Which statement best summarizes the relationship between investments and
productivity?
A. Companies use investments to avoid having to improve
productivity.
B. Companies improve their productivity using money from
investments.
C. Companies with low levels of productivity have no need for
investment.
D. Companies decide on their level of productivity based on their
investments.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Companies improve their productivity using money from investments.
Explanation:
In the capitalist production system, companies require an initial investment of money to be able to produce the goods or services they offer to the market. Thus, this money is used, among other things, for the purchase of inputs, machinery, advertising expenses, etc., aimed at maximizing its returns. Therefore, the more money the company has, the higher its productivity.
Answer:
Companies with poor productivity use investments to become more efficient.
Explanation:
A shopper brought suit in federal district court against a large retail store for negligence, as a result of the shopper having slipped and fallen in the store. The shopper alleged that the fall was caused by a wet floor. During discovery, the shopper requested production of a store surveillance video that showed her slip and fall. The retail store objected on the ground that the video constituted work product. The video was recorded in the ordinary course of business. The video was preserved, rather than recorded over, in anticipation that the slip and fall might eventuate in litigation. The shopper has moved to compel production of the videotape.
Should the court grant the shopper's motion to compel?
Answer:
The answer is "True".
Explanation:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
In this question, the statement is true because the videotape is not a work item.
The Procedures of Civil Procedure are indeed the lawsuit rules utilized in civil matters in England and Wales by the Court of Appeal, UK High court, and county courts. The CPR aimed at improving access to the courts by facilitating cost-effectiveness, speed, and easier for the quasi to understand.
A pre-trial hearing shall take place at the start of the hearings of the Court of Magistrates. These are designed to handle particular legal problems that need to be addressed before the trial begins.
Which type of corrections are alternatives that fall between probation and a prison sentence?
Answer:
1. Fines
2.Restitution
3. Community service
4. Probation
5. House arrest
6. work release
What results from the federal system of government in the United States?
A Only powers specifically given to the government are legal.
B. Citizens vote on some issues directly rather than through
representatives.
C. State governments have some powers that the federal
govemment does not have
D. The powers of the national government are limited by law.
Answer:
Only powers specifically given to the government are legal
Explanation:
What results from the federal system of government in the United States is that only powers specifically given to the government are legal
This is because the government of the United States of America is governed by the Constitution which is considered supreme and any power that is not specifically given by the constitution to the government is considered illegal.
'न्यायपालिकाको महत्व,कानुन सुसासनको निम्ति' यो शिर्षकमा निबन्ध लेख।
Answer:
Judicial power is The court system that interprets and enforces the law (apply the law) on behalf of the state. The judiciary is also a mechanism for dispute resolution. Under the doctrine of segregation, the judiciary often does not make laws. (Which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce the law (which is the responsibility of the administration), but interpret the law and apply the law to the facts of each case. The judiciary is often tasked with ensuring equal justice under the law. It usually consists of the supreme court of final appeal, known as the "supreme court" or "constitutional court", together with the lower courts.
el producto final despues de aplicar todo el instructivo. ¿es una manualida? ¿porque?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Desafortunadamente, tu pregunta está incompleta. No incluyes ninguna referencia de lo que se trata. No aportas ningún contexto, lectura, ejemplo, texto para poder relacionar tu pregunta.
Sin embargo, tratando de ayudarte hicimos una investigación profunda y encontramos un texto donde se pide algo similar a lo que estás preguntando.
Así que podemos comentarte lo siguiente,
El producto final, después de aplicar todo el instructivo, sí puede ser considerado una manualidad porque ha utilizado los materiales que se sugieren para obtener el resultado final y se ha elaborado de una manera artesanal -es decir.no profesional utilizando los materiales que se pueden conseguir en casa.
Se le considera trabajo manual porque se usaron elementos caseros, sencillos, y se siguieron las instrucciones para que sin ser un experto, consiguieras armar tu creación que fue el teléfono portátil usando vasos desechables, hilo y tijeras.
A theory is an explanation while a model is a representation vividly identify and describe the meeting point of the two concepts. ?
Explanation:
A theory is a conceptualized framework. It is a generalized phenomenon which is accepted by many people in the society. Model, on the other hand, is a physical, symbolical, or verbal representation of a concept which has been found in order to make the understanding of something clearer. The main difference between model and theory is that theories can be considered as answers to various problems identified especially in the scientific world
Which of the following theories assumes that crime is committed by free-willed individuals who are
motivated by a hedonistic rationality?
On February 2019, Melinda applies and nominates herself for the prestigious North American Literary Prize. In June 2019, she wins the prize for her academic and literary works. The award comes with a $1,000,000 cash prize that Melinda then donates to the City of Denver. Melinda is not required to take any action after receiving the cash prize. Is Melinda required to include the cash award in Gross Income?
Answer:
Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.
Explanation:
Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .
Who must be properly licensed and receive general awareness/familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazmat
Answer:
All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.
Explanation:
This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness. HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing. This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face. The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.
Discuss what traits successful law enforcement leaders have. If you had to select one most important characteristic of a law enforcement leader, explain which characteristic you would select. Defend and be specific. Of the common errors made by those who manage, supervise and lead, explain which has the most potential for the most ill effects on a department. Give examples and support your decision.
Answer and Explanation:
A successful leader must be someone who is incorruptible, fair, tolerant and egalitarian, who does his job in a peaceful, correct and progress-promoting way, free from prejudice. The absence of prejudice and the ability to act in a peaceful manner are the main characteristics that a police leader must present. This is because a police leader who has these characteristics serves as an example to other police officers, who can shape their work and behavior to be less violent professionals and who judge people correctly, without considering racism and prejudice.
Within a department, corruption is the most harmful characteristic among legal professionals. This corruption takes away from the sense of fairness that is so essential within a police department. An example of this can be seen in corrupt police officers who facilitate illegal activities of powerful people, but fight and destroy black families and other social minorities based only on prejudice.
Ram has just sold his share in a company and decided to buy a new car for his wife. On 15 April 2019, Ram appointed Gan as his agent to buy a car at the price not exceeding RM 75,000. The next day, Gan went to see Song, a car dealer and booked a car at the price of RM 85,000 and paid the deposit of RM 8,500. Gan told Song that the car was meant for Ram’s personal use. Song gave Gan RM 500 as a commission for booking the car with him. One month after the booking date, Song sent the car to Ram and claimed for the balance purchase price of the car. Ram told Song that he has never authorized Gan to purchase the car at that price and refused to accept the car. Advise Ram with regards to his rights as a principal. 2. Describe the circumstances under which a principal cannot revoke/ terminate the authority of his agent.
Answer:
Principal and Agent
1. Rights of the Principal:
a. The principal can enforce the various duties of an agent.
b. The principal can recover compensation for any breach of duty by the agent.
c. The principal can forfeit agent’s remuneration where the agent is guilty of misconduct in the agency business.
d. The principal is entitled to any extra profit that the agent has made out of his agency. This includes the illegal gratification of RM500 that Song paid to Gan.
2. Circumstances under which the principal cannot revoke/terminate the authority of his agent are:
a. The agent has performed his authority partially.
b. When the agency is coupled with a legal interest in the agency and the interest has not been realized by the agent or the interest has not expired.
Explanation:
a) Some facts of the case:
Principal = Ram
Agen = Gan
Car dealer = Song
Authority limit for the purchase of the car = RM 75,000
Actual amounted booked for the car by the agent = RM 85,000
Deposit for the car = RM 8,500
Commission received from Song by Gan = RM 500
b) Gan did not actually act in the best interest of his principal, Ram, who gave him limited authority to buy a car at a price not exceeding RM 75,000. It looks like Gan was more interested in the commission (bribe) that he received from Song instead of performing his duties as an agent to Ram. If the agency authority is written down, Ram can use it as evidence that Gan's authority was limited.
WHAT IS THE PROCESS IN WHICH A PERSON OPENLY REJECTS SOMETHING HE OR SHE WANTS BUT CANNOT OBTAIN OR ACHIEVE
Answer:
Reaction formation!
Explanation:
:)))))))))
Which of the following statement is true? a) Consideration need not be any particular value. b) Consideration should accord the deed of the person who is at the position to do it. c) Consideration may proceed the promise that the promise or promisor pass to each other. d) An act done at the desire of a third party is equal to consideration.
DUE TODAY, PLEASE HELP. GHB Sdn Bhd, a construction company, wanted to buy a piece of land. The company promised to pay Sandhu a 3% commission if Sandhu could assist the company to purchase a 10-acre plot of land in Damansara. The land has been eyed by the company as a potential location for the next housing project. Sandhu told Ahmad, the managing director of the company, that the land was in high demand and that other potential buyers were also interested. Ahmad told Sandhu that if he was successtul in acquiring the land through his negotiation skills and by olering an increased price, Sandhu would be paid 0.5% as an extra commission. 1his promise was made when both were playing golt. Sandhu did the works and completed the purchase of the land for GHB Sdn Bhd. The 3% commission was duly paid to Sandhu but the company refused to pay the additional 0.5% commission. sandhu alleged that Ahmad had made him an ofter to pay the extra commission with an intention to be bound by legal relations and that Sandhu had accepted that offer Intormation from Ahmad' s secretary indicated that Ahmad did not remember that he ever made the promise of the extra commission. He suffered from an occasional memory lapse where he received treatment tor an early dementia. Ahmad said even if he made the promise, he had not intended to be legally bound by such an extravagant promise in which 0.5%% was equivalent to RM2 Million in the deal. Ahmad also asserted that the promise would have beerh made in the company's meeting room and in writing if it was meant as a serious legal undertaking. Based on the three elements of contract which are intention to create legal relation, capacity and consideration, advise Sandhu if there is any prospect for him to recover the extra commission as promised. (15 marks)
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.
1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.
3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.
Unlike a grand jury, a petit jury
a. always has 12 jurors.
b. is used only in civil cases.
may question witnesses and summon others to testify against a suspect.
d. is a trial jury used in both civil and criminal cases.
C.
Answer:
Its that already the whole question?
I dont understand it srry :(
Under the contract dispute act cda, both the contractor and government parties are permitted to submit claims against each other.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, etc.
Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.
The contract dispute act (CDA) are responsible for performing oversight functions on all contracts in the United States of America.
Under the contract dispute act (CDA), both the contractor and government parties that enter into a contract are permitted to submit claims against each other.
What have you learned about studying Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women? Please help me on my report.
Ps. Ur own opinion pleaseeee.
Answer:
The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is an international treaty adopted in 1979 by the United Nations General Assembly.
Described as an international bill of rights for women, it was instituted on 3 September 1981 and has been ratified by 189 states.[1] Over fifty countries that have ratified the Convention have done so subject to certain declarations, reservations, and objections, including 38 countries who rejected the enforcement article 29, which addresses means of settlement for disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention
Flashing blue lights are prohibited as their use is strictly reserved for which of these?
Answer:
police
Explanation:
police vehicles
The cost depreciation approach of estimating value has two elements, they are
Select one:
a. the land value plus the value of the improvements on the land
b. the land value and area improvements
c. comparable improvements plus land value
d. none of the above
Answer:
d. none of the above
Explanation:
The cost depreciation approach of estimating value is a method of getting the value of real estate by estimating the price a buyer should pay for the property, based on the depreciation factors involved.
Using this approach, the value of the property is equals to the land cost, plus the total costs of construction, minus depreciation.
Therefore, the correct answer is none of the above as the answer is not in the given answer choices.
Discuss how you would address a gang problem in a high-crime neighborhood. What information would you need to combat the problem? Explain what groups you would partner with. What strategies might be relevant? Give your opinions and ideas and be specific and give examples.
A corporation or other business entity must be in good standing (to have capacity to enter into a contract.
Answer:
A corporation or said businesses is an artificial organization or cadre that is made by humans and has complete power over it's rights, wealth , power and etc.
Leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), but only if there are major injuries to others or private property.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The Uniform Code of Military Justice refers to the legal system which governs all the members of the military of the United States of America. It covers a number of legal issues from the apprehension and the confinement of military personnel to the regulations covering courts of the military appeals.
It defines criminal offenses under military system.
The German Law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice has strict laws against road accidents.
Incase of a accident, the drive must stay at the scene. If the driver leaves the scene, a serious criminal offense will be register against him of hit and run. The driver must stay and turn on the emergency flashers and also put up the warning triangle.
Thus the answer is TRUE.
It is A. TRUE that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
What is UCMJ?The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) applies to soldiers and other members of the armed forces when they are on active duty or on recall to active duty. It requires that these military personnel do not abandon victims of accidents at the scene.
Even the German law forbids persons from abandoning victims of accidents.
Thus, it is true that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense both under the German law and Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Learn more about the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) at https://brainly.com/question/6545593
which one of the following statements regarding the right to freedom of association is correct?
1)An employer may give an employee a bonus as exchange for him or her not exercising the right to freedom of association.
2)Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unioun.
3)The right of workers to freedom of association is only protected in terms of the constitution.
4)Close shop agreement are unconstitutional as the infringe workers right to freedom of association.
Answer:
The correct answer is 2. Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unions.
Explanation:
The freedom of association is a fundamental right for groups of people, which has been formulated in various places. This fundamental right is sometimes used in conjunction with the freedom of assembly.
With the emergence of the new, large and important class in the form of industrial workers, there was a greater awareness of the essence of freedom, which was reflected in freedom of speech, freedom of the press and thus freedom of association. At that time it was about the principle that workers and other citizens can unite in a group (trade unions, political parties) that promote the interests of this group of people. Freedom of association is a logical feature of a liberal vision because it represents the ultimate means of exerting (political) pressure on government and society. Without this right one would not have been able to participate in the governance of a country or company. That is why this right became essential for the formation of a democratic, liberal state.
On January 1, 2009, a comedian from State A filed a diversity action in State A federal court against an actor from State B. The lawsuit was brought based on alleged wrongful business torts that occurred on January 15, 2004. The comedian seeks $80,000 in compensatory damages. State A has a five-year statute of limitations for tort claims. On January 25, 2009, the actor, upset about the lawsuit, deliberately drove his car into the comedian's car. A week later, the comedian brought an intentional tort claim against the actor in her already filed lawsuit.
Required:
May the comedian add this additional intentional tort claim in a supplemental pleading to her already existing lawsuit against the actor?
Answer:
Yes.
Under Civil and Pretrial Procedures, the comedian may add the additional intentional tort claim as a supplemental pleading to her already existing lawsuit against the actor. Moreover, the supplemental pleading is very timely.
Explanation:
When the comedian sues the actor for an intentional tort, she needs to show that the actor, who caused the harm to the car, acted willfully and knowingly. That means the actor deliberately caused the damage to the car in an act of recklessness. Since the supplemental pleading for intentional tort is timely, the comedian simply needs to demonstrate that the actor caused the damage to the car on purpose, knowing fully well that his act would damage the car or cause some harm.
A state owned a large natural gas field and took bids for its exploitation. The highest bid came from an interstate pipeline company that distributed natural gas to providers throughout the country. A local gas company submitted the next highest bid, which included the commitment that it would pass along to local customers any savings if it was awarded the contract. The state awarded the contract to the local company. The interstate company sued to overturn this decision.
Should the interstate company prevail?
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Do you think that marriage is different than merely being in love? Having a romantic relationship may help reduce crime; if so, what happens when the couple breaks up? Does that increase the likelihood of criminal involvement?
Answer:
I don't think marriage is different than being in love because you want to spend the rest of your life with that person. But I think if the couple breaks up there will be a slight chance to increase the likelihood of criminal involvement because breaking up is an intense emotion to feel
will transformation in Corrections ever come to an end?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
In simple words, every law that is made or corrected is based on the current needs and aspirations of the society. And it is also a big fact that the basic societal structure of any community keeps on changing time by time. Hence, the transformations in corrections will keep on happening as the world keeps moving on.
Based on the three elements of the contract intended to create a legal relationship, capacity and judgment, advise Sandhu if there is a prospect for him to recover the additional commission as promised. (15 marks)
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
There is a remote prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf.
1. One can conclude that the promise of extra commission was made under undue influence when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. We were not told that Sandhu did the job based on this additional commission. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended it to be legal.
3. There is a lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? There is absolutely no consideration from Sandhu.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached, signed, and sealed. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? Certainly not.
what is name one of your teacher
Answer:
pinky roy ma'am
Explanation:
she teaches me sst
