Answer:
How did geography shape the Greek population?
First, state your claim, then support your claim with two pieces of evidence from the following sources (only need two pieces of evidence total and they can come from any of the following three sources), then finish your argument with your reasoning (which can be done in one or two sentences). You can use sentence starters for Claim, Evidence and Reasoning; Make sure your answer is between 3-5 sentences.I know this is a lot but pls help!!!! i will give brainlyest
what is the four means of transport?
Answer:
air road underground and tracks
How did trade networks and migration influence the development of African
Civilization?
Answer: The wealth made through trade was used to build larger kingdoms and empires. To protect their trade interests, these kingdoms built strong armies. Kingdoms that desired more control of the trade also developed strong armies to expand their kingdoms and protect them from competition.
Explanation:
In which zone is the highest peak in Mexico?
tierra templada
tierra caliente
tierra fria
tierra mediana
Answer:
terra fria
Explanation:
Tierra fria. Tierra fria means "cold land." This climate zone includes the land with elevations over six thousand feet to the tallest peak in Mexico. Temperatures in this zone stay below 60° F (15.6° C) and are frigid in the higher mountains. Few crops can be grown in this zone. A few pine and oak trees grow here.
how can life expectancy and literacy rates affect the quality of labor
Answer: A shorter life expectancy may indicate poor medical care, and lower literacy rates may indicate poor education, both of which can have negative impacts on production.
Explanation: I hope this helps.
What causes climate
Answer: Humans are increasingly influencing the climate and the earth's temperature by burning fossil fuels, cutting down rainforests and farming livestock. This adds enormous amounts of greenhouse gases to those naturally occurring in the atmosphere, increasing the greenhouse effect and global warming.
Credit: Beloved Search Engine Saf
The German philosopher Immanuel Kant ________. Multiple Choice rejected the idea that people must be their own lawgivers and freely choose their obligations believed that if an individual acts from a good motive and a sense of duty, the act is good regardless of the consequences rejected the idea that all people must have free choice in moral dilemmas and be responsible for their own actions believed that a person with character is also likely to succumb to base or expedient desires
The correct answer is B) believed that if an individual act from a good motive and a sense of duty, the act is good regardless of the consequences.
The German philosopher Immanuel Kant believed that if an individual acts from a good motive and a sense of duty, the act is good regardless of the consequences.
German philosopher Immanuel Kant was one of the brightest minds of his time.
Kant (1724-1804) focused part of his studies on moral actions of the Ethic of human behavior and actions. To Kant, the categorical imperative was that humans have to stand firmly on their decisions, never biased by their personal references, just led by the good or the bad of the decision or the action.
An investigator reviewed the medical records of 200 children seen for care at Boston Medical Center in the past year who were between ages of 8 and 12 years old and identified 40 with asthma. He also identified 40 children of the same age who were free of asthma. Each child and his or her family were interviewed to assess whether there might be an association between exposure to second-hand smoke and asthma. Classify this study as a
Answer
Case-Control Study
Which of the following influences how Jews and Christians live?
A. the Book of Psalms
B. the teachings of rabbis
C. the Ten Commandments
D. the explanations in the commentaries
Answer:
C. the ten commandments
Fact Pattern:
Peter Protester is a fairly well-known rabble-rouser. His demonstrations have made news across the southwest, and he's been on TV several times. Now, he has had it with the current state of politics. He gathers his group of followers, and they head to downtown Phoenix to make their grievances known. Peter's followers are generally law-abiding, but there are a few in there who have been arrested after turning peaceful protest into vandalism.
After about two hours of chanting and marching, Peter yells, "Alright, we've done the peaceful thing long enough. Now let's take some real action! Let's start breaking some windows now!"
Phoenix Police immediately arrest him.
Meantime, Rachel Reporter is in the KPHO-TV newsroom and gets a call from a police source. The source tells Rachel to take a look at the police report from Peter's arrest. Rachel heads down to the Phoenix Police Records Department and gets a copy of the police report. In it, the arresting officer writes, "This is the same Peter Protester who was convicted of domestic terrorism in 2010."
Rachel believes she has a real scoop on her hands and calls for a live truck to meet her at the scene of the protest. Rachel's live report includes the news of today's arrest. She also quotes the police report, saying Peter was convicted of domestic terrorism in 2010." Rachel did not check with police or try to get ahold of Peter in jail or speak to his lawyer to verify the conviction.
As it turns out, the police report was inaccurate. Peter was never convicted of domestic terrorism.
What charge would prosecutors likely file against Peter and will the case succeed? why?
If Peter sues Rachel, what lawsuit would he likely file and would he succeed? why? Is actual malice required here and is it present? why? Does the fair report privilege apply here to protect Rachel from liability? why?
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
What was the name of Salva's village?
Group of answer choices
Loun-Ariik
Loun-Derrick
Sudan
Answer:
Correct answer is Loun-Ariik .
Explanation:
Sudan is not correct answer, as this is the name of the country, not village Salva was from.
Salva was born in the village Loun-Ariik, and together with a lot of other boys escaped from the village in 1985. He was even their leader.
Option Loun-Derrick is not correct as I have never heard about the mentioned place.
Theory is important in couples, marriage, and family counseling because: a. Theory is needed to diagnose families and individuals. b. Theory describes how people change, what motivates people to behave, think, and feel in the ways that they do, as well as how someone grows and develops. c. Both a and c. d. Theory provides the conceptual framework that explains existing observations in particular contexts and generates hypotheses about new observations.
Answer: Theory provides the conceptual framework that explains existing observations in particular contexts and generates hypotheses about new observations
Explanation:
The role of theory in counselling and marriages cannot be understated. Theory is vital as it is needed because it gives a framework which is required to explain existing observations in particular contexts and at the same time also generates hypotheses about the new observations made.
Therefore, the correct option is D.
