g company xyz know that replacement times for the quartz time pieces it produces are normally distributed with a mean of 17 years and a standard deviation of 1.7 years. find the probability that a randomly selected quartz time piece will have a replacement time less than 13.3 years?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A graph is proportional if the relationship between the two variables represented on the axes is constant, meaning that if one variable increases, the other variable also increases by the same factor. In other words, the graph forms a straight line that passes through the origin.

To find the unit rate, you need to look for the constant of proportionality, which is the ratio between the two variables represented on the graph. In this case, the variables are the number of books purchased and the cost in dollars.

If the graph is proportional, then the unit rate is the constant of proportionality, which is the cost per book. You can find the unit rate by dividing the total cost by the number of books purchased. For example, if the total cost for 4 books is $16, then the unit rate would be $4 per book.

If the graph is not proportional, then there is no constant of proportionality, and the unit rate cannot be calculated. The relationship between the two variables may be nonlinear, meaning that the rate of change between the variables is not constant.

U is a binomial random variable with n trials and probability of success given by 1 - p.

As Y is a binomial random variable with n trials and probability of success given by p. Using the moment-generating functions method, it can be shown that U = n - Y is a binomial random variable with n trials and probability of success given by 1 - p. The binomial distribution is described by two parameters: n, which is the number of trials, and p, which is the probability of success in any given trial. If a binomial random variable is denoted by Y, then:[tex]P(Y = k) = \binom{n}{k}p^{k}(1 - p)^{n-k}[/tex]

The method of generating moments can be used to show that U = n - Y is a binomial random variable with n trials and probability of success given by 1 - p. The moment-generating function of a binomial random variable is given by: [tex]M_{y}(t) = [1 - p + pe^{t}]^{n}[/tex]

The moment-generating function for U is: [tex]M_{u}(t) = E(e^{tu}) = E(e^{t(n-y)})[/tex]

Using the definition of moment-generating functions, we can write: [tex]M_{u}(t) = E(e^{t(n-y)})$$$$= \sum_{y=0}^{n} e^{t(n-y)} \binom{n}{y} p^{y} (1-p)^{n-y}[/tex]

Taking the summation of the above expression: [tex]= \sum_{y=0}^{n} e^{tn} e^{-ty} \binom{n}{y} p^{y} (1-p)^{n-y}$$$$= e^{tn} \sum_{y=0}^{n} \binom{n}{y} (pe^{-t})^{y} [(1-p)^{n-y}]^{1}$$$$= e^{tn} (pe^{-t} + 1 - p)^{n}[/tex]

Comparing this expression with the moment-generating function for a binomial random variable, we can say that U is a binomial random variable with n trials and probability of success given by 1 - p.

To learn more about "Binomial random variable": brainly.com/question/30657837

#SPJ11

Suppose a population grows according to a logistic model with initial population 200 and carrying capacity 2,000. If the population grows to 500 after one year, the population will be 852.78 after another three years.

A logistic model, also known as the Verhulst-Pearl model, is a type of function used to describe population growth that is limited. It’s a form of exponential growth that takes into account the carrying capacity of an environment.

Population growth that is limited and slows down as the population approaches its carrying capacity is modeled using the logistic model. It is given by this equation:

[tex]P(t) = K / (1 + Ae^{-rt})[/tex]

where P(t) is the population at time t, K is the carrying capacity, A is the constant of proportionality, and r is the growth rate.

Suppose a population grows according to a logistic model with initial population 200 and carrying capacity 2,000. If the population grows to 500 after one year, substitute this information into the logistic model: [tex]P(1) = 500[/tex], [tex]K = 2000[/tex], and [tex]P(0) = 200[/tex].

[tex]500 = 2000 / (1 + Ae^{-r(1)})[/tex]

Now, solve for A by dividing both sides by 2000 / (1 + A):

[tex]1 + A = 4A = 3[/tex]

Substitute the value of A back into the logistic model equation:

[tex]P(t) = 2000 / (1 + 3e^{-rt})[/tex]

Solve for r by using the data provided in the problem for the first year (t = 1) and second year (t = 4):

[tex]P(1) = 500 = 2000 / (1 + 3e^{-r(1)})[/tex]

[tex]P(4) = ? = 2000 / (1 + 3e^{-r(4)})[/tex]

Solve the first equation for r:

[tex]500 = 2000 / (1 + 3e^{-r})\\1 + 3e^{-r} = 4e^{-r}\\1 + 3e^r = 4e[/tex]

Solve for e using the quadratic formula to get:

e = 0.4274 and e = 1.1713

Let e = 0.4274:

[tex]1 + 3e^{-r} = 4e^{-r}\\1 + 3(0.4274)^{-r} = 4(0.4274)^{r}\\1 + 0.5746^r = 1.7166^r[/tex]

Take the natural logarithm of both sides:

[tex]ln(1 + 0.5746^r) = ln(1.7166^r) - lnr\\ln(1 + 0.5746^r) = rln(1.7166) - lnr[/tex]

Use a graphing calculator to solve for r:

[tex]ln(1 + 0.5746^r) = rln(1.7166) - lnr[/tex];  -0.1568 < r < 0.7534

Solve for r using the second year’s data:

[tex]2000 / (1 + 3e^{-r(4)}) = P(4)\\2000 / (1 + 3(0.4274)^{-r(4)}) = P(4)\\P(4) = 852.78[/tex]

Thus, the population will be 852.78 after another three years.

Learn more about logistic model here:

https://brainly.com/question/30995760

#SPJ11

The corresponding sides and angles of two polygons ABCD and ZYXW must be proportionate if they are identical.

With straight sides around its perimeter, a polygon is really a circular, two-dimensional, flat of planar structure. Its sides are straight with no bends. Another term for a polygon's sides is its edges. The points at which two sides of a polygon converge are known as its vertices (or corners). These are numerous examples of polygonal geometry.

A closed polygon is a form with more than three sides. A quadrilateral is a 4-sided polygonal shape. A quadrilateral is any closed 4-sided form, however there are six particular quadrilaterals with distinctive characteristics that give them their own names.

To know more about polygons visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24464711

#SPJ1

If the average of three numbers is 16 and one of the numbers is 18, then the sum of the other two numbers is option (d) 30

Let's use algebra to solve this problem. Let x and y be the other two numbers we are looking for. We know that the average of the three numbers is 16, so we can write:

(18 + x + y) / 3 = 16

Multiplying both sides by 3, we get,

[(18 + x + y) / 3] × 3 = 16 ×3

18 + x + y = 48

Subtracting 18 from both sides, we get,

18 + x + y - 18 = 48

x + y = 30

Therefore, the correct option is (d) 30

Learn more about average here

brainly.com/question/1416374

#SPJ4

The degree measure of the largest angle is 72° in the triangle.

We have, The sum of two angles of a triangle is 6/5 of a right angle.

One of these two angles is 30° larger than the other.

Let A and B be the two angles of the triangle such that A = B + 30°.

We know that the sum of three angles in a triangle is 180°.

⇒ A + B + C = 180°

⇒ B + 30° + B + C = 180°

⇒ 2B + C = 150°

We also know that the sum of two angles of a triangle is 6/5 of a right angle.

⇒ A + B = 6/5 × 90°

⇒ B + 30° + B = 108°

⇒ 2B = 78°

⇒ B = 39°

C = 150° - 2B ⇒ 72°

A = B + 30° ⇒ 39° + 30° ⇒ 69°

Therefore, the degree measure of the largest angle in the triangle is 72°.

To know more about the "sum of two angles" of a triangle: https://brainly.in/question/19076450

#SPJ11

Answer:

see the answer and explanation in the attached figure below

Step-by-step explanation:

a.There is a 63.21% chance that the light bulb will have to be replaced within 500 hours.

The probability that the light bulb will have to be replaced within 500 hours can be calculated by finding the area under the exponential probability density function (PDF) from 0 to 500. Using the formula for the exponential PDF with a mean of 500, we get:

P(X ≤ 500) = 1 - e^(-500/500) ≈ 0.6321

Therefore, there is a 63.21% chance that the light bulb will have to be replaced within 500 hours.

b. There is a 39.35% chance that the light bulb will last between 200 and 800 hours.

The probability that the light bulb will last more than 1,000 hours can be calculated by finding the area under the exponential PDF from 1000 to infinity. Using the same formula, we get:

P(X > 1000) = e^(-1000/500) ≈ 0.1353

Therefore, there is a 13.53% chance that the light bulb will last more than 1,000 hours.

c. The probability that the light bulb will last between 200 and 800 hours is0.3935.

It can be calculated by finding the area under the exponential PDF from 200 to 800. Again, using the same formula, we get:

P(200 < X < 800) = e^(-200/500) - e^(-800/500) ≈ 0.3935

Therefore, there is a 39.35% chance that the light bulb will last between 200 and 800 hours.

For more questions like Probability click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Runners and sprinters could be on the track team is 25 distance.

Distance:

Distance is a qualitative measurement of the distance between objects or points. In physics or common usage, distance can refer to a physical length or an estimate based on other criteria (such as "more than two counties"). The term Distance is also often used metaphorically to refer to a measure of the amount of difference between two similar objects.

According too the Question:

Based on the based Information:

15× 5÷3

canceling all the common factor, we get:

5 × 5 = 25

Now, the Product or Quotient is 25.

Learn more about Distance:

https://brainly.com/question/15172156

#SPJ4

the prime factors of 24 are 2 and 3, which combine to give the unique prime factorization of 24 as 2^3 × 3.

There are no factors of 24 that are prime numbers. A factor of a number is a whole number that divides that number without leaving a remainder. Prime numbers, on the other hand, are numbers that are divisible only by 1 and themselves, and cannot be expressed as the product of any other numbers.

The prime factors of 24 are 2, 2, and 3. We can factorize 24 as 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 or 2^3 × 3. Here, 2 and 3 are both prime numbers, but they are not factors of 24 in isolation. They are only prime factors of 24 when combined in the manner shown.

This fact highlights an important concept in number theory: the uniqueness of prime factorization. Every composite number can be expressed as a unique product of prime numbers. This fundamental theorem of arithmetic is crucial in many areas of mathematics, including cryptography, where it is used to secure communications and protect sensitive information.

In summary, there are no factors of 24 that are prime numbers. However, the prime factors of 24 are 2 and 3, which combine to give the unique prime factorization of 24 as 2^3 × 3.

To know more about prime factorization click here:

brainly.com/question/29763746

#SPJ4

The standard deviation of a normal distribution of exam scores is 8. A score that is 12 points above the mean would have a z-score of 1.5, and a score that is 20 points below the mean would have a z-score of -2.5.

The z-score can be calculated by dividing the difference between a data value and the mean of the data set by the standard deviation of the data set.

The z-score of a score that is 12 points above the mean in a normal distribution of exam scores with a standard deviation of 8.

z = (x−μ)/σ = (x−μ)/σ = (12−0)/8 = 1.5

The z-score of a score that is 12 points above the mean in a normal distribution of exam scores with a standard deviation of 8 is 1.5.

The z-score of a score that is 20 points below the mean in a normal distribution of exam scores with a standard deviation of 8.

z = {x-μ}/{σ}  = {-20-0}/{8}  = −2.5

The z-score of a score that is 20 points below the mean in a normal distribution of exam scores with a standard deviation of 8 is -2.5.

Learn more about Z-score here:

https://brainly.com/question/15016913

#SPJ11

Answer:

first one

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation that models the future cost of gasoline is y=1.19(1.003)^(x), where "y" represents the future cost of gasoline per gallon and "x" represents the number of months since January 1, 1999.

In this equation, the initial cost of gasoline is $1.19 per gallon, and the cost increases by 0.3% per month, which is represented by the factor of (1.003)^(x).

Using this equation, you can calculate the future cost of gasoline for any number of months after January 1, 1999. For example, if you want to calculate the cost of gasoline 24 months after January 1, 1999, you can plug in x=24 and calculate y as follows:

y = 1.19(1.003)^(24)

y = 1.19(1.08357)

y = 1.288 per gallon

Therefore, the predicted cost of gasoline 24 months after January 1, 1999 is $1.288 per gallon.

(a) Starting with the 75% estimate for Italians, the sample you must collect in order to estimate the proportion of PTC tasters within ± 0.1 with 90 % confidence is n = 51.

(b) The sample size required if you made no assumptions about the value of the proportion who could taste PTC is n = 68.

(a) To estimate the sample size needed to find the proportion of PTC tasters within ± 0.1 with 90% confidence, we will use the formula for sample size estimation in proportion problems:
n = (Z² * p * (1-p)) / E²

Where n is the sample size, Z is the Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (1.645 for 90% confidence), p is the proportion of PTC tasters (0.75), and E is the margin of error (0.1).

n = (1.645² * 0.75 * (1-0.75)) / 0.1²
n = (2.706 * 0.75 * 0.25) / 0.01
n ≈ 50.74

Since we need a whole number, we round up to the nearest whole number:
n = 51

(b) If no assumptions were made about the proportion of PTC tasters, we would use the worst-case scenario, which is p = 0.5 (maximum variance):

n = (1.645² * 0.5 * (1-0.5)) / 0.1²
n = (2.706 * 0.5 * 0.5) / 0.01
n ≈ 67.65

Again, rounding up to the nearest whole number:
n = 68

Learn more about margin of error here: https://brainly.com/question/29328438

#SPJ11

Answer: Incorrect

Step-by-step explanation:

Your friend Frans' claim is incorrect. A row of zeros in the reduced matrix means that the corresponding equation in the system is redundant and does not provide any additional information. This does not necessarily mean that the system does not have a unique solution. In fact, a row of zeros in the reduced matrix is common when solving systems of linear equations using Gaussian elimination, and it can still lead to a unique solution or even an infinite number of solutions. Therefore, Frans' claim is wrong.

Answer:

Ans = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

because -- is + and  −−√70 is positive

so square root =8.366600265340757

and 8 is bigger as 8.366600265340757 is a decimal number.

a) Option A, A x2 statistic provides strong evidence in favor alternative hypothesis if its value is a large positive number.

b) Option B, The null hypothesis that sex and personal goals are not related vs. the alternative hypothesis that sex and personal goals are related.

c) Option B, The variables considered in a chi-squared test used to evaluate a contingency table B. are categorical.

(a) A x2 statistic provides strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis if its value is a large positive number. The x2 statistic is used in hypothesis testing to determine whether there is a significant difference between observed and expected frequencies. A large positive value indicates that the observed frequencies are significantly different from the expected frequencies, which supports the alternative hypothesis.

(b) The hypotheses being tested in a chi-squared test on a contingency table are the null hypothesis that sex and personal goals are not related vs. the alternative hypothesis that sex and personal goals are related. This test determines whether there is a significant association between two categorical variables.

(c) The variables considered in a chi-squared test used to evaluate a contingency table are categorical. These variables cannot be averaged or assumed to be normally distributed. The chi-squared test is used to analyze the relationship between two or more categorical variables, where each variable has a discrete set of categories.

Learn more about statistics at

https://brainly.com/question/29093686

#SPJ4

In the following question, among the conditions given, {q1, q2} is a basis for the vector space of polynomials p(t) of degree at most two that satisfy the constraint p(2) = 0. In this particular case, we must enter our basis as [[1,0,-4],[0,1,-2]], since q1(t) = t^2 - 4 and q2(t) = t - 2.

To find a basis for the vector space of polynomials p(t) of degree at most two which satisfy the constraint p(2)=0, we can take the following steps:
1. Rewrite the polynomials as linear combinations of the form a + bt + ct^2
2. Use the constraint p(2) = 0 to eliminate one of the coefficients a, b, or c
3. Normalize the polynomials so that they are unit vectors
For example, if your basis is 1 + 2t + 3t^2, 4 + 5t + 6t2 then you can enter it as [[1,2,3],[4,5,6]].

For more such questions on polynomials

https://brainly.com/question/4142886

#SPJ11

Then we will get the following odds

a.  None will have high blood pressure. Let the probability of having high blood pressure be denoted by P(A) and the probability of not having high blood pressure be denoted by P(A'). Since none will have high blood pressure, it means all the sixteen Americans selected are healthy, and therefore P(A') = 1. Therefore

P(A) = 1 - P(A')= 1 - 1= 0

b. One-half will have high blood pressure. The probability that one-half of the sixteen Americans will have high blood pressure can be found using the binomial distribution formula that is given by the expression

[tex]P(X = r) = (nCr) * p^r * q^{(n-r)}[/tex]

Where

Therefore

[tex]P(X = 8) = (16C8) * 0.2^8 * 0.8^8= 0.202[/tex]

c. Exactly 4 will have high blood pressure Similarly, the probability that exactly four of the sixteen Americans will have high blood pressure can be found using the binomial distribution formula as follows:

[tex]P(X = r) = (nCr) * p^r * q^{(n-r})[/tex]

Where

Therefore

[tex]P(X = 4) = (16C4) * 0.2^4 * 0.8^{12}= 0.236[/tex]

See more about probability at: https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The number of positive integers with exactly four decimal digits, that is, positive integers between 1000 and 9999 inclusive, are not divisible by either 5 or 7 is 4680.

Step by step explanation:
The number of positive integers with exactly four decimal digits between 1000 and 9999 inclusive can be obtained as follows:

Total number of four decimal digits = 9999 − 1000 + 1 = 9000
Numbers that are multiples of 5 are obtained by starting with 1000 and adding 5, 10, 15, 20, ..., 1995, that is, 5k, where k = 1, 2, 3, ..., 399.

Therefore, the number of positive integers with exactly four decimal digits that are multiples of 5 is 399.

Numbers that are multiples of 7 are obtained by starting with 1001 and adding 7, 14, 21, 28, ..., 1428, that is, 7m, where m = 1, 2, 3, ..., 204.

Therefore, the number of positive integers with exactly four decimal digits that are multiples of 7 is 204.

Note that some numbers in the interval [1000, 9999] are divisible by both 5 and 7. Since 5 and 7 are relatively prime, the product of any number of the form 5k by a number of the form 7m is a multiple of 5 × 7 = 35.

The numbers of the form 35n in the interval [1000, 9999] are

1035, 1070, 1105, 1140, ..., 9945, 9980.
We can check that there are 285 numbers of this form.

To find the number of positive integers with exactly four decimal digits that are not divisible by either 5 or 7, we will subtract the number of multiples of 5 and 7 and add the number of multiples of 35.

Therefore, the number of positive integers with exactly four decimal digits, that is, positive integers between 1000 and 9999 inclusive, are not divisible by either 5 or 7 is

9000 - 399 - 204 + 285 = 4680.

See more about number integers at: https://brainly.com/question/29373718

#SPJ11

In the case of the inequality w < 1, we found that the set of solutions is (-∞, 1), which represents all real numbers less than 1.

The inequality w < 1 means that w is less than 1. To identify all the numbers that satisfy this inequality, we need to look for values of w that are less than 1.

We can continue this process and substitute different values of w in the inequality w < 1 to find more solutions. For instance, if we substitute w = -1, we get -1 < 1, which is also true.

Therefore, -1 is a solution to the inequality w < 1. However, if we substitute w = 2, we get 2 < 1, which is false. This means that 2 is not a solution to the inequality w < 1.

Therefore, the set of all numbers that are solutions to the inequality w < 1 is the set of all real numbers that are less than 1. We can represent this set using interval notation as (-∞, 1), where (-∞) represents all numbers less than negative infinity and 1 represents the upper bound of the interval.

To know more about inequality here

https://brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ4

The values of x such that the graph of f has a horizontal tangent are;x = 2π/3 + 2πn, 4π/3 + 2πn, where n is an integer.

1. The given derivative can be found by finding the first few derivatives and observing the pattern that occurs as shown below;Differentiating sin x with respect to x gives the derivative cos x. Continuing this process, the pattern that emerges is that sin x changes sign for every odd derivative, and stays the same for every even derivative. Therefore the 115th derivative of sin x can be expressed as follows;(d115/dx115)(sin x) = sin x, for n = 58 (where n is an even number)2. To find the values of x such that the graph of f has a horizontal tangent, we differentiate f with respect to x, and then solve for x such that the derivative equals zero. We have;f(x) = x + 2sin xDifferentiating f(x) with respect to x gives;f'(x) = 1 + 2cos xFor a horizontal tangent, f'(x) = 0, thus;1 + 2cos x = 02cos x = -1cos x = -1/2The solutions of the equation cos x = -1/2 are;x = 2π/3 + 2πn or x = 4π/3 + 2πnwhere n is an integer. Therefore the values of x such that the graph of f has a horizontal tangent are;x = 2π/3 + 2πn, 4π/3 + 2πn, where n is an integer.

Learn more about Graph

brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ11

The claim of the production manager is not true because more than 4000 insulating washers are defective per day.

The total amount of insulating washer for the electrical devices produced per day = 225,000.

The amount chosen at random for sampling = 200 washers.

The amount shown to be defective in the chosen sample = 4

If every 200 = 4 defective

225,000 = X

Make c the subject of formula;

X = 225000×4/200

X = 900000/200

X = 4,500.

This shows that the claim is wrong because more than 4000 insulating washers are defective per day.

Learn more about random sampling here:

https://brainly.com/question/24466382

#SPJ1

There are, 6300 different possibilities for the researcher’s study.

Total number of class I railroads = 10Number of class I railroads selected = 3Total number of class II railroads = 6Number of class II railroads selected = 2Total number of class III railroads = 5Number of class III railroads selected = 1Number of different possibilities for selecting 3 class I railroads from 10 class I railroads = 10C3 = (10 x 9 x 8)/(3 x 2 x 1) = 120

Number of different possibilities for selecting 2 class II railroads from 6 class II railroads = 6C2 = (6 x 5)/(2 x 1) = 15Number of different possibilities for selecting 1 class III railroad from 5 class III railroads = 5C1 = 5Total number of different possibilities for selecting 3 class I railroads from 10 class I railroads, 2 class II railroads from 6 class II railroads, and 1 class III railroad from 5 class III railroads = 10C3 x 6C2 x 5C1= 120 x 15 x 5= 6300Therefore, there are 6300 different possibilities for the researcher’s study.

See more about calculate possibilities at: https://brainly.com/question/4658834

#SPJ11

Jenny works at Sammy's Restaurant and is paid according to the rates in the following

table.

Jenny's weekly wage agreement

Basic wage $600.00

PLUS

$0.90 for each customer served.

In a week when Jenny serves n customers, her weekly wage, W, in dollars, is given by

the formula

W = 600+ 0.90n.

(i) Determine Jenny's weekly wage if she served 230 customers.

(ii) In a good week, Jenny's wage is $1 000.00 or more. What is the LEAST number

of customers that Jenny must serve in order to have a good week?

(iii) At the same restaurant, Shawna is paid a weekly wage of $270.00 plus $1.50 for

each customer she serves.

If W, is Shawna's weekly wage, in dollars, write a formula for calculating Shawna's

weekly wage when she serves m customers.

(iv) In a certain week, Jenny and Shawna received the same wage for serving the same

number of customers.

How many customers did they EACH serve?

3 / 3

(i) If Jenny serves 230 customers, her weekly wage is

W = 600 + 0.90n = 600 + 0.90(230) = $807.00

Therefore, Jenny's weekly wage if she serves 230 customers is $807.00.

(ii) We want to find the least number of customers, n, that Jenny must serve in order to earn $1,000 or more. That is,

600 + 0.90n ≥ 1,000

0.90n ≥ 400

n ≥ 444.44

Since n must be a whole number, Jenny must serve at least 445 customers in order to earn $1,000 or more in a week.

(iii) Shawna's weekly wage, W, in dollars, when she serves m customers is given by the formula:

W = 270 + 1.50m

Therefore, Shawna's weekly wage when she serves m customers is $270.00 plus $1.50 for each customer she serves.

(iv) Let's assume that Jenny and Shawna received the same wage, W, for serving the same number of customers, x. Then we have:

Jenny's wage = 600 + 0.90x

Shawna's wage = 270 + 1.50x

Setting these two expressions equal to each other, we get:

600 + 0.90x = 270 + 1.50x

330 = 0.60x

x = 550

Therefore, Jenny and Shawna each served 550 customers.

The ratio of the length of the side directly opposite the angle to the length of the hypotenuse is known as the sine of an acute angle in a right triangle.

Hence, the sine of angle T in the right triangle RST with a right angle at S is given by:

opposite side / hypotenuse = sin T

We must know the triangle's side lengths in order to calculate the value of sin T. We can use trigonometric ratios to calculate the lengths of the remaining sides.

if we know the length of the hypotenuse and the measurement of one acute angle.

thus, we cannot define the value of triangle RST.

To learn about triangle RST visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28738706?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The shortest distance from the origin to the curve x2 + xy + y2 = 3 is √(6-2√7) and the longest distance is √(6+2√7).

We have to find the shortest and longest distances from the origin to the curve x^2 + xy + y^2 = 3. This can be done using the Lagrange multiplier technique.

Given, x^2 + xy + y^2 = 3.

We have to minimize and maximize the distance of the origin from the given curve. The distance of the origin from the point (x, y) is given by √(x²+y²).

Therefore, we have to minimize and maximize the function f(x, y) = √(x²+y²) subject to the constraint x^2 + xy + y^2 = 3.

Now, we have to form the Lagrange function.

L(x, y, λ) = f(x, y) + λ(g(x, y))

where, g(x, y) = x2 + xy + y2 - 3L(x, y, λ) = √(x²+y²) + λ(x2 + xy + y2 - 3)

Now, we have to find the partial derivatives of L with respect to x, y, and λ.

∂L/∂x = x/√(x²+y²) + 2λx+y = 0 ............. (1)

∂L/∂y = y/√(x²+y²) + λx+2λy = 0 ............. (2)

∂L/∂λ = x² + xy + y² - 3 = 0 ............. (3)

Solving equations (1) and (2), we get x/√(x²+y²) = 2y/x.

Since x and y cannot be equal to 0 simultaneously, we can say that x/y = ±2.

Substituting x = ±2y in equation (3), we get y²(5±2√7) = 9.

Now, we can solve for x and y to get the values of (x, y) at which the minimum and maximum value of the distance of the origin occurs.

Using x = 2y, we get y²(5+2√7) = 9 ⇒ y = ±3/√(5+2√7)

Using x = -2y, we get y²(5-2√7) = 9 ⇒ y = ±3/√(5-2√7)

Therefore, the four points at which the distance is minimum and maximum are {(2/√(5+2√7), 1/√(5+2√7)), (-2/√(5+2√7), -1/√(5+2√7)), (2/√(5-2√7), -1/√(5-2√7)), (-2/√(5-2√7), 1/√(5-2√7))}.

To find the minimum and maximum distances, we can substitute these points in f(x, y) = √(x²+y²).

After substituting, we get the minimum distance as √(6-2√7) and the maximum distance as √(6+2√7).

Therefore, the shortest distance from the origin to the curve x^2 + xy + y^2 = 3 is √(6-2√7) and the longest distance is √(6+2√7).

To know more about the shortest distance and longest distance: https://brainly.com/question/30985130

#SPJ11

The price after discount is $33 and option 1 is the correct answer.

A discount is a drop in a product's or service's price. Discounts can be provided for a variety of purposes, such as to entice consumers to make larger purchases, to get rid of excess inventory, or to draw in new clients. Discounts can be represented as a set monetary amount or as a %, as in the example above. For instance, a shop may give customers $10 off any purchase of more than $50.

Given that, one-day discount rate of 45% is applied.

Thus,

Discount = 60.20 * 0.45 = 27.09

Price after discount = 60.20 - 27.09 = 33.11

Hence, the price after discount is $33 and option 1 is the correct answer.

Learn more about discount here:

https://brainly.com/question/16999193

#SPJ1

The rate of change of the area of a square with respect to the length z, the diagonal of the square is  dA/dz = 2z; rate = 6. The correct answer is C.

We know that the area A of a square is given by A = s², where s is the length of the sides of the square. Also, we know that the diagonal of the square (z) is related to the sides by the Pythagorean theorem: s² + s² = z² or 2s² = z² or s² = z²/2.

Taking the derivative of both sides of the equation s² = z²/2 with respect to z, we get:

2s ds/dz = 2z/2

s ds/dz = z

Now, since the area A is given by A = s², we can take the derivative of both sides of this equation with respect to z:

dA/dz = d/dz (s²) = 2s ds/dz

Substituting the value of s ds/dz obtained earlier, we get:

dA/dz = 2s (z/s) = 2z

Therefore, the correct option is (c) dA/dz = 2z, and the rate of change of the area of the square with respect to the length z is 2z. When z = 3, the rate of change is 2(3) = 6. So, the answer is (c) dA/dz = 2z; rate = 6.

Learn more about rate of change at https://brainly.com/question/31075599

#SPJ11

Answer:

x² - 49

Step-by-step explanation:

(x - 7)² =

(x - 7) * (x - 7) =

x * x - 7 * 7 =

x² - 49