Answer:
Thomas Jefferson believed Native American peoples to be a noble race[1] who were "in body and mind equal to the white man, and were endowed with an innate moral sense and a marked capacity for reason. Nevertheless, he believed that Native Americans were culturally and technologically inferior.Like many contemporaries, he believed that Indian lands should be taken over by white people.
Explanation:
Jefferson never removed any Native Americans. However, in private letters he did suggest various ideas for removing tribes from enclaves in the East to their own new lands in lands west of the Mississippi. Indian Removal was passed by Congress in 1831, long after he died. Before and during his presidency, Jefferson discussed the need for respect, brotherhood, and trade with the Native Americans, and he initially believed that forcing them to adopt European-style agriculture and modes of living would allow them to quickly "progress" from "savagery" to "civilization". Beginning in 1803, Jefferson's private letters show increasing support for the idea of removal. Jefferson maintained that Indians had land "to spare" and, he thought, would willingly exchange it for guaranteed supplies of food and equipment.
Late in World War 1 the Russian Army went home because
A. They went to fight China
B. They had done their part
C. They had a revolution at home to take care of
D. The war had already been decided
Answer: The answer is C. They had a revolution at home to take care of
Which statement accurately describes a key difference between Simón
Bolívar and José de San Martín?
A. San Martín believed in nonviolent resistance to colonial rule, while
Bolívar preferred a violent revolution,
B. Bolívar declared himself emperor of Venezuela, while San Martín
tried to make Venezuela a democracy.
C. San Martín began the liberation of Peru, while Bolívar completed
the liberation of the country.
D. Bolivar fought to preserve Spanish rule over Peru, while San Martín
fought against the Spanish.
Answer:
It is C
Explanation:
The statement that best describes a key difference between Simon Bolivar and Jose de San martin is that San Martin began the liberation of Peru while bolivar completed the liberation of the country. So, C is the correct option.
What do you mean by the statement?A Statement refers to the group of words or phrases that includes main and subordinate clauses.
The statement that best describes the key difference between Simon Bolivar and Jose de San Martin is that San martin began the liberation of Peru while Bolivar completed the liberation of the country.
Therefore, C is the correct option.
Learn more about the statement here:
https://brainly.com/question/2285414
#SPJ2
Diferencias e implicaciones culturales que experimentan las gerencias de las organizaciones sin fronteras.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Aunque no anexaste opciones o incisos para responder a esta pregunta, podemos ayudarte a responder lo siguiente.
Las diferencias e implicaciones culturales que experimentan las gerencias de las organizaciones sin fronteras son las siguientes.
Cada país tiene su propia cultura, tradiciones, estilos de vida y sistemas de creencias. Y esas son precisamente las diferencias e implicaciones culturales que experimentan las Organizaciones No Gubernamentales o Asociaciones Civiles internacionales conocidas como "Sin Fronteras" que se dedican a ayudar a las personas y a defender algunas causas que consideran injustas en diferentes países del mundo.
Estas organizaciones no son tan bien aceptadas en todo el mundo precisamente por esas diferencias culturales y diferentes sistemas de gobierno que pueden no ser tan democráticos.
PLZ HELP. Would you agree with the Laissez Faire Philosophy or the Utilitarian Philosophy?
Answer:
i would agree with the utilitarian philosophy
Explanation:
What is the effect of railroads
is it possible to win war on terror in your opinion? why or why not
Answer:
Yes (Short term) and no (Long Term)
Explanation:
The war on terror can be divided among different terrorist organizations. You can successfully bring down a terrorist organization but that does not mean it will rise again or another one would start. Example: Al-Queda was taken down but now the UN and Middle Eastern countries face ISIS. If the message of Radical-Islamic movements is still present there will be terrorism in the middle-east. Or if Ireland is still being suppressed by Britain the IRA will still stand. Extreme-Anarchists as well in France, Spain, Britain, etc will still use violence to prove a message. The Ku Klux Klan will still use violence and fear to get their way as they advocate white supremacy. All of these terrorists organizations could be brought down but that doesn't promise that they would ever rise again or start another movement.
one thought the native americans would have about "assimilation"
Answer:
xnrkkekjdnwkkqkksjjckfoekwnanjzkzks
Explanation:
anajkskwmwks
who caused the Cuban Missile Crisis
Answer:
It all started because the Soviet Union (USSR) began building missile sites in Cuba in 1962. Together with the earlier Berlin Blockade, this crisis is seen as one of the most important confrontations of the Cold War. It may have been the moment when the Cold War came closest to a nuclear war. Yeah :)
In order to preserve raw materials and support the war effort, factories converted to manufacturing military supplies and the government rationed raw
materials. The general population operated with restrictions on their materials and activities, and assisted the war effort in other ways such as planting war
gardens and donating clothing. What was the impact of these domestic rationing policies?
Select one:
A. The policies helped people feel involved in the war effort.
B. The policies fostered resentment towards the war.
C. The policies enabled the government to maintain control after the war.
D. The policies encouraged consumerism following the war.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
i did the test before
What court cases helped promote integration in Oklahoma?
Select all that apply.
O . Plessy v. Ferguson
O . Gary v. State of Oklahoma
O . Sipuel v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma
O . McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents for Higher Education
O . Brown v. Board of Education v.
Answer:
Explanation:
Gary v. State of Oklahoma.
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma.
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education
Explanation:
Mass Demonstrations, Rallies and Spectacles did it help the Nazis and Hitler gain,consolidate,and/or maintain power?
Large demonstrations, rallies, spectacles indoctrinating the youth—the nation's future—secret agencies for a sense of national security, propaganda, etc., were all used by them to consolidate their power.
How did Hitler's Nazi Party get to power?Germany experienced a sense of doom at the beginning of the 1930s. The nation was severely affected by the global economic crisis, which left millions of people jobless.
In addition, the Germans thought their government, the Weimar Republic, was too weak because of Germany's catastrophic defeat in World War I fifteen years prior.
These circumstances gave Adolf Hitler, the new leader, and his organization, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, also known as the Nazi Party, a chance to succeed.
Hitler won over many Germans seeking change by speaking persuasively. He made unfulfilled promises to an impoverished populace to raise living standards and bring Germany back to its former splendor.
The unemployed, young people, and lower middle class were the Nazis' main target demographics (owners of small shops, office workers, artisans, and farmers).
Lightning-fast, the party seized control. Before the financial crisis, the Nazis were a marginal party with little support; in the 1924 elections for the Reichstag (German parliament), they got only 3% of the vote.
The Nazis came second to all other parties in the 1932 elections with 33% of the vote. Hitler was chancellor of Germany in January 1933, and many Germans regarded him as the country's savior.
Learn more about the Hitler Nazi party here:
https://brainly.com/question/4364226
#SPJ2
What issues did the Roman Republic face that led to its demise?
Answer:
Most of there army was killed and they had sickness
Explanation:
Answer:
Internal turmoil in 133 BC by economic stagnation in the city of Rome , slave revolts without, and dissension in the military precipitated a period of unrelenting political known as the Roman Revolution, the Late Roman Republic , or the Fall of the Republic, 133-27 BC......
I hope it is helpful.....
was slavery a problem for Historian 2
(Freehling)
Explanation:
Historian 2 (Freehling): Believed slavery was a problem. Freehling recognized that blacks & whites were separated, if slavery ended blacks & whites may not be able to live together, so blacks would have to go back to Africa.
How were the governments of Sparta and Athens similar?
They were both run by men.
They were both run by kings.
They were both run by the elders.
They were both run by the people.
Answer:
d) They were both run by the people
"One of the main ways they were similar was in their form of government. Both Athens and Sparta had an Assembly, whose members were elected by the people. Sparta was ruled by two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of office. Athens was ruled by archons, who were elected annually."
Answer:
A) They were both run by men.
Explanation:
The excerpt below was written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the decision of Schenck v. United States (1919).
The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shounting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.... The question in everycase is whether the words used are used in such curcumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that congress has a right to prevent.
Which conduct did the U.S Supreme Court determine was a “clear and present danger” in this case?
demonstrations in which protestors burned American flags
newspaper articles criticizing U.S. entry into the war
the presence of Japanese Americans on the West Coast
the mailing of pamphlets advising young men to resist the draft
Answer: The mailing of pamphlets advising young men to resist the draft
Explanation:
As much as every American is entitled to freedom of speech by the First Commandment, according to the case of Schenck v. United States (1919), that does not apply when the words spoken created a clear and present danger.
This is what the defendants in the case had done when they mailed pamphlets to young men urging them to resist a draft into the U.S. army even though the Americans were now at war with Germany in the first World War.
John Adams was a Federalist. Why was his son a member of
the National Republican party?
I’ll give you Brainly
Answer:
because he can have his own opinions on politics and his own ideas!!! :/
6) The practice of appointing political supporters to government jobs during the Jackson
Administration was known as
a) the Spoils System
b) nullification
c) states' rights
d) secession
President Jackson Political Cartoons
please help
Answer:
After his unprecedented veto of the Bank bill, President Andrew Jackson's opponents accused him of abusing his Presidential powers. This cartoon depicted him as a tyrannical king, trampling on the Constitution.Explanation:
What do you think would be the biggest challenge of being a woman in the United States in the early 1800’s, and why?
Answer: The biggest challenge of being a woman in the United States in the early 1800’s is that they have no control of their lives because they were expected to take the roles of housewives and mothers, instead of working and supporting the family like the men are. This basically took away their need for high education, which would allow them to get jobs with higher salary, causing them to be looked down opon since they are dependent on the men and not seem as individuals apart.
HELP !!!!!!pls !!!!!!!
Answer:
2nd Dot
Explanation:
Can't read my,
Can't read my
Finish it easy peesy lemon squeezy
if yall get this wrong no brainliest
Answer:
Wheres the question-
Explanation:
Why did Stalin kill a total of 18 million people?
Answer:he was a very angry man that hated Jewish people:) hope I helped
Explanation:
With Caesar Augustus’s rise to power, Rome
became a powerful empire.
was invaded by outsiders.
lost its battles with its enemies.
ruled the entire world.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
hope you have a good day!!!!
Answer:
the anwser is A on ed
Explanation:
what were two
effects of the development of the West on
Native American Indians?
Answer: These tribes suffered greatly as the United States government took more and more land. Nomadic tribes suffered as well. They had to leave the rivers, forests, and mountains and move to a very different topography. At first, the native tribes were given a choice of sorts.
Explanation: Hope this helps
What were the positions of the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans on domestic and foreign issues?
Answer:
federalist wanted a strong central government and also a bank. anti-feds wanted a weak central government and More rights to absolute freedom
What would have been the potential impact if the putsch had succeeded?
Answer:
The Putsch was a badly organised fiasco which was easily put down and showed how weak the Nazis were. The Putsch was a success for the Nazis as it put them on the national map and made Hitler famous.
Explanation:
I hope I helped
General Lucius D. Clay contributed to Georgia’s transportation system by
ordering that Savannah’s port be improved.
helping plan the interstate highway system.
taking charge of the state’s railroads during World War II.
presiding over the opening of Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport.
Answer:
helping plan the interstate highway system.
Explanation:
Took the quiz : ) <33
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
how did american society respond to the new woman of the 1920s
Answer:
Significant changes for women took place in politics, the home, the workplace, and in education. ... When passed in 1920, the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote. Surprisingly, some women didn't want the vote. A widespread attitude was that women's roles and men's roles did not overlap.
Hope this helps....have an amazing day my friend ^_^
os
Give two things you can infer from Source A about the League of Nations.
(4 Points)
THE FLOWER
Source A: A political cartoon produced by British
cartoonist David Low. It appeared in the Star
Magazine on 11th November 1919.
Answer:
The League of Nations is an angel. This angel connotes peace meaning the League of Nations is a divine bringer of peace to the world.
The League of Nations is a flower and flowers are pretty things. So peace is a pretty thing. Meaning the League of Nations is a beautiful thing.
The flower is growing in a graveyard. The League was one result of the First World War. Meaning the soldiers did not die in vain.
What was one result of both the French Revolution and the American Revolution?
Answer:
The first ten amendments of the US constitution. These include our freedoms and rights. Both want a change from being ruled by an absolute ruler, both have economic instability from war debt, both have social inequality. And also, both started because of enlightenment ideas.
hope that this helps.
Explanation:
Answer: increased political influence of the middle class
Explanation:
middle class was a majority of the population but they were highly taxed and treated very unequally. the whole revolution was based on enlightenment ideas and they (third estate and Americans) were fighting for rights as well
