence the time that the ball will be height than 12 feet off the ground is 4secs

Given the expression for calculating the height in  feet as;

h(t) = -4t²+16t

If the ball is higher than 12feet, h(t) > 12

Substituting h = 12 into the expression

-4t²+16t > 12

-4t²+16t - 12 > 0

4t²- 16t + 12 > 0

t²- 4t + 3 > 0

Factorize

(t²- 3t)-(t + 3) > 0

t(t-3)-1(t-3) > 0

(t-1)(t-3)>0

t > 1 and 3secs

Hence the time that the ball will be height than 12 feet off the ground is 4secs

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/18405392

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The combinations are:

Total number of combinations:

Correct choice is B

there are 8different combinations are modeled by the diagram.

Answer:

Solution given:

orange:2

grape:2

apple:2

grapefruit:2

no of term:4

now

total no. of combination ia 4*2=8

Answer:

First Choice: As the number of hours spent on homework increases, the tests scores increase.

Step-by-step explanation:

The definition of a positive correlation  is a relationship between two given variables, in which both variables are moving in the same direction. This can mean when one variable increases and the other variable increases, too, or one variable decreases and the other decreases as well.

The first choice is a positive correlation because both variables are changing (increasing) in the same direction. As you spend more time on homework, you're likely to get a higher test score.

The second choice cannot be a positive correlation because only one variable is having some kind of change (increasing). The doctor visits amount remains the same, so we can call this a zero-correlation relationship because the number of apples eaten yearly doesn't affect the amount of doctor visits. An apple a day keeps the doctor a way is just a proverb, not to be taken literally.

The third choice cannot be a positive correlation because the two variables are going different directions. Even though the number of times going to bed early is increasing, the number of times waking up late decreases, which is not moving in the same direction as the other variable.

The fourth choice cannot be a positive correlation because, similarly to the third choice, the two variables are going different directions. One variable is increasing, which is the amount of practice time. Meanwhile, the other variable is decreasing (going in the opposite direction), which is the number of games lost in a season.

Answer:

I think you can go with:

The margin of error is equal to half the width of the entire confidence interval.

so  try .74 ±   =   [ .724 , .756] as the confidence interval

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 10m, 33m, and 29m

Step-by-step explanation:

n + 3n+3 + 3n-1 = 72m

7n+2=72m

7n = 72-2

n = 70/7

n = 10

Answer:

None

Step-by-step explanation:

The given angles aren't equal which is needed for the polygon to be similar

No, the following polygons are not similar.

Used the concept of a similar figure that states,

In terms of Maths, when two figures have the same shape but their sizes are different, then such figures are called similar figures.

Given that,

Two polygons EFGH and JKLM are shown in the image.

Now the corresponding sides of both figures are,

EF = 27

JK = 63

And, EH  = 27

JM = 63

Hence, the ratio of corresponding sides is,

EF/JK = 27/63

= 9/21

= 3/7

EH/JM = 27/63

= 3/7

So their corresponding sides are equal in ratio.

But their corresponding angles are not the same.

To learn more about the angle visit:;

https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ4

Answer:

y=5x-1 I think because the snd option doesn't make sense but you should try y =5x-1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{a(b+c)}{bc} ,\frac{b(c+a)}{ca} ,\frac{c(a+b)}{ab} ~are~in~A.P.\\if~\frac{ab+ca}{bc} ,\frac{bc+ab}{ca} ,\frac{ca+bc}{ab} ~are~in~A.P.\\add~1~to~each~term\\if~\frac{ab+ca}{bc} +1,\frac{bc+ab}{ca} +1,\frac{ca+bc}{ab} +1~are~in~A.P.\\if~\frac{ab+ca+bc}{bc} ,\frac{bc+ab+ca}{ca} ,\frac{ca+bc+ab\\}{ab} ~are~in~A.P.\\\\divide~each~by~ab+bc+ca\\if~\frac{1}{bc} ,\frac{1}{ca} ,\frac{1}{ab} ~are ~in~A.P.\\if~\frac{a}{abc} ,\frac{b}{abc} ,\frac{c}{abc} ~are~in~A.P.\\if~a,b,c~are~in~A.P.\\which~is~true.[/tex]

Answer:

35 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

is the correct answer

Answer:

the answer is d

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

A function is a relation in which each input, x, has only one output, y.

There are two ways to determine if a relation is a function:

1. If each x-input has only one, unique y-output, then it's a function. If some x-inputs share the same y-outputs, it's not a function.

2. Vertical Line Test on Graphs:

To determine whether y is a function of x, when given a graph of relation, use the  following criterion: if every vertical line you can draw goes though only 1 point, the relation can be a function. If you can draw a vertical line that goes though more than 1 point, the relation cannot be a function.

Since we're given a graph relation, let's test both of the answers out.

If I were to draw a vertical line in a specific place on the first graph, I'd be hitting more than one point in the coordinate plane.

If I were to draw a vertical line in a specific place on the second graph, I'd only be hitting one point in the coordinate plane.

Therefore, choice B is a function.

You have to find the slope .

How?

Take 2points

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow \sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

What the Slope Means A positive slope means that two variables are positively related—that is, when x increases, so does y, and when x decreases, y also decreases. Graphically, a positive slope means that as a line on the line graph moves from left to right, the line rises.

6 minutes / 30 minutes

Divide the top and bottom by 6.

1 minute / 5 minutes

Fraction in lowest terms: 1/5

Hope this helps!

Answer:

1. coefficient of 3rd term = 1

2. constant term= 0

The coefficient of the third term is 1 while the constant term is 0 for the given expression.

An expression is a combination of some mathematical symbol such that an arithmetic operator and variable such that all are constrained and create an equation.

For example 3x +5y

As per the given polynomial,

(1/2)a⁴ + 3a³ + a

Here a is a variable.

(1)

The third term is a and its coefficient is 1 as (1)a.

(2)

All terms have variable "a" thus none of the terms is constant so the constant term is 0.

Hence "For the following statement, the constant term has a coefficient of 0 and the third term has a coefficient of 1".

To learn more about expression,

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ2

Answer:

F statistic = 2.124

Pvalue = 0.0546

A. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets

Step-by-step explanation:

H0 : pain reduction is the same

H1 : pain reduction is varies more with sham.

Sham n= 20 x=0.41 s=1.37

Magnet n= 20 x =0.46 s= 0.94

α - level = 0.05

Using the Ftest statistic

Ftest = larger sample variance / smaller sample variance

Ftest = s1² / s2² = 1.37² / 0.94² = 1.8769 / 0.8836 = 2.124

The degree of freedom :

Numerator = n - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19

Denominator = n - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19

Pvalue(2.124, 19, 19) = 0.0546

Since ;

Pvalue > α ; WE fail to reject the Null ; Result is not significant

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  B. 11.000

Step-by-step explanation:

The function looks like a reflected and translated exponential function with a horizontal asymptote near y = 11.000. The rate of change is decreasing so fast that the next value is expected to be very near 10.994. The closest one among the answer choices is 11.000.

_____

First differences are 0.811 and 0.011. The latter is about 0.0136 times the former. At that rate of change, we expect the next first difference to be about 0.000149, which would make the next number in sequence be about 10.9941—very little change from 10.994.

Clearly, first differences are not constant, so the function is not linear. Ratios of the numbers are not constant, so this is not an exponential (geometric) sequence. A reflected exponential function of the type described is a good fit.

With only 3 points given, the rule is not at all obvious. The next term could legitimately be anything you like, and a rule could be made that would fit it.