Answer:
The Second Italian War of Independence, also called the Franco-Austrian War, the Austro-Sardinian War or Italian War of 1859, was fought by the Second French Empire and the Savoyard Kingdom of Sardinia against the Austrian Empire in 1859 and played a crucial part in the process of Italian Unification.
Explanation:
The Kingdom of Piedmont was able to gain control of the Unification through the alliance with Napoleon III's France.
How the Kingdom of Piedmont caused the war in AustriaThe war in Austria after there was an alliance with Napoleon the III. Piedmont had caused the Austrian nation to declare war.
This then led to a conflict that brought about the unification of the Italian states.
Raed more on the unification of Italy here: https://brainly.com/question/220253
#SPJ6
How did Bourbon rule impact Mississippi's education system?
It benefited African American children.
It drastically cut spending on education.
It led to significant improvements in literacy.
It decreased the length of the school year.
Answer:
it benefited african american children
Explanation:
Hitler's "last stand" or counterattack was at
1) Paris
2) D-Day
3) Battle of the Bulge
4) Stalingrad
Answer:
I am sure, it's 3) Battle of the Bulgr
Explanation:
Hope it will help you
Answer:
I believe it was the Battle of the Bulge where he sent a lot of tank divisions and infantry to stop the American advance.
Explanation:
Which term is applied to personal characteristics that influence how our political attitudes develop?
A. political factors
B. social factors
C. political polls
D. demographic factors
What is one way government changed in Athens during the Golden Age?
Answer:
they gave power to sparta and lost their rank as the most powerful city/state.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
increased the public works payroll
One of the main ways in which government changed in Athens during the Golden Age was that in increased the public works payroll, which allowed for the construction of great buildings such as the Acropolis. The amount of paid officials increased.
PLS HELP
https://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp
After reading the article and learning about our adversaries during WWII, do you think President Truman was justified in dropping the bombs? Would you have done it if you were the President? Why or why not? Explain your answer in 3+ complete sentences.
Answer:
The United States was not justified in launching two atomic bombs on Japan, in my opinion. The United States was intercepting messages about Japan surrendering months before the bombs were launched because Japanese commanders understood they had been soundly defeated. Their single condition of surrender was that they be allowed to keep their emperor, and strangely, they were permitted to keep their emperor after the bombs were dropped and Japan “officially” surrendered, so it wasn't like the US had any issues with their terms of surrender.
Explanation:
Why are there so many Indians here?
answer my question but
no india
Answer:
bc they signed up on this website?
like what's wrong with them?
what were some inventions that contributed to the industrail Revolution of the 19th century.
Answer
Two inventions of the 19th century, the electric telegraph and the electric telephone, made reliable instantaneous communication over great distances possible for the first time.
Explanation:
hope i help you
have a great summer
time with your family
:)
Why does the Harlem Renaissance hold such significance in us history despite its fading influence during the Great Depression?
Answer:
The quality of Life has vastly improved
Explanation:
Do to a better Management Policing and racial Policy
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall
not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by
the people.
-Amendment IX, Bill of Rights, 1789
Answer:
hope it will help you
Explanation:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
II
A well–regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
Which of the following is not a form of political participation?
A. writing to your representative
B. reading the newspaper
C. joining a party
D. canvassing for a candidate
Under what circumstances should a country (like USA) go to war? (1 paragraph please)
Explanation:
A war is only just if it is fought for a reason that is justified. The country that wishes to use millitary force must demonstrate that there is a just cause to do so
ASAP PLEASE
Select ALL the correct answers.
What are TWO methods that some states used to make voting more difficult for some groups following the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby v.
Holder?
limited early voting
photo ID laws
literacy tests
poll taxes
Methods that some states used to make voting more difficult for some groups following the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby v. Holder are literacy tests and poll taxes. Thus options C and D are correct.
What is the supreme court?The Supreme court refers to the highest judiciary body in the country that helps to seek whether the laws are implemented properly or not. It helps to take actions that seem unconstitutional to maintain peace and equality.
To prohibit Black Americans from participating in voting, states and municipal governments implemented a variety of restrictive methods, including literacy tests, poll taxes, and physical aggression.
Therefore, options C and D are appropriate.
Learn more about the Supreme court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ5
HELP ASAP, BEING TIMED UNIT TEST
The map shows Washington in the United States.
Where is Washington located?
east of Canada
south of California
north of Oregon
east of Idaho
Answer: North of Oregon
Explanation: Yes
Answer:
north of oregon
Explanation:
¿Por qué Napoleón pudo estabilizar la situación política en Francia y terminar con estas disputas internas?
Answer:
Mediante el uso de fuerzas armadas.
Explicación:
Napoleón pudo estabilizar la situación política en Francia y poner fin a estas disputas internas mediante el uso de militares para mantener la paz porque es un militar y tenía influencia en el ejército. Estabiliza el sistema político declarándose emperador de Francia mediante el uso de las fuerzas armadas y se convierte en dictador. También encauzó la economía a través de sus decisiones.
What is the answer to this need to know
Answer:
answer is b
no explanation needed
Which was not a reason Johnson used when vetoing the extension of the Freedmen's Bureau and the Civil Rights Bill of 1866?
Answer:
The correct statement that was not used by Johnson while he decided to veto in 1866 the Freedmen's Bureau and the Civil Right bills was “Johnson said the rights and guarantees of the Emancipation Proclamation were sufficient to protect black's civil rights and a new bill was unnecessary.
How does Sikhism compare with Hinduism and Islam?
Correct answer is D ____
Which statement is true
Question 10 (4 points)
✓ Saved
All of the following were examples of negative American responses to immigration in
the late 1800s EXCEPT:
1) Chinese Exclusion Act
2) Nativistallies
3) Church vandalism
4) Settlement Houses
True or False: President Johnson supported states' rights and southern secession during the American Civil War.
Answer:
False Johnson is the only southern seator not to resign his seat in the US senate once the southern states left the union
Explanation:
What does the term interpretation mean in the context of studying history?
A. A technique used to convince others to accept an argument
B. A method for analyzing events outside their historical context
C. An argument that refutes a historian's claims
D. A particular historian's understanding of the past
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Interpreation is how people understand things
Kush conquered which kingdom?
Åxum
Babylon
Egypt
Assyria
Essay about what role did south African women play against the violation of human rights from 1950s to 1960s?
Explanation:

GO

History of Women’s struggle in South Africa

Contents
1910s - Anti-pass campaigns
The 1920s - Women, employment and the changing economic scene
The 1930s - Trade unionism blossoms and women become more assertive
Women in the schizophrenic 1940s - World War II and its aftermath
The turbulent 1950s - Women as defiant activists
Women's resistance in the 1960s - Sharpeville and its aftermath
Women in the 1970s - Soweto and mounting pressure on the apartheid state
Apartheid crumbles - Women in the turmoil of the 1980s
The pre-election period - Women in the early 1990s
Women in the new democracy
Women at the start of the 20th century
It is only over the last three or four decades that women's role in the history of South Africa has, belatedly, been given some recognition. Previously the history of women's political organization, their struggle for freedom from oppression, for community rights and, importantly, for gender equality, was largely ignored in history texts. Not only did most of these older books lean heavily towards white political development to the detriment of studies of the history and interaction of whites with other racial groups, but they also focused on the achievements of men (often on their military exploits or leadership ability) virtually leaving women out of South African history.
The reason for this ‘invisibility' of women, calls for some explanation. South African society (and this applies in varying degrees to all race groups) are conventionally patriarchal. In other words, it was the men who had authority in society; women were seen as subordinate to men. Women's role was primarily a domestic one; it included child rearing and seeing to the well-being, feeding and care of the family. They were not expected to concern themselves with matters outside the home – that was more properly the domain of men. Economic activity beyond the home (in order to help feed and clothe the family) was acceptable, but not considered ‘feminine'. However, with the rise of the industrial economy, the growth of towns and (certainly in the case of indigenous societies) the development of the migrant labour system, these prescriptions on the role of women, as we shall see, came to be overthrown.
This is a particularly appropriate time to be studying the role of women in the progress towards the new South African democracy. The year 2006 was a landmark year in which we celebrated the massive Women's March to the Union Buildings in Pretoria 50 years ago. Women throughout the country had put their names to petitions and thus indicated anger and frustration at having their freedom of movement restricted by the hated official passes. The bravery of these women (who risked official reprisals including arrest, detention and even bannings) is applauded here. So too are their organizational skills and their community-consciousness – they were tired of staying at home, powerless to make significant changes to a way of life that discriminated against them primarily because of their race, but also because of their class and their gender.
We invite you to read, in the pages that follow, on the important role played by women in twentieth-century South Africa. A list of works for further reading and some appropriate documents are also included in this archive. Women, half the population after all, have been silent for too long in our history books, and although this need is now to an extent being addressed, there is still a huge gap in our knowledge on the role of South African women. It is high time that our young South Africans should put the record straight.
Based on the graph, what conclusion can be drawn about Germany?
1.Until 1900, Germany had significantly fewer rail lines than Russia.
2.Germany could not afford to build as many rail lines as the United States.
3.By 1880, Germany had more rail lines than Great Britain and Russia.
4.Germany’s economy did not require as many rail lines as Great Britain.
Answer:
By 1880s, Germany had more rail lines than Great Britain and Russia
Explanation:
Germany’s first railroad came in 1835 with the construction of the six-kilometer Bayerische Ludwigsbahn, which was located in Bavaria. Germans had visited Britain prior to this and examined the British railway industry and brought what they learned back to Germany. British investors were also looking to invest in the industrialized regions of Germany. In fact, the locomotive and driver of Germany’s first railroad were both British. Railway construction boomed in Germany in the 1840s and the Germans once again learned from the British and passed laws to prevent something like Railway Mania from happening in Germany. By 1849, Germany had over 5,000 kilometers of track, double that of France, which had 2,467 kilometers of track at the time. Aside from economic benefits, a national railway system assisted in German unification. As the various German states began developing their own railways, the corners of Germany began to connect. In 1871, twenty-five German states were unified by the national railway network and by 1873 Germany had surpassed Britain’s total railway length.
Answer:
By 1880s, Germany had more rail lines than Great Britain and Russia
Explanation:
Germany’s first railroad came in 1835 with the construction of the six-kilometer Bayerische Ludwigsbahn, which was located in Bavaria. Germans had visited Britain prior to this and examined the British railway industry and brought what they learned back to Germany. British investors were also looking to invest in the industrialized regions of Germany. In fact, the locomotive and driver of Germany’s first railroad were both British. Railway construction boomed in Germany in the 1840s and the Germans once again learned from the British and passed laws to prevent something like Railway Mania from happening in Germany. By 1849, Germany had over 5,000 kilometers of track, double that of France, which had 2,467 kilometers of track at the time. Aside from economic benefits, a national railway system assisted in German unification. As the various German states began developing their own railways, the corners of Germany began to connect. In 1871, twenty-five German states were unified by the national railway network and by 1873 Germany had surpassed Britain’s total railway length.
Why is it important to know how many people lived in urban (cities) and rural (farms) areas? What
change occurred as far as where people lived in the 1920’s?
Answer:Sống ở thành phố và nông thôn hoàn toàn khác nhau. Sống ở nông thôn mang lại không gian thoáng đãng hơn, môi trường không ô nhiễm, thực phẩm sạch và cuộc sống lành mạnh.
Nhưng mặt trái, người dân ở nông thôn lại phụ thuộc vào thành phố để hưởng một số lợi ích về giáo dục và y tế. Thực tế này không chỉ ở Việt Nam mà trên thế giới cũng vậy, ở nông thôn đồng nghĩa với việc chấp nhận ít cơ hội tiếp cận giáo dục, y tế chất lượng cao.
Trong khi đó, sống ở thành phố mang đến một cuộc sống hào nhoáng với đầy đủ tiện nghi. Bạn đang ở trung tâm của mọi thứ, nơi bạn dễ dàng tiếp cận với mọi tiện nghi hiện đại làm cho cuộc sống của bạn trở nên đầy màu sắc. Tất nhiên cuộc sống trong thành phố là máy móc và phức tạp hơn. Khi cả triệu người sống trong một vùng đất nhỏ họ sẽ hiếm khi thể hiện tình đoàn kết bền chặt. Đây chính là lý do mà nhiều người xem cuộc sống ở thành phố đầy căng thẳng và phức tạp.
ự nhiên.
Cuộc sống thành thị đi lên nhanh chóng, thay đổi chóng mặt. Còn cuộc sống nông thông hầu như không đổi thay nhiều hoặc nếu có thì diễn ra chậm.
Văn hóa của đời sống đô thị về cơ bản là sự pha trộn của nhiều loại hình văn hóa. Vì nhiều người khác nhau từ các nền văn hóa khác nhau sống trong cùng một lãnh thổ nên thường khó "chấp nhận nhau". Trong khi đó ở nông thôn thì gần như cùng chung một loại hình văn hóa, khiến họ "dễ sống với nhau" hơn.
Phân công lao động và phân bổ công việc chuyên môn hóa luôn có trong các đô thị. Nhưng cơ hội việc làm ở khu vực nông thôn luôn hạn chế. Do đó, mọi người di chuyển đến khu vực thành thị để có cơ hội việc làm tốt hơn.
Ở nông thôn mọi người đều biết nhau và trẻ em nhất định phải tôn trọng người lớn. Nhưng điều này sẽ khó xảy ra ở thành thị.
Explanation:
Việc sống ở thành phố hay nông thôn là một sự lựa chọn về cách sống. Khó có thể nói sống ở nơi nào tốt hơn nơi nào, vì điều này còn tùy thuộc vào từng hoàn cảnh, cá tính lẫn nhiều yếu tố bên ngoài khác. Sống nơi nào mà bạn cảm thấy thoải mái nhất thì đó chính là nơi đáng sống nhất. Dưới đây là một số phân tích chi tiết mà bạn có thể tham khảo trước khi bắt đầu sự lựa chọn của mình.
4.1. Cuộc sống thành phố bận rộn và cuộc sống nông thôn yên tĩnh
Để bắt kịp nhịp sống bận rộn của thành phố, con người di chuyển như một cái máy và do đó cuộc sống ở thành phố trở nên căng thẳng hơn. Nhưng cuộc sống thành phố luôn đảm bảo quyền công dân tốt hơn và được tiếp cận với mọi tiện nghi hiện đại.
Trong khi đó cuộc sống nông thôn tập trung trong một khu vực nhỏ, người dân có đủ thời gian để di chuyển thoải mái. Nhưng sống ở làng có nghĩa bạn phải phụ thuộc vào các thành phố vì hầu hết các công nghệ hiện đại không có hoặc không đáp ứng đủ (ví dụ câu chuyện học đại học).
4.2. Thành phố ô nhiễm hơn so với cuộc sống ở nông thôn
Ô nhiễm không khí, tiếng ồn, và ô nhiễm nước thường gặp trong cuộc sống thành phố. Các nhà máy và phương tiện giao thông là lý do đằng sau loại ô nhiễm này. Tuy nhiên, cuộc sống thành phố có nhiều cơ hội việc làm hơn cuộc sống ở nông thôn.
Còn sống ở nông thôn đảm bảo không khí trong lành, nước sạch và không ồn ào. Người dân quê ít mắc các bệnh như hen suyễn, viêm phế quản. Nhưng cơ hội việc làm ít hơn nên họ phải chạy vào thành phố và chấp nhận "hít bụi".
khac biet thanh pho nong thon 7
Người nông thôn sống hòa đồng, thân thiện hơn.
4.3. So sánh về những tiện nghi trong cuộc sống
Cuộc sống thành phố cung cấp tất cả các lợi thế hiện đại và các hoạt động giải trí như nhà hát, công viên, bảo tàng, câu lạc bộ thể thao, thư viện và tượng đài... Các dịch vụ như Ngân hàng, Bưu điện, Viễn thông có nhiều chi nhánh đảm bảo làm việc nhanh chóng và thoải mái. Tuy nhiên, ở thành phố nhà cửa, đất đai đắt hơn, người nhập cư khó mua để ở. Do đó chi phí ở thành phố cao hơn cuộc sống ở nông thôn.
Còn khi sống trong làng bạn luôn êm đềm, thư thái, bình yên. Ngoài ra, thực phẩm sạch và bầu không khí trong lành luôn đảm bảo một cuộc sống lành mạnh, tinh thần bình an, tự do hơn thành phố. Hơn nữa ở quê người dân có không gian sống thoải mái, nhà cửa rộng rãi hơn...
4.4. Giá trị xã hội và tinh thần tập thể
Cuộc sống làng quê mang lại nhiều giá trị và trách nhiệm xã hội hơn. Mọi người được kết nối chặt chẽ với nhau thông qua các mối quan hệ gia đình.
Ở khía cạnh này, người dân thành phố là những người "thích selfie" và bận rộn với cuộc sống của riêng họ. Họ không có mối liên hệ với nhau nên cuộc sống của họ rất phức tạp và họ gặp rất nhiều rắc rối trong cuộc sống hằng ngày.
Mặt khác, người dân quê coi trọng mối quan hệ gia đình hơn. Trong khi đó, thành phố vốn có lối sống "thoáng hơn" dẫn đến tỷ lệ ly hôn cao vì mối quan hệ gia đình yếu km.
Who was the first president ever to get impeached?
Answer: andrew johnson
Explanation: the house committee voted 125 to 47 to impeach andrew johnson of high crimes and misdemeanors in 1868
Which term describes the pre-Civil War, loose-knit organization that helped runaway slaves escape to Canada?
Answer:
B)Underground
Explanation:
The preCivil War took place arround
year 1820 to arround year 1860 it was regarded as "antebellum years” which was among most chaotic events that took place in in American history, it's regarded as a time that symbolize significant changes which took place during the time United States came of age. There is transformation of the nation from an underdeveloped nation of farmers into an urbanized economic powerhouse. The Underground Railroad was the loose-knit organization that render some service in order to help the slaves so they can escape to the Canada, this organization make use of
Underground Railroad.
It should be noted that the term describes the pre-Civil War, loose-knit organization that helped runaway slaves escape to Canada is Underground Railroad
These are the options for the question
a. Freedmen's Bureau
b. Underground Railroad
c. Ku Klux Klan
d. Know-Nothing Party
Why did the settlers in the Americas begin developing their own form of
government?
A. They wanted to be free of government tyranny.
B. They wanted to make more money.
C. They were very far away from their ruling government.
D. They wanted to experiment on the best forms of government. .
anyone know this im stuck.
What happens to students’ rights when they step onto the school grounds (list 3 things and describe it)?
Answer:
some school make it so students lose there privilege to use the bathroom during class even if there is a reason , lose privilege to use phones. some schools have uniform witch takes away our privilege to dress how we want . sometimes students are treated unfairly .
Answer:
Seems like when students need to call their parents even when they are in class cause of a catastrophe phones are not allowed in school classrooms. Restroom privileges are not allowed class hours much unless a doctors note says that a student is given the ability to use the restroom at any time. And that we should allow to wear what students want to say and how they feel bout other things that bothers them.
Explanation:
