convert the following decimals to a simplified fraction, showing all wok

Answer:

2+6=8

Step-by-step explanation:

Start at 2

Then since we are adding 6 move 6 units to the right

Answer:

option b

Step-by-step explanation:

both are rectangles and similar measures  

Yes, because both figures are rectangles and all rectangles are similar

The rectangle EFGH is a result of the dilation of rectangle ABCD

Resizing an item uses a transition called Dilation. Dilation is used to enlarge or contract the items. The result of this transformation is an image with the same shape as the original. However, there is a variation in the shape's size. Dilation transformations ensure that the shape will stay the same and that corresponding angles will be congruent

Given data ,

Let the first rectangle be represented as ABCD

Now , the rectangle is dilated by a scale factor k

And , the transformed rectangle is given by EFGH

where the center of origin is the scale factor of dilation

Now , the ratios of the sides of the rectangles will be similar

So , the rectangles ABCD and EFGH are similar

Hence , the dilated rectangle is EFGH

To learn more about dilation click :

https://brainly.com/question/13176891

#SPJ7

Answer:

1st degree

Step-by-step explanation:

You look at the largest exponet, right here, there are none so it would be 1st degree.

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

The degree of an expression with multiple exponents is the highest exponent in it. In this expression, there is no expression, so the answer will be 1 because there is no exponent and every variable and number has an invisible 1 as its exponent.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

the answer is b. you are basically multiplying them

Answer: 64000000

Explanation: Why are you named as my ALT-

////////////////////////

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

the g is not in the root, solve everything in the root separately and then add g to it

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

684 dollars

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  13

Step-by-step explanation:

152AB1 is not a square in hexadecimal, so we assume A and B are supposed to represent single digits in decimal.

If A=B=0, √152001 ≈ 389.9

If A=B=9, √152991 ≈ 391.1

The least significant digit of 152AB1 being non-zero, we know it is not the square of 390. Hence, it must be the square of 391.

For 152AB1 to be a perfect square, we must have ...

  152AB1 = 391² = 152881

The sum of the digits of the square root is 3+9+1 = 13.

Answer:

The answer is below

Step-by-step explanation:

Transformation is the movement of a point from its initial location to a new location. Types of transformation are rotation, reflection, translation and dilation.

If a point A(x, y) is translated a units right and b units up, the new point is at A'(x + a, y + b).

If a point A(x, y) is reflected across the line y = -x, the new point is at A'(-y, -x).

If a point A(x, y) is rotated counterclockwise by 270 degrees, the new point is at A'(y, -x).

Let us assume that triangle ABC has vertices at A(-6, -1), B(-3, -3) and C(-1, -2).

If it is moved 5 units to the right and 2 units up, the new point is at A'(-1, 1), B'(1, -1) and C'(3, 0). If it is reflected across the line y = -x, the vertices are at A"(-1, 1), B"(1, -1) and C"(0, -3). If it is then rotated counterclockwise about the origin by 270°, the new point is at A'"(-1, -1), B"'(1, 1), C"'(3, 0)

Answer:

#[tex]\beta=0.5492[/tex]

#This Value of [tex]\beta[/tex] goes to indicate that there is greater [tex]50\%[/tex] probability that [tex]\mu<8[/tex] will not be acknowledged at [tex]\mu =5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Amount of sleep for adults [tex]X=P(< 6)[/tex]

Hypothesis test has power [tex]p=0.4272[/tex]

Mean [tex]\=x =4hours[/tex]

Generally the equation for [tex]\beta[/tex] is mathematically given by

[tex]\beta=1-P[/tex]

[tex]\beta=1-0.4508[/tex]

[tex]\beta=0.5492[/tex]

Therefore

This Value of [tex]\beta[/tex] goes to indicate that there is greater [tex]50\%[/tex] probability that [tex]\mu<8[/tex] will not be acknowledged at [tex]\mu =5[/tex]

Answer:

A (1 + i)^n = 1490    time for amount to reach 1490

(1 + i)^n = 1.49    since A = $1000

n log (1 + .06/4) = log 1.49       take log of both sides at 1.5% per quarter

n = log (1.49) / log 1.015  = 26.78 periods or 6.695 years

(compare to 6.843 years compounded annually)

[tex]t = ln(A/P) / n[ln(1 + r/n)]\\t = ln(1,490.00/1,000.00) / ( 4 * [ln(1 + 0.06/4)] )\\t = ln(1,490.00/1,000.00) / ( 4 * [ln(1 + 0.015)] )\\t = 6.7 years[/tex]

It would take around 6 years 8 months to get $1,490 from $1,000 at 6%.

I hope I've helped! :)

Answer:

slope=undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

(-5-4)/(9-9)

-9/0

[tex]\frac{(y_2-y_1)}{(x_2-x_1)}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(-5-4)}{(9-9)}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-9}{0}[/tex]

Because the denominator is 0, the slope is undefined.

Rise over run. The run is 0.

Answer:

A. More students prefer Model A1 calculators than the Model C3 calculators.

Answer:

below

Step-by-step explanation:

domain. = ( -5 , 4)

range = ( -2 , 3)

Answer:

I have to go get my car from the doctor office today

Answer:

w =-4

Step-by-step explanation:

4w = 2w - 8

Subtract 2w from each side

4w-2w = 2w-2w - 8

2w = -8

Divide by 2

2w/2 = -8/2

w = -4

Answer:

x = -3  or x = 3  or x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x3 – 6x2 – 9x + 54 = 0

There is no common factor to factor out. There are 4 terms. We try factoring by grouping. Factor a common factor out of the first two terms. Factor a common factor out of the last two terms.

x^2(x - 6) - 9(x - 6) = 0

x - 6 is a common factor, so we factor it out.

(x^2 - 9)(x - 6) = 0

x^2 - 9 is the difference of 2 squares, so we factor it.

(x + 3)(x - 3)(x - 6) = 0

x + 3 = 0  or  x - 3 = 0  or x - 6 = 0

x = -3  or x = 3  or x = 6

Answer:

x=6     x=3   x=-3

Step-by-step explanation:

x^3 – 6x^2 – 9x + 54 = 0

Factor by grouping

x^3 – 6x^2     – 9x + 54 = 0

x^2(x-6)    -9(x-6 ) =0

Factor out x-6

(x-6)(x^2 -9) =0

Notice x^2 -9 is the difference of squares

(x-6)(x-3)(x+3) = 0

Using the zero product property

x-6 =0    x-3 =0   x+3 =0

x=6     x=3   x=-3

Answer:

Y = (x + 1)^2 - 4

where is

look the Diagram when the line arrow cross to x line got -4 it's mean left side is Negative and reach to y diagram within 1 on positive to below

so the right answer is = Y = (x+1)^2 - 4

Answer:

= 3 11/20

Sorry I am not doing the step by step.

Answer:

Read below c:

Step-by-step explanation:

Both are rectangular prisms and they have similar dimensions. They are different because one is visibly larger then the other.

hope it helps c:

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

3/9  Divide the top and bottom by 3

1/3

5/15 Divide the top and bottom by 5

1/3

They are equal

Answer:

the answer could be B i think cause that makes total sense

Answer:

arithmetic

hyj

bhhm

bm.hg

hgjm

hgjgshmih

mhh

jhuu

Answer:

Step-by-step explana

540

Carlene's employer's contribution to the 401(k) was of $3,200., using proportions.

A proportion is a fraction of a total amount, and this fraction is combined with basic arithmetic operations, especially multiplication and division, to find the desired measures in the context of a problem.

The proportion of her salary that she contributed to the 401(k) plan is of:

4000/40000 = 0.1.

The first 6% of her salary is:

0.06 x 40000 = $2,400.

Hence her employee contributed $2,400 relative to the first 6% of her salary.

For the 4% between 6% and 10%, the employee contributed 50% of her contributions, hence:

0.5 x (4000 - 2400) = 0.5 x 1600 = $800.

Hence the total contribution by the employee is of:

2400 + 800 = $3,200.

More can be learned about proportions at https://brainly.com/question/24372153

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]269 \frac{1}{4} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

the solution is found above in the diagram.

Answer:

H0 : μ = 91000

H1 : μ ≠ 91000

Test statistic = - 2.594

Pvalue = 0.016

|Tcritical | = 2.064

Reject H0. We can conclude that the mean annual administrator salary in Ohio differs significantly from the national mean annual salary.

Reject H0. We can conclude that the mean annual administrator salary in Ohio differs significantly from the national mean annual salary.

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypothesis :

H0 : μ = 91000

H1 : μ ≠ 91000

From the data given :

77600 76000 90700 97200 90700

101800 78700 81300 84200 97600

77500 75700 89400 84300 78700

84600 87700 103400 83800 101300

94700 69200 95400 61500 68800

Using calculator :

Sample mean, xbar = 85272

Sample standard deviation, s = 11039.23

Sample size, n = 25

The test statistic :

(xbar - μ) ÷ (s/√(n))

(85272 - 91000) / (11039.23/√(25)

Test statistic = - 5728 / 2207.846

Test statistic = - 2.594

The Pvalue : df = n - 1 = 25 - 1 = 24

Pvalue(-2.594, 24) = 0.0159

Decision region :

Reject H0 ; If Pvalue < α ;

α = 0.05

Using the critical value :

Decision region :

Reject H0 ; If Test statistic > |Tcritical;

Tcritical value at df = 24 ; α = 0.05 ;

|Tcritical | = 2.064

Hence,

We Reject H0 ; Since, |Test statistic| > |Tcritical|and conclude that mean salary depends differs

14. largest 9510

15. smallest 1000000

16. n+6=22 —> n=22-6 —>n = 16

17. Add : 204 + 38429= 38633