Answer:
the correct statement is 2. The solid plate will have the greater angular acceleration.
the correct phrase is 4. The plate with the hole has its mass distributed further out from the axis of rotation, which will increase its moment of inertia.
Explanation:
Newton's second law expression for rotational motion is
τ = I α (1)
where the torque is
τ = F r
in this case, as the discs have the same radius and the applied force is the same, the torque is the same on the two discs.
The moment of inertia is given by the expression
I =∫ r² dm
for bodies with high symmetry are tabulated
the moment of inertia for in disk solid is I₁ = ½ m R₂²
the moment for a disk with a hole I₂ = ½ m (R₁² + R₂²)
We can see that the moment of inertia of the disk with the hole is greater than the moment of inertia of the solid disk.
Let's use equation 1
α = τ/I
therefore the angular acceleration is lower for the body with the higher moment of inertia, consequently the solid disk has higher angular acceleration
the correct statement is 2
The reason is because the moment of inertia is higher for the hollow disk.
the correct phrase is 4
how to calculate sound of an echo
by an echo meter
please flw me and thank my answers
#Genius kudi
why does a spherometer have three legs?
spherometer is a device used to measure curved in surface
it have 3 legs which form equivalent triangle.
geometry says that 3 point determine a plane that's why it have 3 legs
Calculate the current flowing when the voltage across is 35V and the resistance is 7ohms.
Explanation:
V= IR
35=I×7
I=35/7
I=5amperes
pls give brainliest
A 35 kg child slides down a playground slide at a constant speed. The slide has a height of 3.8 m and is 8.0 m long. Find the magnitude of the kinetic friction force acting on the child.
Answer:
The magnitude of the kinetic frictional force acting on the child is 162.93 N
Explanation:
Given;
mass of the child, m = 35 kg
height of the slide, h = 3.8 m
length of the slide, d = 8.0 m
The change in thermal energy associated with the kinetic frictional force is calculated as follows;
[tex]\Delta E_{th} + \Delta K.E + \Delta U = 0\\\\\Delta E_{th} + (\frac{1}{2} mv_f^2 - \frac{1}{2} mv_i^2) + (mgh_f - mgh_i) =0\\\\since \ the \ speed \ is \ constant, \ v_f = v_i \ and \ \Delta K.E = 0\\\\Also, \ final \ height \ , h _f= 0\\\\\Delta E_{th} - mgh_i = 0\\\\\Delta E_{th} = mgh_i\\\\\Delta E_{th} = 35 \times9.8 \times 3.8\\\\\Delta E_{th} = 1303.4 \ J[/tex]
The magnitude of the kinetic frictional force that produced this thermal energy is calculated from the work done by frictional force;
[tex]\Delta E_{th} = F \times d\\\\F = \frac{\Delta E_{th} }{d} \\\\F = \frac{1303.4}{8} \\\\F = 162.93 \ N[/tex]
Therefore, the magnitude of the kinetic frictional force acting on the child is 162.93 N
Is the following chemical reaction balanced?
2H202-H2O + O2
yes
no
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS ONE QUESTION
The color orange has a wavelength of 590 nm. What is the energy of an orange photon? (h = 6.626 x 10^-19, 1 eV = 1.6 x 10^-19 J)
A) 2.81 eV
B) 3.89 eV
C) 2.10 eV
D) 2.78 eV
k = [tex] \dfrac{ (\dfrac{h}{ \lambda} )^{2} }{2m} [/tex]
k = (6.626×10-¹⁹/590 × 10-⁹ )^{2} /2 × 1.673 × 10-²⁷
k = (1.12 × 10-³⁰)^2/3.346×10-²⁷
k = 1.25 × 10-⁶⁰ /3.346×10-²⁷
k = 0
ldk why, my answer is coming this :(
Hydrogen carried in light phase
Answer:
because it is helpful to human beings I think
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS ONE QUESTION
The color orange has a wavelength of 590 nm. What is the energy of an orange photon? (h = 6.626 x 10^-19, 1 eV = 1.6 x 10^-19 J)
A) 2.81 eV
B) 3.89 eV
C) 2.10 eV
D) 2.78 eV
The color orange has a wavelength of 590 nm. The energy of an orange photon is approximately 0.337 eV.
The correct answer is option E.
To calculate the energy of a photon, we can use the equation:
E = (hc) / λ
where E is the energy of the photon, h is the Planck's constant (6.626 x [tex]10^-^3^4[/tex]J·s or 6.626 x[tex]10^-^1^9^[/tex] eV·s), c is the speed of light (3.00 x [tex]10^8[/tex] m/s), and λ is the wavelength of the light.
Given that the wavelength of orange light is 590 nm (or 590 x [tex]10^-^9[/tex]m), we can substitute the values into the equation:
E = [(6.626 x[tex]10^-^1^9^[/tex] eV·s) x (3.00 x [tex]10^8[/tex] m/s)] / (590 x[tex]10^-^9[/tex]m)
E = (1.9878 x [tex]10^-^1^0[/tex]eV·m) / (590 x [tex]10^-^9[/tex] m)
E = 3.3695 x [tex]10^-^1[/tex] eV
For more such information on: wavelength
https://brainly.com/question/4881111
#SPJ8
The question probable may be:
The color orange has a wavelength of 590 nm. What is the energy of an orange photon? (h = 6.626 x [tex]10^-^1^9^[/tex], 1 eV = 1.6 x[tex]10^-^1^9^[/tex]J)
A) 2.81 eV
B) 3.89 eV
C) 2.10 eV
D) 2.78 eV
E) 0.337 eV
Using pascals principle, F1/A1=F2/A2, solve this like a proportion.
A force of 50 N is applied to an area of 200 sq feet, how much force will be applied of the area to be covered is 50 sq feet?
Answer:
NO CLUE
Explanation:
GOOD LUCK THOUGH
an artificial satellite is moving in a circular orbit of radius 36000 kilometre calculate its speed if it takes 24 hours to revolve around the earth
Explanation:
9420 km/hr is the correct answer
Hope this helps...☺
How much power does it take to lift 70.0 N to 5.0 m high in 5.00 s?
Answer:
Power = 70 W
Explanation:
Given that,
Force, F = 70 N
Height, h = 5 m
Time, t = 5 s
We need to find the power of the object. We know that,
Power = work done/time
Put all the values,
[tex]P=\dfrac{Fd}{t}\\\\P=\dfrac{70\times 5}{5}\\\\P=70\ W[/tex]
So, the required power is 70 W.
Why is it that, when we observe an extragalactic source whose diameter is about one lightday, we are unlikely to see fluctuations in light output in times shorter than about one day
The reason why we are unlikely to see fluctuations in light output in extragalactic sources with a diameter of about one light day over timescales shorter than about one day is due to the size and distance of the source, as well as the speed of light.
How to observe extragalactic sources whose diameter is about one light day?When we observe an extragalactic source with a diameter of about one light day, we are essentially observing light that has traveled a very long distance through space to reach us. This light may have originated from a region of the source that is changing in brightness or emitting intense bursts of light, but by the time the light reaches us, these fluctuations are smeared out over a longer period of time due to the speed of light.
For example, if the source were emitting a burst of light that lasted for only a few hours, by the time that light travelled a distance of one light day (which is about 25 billion miles or 40 billion kilometres), the burst would be spread out over a longer period of time. This is because the light emitted at the beginning of the burst would have already traveled a significant distance away from the light emitted at the end of the burst by the time it reached us. As a result, we would observe the burst as a more gradual increase and decrease in light output over a period of several days, rather than a sharp increase and decrease over a few hours.
In addition, the turbulent interstellar and intergalactic media that the light passes through can also scatter and delay the light, further smearing out any short-term fluctuations in light output. This effect is known as interstellar scintillation and can make it even more difficult to observe short-term variations in the light output of extragalactic sources.
To know more about extragalactic sources follow
https://brainly.com/question/15023361
#SPJ6
Find the ratio of speeds of a proton and an alpha particle accelerated through the same voltage, assuming nonrelativistic final speeds. Take the mass of the alpha particle to be 6.64 ✕ 10−27 kg.
Answer:
The required ratio is 1.99.
Explanation:
We need to find the atio of speeds of a proton and an alpha particle accelerated through the same voltage.
We know that,
[tex]eV=\dfrac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex]
The LHS for both proton and an alpha particle is the same.
So,
[tex]\dfrac{v_p}{v_a}=\sqrt{\dfrac{m_a}{m_p}} \\\\\dfrac{v_p}{v_a}=\sqrt{\dfrac{6.64\times 10^{-27}}{1.67\times 10^{-27}}} \\\\=1.99[/tex]
So, the ratio of the speeds of a proton and an alpha particle is equal to 1.99.
The correct formula for finding the relative velocity of an object is:
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST TO THE CORRECT ANSWER!!
Answer:
[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}[/tex]
Explanation:
The relative velocity of an object is the velocity of the object relative to the observer or frame of reference.
The velocity of particle "A" with respect to particle "B" is written as [tex]V_{A/B} = V_{A} - V_{B}[/tex]
From the given options, the second option is the correct answer.
[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}\\\\Re-arrange \ the \ above \ equation;\\\\V_{a/c} - V_{b/c}= V_{a/b}\\\\or\\\\V_{a/b}= V_{a/c} - V_{b/c}[/tex]
Electromagnetic radiation from a 8.25 mW laser is concentrated on a 1.23 mm2 area. Suppose a 1.12 nC static charge is in the beam, and moves at 314 m/s. What is the maximum magnetic force it can feel
Answer:
The maximum magnetic force is 2.637 x 10⁻¹² N
Explanation:
Given;
Power, P = 8.25 m W = 8.25 x 10⁻³ W
charge of the radiation, Q = 1.12 nC = 1.12 x 10⁻⁹ C
speed of the charge, v = 314 m/s
area of the conecntration, A = 1.23 mm² = 1.23 x 10⁻⁶ m²
The intensity of the radiation is calculated as;
[tex]I = \frac{P}{A} \\\\I = \frac{8.25 \times 10^{-3} \ W}{1.23 \ \times 10^{-6} \ m^2} \\\\I = 6,707.32 \ W/m^2[/tex]
The maximum magnetic field is calculated using the following intensity formula;
[tex]I = \frac{cB_0^2}{2\mu_0} \\\\B_0 = \sqrt{\frac{2\mu_0 I}{c} } \\\\where;\\\\c \ is \ speed \ of \ light\\\\\mu_0 \ is \ permeability \ of \ free \ space\\\\B_0 \ is \ the \ maximum \ magnetic \ field\\\\B_0 = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 4\pi \times 10^{-7} \times 6,707.32 }{3\times 10^8} } \\\\B_0 = 7.497 \times 10^{-6} \ T[/tex]
The maximum magnetic force is calculated as;
F₀ = qvB₀
F₀ = (1.12 x 10⁻⁹) x (314) x (7.497 x 10⁻⁶)
F₀ = 2.637 x 10⁻¹² N
26.
Which one of the following is not a vector quantity?
(2)
A) acceleration
C) displacement
E) instantaneous velocity
B) average speed
D) average velocity
Answer:
Answer: Speed is not a vector quantity. It has only magnitude and no direction and hence it is a scalar quantity.
Need in hurry important please
Answer:
I don't see anything on your question?
A 56 kg pole vaulter falls from rest from a height of 5.1 m onto a foam rubber pad. The pole vaulter comes to rest 0.29 s after landing on the pad.
Required:
a. Calculate the athlete's velocity just before reaching the pad
b. Calculate the constant force exerted on the pole vaulter due to the collision
a. The athlete's velocity just before reaching the pad is [tex]35.21m/s[/tex]
b. The constant force exerted on the pole vaulter is 6799.52 N
a. We use Newton's equation of motion,
[tex]v=u+at\\\\S=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^{2}[/tex]
Where u is initial velocity, v is final velocity, a is acceleration , t is time and S represent distance.
Given that, s = 5.1 m , t = 0.29s, u = 0
Substitute in above equation.
[tex]5.1=\frac{1}{2}*a*(0.29)^{2} \\\\a=\frac{5.1*2}{0.084}=121.42m/s^{2}[/tex]
the athlete's velocity, [tex]v=0+121.42*(0.29)=35.21m/s[/tex]
b. The constant force exerted on the pole vaulter due to the collision is given as, [tex]Force=mass*acceleration[/tex]
[tex]Force=56*121.42=6799.52N[/tex]
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/13532462
. A car increases velocity from 20 m/s to 60 m/s in a time of 10 seconds. What was the acceleration of the car?
Answer:
0.3333
Explanation:
Acceleration = change in velocity/time
a = 20 m/s / 60 m/s
a = 0.3333 m/s^2
You throw a football straight up. Air resistance can be neglected. When the football is 4.00 mm above where it left your hand, it is moving upward at 0.500 m/sm/s. What was the speed of the football when it left your hand
Answer:
u=8.868 m/s
Explanation:
The displacement of the ball is 4 meters
The final speed of the ball is 0.5 m/s
The initial speed of the ball is to be calculated. Using the equation of the rectilinear motion,
[tex]v^{2} =u^{2} +2as[/tex]
Plugging the values in the above expression,
[tex]\\0.5^{2} =u^{2} +2*(-9.8)*4\\\\u^{2} =78.4+0.25\\\\u^{2} =78.65\\\\u=8.868 m/s[/tex]
The steps to determine the sum are shown. (6.74x104)+(8.95 x 104) Step 1. Rearrange the expression: (6.74+8.95) 104 Step 2. Add the coefficients: (15.69) 104 Step 3. Write in scientific notation: 1.569x 10 What is the value of k in Step 3? =
Answer:
We want to solve the sum:
6.74*10⁴ + 8.95*10⁴
first, we take the common factor 10⁴ out, so we get:
(6.74 + 8.95)*10⁴
Now we solve the sum:
(15.66)*10⁴
Now we want to rewrite it in exponential form, wo we can rewrite it as:
(15.66)*10⁴ = (1.566*10)*10⁴ = (1.566)*10*10⁴ = (1.566)*10⁴⁺¹ = 1.566*10⁵
k = 5.
A long, straight metal rod has a radius of 5.75 cm and a charge per unit length of 33.3 nC/m. Find the electric field at the following distances from the axis of the rod, where distances are measured perpendicular to the rod's axis.
Answer:
Explanation:
From the question;
We will make assumptions of certain values since they are not given but the process to achieve the end result will be the same thing.
We are to calculate the following task, i.e. to determine the electric field at the distances:
a) at 4.75 cm
b) at 20.5 cm
c) at 125.0 cm
Given that:
the charge (q) = 33.3 nC/m
= 33.3 × 10⁻⁹ c/m
radius of rod = 5.75 cm
a) from the given information, we will realize that the distance lies inside the rod. Provided that there is no charge distribution inside the rod.
Then, the electric field will be zero.
b) The electric field formula [tex]E = \dfrac{kq }{d}[/tex]
[tex]E = \dfrac{9 \times 10^9 \times (33.3 \times 10^{-9}) }{0.205}[/tex]
E = 1461.95 N/C
c) The electric field E is calculated as:
[tex]E = \dfrac{9 \times 10^9 \times (33.3 \times 10^{-9}) }{1.25}[/tex]
E = 239.76 N/C
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS ONE QUESTION
Given the atomic mass of Boron-9 is 9.0133288 u, what is the nuclear binding energy of Boron-9? (Mproton = 1.0078251, Mneutron = 1.0086649, c^2 = 931.5 eV/u)
A) 59 eV
B) 58 eV
C) 57 eV
D) 56 eV
Answer:
a. 59 ev. helpful answer
B. Complete the lists:
Things that I must do for my family
Things I must never do to my family
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
5.
Answer:
Things you should do for your family
help your parentstreat them kindlylisten and obey themappreciate them for anything they do for you talk softlythings you shouldn't
backanswering them Disobey And anything that's harsh or make it parents sadA mass of 4 kg is traveling over a quarter circular ramp with a radius of 10 meters. At the bottom of the incline the mass is moving at 21.3 m/s and at the top of the incline the mass is moving at 2.8 m/s. What is the work done by all non-conservative force in Joules?
Answer:
499.7 J
Explanation:
Since total mechanical energy is conserved,
U₁ + K₁ + W₁ = U₂ + K₂ + W₂ where U₁ = potential energy at bottom of incline = mgh₁, K₁ = kinetic energy at bottom of incline = 1/2mv₁² and W₁ = work done by friction at bottom of incline, and U₂ = potential energy at top of incline = mgh₂, K₁ = kinetic energy at top of incline = 1/2mv₂² and W₂ = work done by friction at top of incline. m = mass = 4 kg, h₁ = 0 m, v₁ = 21.3 m/s, W₁ = 0 J, h₂ = radius of circular ramp = 10 m, v₂ = 2.8 m/s, W₂ = unknown.
So, U₁ + K₁ + W₁ = U₂ + K₂ + W₂
mgh₁ + 1/2mv₁² + W₁ = mgh₂ + 1/2mv₂² + W₂
Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have
mgh₁ + 1/2mv₁² + W₁ = mgh₂ + 1/2mv₂² + W₂
4 kg × 9.8 m/s²(0) + 1/2 × 4 kg × (21.3 m/s)² + 0 = 4 kg × 9.8 m/s² × 10 m + 1/2 × 4 kg × (2.8 m/s)² + W₂
0 + 2 kg × 453.69 m²/s² = 392 kgm²/s² + 2 kg × 7.84 m²/s² + W₂
907.38 kgm²/s² = 392 kgm²/s² + 15.68 kgm²/s² + W₂
907.38 kgm²/s² = 407.68 kgm²/s² + W₂
W₂ = 907.38 kgm²/s² - 407.68 kgm²/s²
W₂ = 499.7 kgm²/s²
W₂ = 499.7 J
Since friction is a non-conservative force, the work done by all the non-conservative forces is thus W₂ = 499.7 J
A gymnast of mass 70.0 kgkg hangs from a vertical rope attached to the ceiling. You can ignore the weight of the rope and assume that the rope does not stretch. Use the value 9.81m/s29.81m/s2 for the acceleration of gravity.
PART A Calculate the tension T in the rope if the gymnast climbs the rope at a constant rate.
PART B Calculate the tension TTT in the rope if the gymnast climbs up the rope with an upward acceleration of magnitude 1.00 m/s2
PART C Calculate the tension TTT in the rope if the gymnast slides down the rope with a downward acceleration of magnitude 1.00 m/s2m/s2 .
Answer:
43994
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Which statement describes an action-reaction pair?
O A. You push on a car, and the car pushes back on you.
B. A book pushes down on a table, and the table pushes down on the
Earth.
C. The Moon pulls on Earth, and Earth pulls on the Sun.
D. You push down on your shoe, and Earth's gravity pulls down on the
shoe.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
a pex
Erica (37 kg ) and Danny (45 kg ) are bouncing on a trampoline. Just as Erica reaches the high point of her bounce, Danny is moving upward past her at 4.7 m/s . At that instant he grabs hold of her. What is their speed just after he grabs her?
Answer:
V = 2.58 m/s
Explanation:
Below is the calculation:
Given the weight of Erica = 37 kg
The weight of Danny = 45 kg
Danny's speed to move upward = 4.7 m/s
Use below formula to find the answer.
m1 * u1 = (m1+m2) * V
V = m1*u1 / (m1+m2)
Here, m1 = 45
u1 = 4.7
m1 = 45
m2 = 37
Now plug the values in formula:
V = m1*u1 / (m1+m2)
V = (45*4.7)/(45+37)
V = 2.58 m/s
scripture union was founded by who in what year
Answer:
Josiah Spiers in 1867 was when scripture union was founded
A kangaroo kicks downward with a 1000N force. According to Newton's Law the kangaroo is propelled into the air by:
A) gravitational force
B) his muscles
C) The earth
D) wallabies
Explanation:
Specifically his leg muscles. As the leg muscles expand, they push down on the ground. Newton's 3rd law says that for any action, there's an opposite and equal reaction. That means a downward push into the ground will have the ground push back, more or less, and that's why the kangaroo will jump. The ground (and the earth entirely) being much more massive compared to the animal means that the ground doesn't move while the kangaroo does move. Perhaps on a very microscopic tiny level the ground/earth does move but it's so small that we practically consider it 0.
This experiment can be done with a wall as well. Go up to a wall and lean against it with your hands. Then do a pushup to move further away from the wall, but you don't necessarily need to lose contact with the wall's surface. As you push against the wall, the wall pushes back, and that causes you to move backward. If the wall was something flimsy like cardboard, then you could easily push the wall over and you wouldn't move back very much. It all depends how much mass is in the object you're pushing on.
