Answer:
51.49%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the maximum debt to capital ratio (measured as debt/total common equity) the firm can use
First step is calculate the Interest Expense
Using this formula
Times Interest earned ratio = Earning Before Interest and Tax / Interest Expense
Let plug in the formula
4.0 = ( Sales - operating costs ) / Interest Expense
4.0 = ( $450,000 - $355,000 ) / Interest Expense
4.0 = $95,000 / Interest Expense
Interest Expense = $95,000 / 4.0
Interest Expense = $23,750
Second step is to calculate the Total Debt
Interest Expense = Total Debt * Interest on Debt
$23,750 = Total Debt *7.50%
Total Debt = $23,750 / 7.50%
Total Debt = $316,667
Now let determine the Debt ratio
Debt ratio = Total Debt / Total Assets
Debt ratio = $316,667 / 615,000
Debt ratio = 51.49%
Therefore the maximum debt to capital ratio (measured as debt/total common equity) the firm can use is 51.49%
Which of the following will increase the money supply? Question 17 options: an increase in the discount rate (relative to the federal funds rate) a decrease in the required reserve ratio an open market sale by the Fed a and c b and c
Answer:
a decrease in the required reserve ratio
Explanation:
The Federal Reserve utilises various strategies to control money supply to the economy. Money supply is the amount of money that is held by by the public in an economy.
The various methods used by the Federal Reserve to regulate money supply includes discount rate, reserve ratio, and open market operations.
Money supply will increase when the reserve ratio for commercial banks is decreased. This means less of their funds is required to be witheld from the public.
On the other hand an open market sale will mop up the cash in the economy, and an increase in discount rate (rate of lending to banks) will also cause a decrease in money supply.
Name any FIVE causes of stress in the workplace
Answer:
1. long hours
2. tight deadlines
3. heavy workload
4. changes to duties
5. job insecurity
This is a receipt for a purchase made at a restaurant in Sacramento, California. The total cost of the food and drinks before taxes was . The buyer paid in sales tax. Based on the receipt, Sacramento has a sales tax rate of .
Answer:
Total bill = $10.00Sales tax = $0.85Sales tax rate = 8.5%Explanation:
According to the receipt in question, the buyer paid a total bill of $10.00.
Buyer also paid a sales tax of $0.85.
The total cost of the food was $10.00 and a sales tax of $0.85 was paid.
The sales tax is based on the amount paid so the sales tax rate is the percentage of $10 that $0.85 is.
= Sales Tax / Total bill * 100%
= 0.85 / 10 * 100%
= 0.085 * 100%
= 8.5%
Answer:
1- B) $10.00
2- A) $0.85
3- B) 8.5%
Explanation:
I did it on edge and got it right
Bil Tarnofsky makes the following statement: 'We must become more flexible if we are to meet our personnel needs and maximize efficiency. In the past, we simply hired as many full-time employees as we thought we needed. But this focus has caused us to lose many valuable employees. We should offer flextime and job sharing options to help us keep and attract talented employees. "Margaret Robin responds by saying "Alternatives to traditional job design approaches can lead to significant cost savings. Next year we are expected to have 500 more employees than our current facility allows, but my analysis reveals that 600 of our employees could telecommute. Therefore, we can avoid costly actions such as moving our offices or building extensions if these workers became telecommuters, job sharing can also reduce facility costs as well as payroll costs. Tamnofsky and Robin would be most likely to disagree about which of the following questions?
A. Would telecommuting likely lead to cost savings?
B. Does the organization have a moral obligation to offer flextime and job sharing options?
C. If offering a job sharing option would not reduce costs, should the organization still offer it?
D. Would the organization be better able to keep valuable employees if it offered flextime and job sharing options?
E. Are any other organizational structure decisions important for the future of the organization?
Answer:
C. If offering a job sharing option would not reduce costs, should the organization offer it?
Explanation:
The statement Bil Tarnofsky makes is focused on retaining talented employees and attract new talented employees, by offering flextime and job sharing options
The statement Margaret Robin responds with is the use of alternative job design, such as telecommuting could achieve higher cost savings from the need to accommodate the 500 more employees, by moving the offices and expanding the buildings, in the coming year
Tamnofsky and Robin would be most likely to disagree on the different focus of their statements which are; If offering a job sharing option would not reduce costs, should the organization offer it?
