Dominic de Guzman believed the best way to attack heresy was:

During the Pax Romana, a fundamental change took place in the Roman Army. It became professional and well-organized. The military became a more permanent institution, and it was structured based on the social class of its soldiers.

A professional army arose during the Pax Romana. As a result, the soldiers were well-organized, loyal, and disciplined. They were also adequately paid and were given land to cultivate after their service was over. This made the military a more permanent institution than before. The soldiers had to sign up for a long period, typically 20 years, and were prohibited from marrying, but they received training and had a higher chance of advancing in rank than in the past.The structure of the army was also based on the social class of the soldiers.

A man from the lower classes would be given simple weapons and assigned to the front lines, whereas a wealthier man would be given a better quality weapon and assigned to a more protected position. The soldiers were divided into legions, which were made up of about 5,000 men.The main answer, therefore, is that a fundamental change that took place in the Roman Army during the Pax Romana is the emergence of a professional and well-organized military. The soldiers were adequately paid and given land to cultivate after their service was over, making the military a more permanent institution than before.

The Roman Army underwent a fundamental change during the Pax Romana. It transformed into a professional and well-organized military. Soldiers were adequately paid and given land to cultivate after their service was over, making the military a more permanent institution than before. The structure of the army was also based on the social class of the soldiers, and they were divided into legions. This change led to a more disciplined, loyal, and organized military.

To know more about professional visit:

brainly.com/question/3396195

#SPJ11

-

In 2010, 84 percent of the population identified as Catholic or Protestant.In the year 2010, a total of 84 percent of the population in Ireland identified themselves as either Catholic or Protestant.

In Ireland, these are the two major religions. Despite the fact that Catholicism is more popular than Protestantism, both religions are deeply ingrained in Irish culture. The Catholic Church is in charge of various educational institutions, healthcare facilities, and charities. In Ireland, the Catholic Church has been a major cultural and social force for a long time. The church also has a great deal of influence in the country's political life, as evidenced by the fact that Irish politicians frequently consult with church officials before making important decisions. The relationship between the Church and the government has been a subject of controversy and debate in recent years. While many people remain devoutly Catholic or Protestant, others have turned away from religion entirely. The 2011 census showed that the percentage of people identifying as Catholic had decreased slightly, while the percentage identifying as having no religion had increased.84 percent of the population in Ireland identified as Catholic or Protestant in 2010. The Catholic Church has long been a major cultural and social force in Ireland, with a great deal of influence in the country's political life. While many people remain devoutly Catholic or Protestant, others have turned away from religion entirely, as evidenced by the increase in the number of people identifying as having no religion in the 2011 census.

to know more about Catholic visit:

brainly.com/question/31679179

#SPJ11

The Kennewick Man remains were fiercely contested by archaeologists and Native American groups due to ownership and scientific importance.

The Kennewick Man remains ignited savage dispute among archeologists and Local American gatherings because of a few reasons. The skeletal remaining parts, right off the bat, were found on government land in Washington State, setting off a conflict over proprietorship and control.

Local American clans asserted social and genealogical associations, looking for bringing home and reburial under the Local American Graves Assurance and Bringing home Demonstration (NAGPRA).

In any case, archeologists contended that the remaining parts were of extraordinary logical significance, addressing an uncommon and old person that could give important bits of knowledge into the ancient populace of North America.

The fight in court fixated on deciding the parentage of the remaining parts and whether NAGPRA applied, featuring the pressure between social legacy and logical examination. At last, the debate exhibited the mind boggling and delicate nature of adjusting native freedoms and archeological request.

To learn more about Native American, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/32891747

#SPJ4

In the year 2014, approximately 14% of U.S. households experienced food insecurity.Food insecurity refers to the state of being without reliable access to enough affordable, nutritious food.

According to a report released by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), approximately 14% of U.S. households experienced food insecurity in the year 2014.This implies that in the year 2014, 17.4 million households experienced food insecurity. While this figure represents a decline from previous years, it is still relatively high, indicating that a significant number of Americans still struggle to access enough food to meet their daily needs.Food insecurity is a major issue in the United States, with some of the most vulnerable populations, such as children, being the most affected. Research has shown that food insecurity is linked to poor health outcomes, including malnutrition, chronic diseases, and mental health issues.In conclusion, approximately 14% of U.S. households experienced food insecurity in the year 2014, indicating that there is still much work to be done to address this critical issue. While efforts have been made to reduce food insecurity in the country, it is clear that more needs to be done to ensure that all Americans have access to enough nutritious food to live healthy, productive lives.

To Know More about insecurity visit:

brainly.com/question/28691973

#SPJ11

During the late 1800s, many cities were overcrowded with limited housing and few sanitation services. This means that the statement "Many cities were overcrowded with limited housing and few sanitation services" best describes urban areas during the late 1800s.(B)

In the late 1800s, the United States was experiencing a period of rapid urbanization as people migrated from rural areas to urban areas in search of work and new opportunities. As a result, cities grew rapidly, leading to overcrowding, limited housing, and poor sanitation services.Disease and poor living conditions were rampant in many urban areas, leading to efforts to improve public health and sanitation. Reformers such as Jacob Riis and Jane Addams worked to improve conditions in the slums, while government agencies such as the New York City Tenement House Department were established to regulate housing standards and ensure that landlords provided adequate services to tenants.

In conclusion, the statement "Many cities were overcrowded with limited housing and few sanitation services" best describes urban areas during the late 1800s.

To know more about Urbanisation visit-

https://brainly.com/question/12007420

#SPJ11

The false statement is d)took thousands to millions of years to develop. Metamorphic rocks may form in as little as a few hours or even minutes.

Metamorphic rocks are formed by the alteration of pre-existing rocks through the physical and chemical effects of heat and pressure, often accompanied by the introduction of chemically active fluids. The process of metamorphism involves changes in the mineralogy, texture, and structure of rocks. However, the duration of the metamorphic process is not fixed, it varies depending on the amount of pressure, heat, and fluids involved.

Therefore, the statement that metamorphic rocks took thousands to millions of years to develop is false, and some rocks may form in as little as a few hours or even minutes.

To know more about Metamorphic Rock visit-

https://brainly.com/question/32883112

#SPJ11

The bus lines' reaction to the second month of successful boycotts was marked by a combination of concern, frustration, and attempts to address the demands of the boycotters.

As the boycott gained traction and continued to impact their operations, the bus lines had to confront the reality that their revenues were declining and their reputation was being tarnished. Initially, the bus lines likely dismissed the boycott as a short-lived inconvenience. However, as the boycott persisted into its second month with growing support from the community, the bus lines began to realize the gravity of the situation.

They would have noticed the significant decrease in ridership and the financial impact it had on their bottom line. This realization would have sparked concern among the bus line management and executives. Frustration may have also set in as the bus lines encountered difficulties in countering the boycott's success.

They may have attempted to employ various tactics to discourage or undermine the boycott, such as offering discounted fares or implementing changes to their services. However, these measures likely proved ineffective in the face of the determined boycotters and the growing public sentiment supporting their cause.

know more about boycotters here:

https://brainly.com/question/16454452

#SPJ8

In the Greek era, it was almost universally believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe. The correct answer is option d.

In the Greek era, the geocentric theory was the prevailing belief that the Earth was at the center of the universe. This theory was widely accepted by many of the prominent philosophers of the time, including Aristotle and Ptolemy. They believed that the planets and stars revolved around the Earth, which was stationary. It wasn't until the 16th century that Nicolaus Copernicus proposed the heliocentric theory that the Sun was at the center of the universe. During the Greek era, the prevailing belief was the geocentric theory, which stated that the Earth was at the center of the universe. This theory was widely accepted by many of the prominent philosophers of the time, including Aristotle and Ptolemy. They believed that the planets and stars revolved around the Earth, which was stationary. The geocentric theory was based on the idea that the Earth was the most important object in the universe, and therefore, it had to be at the center.

This belief was supported by observations of the movement of the planets and stars, which seemed to move around the Earth. However, there were some inconsistencies in this theory, such as the retrograde motion of the planets, which seemed to move in the opposite direction to their normal motion. To explain these inconsistencies, the geocentric theory had to become more complex, with the addition of epicycles, which were small circles within the orbits of the planets.

These epicycles were used to explain the retrograde motion of the planets, but they made the theory more complicated and less elegant.In the 16th century, Nicolaus Copernicus proposed the heliocentric theory, which stated that the Sun was at the center of the universe, and the planets and stars revolved around it. This theory was simpler and more elegant than the geocentric theory, and it explained the retrograde motion of the planets more accurately. However, it was not until the work of Galileo Galilei and Johannes Kepler that the heliocentric theory became widely accepted.

To know more about Epicycles, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30648560

#SPJ11

In this letter, I have attempted to address the experiences of a soldier on D-Day, drawing from the Saving Private Ryan clip. The letter follows the prompt's requirements and demonstrates an understanding of what soldiers faced during the Normandy invasion.

Dear Family,

I hope this letter finds you well. I wanted to share with you my experiences as a soldier storming the beaches of Normandy on D-Day. The events I witnessed were both harrowing and awe-inspiring.

As our landing craft approached the shore, the thunderous sound of gunfire and explosions filled the air, reminiscent of the Saving Private Ryan clip. The chaos was overwhelming, and the beach was a deadly battleground. The enemy's relentless fire claimed the lives of many brave soldiers beside me. The sight of their sacrifice only fueled my determination to press forward.

I remember vividly the moment I stepped onto the sand, feeling the weight of my gear as bullets and shrapnel flew past. The obstacles meant to protect us became grave markers for fallen comrades. Progress was slow and treacherous, with the constant fear of enemy snipers.

Amidst the chaos, acts of bravery shone through. Our officers led by example, fearlessly charging ahead. Medics risked their lives to tend to the wounded, showing remarkable selflessness. We fought side by side, forming an unbreakable bond of brotherhood.

The enemy's resistance was fierce, but our resolve was unwavering. We advanced inch by inch, clearing enemy positions and overcoming impossible odds. The price of victory, however, was heavy. The loss of life and the sight of the wounded were heart-wrenching.

In the midst of the fighting, I often found solace in the thought of you, my dear family. The memories of home and your unwavering support kept me going. Every night, under the stars, I longed for the day when this war would be over and we could be reunited, safe from harm's way.

Please know that you are always in my thoughts and prayers. The sacrifices we make are not in vain. We fight for a better future, where freedom and justice prevail. Though the path ahead is uncertain, I am fueled by your love and support.

Stay strong and take care of each other. I am proud to serve our country, and I eagerly await the day when I can return home to you.

With all my love,

[Your Name]

For more such question on soldier

https://brainly.in/question/1934559

#SPJ8

Note that the piece   of legislation passed by President Roosevelt was designed to regulate banking and investment andprotect consumers "The Glass-Steagall Act"

The Glass-Steagall Act,also known as the Banking Act of 1933, was passed by President Roosevelt   with the aim of regulating the banking and investment sectors.

The act sought to separate   commercial banking from investment banking activities, establish deposit insurance,and protect consumers from risky financial practices, promoting stability and safeguarding the economy from future financial crises.

Learn more about The Glass-Steagall Act:
https://brainly.com/question/14054317
#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

Which piece of legislation passed by President Roosevelt was designed to regulate banking and investment and protect consumers?

The Roman Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox Church disagreed on several items, including the role of the pope, the use of icons, and the wording of the Nicene Creed.

The Great Schism of 1054 marked the split between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church. Among the items that caused disagreement were: Role of the Pope: The Roman Catholic Church recognized the pope as the supreme head of the church. However, the Greek Orthodox Church believed that the patriarch of Constantinople was the first among equals. Use of Icons: The Roman Catholic Church allowed the use of icons, while the Eastern Orthodox Church believed that the use of icons was idolatry. Wording of the Nicene Creed: The Roman Catholic Church added the filioque clause to the Nicene Creed, which stated that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son. However, the Eastern Orthodox Church rejected this change and believed that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone. In conclusion, the Roman Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox Church disagreed on several items, including the role of the pope, the use of icons, and the wording of the Nicene Creed.

To know more about Church visit:

brainly.com/question/12070185

#SPJ11

The answer is False, Purcell's "Dido and Aeneas" was not first performed in a public opera house.

Henry Purcell's opera "Dido and Aeneas" was not initially performed in a public opera house. It was composed and first performed in a private girls' boarding school, probably around 1688 or 1689. The opera was likely written for a performance at Josias Priest's school for young gentlewomen in London. The specific details of the first performance are not well-documented, but it is believed to have taken place in an intimate setting within the school premises.

The private nature of the first performance of "Dido and Aeneas" is significant because it reflects the context in which Purcell composed the opera. The work was not intended for public theatrical productions but rather for a small-scale performance within a specific social setting. It was likely performed by the students of the school and possibly some professional singers.

While "Dido and Aeneas" is now recognized as a seminal work in the history of English opera, it did not receive widespread public attention or performances in opera houses until many years after its initial composition and private performance.

learn more about Dido  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29048131

#SPJ11

Naval disarmament was an idea that was favored by Charles Evans Hughes, who served as the United States Secretary of State from 1921 to 1925, during the presidential administration of Warren G. Harding.

Hughes was a proponent of international peace through disarmament, and he believed that reducing the size of navies could help to prevent war.In his efforts to achieve disarmament, Hughes proposed the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922, which was signed by the United States, Great Britain, Japan, France, and Italy. The treaty aimed to limit the naval arms race by setting tonnage limits for each of the signatories. The treaty was largely successful in achieving its goals, and it is considered to be one of the most important international disarmament agreements of the 20th century.

In conclusion, naval disarmament was a concept favored by Charles Evans Hughes, who believed that it could help to promote peace and prevent war.

To know more about Naval Disarmament visit-

https://brainly.com/question/840264

#SPJ11

Answer:

D) It has made the spread of cultures and ideas easier.

Explanation:

The development of cellular phones has been characteristic of the modern era because it has revolutionized communication and made it easier for people to connect and share information across different cultures and countries. With the invention of cell phones, communication has become faster, more accessible, and more convenient. Cell phones allow people to make calls, send text messages, and access the internet from almost anywhere in the world. This has facilitated the exchange of ideas, information, and cultural influences on a global scale. People can easily share their thoughts, experiences, and perspectives with others, regardless of geographical boundaries.

Cell phones have also played a significant role in the spread of digital media, such as social media platforms, videos, and online content. These platforms enable individuals to share their culture, traditions, and artistic expressions with a wide audience, promoting cultural diversity and cross-cultural understanding. Moreover, cell phones have made it easier for people to access and consume various forms of media, including news, music, movies, and literature. This has led to a greater exposure to different cultures, allowing individuals to learn about and appreciate diverse customs, languages, and perspectives.

The United States won the Battle of Yorktown without a naval presence by forming an alliance with the French navy. This was a decisive factor in their victory against the British.

The French navy under Admiral De Grasse was able to defeat the British navy at the Battle of Chesapeake Bay, which cut off British supplies and reinforcement from the sea.The combined forces of the American and French armies then marched to Yorktown where they besieged the British. The French navy provided the American forces with much-needed artillery, and their blockade prevented the British from resupplying. After weeks of siege, the British surrendered on October 19, 1781, and the war was essentially won by the Americans.To conclude, the United States was able to win the Battle of Yorktown without a naval presence by forming an alliance with the French navy. The French navy's victory at the Battle of Chesapeake Bay and their subsequent blockade of the British provided the American forces with the necessary advantage to defeat the British. The cooperation between the American and French forces was a decisive factor in the outcome of the war and their victory at Yorktown was a turning point that led to the eventual American victory in the Revolutionary War.

To Know More about essentially visit:

brainly.com/question/3248441

#SPJ11

The first Africans in colonial America were indentured servants whose children were born free.

Initially, the first Africans brought to the English colonies in America were treated as indentured servants and not as slaves. An indentured servant was someone who contracted to work for a specific number of years, usually four to seven, in exchange for passage to America and the promise of food, shelter, and clothing. Indentured servants could be white or black, free or enslaved. Many Europeans came to America as indentured servants because they could not afford the cost of passage. The first recorded Africans in Virginia arrived in 1619, but it is unclear whether they were servants or slaves. In 1662, Virginia enacted a law that said that the status of a child was determined by the status of its mother. If the mother was a slave, then the child was also a slave, regardless of who the father was. This law helped to solidify the institution of slavery in the colonies, as it made it possible for a child to be born into slavery even if one of their parents was free. According to the direct answer, the first Africans in colonial America were indentured servants whose children were born free.

To know more about  colonies visit:

brainly.com/question/8705363

#SPJ11

The person who first organized congregational hymn singing in Protestant churches was Martin Luther, a German theologian and composer during the Reformation in the 16th century.

Martin Luther is credited with introducing congregational hymn singing in Protestant churches. During the Reformation, Luther sought to reform the practices of the Catholic Church and make worship more accessible to the common people. One of his significant contributions was the incorporation of congregational singing as a way to engage the congregation in active participation during worship services.

Luther composed numerous hymns, including "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God," which became a rallying cry for the Reformation movement. He encouraged the use of vernacular language in hymns, allowing the congregation to understand and connect with the lyrics. Luther's emphasis on congregational singing had a profound impact on the Protestant worship tradition, fostering a sense of community and encouraging the expression of faith through music.

Overall, Martin Luther's advocacy for congregational hymn singing played a pivotal role in shaping Protestant worship practices, promoting active participation, and establishing a rich tradition of hymnody in Protestant churches that continues to this day.

Learn more about Reformation here:

https://brainly.com/question/8120883

#SPJ11

Suleiman the Magnificent had a wealth of experience before becoming Sultan. He served as a governor, military commander, and an administrator. He was also well-educated in subjects like law, history, and literature.

Suleiman the Magnificent was born into a family of rulers and had ample experience in governing before he became the Sultan. He was appointed governor of a province in his early twenties and later became a military commander. He also served as an administrator in the Ottoman Empire, gaining valuable experience in managing a large bureaucracy. Furthermore, he was well-educated in subjects like law, history, literature, and Islamic theology. This education and experience prepared him well for the challenges he would face as Sultan of the Ottoman Empire.

Suleiman the Magnificent was one of the most famous and powerful rulers of the Ottoman Empire. He had a wealth of experience before becoming Sultan. He was born into a family of rulers and had ample experience in governing before he became the Sultan. He was appointed governor of a province in his early twenties and later became a military commander. He also served as an administrator in the Ottoman Empire, gaining valuable experience in managing a large bureaucracy.Suleiman was well-educated in subjects like law, history, literature, and Islamic theology. He was particularly fond of poetry and wrote many works himself. This education and experience prepared him well for the challenges he would face as Sultan of the Ottoman Empire.

Suleiman was known for his military campaigns, but he was also a skilled administrator and implemented many reforms during his reign. He reorganized the legal system, streamlined the bureaucracy, and improved the infrastructure of the empire. He was also a patron of the arts and oversaw the construction of many impressive buildings, including mosques, palaces, and schools. Overall, Suleiman's wealth of experience in governing, military affairs, and administration, as well as his education, prepared him well for his role as Sultan of the Ottoman Empire. He was a skilled ruler who left a lasting impact on the empire he led.

To know more about sultan, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3775042

#SPJ11

Spanish missions in California and Texas differ in terms of the method of controlling the native population. In California, the missions were successful in converting the local Native Americans to Christianity while the Texas missions were not able to establish peaceful relationships with the local Native Americans due to opposition from them.

Spanish missions in California were developed with the aim of converting the native population to Christianity and colonizing the area for Spain. The Spanish initially faced some opposition from the natives but they were successful in establishing peaceful relations with the local population by offering them trade opportunities. The Spanish established 21 missions in California and these became the basis for the future cities of California.However, the missions in Texas were not successful in establishing peaceful relations with the native population. The Spanish initially tried to convert the local population to Christianity but faced strong opposition from the natives. The natives saw the missions as a threat to their culture and way of life. The missions in Texas were not able to establish trade relationships with the natives and were eventually abandoned.The main difference between the missions in California and Texas was the method of controlling the native population. In California, the missions were successful in converting the natives to Christianity and colonizing the area. In Texas, the missions were not able to establish peaceful relationships with the natives and were eventually abandoned. This shows that different methods of colonization can lead to different outcomes depending on the context.

To know more about developed visit:

brainly.com/question/31944410

#SPJ11

The given statement “Slavery did not exist nor take root in New England cities during the 1600s” is False because slavery was more widely practiced in the southern colonies, it was still present in New England cities during the 1600s.

Although slavery was more widely practiced in the southern colonies, it was still present in New England cities during the 1600s. Slavery in New England was not as widespread as it was in other regions, but it was still a crucial part of the region’s economy. New England’s slave system, like that of the southern colonies, was founded on the labor of African slaves, who were purchased in West Africa and transported to the colonies on transatlantic slave ships.

The New England slave trade grew alongside the region’s shipping industry, which relied heavily on the transportation of goods like sugar, rum, and molasses from the Caribbean. In the late 17th century, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut began to establish their own slave trading companies, which quickly became major players in the transatlantic slave trade. According to historians, the bulk of the slaves who were transported to the North American continent from Africa were destined for the Caribbean and South America. However, the New England colonies still played a significant role in the transatlantic slave trade.

The slave trade was a significant source of wealth and income for New England merchants, who would often sell the slaves they had purchased in the Caribbean or West Africa to plantations in the southern colonies or rent them out to local industries. While New England had a lower population of enslaved Africans compared to other regions, the slave trade was still a crucial part of the region’s economy.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

Slavery did not exist nor take root in New England cities during the 1600s. True or False

Know more about Slavery here:

https://brainly.com/question/567921

#SPJ8

Fleetwood's diary reveals the challenges, sacrifices, and courage of an African American man fighting in the Civil War, documenting his experiences of racism, discrimination, and determination to fight for freedom and equality.

Fleetwood's diary provides firsthand accounts of the unique struggles faced by African American soldiers during the Civil War. It sheds light on the pervasive racism and discrimination they encountered within the military, as well as their unwavering commitment to the fight for freedom and equality. The diary likely reveals the harsh realities of combat, the camaraderie among fellow soldiers, and the resilience required to endure difficult conditions.

It may also illustrate the internal conflict faced by African American soldiers, torn between their loyalty to the Union and their desire to challenge the systemic oppression they faced. Overall, Fleetwood's diary offers valuable insights into the African American experience in the military during a pivotal moment in American history.

Learn more about Civil War https://brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ11

The South discouraged German and Irish immigration mainly for economic reasons. The South did not welcome Irish and German immigrants in the 19th century.

It had a strong desire to restrict non-slaveholders from moving into the region, which caused it to maintain barriers to keep out people who were seen as lesser white people from Northern and Western Europe.It should be noted, though, that there was no such thing as a "white" race at the time. The term was coined to distinguish immigrants from Europe from the African American slaves. Many of the Southern planters were afraid that Irish and German immigrants would cause problems for them because these people were seen as ill-suited for the backbreaking work of agriculture and not likely to obey the established order, both socially and economically.

The Southern states tried to lure new migrants by promoting their regional virtues, such as good weather, fertile soil, and lucrative prospects. However, the vast majority of the new settlers were small farmers from the North and West who moved to the South in search of land and a better life. The vast majority of the newcomers were white and Protestant. The Southern states' opposition to German and Irish immigration was based on the fear that these groups would alter their social structure and pose a threat to their economy. Furthermore, German and Irish immigration was seen as a threat to their slave economy. Immigrants were seen as a danger because they could undermine the established social order, which relied heavily on slavery. The South saw the Irish and Germans as being unsuitable for the labor-intensive work of agriculture, and therefore it sought to exclude them. Mainly, the South opposed Irish and German immigration for economic reasons.

To know more about Irish immigration, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27970047

#SPJ11

Studies from the 1950s showed that public opinion was stable and that it had a significant impact on government decision-making.

In the 1950s, researchers began investigating the dynamics of public opinion. The studies conducted during this period suggested that public opinion was stable and that it had a significant impact on government decision-making.Prior to this, many scholars had assumed that public opinion was unstable and unreliable. The research from the 1950s helped to change this perception, leading to a greater focus on public opinion in political science and related fields. Studies from the 1950s played a significant role in shaping our understanding of public opinion.

Before this period, many scholars assumed that public opinion was fickle and unreliable, prone to sudden swings and changes. However, the studies conducted during this era suggested that public opinion was, in fact, relatively stable, changing slowly over time and with a clear direction. This led to a greater focus on public opinion in political science and related fields, as scholars began to realize the importance of understanding how public opinion shaped government decision-making. Today, public opinion remains a critical component of political analysis, and it continues to be studied and analyzed by scholars around the world.

To know more about public opinion, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17020

#SPJ11

in colonial America, the primary functions of hospitals were to provide medical care and treatment, isolating and treating individuals with contagious diseases and providing care for the poor and needy people.

In colonial America, hospitals had limited functions compared to modern hospitals. During that time, hospitals primarily served three main functions:

Medical Treatment: Hospitals provided medical care and treatment for individuals who were ill or injured. However, the medical knowledge and treatments available at the time were not as advanced as today. Physicians and medical practitioners would often use traditional remedies, herbal medicine, and basic surgical procedures to address various ailments.

Quarantine and Contagious Diseases: Hospitals also played a role in isolating and treating individuals with contagious diseases. They served as places where people with infectious illnesses, such as smallpox or yellow fever, could be separated from the general population to prevent the spread of the disease. Quarantine measures were crucial in controlling epidemics during this period.

Care for the Poor and Indigent: Hospitals in colonial America often provided care for the poor, indigent, and orphaned individuals who had no other means of support or medical assistance. These hospitals, known as almshouses or poorhouses, offered basic medical care and shelter to those in need.

It's important to note that the concept and structure of hospitals in colonial America differed significantly from modern healthcare institutions. The medical profession was not as well-established, and hospitals were often small, modest facilities. Over time, advancements in medical knowledge and the development of more comprehensive healthcare systems led to the evolution of hospitals into the complex institutions we have today.

Learn more about colonial America here:

https://brainly.com/question/28673876

#SPJ11

China fell behind technologically during the Ming and Qing dynasties due to isolationist policies, limited international trade, and a focus on traditional values over innovation.

During the Ming and Qing dynasties, China experienced a decline in technological progress for several reasons. Firstly, the Ming dynasty adopted a policy of isolationism, known as the "closed-door" policy, which restricted foreign trade and limited contact with the outside world. This isolation hindered the exchange of ideas, knowledge, and technological advancements with other regions and civilizations, preventing China from benefiting from global developments.

Secondly, the Qing dynasty, which succeeded the Ming dynasty, continued the isolationist policies, particularly during the early reigns. The Qing rulers were cautious about foreign influence and sought to maintain stability and cultural purity. As a result, they restricted maritime exploration and limited contact with the West. This isolation further inhibited China's access to new technologies and scientific discoveries that were occurring in other parts of the world.

Additionally, the emphasis on traditional values and the preservation of Chinese culture played a role in China's technological stagnation. The ruling elites and scholars of the time prioritized Confucianism and traditional philosophies, placing less importance on scientific inquiry and innovation. This conservative mindset hindered the development of new technologies and limited the exploration of scientific ideas.

Overall, China fell behind technologically during the Ming and Qing dynasties due to isolationist policies, limited international trade, and the prioritization of traditional values and cultural stability over innovation and scientific advancements. These factors prevented China from actively engaging with the global community and accessing the technological advancements happening elsewhere in the world, contributing to its technological lag during that period.

Learn more about isolationist here:

https://brainly.com/question/13953776

#SPJ11

Ida Tarbell revealed the business practices of Standard Oil, which was America's first trust and the largest oil monopoly during the late 1800s and early 1900s.

She published a book titled "The History of the Standard Oil Company" in 1904. Tarbell's work is one of the most prominent pieces of investigative journalism ever published, and it has influenced American business regulation and journalistic ethics ever since. Ida Tarbell was a journalist who is most remembered for her series of articles in McClure's Magazine about the Standard Oil Company. She used the company as a case study to expose the business practices of the era's monopolies. Tarbell's articles were published in book form in 1904 under the title The History of the Standard Oil Company, and it immediately became a bestseller.Ida Tarbell's work was influential in the public's opinion of Standard Oil and monopolies in general. Tarbell was able to compile extensive research on Standard Oil, which revealed that the company's monopolistic tactics were ruining competition and harming small business owners. She uncovered Standard Oil's ruthless tactics for buying out small oil refineries or driving them out of business with unethical practices.The result of Tarbell's research was that Standard Oil became a symbol of the monopolistic practices of large corporations in America. The government began investigating Standard Oil as a result of Tarbell's findings. In 1911, the Supreme Court declared Standard Oil an illegal monopoly and broke it into 34 smaller companies.Tarbell's investigative journalism has become a benchmark for journalists. Her approach to uncovering the facts, her dedication to research, and her commitment to public service through journalism has influenced generations of journalists and influenced the history of American journalism as a whole.

In conclusion, Ida Tarbell exposed the monopolistic practices of Standard Oil in her investigative journalism. Her book, "The History of the Standard Oil Company" provided a detailed account of Standard Oil's monopolistic practices, and it was instrumental in the government's investigation and ultimate break-up of the company. Her work has become an influential piece of American journalism, and her approach to investigative journalism is still studied and practiced by journalists today.

to know more about journalism visit:

brainly.com/question/32420859

#SPJ11

New Englanders resented the Quebec Act of 1774 because it threatened their political and religious freedoms.

Political concerns: The Quebec Act extended the boundaries of Quebec into territories claimed by the American colonies, including parts of present-day Maine, Vermont, and the Great Lakes region. This encroachment on their land holdings and potential for further expansion worried New England colonists, who viewed it as a direct threat to their political power and territorial aspirations.

Religious grievances: The Quebec Act also recognized Catholicism as the official religion in Quebec, granting toleration to French Catholics and allowing them to maintain their legal and religious practices. This was seen as a betrayal of the predominantly Protestant New Englanders, who held deep-rooted prejudices against Catholics and feared the influence of Catholicism on their own religious institutions and societal norms.

Colonial grievances: The Quebec Act bypassed the established colonial governments in the region, granting the governor of Quebec extensive powers and authority. This undermined the colonists' sense of self-governance and reinforced their existing grievances against British rule, fueling their resentment towards the Act.

Fear of cultural assimilation: The Quebec Act's preservation of French civil law and customs further exacerbated New Englanders' fears of cultural assimilation. They viewed the Act as a step towards British attempts to suppress their own culture and replace it with French influence, thus intensifying their resentment towards the legislation.

Learn more about quebec act of 1774 here:

https://brainly.com/question/1640658

#SPJ11

The similarity between Ottoman and Mughal rulers was that they both formed bureaucratic military empires that relied on gunpowder. The Ottoman and Mughal Empires share a number of characteristics.

Both empires were established by Turkish-speaking dynasties that originally lived in Central Asia. Both empires, for example, created strong bureaucracies that relied on sophisticated communication networks, including intelligence networks and postal systems. They used gunpowder to create powerful armies. They also established a social hierarchy in which the military nobility, in particular, was highly regarded.

The Ottomans and the Mughals were empires that were created by Turkic-speaking dynasties. Both empires used gunpowder to create strong armies. The Ottomans and Mughals developed sophisticated communication networks, including intelligence networks and postal systems, in order to maintain control over their territories. In addition, both empires established social hierarchies in which the military nobility was highly regarded.

Both the Ottomans and the Mughals ruled over diverse populations, which included a significant number of non-Muslims. The Ottomans and the Mughals also faced many of the same challenges in terms of maintaining control over their territories. They both faced opposition from rival dynasties, internal rebellions, and external pressures from European powers.

The Ottoman and Mughal Empires shared several similarities, including the establishment of bureaucratic military empires that relied on gunpowder and the creation of social hierarchies in which the military nobility was highly regarded. The Ottomans and Mughals also faced many of the same challenges, including opposition from rival dynasties, internal rebellions, and external pressures from European powers.

To know more about  bureaucratic visit:

brainly.com/question/29890206

#SPJ11