Answer:
A. Ida Tarbell
Explanation:
The answer is Ida Tarbell
What was the significance of the Brown v. Board of Education decision?
It ended school segregation forever.
It ended racist politicians' control over the South.
It solidified the advances of Plessy v. Ferguson.
It was the first major victory for civil rights.
Which of the following explains one method the Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe after the Roman empire collapsed
The statement that explains one method the Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe after the Roman empire collapsed is B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.
What method did Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe?It should be noted that the Catholic Church unified Europe socially through the continuing masses, as well as the holding baptisms and weddings, and caring for the sick.
However the Catholic Church unified Europe politically through the process of acting as a unifying "leader" for Christians and it can be considered as a place people could come to for help they needed and the Church would be there, hence considering the case above it brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about Roman Catholic Church at:
https://brainly.com/question/3323129
#SPJ1
missing options:
A. It forced all Eastern Orthodox Christians to respect the pope’s authority.
B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.
C. It established the Code of Justinian as the official European legal system.
D. It required that Latin act as the official spoken language throughout Europe.
It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam
PLEASE HELP IM TAKING AN ASSESSMENT
what situation allowed authoritarian governments to flourish in the 1920s?
Answer:
URL copied to clipboard
As the one hundredth anniversary of the beginning of World War I approaches, one may encounter some rather strained attempts to compare the current global balance of forces to that in Europe in 1914. I recently visited several countries in south east Asia and a different comparison struck me, the similarities between now and the 1930s, weak democracies and strong dictatorships.
This comparison “jumped off the page” after a week in Bangkok, followed by several days in Hanoi - a journey from a country with weak and faltering formal democratic institutions to an apparently stable one with an authoritarian regime (bordering on a country with a considerably more brutal dictatorship, China).
In The Age of Extremes, Eric Hobsbawm argued that the conflict between capitalism and communism determined the course of the twentieth century. This confrontation of socio-economic ideologies without doubt dominated European and global history, especially after 1945. But another, inter-related confrontation that determined the course of the century was authoritarianism versus democracy. The capitalism-communism conflict seems but a moment of history for people in their forties and younger. However, the danger of a rising authoritarian wave is as imminent in the twenty-first century as it was in the twentieth.
In most countries of Europe in the 1930s the contest between authoritarian and democratic visions of society dominated the political struggle. The exceptions were Italy where the fascists had already established an extreme version of authoritarian rule, and Britain where a rigid class structure gave stability to superficially democratic institutions. By the middle of the decade, capitalist authoritarian regimes were clearly on the rise in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary and Poland), as well as Portugal, with Spain soon to join the anti-democratic camp.
Indeed, in very few of the industrialised countries in the late 1930s did democracy seem the stronger trend. Among the large countries only in the United States was there an unambiguous shift towards strengthening popular participation. Ironically enough it was during the presidency of patrician Franklin D Roosevelt that trade unions asserted themselves as a major political force (which would not survive much past mid-century).
Now, well into the twenty-first century it is even more difficult to find a major country with vigorous and democratic institutions, certainly not in the United States nor in Europe. In the United States the confrontation between a well-funded right wing Republican Party and the middle-of-the road Democrat Party dominates politics, one doctrinaire and aggressive, the other muddled and vascillating. The anti-democratic trend is demonstrated by passage of laws restricting the right to vote in Republican controlled states, linked to the racist xenophobia of the Tea Party. In the White House sits a Democrat apparently unconcerned by a massively intrusive national security complex.
In Europe anti-democratic trends are if anything stronger. Britain probably has the most extensive video surveillance network in Europe (see recent articles in the Guardian), as well as legal restrictions on the right of assembly, designed to reduce public protests (as we find in Spain). In addition, the Conservative-dominated coalition government’s brutal attack on poor households receiving social support in effect legalises civil rights violations. Surveillance, attacks on the poor and the government fanning fears of immigrants combine to make a potent anti-democratic package.
On the continent pre-existing authoritarian tendencies enjoyed a quantum leap under the EU-wide austerity regime fostered by the German government under the cover of the European Commission. The unelected governments in Greece (2011-12) and Italy (2011-13) represent the most obvious and shocking examples of the authoritarian trend. Much more serious in the long term is the EU fiscal compact (officially named the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union).
This treaty, which came into effect at the beginning of 2013, severely limits the authority of national parliaments to set fiscal policy. The treaty and additional measures demanded by the German government remove fiscal policy from public control (with monetary policy in the hands of the European Central Bank and beyond national accountability). This process in which major decisions are taken away from the electorate fundamentally undermines public faith in the democratic process.
Explanation:
Authoritarian governments were able to flourish in the 1920s because democratic governments were failing especially in the late 1920s and early 1930s. On top of that socialism was spreading which scared many people and authoritarianism seemed like a better option than democracy for stopping socialism.
What is an authoritarian government?Authoritarian government is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government.
Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.
Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.
Learn more about authoritarian, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019371
#SPJ2
define the following terms of domestication
Answer:
the adaptation of a plant or animal from a wild or natural state (as by selective breeding) to life in close association with humans Wild and feral dogs are hunters, but domestication and differential breeding have modified breed and individual predatory motivation.
Write instruction to recharge the mobile phone.
which is used to calculate the number of cells in a range that have numbers in them
A. ms excel
B. argument
C. functions
D. electronic spread sheets
Answer:
COUNT function
Explanation:
The COUNT function counts the number of cells that contain numbers, and counts numbers within the list of arguments. Use the COUNT function to get the number of entries in a number field that is in a range or array of numbers.
How did toussaint l'ouverture affect the haitian revolution?
Subjective measures are numeric or quantifiable while objective measures are based on the perceptions of the family members or therapist ?
True or false
The correct answer is False
Explanation
The word "subjective" is a concept that refers to the opinion or point of view of a person or group on a specific topic. While the word "objective" is a concept that refers to information or knowledge that does not include the opinion or point of view of its author, but rather focuses on the nature of a specific topic in general and specific. According to the above, the correct answer is false because subjective measures are not numerical or quantifiable but refer to an opinion or point of view and perceptions, while objective measures are not based on someone's perceptions but rather refer to numeric or quantifiable information.
What is a second-generation Japanese American called?
issei
nisei
desu
ossu
THE ANSWER IS B) NIESEI I JUST DIDNT SEE IT ON HERE SO IM ADDING IT
Answer:
Nisei
Explanation:
The first generation is Issei, desu is a japanese copula used to connect subjects with predicates, and ossu is a shortened japanese greeting.
The map shows occupied Germany in 1945.
Based on the map, why were tensions high in Germany after World War II?
A. The country was unified, and everyone involved worried about unrest from the German population.
B. The country was divided into satellite states, and everyone involved worried about a German revolt.
C. The country was unified under four countries, but all sides feared a German revolt.
D. The country was divided under four countries, but all sides feared attack from one another.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
They are incorrect its D
Explanation:
What does Cassius foreshadow to be the outcome of the war?
A victory for his army
B. the falling of two eagles
C. defeat for his army
D. the return of Caesar's ghost
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Cassius foreshadows defeat for his army in the war. Cassius foreshadows defeat for his army in the war.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
A viral music video is spreading to many parts of the world as children love to watch and sing along with the song. What type of diffusion would this represent?
relocation
expansion
contagious
what is negritude and. where and how did it develop
Answer:
Negritude is the literary and intellectual movement that developed in Paris among the black writers in France. This movement was a sort of open declaration and acceptance of their black or African origin and their public expression of being accepted as Black writers.
Explanation:
The term "Negritude" refers to the literary movement during the early 19th century that originated in France. This literary movement was a result of the collected group of black writers and intellectuals banding together to raise concerns and cultivate their African identity and origin.
The concept of negritude developed first in Paris among the black or African writers and intellectuals who speak French and desired to express and openly declare their African origin. It was a result of their desire to be accepted and identified as black writers, their acceptance of their culture and identity. The movement was a sort of reaction against the European colonization of Africa and the need to assert the cultural racism that the Europeans had directed against the colonies.
What does article 1, section 7 of the constitution explain?
Answer:
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
why the attitude toward the Etruscan rule changed over time.
Answer:
They saw them as honorable men.
Explanation:
What problem was the caused by the quick growth of tobacco farming in Jamestown?
Answer:
Tobacco farming changed the settlement at Jamestown in many ways like- tobacco farming saved Jamestown by ensuring its economic success by becoming the colony's cash crop. As it required lots of land and labor, it sped up the growth of the colony.
PLEASE ANSWER
1. What motivated the United States to build the Panama Canal?
(5 sentences +)
2. How did World War I impact minorities in the war and on the homefront?
(5 sentences +)
Answer:
A) The U.S. built the Panama Canal as to make the trip from the East Coast to the West Coast, take half the time as before, where boats had to traval raount the south and north american continent.
B) American Minorites helped the fight both on the homelines and battle feilds, albiet lower stations for each, withe mixed feeling a and reservations, but genrallly supportive of the U.S."s goal. Segration was still being used at the time, and push back to the unfair sytem started to gain, partly becuase of the above feelings coming with relization.
Explanation:
i started these with a single point and only one sentence to help start the answers and (hopefully) lead in the right direction, i also put some links to sources i used which you might want to check out since i found them informative. As always make sure to back through your lessons and readings so you dont miss anything and can get closer to the ansew your teacher miht want/expect. Also please do not copy-cut- and paste the above answers, reword.
history. delaware.gov/world-war-i/african-americans(dashww1/
www. brandeis.edu/now/2014/july/worldwar(dot)html (best one, but try to skim through them all)
www. reference.com/history/did-united-states-want-build-panama-canal272a7766e3f669d5#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20wanted%20to,less%20than%20half%20the%20time.
please please please question paper maths science social science answer please my friends
Tanks
· Machine guns
· Poison gas
· Flamethrowers
· Airplanes
These new military technologies resulted in a huge expansion of the military tactic known as trench warfare and made _______ the most deadly war up to that point in history.
a.
Vietnam
b.
World War I
c.
World War II
d.
American Civil War
Answer:
The correct answer is B. World War I.
Explanation:
A trench warfare is a war in which both sides have dug themselves opposite each other in trenches and other fortified positions, with the aim of halting the advance of the enemy, which culminates in a stalemate where neither side succeeds in breaking through the enemy lines. The best-known trench warfare is World War I.
In general, trench warfare is the result of technological advances that allow enemy soldiers to be killed faster than they can advance. For example, in World War I, repeating rifles, machine guns, and modern artillery made it possible to mow down soldiers in the open by bushes. However, as armies still moved largely on foot and horseback, they could not cross those same open battlefields fast enough to get close enough to the enemy and fire effectively at the enemy.
How did "the loyal
American people”
see the
Reconstruction Act?
Answer:
The Southerners did not like the Reconstruction Act..and did all they could until they eventually destroyed it
Explanation:
This is all I know....
What caused the United States to adopt the policy of containment?
a desire to prevent prosperity in Germany
Soviet rejection of the Marshall Plan
the spread of communism across Europe
the spread of communism on several continents
Explanation:
The Truman Doctrine essentially meant giving money and weapons to enemies of the USSR. The Marshall Plan was an attempt to get all of Europe in debt to the USA and allow the Americans to dominate it. The American view was that the Truman Doctrine was stopping the continuing spread of Communism. please marks me as brainliests please for my effort...Answer:
C. the spread of communism on several continents
Explanation:
the guy above gave the answer, for those of you that are to lazy to read here ya go
class 6 sst ch diversity,how can people depend on each other
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
Power, right to rule
Saladin
policy
excommunicate
clergy
Pope Innocenti III
authority
King Henry IV
heretics
Palestine
convenis
Saint Peter
King Richard I
Crusade
Answer:
Policy or power, right to rule.
Explanation:
plz mark me brainliest
Labor legislation was most favorable to labor unions during the pe- riod (a) 1960–present (b) 1945–1959 (c) 1933–1945 (d) 1865–1933.
The correct answer is C. 1933 - 1945.
Explanation
In 1929 there was a world financial crisis that affected the great world powers like the United States. Therefore, the 1930s represented a challenge for President Franklin D. Rosevelt, who had to lead the economic reactivation after this crisis. For this reactivation, Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented the New Deal in which he included broad support for workers through laws such as The Fair Labor Standards Act of 19383 and the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933. These policies contributed to the strengthening of unions and labor rights over the next decade. So the correct answer is C.
discuss the benefits of applying the sociological imagination to individual troubles
Standing your ground is primarily about protecting an individual from criminal charges true or False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
What was a prominent cultural trait of Italian immigrants?
A. Political and economic gain was the paramount goal of Italian culture.
B. talian history and culture promoted a strong bond with strangers and the upper class members of society.
C. The family was the purpose of existence and thc heart of the social/cultural system.
D. Italian Catholics did not believe in the use saints as intermediaries to God.
Answer:
C. The family was the purpose of existence and thc heart of the social/cultural system.
Explanation:
Italian immigrants were very family-oriented to the point of making family the heart of their subculture. The reason is that Italians themselves are very family oriented in Italy and those who emigrated did not change this aspect of their culture.
This was also advantageous because families helped each other in such a difficult process as it is emigrating to a different country with very little or no property at all.
How did the economies of the North, the West, and the South differ?
Answer:
The North was more industrial while the South was more agricultural.
Explanation:
The North was more industrial while the South was more agricultural.
This difference played out heavily in the US Civil War - while the South was better led, constant shortages of weapons and equipment, along with blockades of ports to prevent supplies from coming in, led ultimately to the South losing the war.
Economists can use new technology to
What resulted because Georgia did not allow slavery?
A. Plantations had to be divided into smaller farms.
B. There wasn't enough lather to grow food crops.
C. Native Americans refused to sell land to the farmers.
D. Slaves from other colonies ran away to Georgia.
Slaves from other colonies ran away to Georgia.
What is slavery in Africa?Being a slave, who is unable to leave the duty they are performing for an enslaver and who is treated as the enslaver's property, is both the state and the condition of being an enslaved person.
Slavery was practiced in many different ways throughout historical Africa, including debt slavery, the enslavement of prisoners of war, military slavery, slavery for prostitution, and the enslavement of criminals. Slavery was frequently used in Africa for household and legal purposes.
To know more about slavery refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/16809902
#SPJ2
