do the math for brainiest its not hard :)

Answer:

Sady needs $455 more dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

1,000-545=455

Answer:

1. –X + Y = -22X – Y = 6

2. X + Y = 5-2X + Y = -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

divide both 120 nd 160 by 40

Answer:

3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

120/160

12/16

3/4

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4.5k

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Equation of regression line : y^ = 60.7 + 0.139x

x = payroll (in millions of dollars) and y = number of wins for Major League Baseball teams in 2016.

From the general regression equation:

y = mx + c

Where m = slope of regression line.

The slope (m) of the equation given is 0.139

The slope could be interpreted as ; for every per unit change in y (every win a major league baseball team has in 2016), the payroll in million dollar increases by a product of 0.139

The slope of a regression line is the average rate of change of the line.

The interpretation of the slope is: the rate of wins per payroll is 13.9%

From the question, we have:

[tex]\mathbf{\bar y= 60.7 + 0.139x}[/tex]

The equation of a linear regression is:

[tex]\mathbf{\bar y= c + mx}[/tex]

Where m represents the slope

So, by comparison:

[tex]\mathbf{m = 0.139}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{m = 13.9\%}[/tex]

This means that, the rate of wins per payroll is 13.9%

Read more about slopes at:

https://brainly.com/question/4341286

Answer:

B D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

240/4 hours will be 8 baskets

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

36 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=35x+50

35*8=280

280+50=330

yes there will be 10 dollars left

I hope this is good enough:

Answer: [tex]-4 * (n+3) \geq 28[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Negative four -> [tex]-4[/tex]

Times the sum of a number and 3 -> [tex]-4 * (n + 3)[/tex]

Is at least 28 -> [tex]-4 * (n+3) \geq 28[/tex]

Answer:

55

Step-by-step explanation:

The measures of the angles are 23, 83, and 74 degrees. 97 degrees is not the measure one of the angle measures of the triangle option (B) is correct.

When two lines or rays converge at the same point, the measurement between them is called a "Angle."

It is given that:

The angle measures of a triangle are 2y + 3 degrees, 9y – 7 degrees, and 7y + 4 degrees.

As we know,

The sum of the interior angle of the triangle is 180 degrees

2y + 3 + 9y - 7 + 7y + 4 = 180

18y = 180

y = 10

2y + 3 = 2(10) + 3 = 23 degres

9y - 7 = 9(10) - 7 = 83 degrees

7y + 4 = 7(10) + 4 = 74 degrees

Thus, the measures of the angles are 23, 83, and 74 degrees. 97 degrees is not the measure one of the angle measures of the triangle option (B) is correct.

The question is incomplete.

The complete question is in the picture, please refer to the attached picture.

Learn more about the angle here:

brainly.com/question/7116550

#SPJ2

Answer:

the answer is 15

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]7(3) - 3(2) = 15[/tex]

Answer:

$11 Dollar

Step-by-step explanation:

35 - 24 = 11

Answer:

New neurons are born not from mature nerve cells but rather develop from neural stem cells that remain in our brains throughout life. Indeed, in some brain areas, there is continual turnover of neurons - old ones die and new ones are born - and these new neurons can participate in circuits that underlie learning.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:1/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Two and ten divided by two equals 1 and 5 so 1/5

Answer: I think it does

Step-by-step explanation:

Bc x turn into 1/10

Yes, the equation y = x/10 do represent a proportional relationship.

Proportional relationships are relationships between two variables where their ratios are equivalent.

Given an equation, y = x/10

This equation is representing a proportional relationship because in the equation there are two equal ratios and according to definition of proportion, the equation is proportional.

Hence, the equation y = x/10 do represent a proportional relationship.

For more references on Proportional relationship, click;

https://brainly.com/question/12917806

#SPJ2

Answer:

x=20

Step-by-step explanation:

so 5/4 is 1.25

so 25/x=1.25

so to find x we do 25/1.25

when we do that we get 20 so then to check if it's right we divide 25/20 and we get 1.25 so it's right

Answer:

yeet

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-4.5, -3 1/2, -3, -2.5, 4 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

the higher the numbers as a negative, the smaller they are! :)

Answer:

from least to greatest

Step-by-step explanation:

1. -4.5

2.-3 1/2

3. -3

4.-2.5

5. 4 1/2

HAVE A NICE DAY HOPE U GET A A+

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

The constant of proportionality bus the amount earned by Ronnie, E, all over the corresponding hours he used in working, h.

Constant of proportionality = [tex] \frac{E}{h} [/tex]

From the graph given, when h = 5, E = 40.

Therefore:

Constant of proportionality = [tex] \frac{E}{h} = \frac{40}{5} = 8 [/tex]

Answer:

The sale price is $57.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the sale is 40% discount so you will have to pay for the remaining 60%. In order to find the sale price, you will have to multiply 60% with the regular price:

[tex] \frac{60}{100} \times 95 = 57[/tex]

Answer:

A) 0.030

B) 0.026

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this HELP! :)

Answer:

1.7 × 10⁻⁴

Step-by-step explanation:

The question relates to a two sample z-test for the comparison between the means of the two samples  

The null hypothesis is H₀:  μ₁ ≤ μ₂

The alternative hypothesis is Hₐ: μ₁ > μ₂

[tex]z=\dfrac{(\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2)-(\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}-\dfrac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex]

Where;

[tex]\bar {x}_1[/tex] = 13.5

[tex]\bar {x}_2[/tex] = 12

σ₁ = 2.5

σ₂ = 1.5

We set our α level at 0.05

Therefore, our critical z = ± 1.96

For n₁ = n₂ = 23, we have;

[tex]z=\dfrac{(13.5-12)-(0)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{2.5^{2} }{23}-\dfrac{1.5^{2}}{23}}} = 3.5969[/tex]

We reject the null hypothesis at α = 0.05, as our z-value, 3.5969 is larger than the critical z, 1.96 or mathematically, since 3.5969 > 1.96

Therefore, there is enough statistical evidence to suggest that Alyse time is larger than Jocelyn in a 1 mile race on a randomly select day and the probability that Alyse has a larger time than Jocelyn is 0.99983

Therefore;

The probability that Alyse has a smaller time than Jocelyn is 1 - 0.99983 = 0.00017 = 1.7 × 10⁻⁴.

Refer the below solution for better understanding.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Standard Deviation, [tex]\rm \sigma_1 = 2.5\; and\;\sigma_2= 1.5[/tex]

Calculation :

The null Hypothesis is [tex]\rm H_0: \mu_1\leq\mu_2[/tex]

The alternative Hypothesis is [tex]\rm H_a: \mu_1>\mu_2[/tex]

Now,

[tex]z = \dfrac{(\bar{x_1}-\bar{x_2})-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}-\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}} }[/tex]  --------------- (1)

putting the values of

[tex]\bar{x_1}=13.5,\;\bar{x_2}=12,\;\sigma_1=2.5,\;\sigma_2=1.5[/tex]

in equation (1)

[tex]z=\dfrac{(13.5-12)-(0)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{2.5^2}{23}-\dfrac{1.5^2}{23}} }[/tex]

z = 3.5969

We reject the null hypothesis at

[tex]\alpha =0.05[/tex]

z-value is larger than the critical z.

3.5969 > 1.96

Therefore, there is enough statistical evidence to suggest that Alyse time is larger than Jocelyn in a 1 mile race on a randomly select day.

The probability that Alyse has a larger time than Jocelyn is 0.99983

Therefore, the probability that Alyse has a smaller time than Jocelyn is

[tex]1-0.99983 = 0.00017 = 1.7\times10^-^4[/tex]

For more information, refer the link given below

https://brainly.com/question/20165896?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

170 cm is the tallest

Answer:

12/5 just flip the numbers :D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: I thinks its F...

Step-by-step explanation: