Answer: the Confederate army on that day opened fire on the federal garrison and forced it to lower the American flag in surrender.
The most important element in Rome’s strong economy was
a. agriculture
b. glassmaking
c. metalworking
d. pottery
The most important element in Rome’s strong economy was A) agriculture.
The Roman Empire's economy was fueled by agriculture, and it was the foundation of the empire's wealth. The Roman economy was primarily based on A) agriculture, as was the case in most ancient civilizations. Rome's prosperity was founded on its agricultural resources, which were significant because they offered food for the populace and contributed to the empire's wealth.
Agriculture was the primary source of income for the Roman Empire. It was the foundation of the empire's wealth, as well as the primary source of income for the state treasury. Romans were well-known for their skills in constructing an irrigation system to transport water throughout the arid land.
In the Roman Empire, there was a lot of land that was perfect for agriculture. They produced crops such as wheat, corn, and barley, and livestock such as cattle, goats, and sheep. The majority of the crops were utilized to feed the Roman population, with a small percentage being exported to other nations.
The wealth that Rome generated from agriculture was used to fund its military campaigns, construct public buildings, and maintain public works like aqueducts and roads. Agriculture was the primary source of the empire's wealth, as well as the primary source of income for the state treasury. As a result, it is safe to say that Rome's agricultural sector was the backbone of its economy, and without it, the empire would not have been able to achieve such a high degree of wealth and success.
For similar questions on "Agriculture" :
https://brainly.com/question/3161950
#SPJ11
Why are different countries constructing Bihars in lumbini Area. Present your logic in a sentence.
In order to uphold religious tolerance and establish their own reputations, various nations are building Bihars in the Lumbini region.
Siddhartha Gautama, popularly known as the Buddha, was born in Lumbini, which is well-known for this fact. Buddhists travel from all over the world to this significant pilgrimage site to pay their respects and learn more about the life and teachings of the Buddha. The Nepalese city of Lumbini has been named a UNESCO World Heritage site.
India's Gaya is well known for being a significant religious and cultural centre. In this location, while meditating beneath the Bodhi tree, the Buddha is supposed to have obtained enlightenment. Bodh Gaya is an important Buddhist pilgrimage place that draws travellers from all over the world. Gaya has a lengthy history and is thought to have been a significant hub of learning in antiquity. It also features a number of historical places worth visiting and is connected to a number of mythological tales.
To know more about Buddhist
brainly.com/question/30518883
#SPJ4
1. According to the document, why was the deposed Shah allowed to come into the United States?
Answer:
1. According to the document, why was the deposed Shah allowed to come into the United States?
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in the question, I cannot determine which document you are referring to. Please provide more context or information so I can better understand and provide an accurate answer.
the compromise of 1850 removed the slavery question from congressional debate. yet, the new fugitive slave act made further controversy inevitable. which of the following provisions of the fugitive slave act proved controversial?
Federal commissions now decided the fate of fugitive slaves who have been arrested in the North, independent of state and local regulations.
Which were the main tenets of the 1850 Compromise?The laws set a boundary with Tex and the The Us, abolished the slave market in Washington, DC, that revised this same Fugitive Slave Act in addition to calling for the entrance of California as just a "free state" and territory governments for both New Mexico and Utah.
Why did Wilmot object to slavery being introduced to the new lands?Wilmot opposed the expansion of slavery into in the Mexican Cession and not just because he cared about African Americans but rather because he thought that slavery was bad for white labor and that lands should not be ceded to slaves. The government should use its newly acquired resources to strengthen the situation of white seasonal workers and small farms.
To know more about fugitive visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31036916
#SPJ1
Why was Stephen F. Austin unable to use the land grant his father, Moses Austin, received after he died in 1821?
Stephen F. Austin was unable to use the land grant his father, Moses Austin, received after he died in 1821 because the Mexican government had suspended all land grants until further notice
American-born empresario Stephen Fuller Austin lived from November 3, 1793, to December 27, 1836. As the "Father of Texas" and the creator of Anglo Texas, he brought 300 families from the United States and their slaves to the Tejas region of Mexico in 1825, starting the second and ultimately successful colonization of the area.
Austin, who was born in Virginia and raised in southeast Missouri, served in the territorial legislature of Missouri. He first relocated to Louisiana before going to Arkansas Territory. For the purpose of settling Texas, his father, Moses Austin, was given an empresario grant by Spain. After Moses Austin passed away in 1821, Stephen Austin succeeded in having the newly independent country of Mexico recognize the empresario grant.
To know more about Stephen F. Austin here
https://brainly.com/question/20065024
#SPJ4
as demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
The documentation of events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising allowed for the dissemination of information that may have been suppressed or distorted by traditional media outlets (option A).
Social media and citizen journalists provided real-time updates and footage of the protests, allowing for a global audience to witness the events as they unfolded. This helped to galvanize international support for the protesters and put pressure on the Ukrainian government to address their grievances. Additionally, the documentation of police brutality and human rights violations helped to hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
Overall, the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising include increased transparency, accountability, and support for social and political change.
Option A is the correct answer.
"
Complete quesion
As demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
A- The documentation of events on a grassroots level.
B- The hindrance of events.
"
You can learn more about Ukraine uprising at
https://brainly.com/question/26824054
#SPJ11
who were the first group of people targeted by huac? doctors government workers screenwriters and actors
The first group of people targeted by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) were screenwriters and actors.
What was the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)?The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was a congressional committee established in 1938 to investigate individuals and organizations with alleged ties to communism. It became more active in the 1940s and 1950s, with a focus on investigating alleged communist influence in the film industry, universities, and government agencies.
Several prominent figures in the entertainment industry, including screenwriters and actors, were called to testify before the committee and were blacklisted for their political views. This led to many people losing their jobs and facing significant personal and professional consequences.
Therefore, the correct answer is: ''Screenwriters and actors.''
See more about HUAC at https://brainly.com/question/1130666.
#SPJ11
who was not a subject of red scare investigations?
the correct option is: Alben Barkley was not a subject of red scare investigations.
Alben Barkley was brought into the world in 1877 in a log lodge on his dad's tobacco ranch close to Lowes, Kentucky. As a young fellow with minimal elementary school training, he filled in as a janitor as a trade-off for the chance to go to Marvin School in Clinton, Kentucky, educational cost-free. Subsequent to graduating in 1897, Barkley concentrated on regulation at Emory College and later partook in a mid-year program at the College of Virginia Graduate school. He breezed through the Kentucky legal defense test in 1901 and set up a regulation practice in Paducah.
Barkley's political profession started in 1905, when he rode a one-looked control horse over the back slopes of McCracken Region to effectively lobby for the workplace of district arraigning lawyer, a position he held from 1905 to 1909. Four years as judge of the McCracken Area Circuit Court followed, and in 1912 he was chosen to serve Kentucky's Most memorable Region in the U.S. Place of Delegates. As a delegate, Barkley excitedly upheld the Democratic organization of President Woodrow Wilson, whom he viewed as the "greatest legislator and the greatest president" of his lifetime.
to know more about democratic click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ4
the complete question is:
Who was not a subject of Red Scare investigations?
Ethel Rosenberg
Alben Barkley
Alger Hiss
Whittaker Chambers
The Shocking Cynicism Behind the Voyage of the “St. Louis” and Its Ship Full of Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany
What is the author referring to when he says, “And if a few thousand Nazi collaborators ended up in the US refugee potpourri, better them than Jews, who belonged in Palestine?”
What is the “shocking cynicism” that the author refers to in the title of the article?
Answer:
\ The author is referring to the belief held by some in the US government at the time that Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany were not a priority and that it was more important to focus on admitting refugees who were deemed politically favorable, such as those who were anti-Nazi or potential allies in the war effort. The author suggests that this attitude led to a lack of action on the part of the US government to help the Jewish refugees aboard the St. Louis, and instead they were turned away and sent back to Europe.
Explanation:
What is one reason rivers are important natural resources in sub-Saharan Africa? answer choices
o They provide water for rainforest plants. o They provide drainage for river basins. o They provide electricity for several countries. o They provide fish for overseas export.
First option is correct. One of the reasons why rivers are an important natural resource in sub-Saharan Africa is that they provide water for the plants in the rainforests.
Africa has oil and gas deposits that are drilled for energy and fuel production. In 2007, the continent produced 12.5% of the world's total oil production and 6.45% of the world's total natural gas production. Nigeria, Libya, Algeria, Egypt and Angola dominate the African oil industry.
Oil exploration has increased significantly on the continent, with many countries aiming to become first-time producers. Exploration for oil and natural resource is also linked to the civil war. In Nigeria, guerrilla groups have been attacking oil infrastructure and stealing oil from pipelines since the early 1990s.
These groups, mostly ethnic minorities, say they retain most of their wealth while foreign oil companies exploit their workforce. They also claim that outdated equipment is severely polluting air, soil and water resources.This pollution has led to the loss of agricultural land and fish resources. However, the violent actions of these guerrilla groups damaged equipment and thus increased pollution. The attacks also reduced production and local income, as many businesses were forced to close.
Know more about natural resource here:
https://brainly.com/question/13954163
#SPJ4
What does building socialism mean
Opportunity Cost George Amy Flats 16 14 Breaks 8 8
Answer:
George fixes 16 flats or 8 brakes per day. Amy. ... Amy fixes 14 flats ... cost goes Over (IOU) Input problems Opportunity cost goes Under.
Explanation:
How might your life be different had George iii accepted the olive branch petition
Explanation:
Britain's King George III, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written by John Dickinson, appealed directly to the king and expressed hope for reconciliation between the colonies and Great Britain.
who is the youngest person to win an academy award
The youngest person to ever win an Academy Award is Tatum O'Neal.
She won the award for Best Supporting Actress in 1974 at the age of 10 for her role in the film "Paper Moon". O'Neal played the role of Addie Loggins, a young girl who travels with a con artist pretending to be her father. The film was directed by Peter Bogdanovich and also starred Ryan O'Neal, Tatum's real-life father. O'Neal's win was a historic moment for the Academy Awards, and she remains the youngest person ever to receive an Oscar. Despite her early success, O'Neal faced personal struggles in her life and career, but her achievement as a young actress in Hollywood remains a significant milestone in film history.
To learn more about Academy Award refer to:
brainly.com/question/15096407
#SPJ4
the changes in described in the excerpt most strongly support the argumen that in the late nineteenth century worker's ideas were evolving with regards to
The changes described in the excerpt most strongly support the argument that in the late nineteenth century workers' ideas were evolving with regards to their political power and the possibility of collective action.
What the author is saying in this excerpt is that the struggle for the eight-hour workday was not just about that specific issue, but was part of a broader movement for workers' rights and recognition. Workers were beginning to realize that they had power in numbers, and that by joining together and fighting for their rights they could achieve greater equality and respect in society.Therefore, the changes described in the excerpt most strongly support the argument that in the late nineteenth century workers' ideas were evolving with regards to their political power and the possibility of collective action.
For more such questions on late nineteenth century
https://brainly.com/question/11579840
#SPJ11
how did the federal government implement the indian removal act in 1838?
President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830, giving him the power to exchange Indian territories inside of current state lines for uninhabited territory west of the Mississippi. Many tribes opposed the concept of removal, however a few tribes left quietly.
What about Andrew Jackson?American lawyer, planter, general, and statesman Andrew Jackson presided over the country as its seventh president from 1829 to 1837. He rose to fame as a U.S. Army general and served in both houses of Congress before being chosen to the presidency. Jackson, a major general in the War of 1812, won national acclaim for defeating the British at New Orleans. Some state political factions supported Jackson in 1824; by 1828, enough had allied with "Old Hickory" to win a number of state elections and take over the federal government in Washington.During the War of 1812, Andrew Jackson led the Tennessee militia in a crushing victory over the Creek Indians (allied with the British).To learn more about Andrew Jackson, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15647756
The Indian Removal Act was implemented by the U.S. government in 1838 through a forceful relocation of Native American tribes from the Southeast to the 'Indian Territory'. This led to the Trail of Tears, a journey marking the suffering of Native Americans during relocation.
Explanation:The federal government implemented the Indian Removal Act in 1838 through a series of measures designed to forcibly relocate Native American tribes living in the southeastern United States to designated 'Indian Territory' in the West (now Oklahoma). This policy was largely driven by the desire of white settlers to expand their agricultural enterprises into Native American lands. The enforcement of the act is perhaps best remembered for the brutal journey known as the Trail of Tears, during which thousands of Native Americans died from disease, exposure, and starvation.
Learn more about Indian Removal Act here:https://brainly.com/question/476650
#SPJ2
briefly explain one example of how religion and science were a source of conflict in american society during the 1920s. b) briefly explain one development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition. c) briefly explain one important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods.
a) The conflict between religion and science in American society during the 1920s can be exemplified by the Scopes Monkey Trial. The trial was a court case held in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, where a high school biology teacher named John Scopes was accused of violating the Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in schools. The case became a national spectacle and pitted proponents of evolution against those who believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Although Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, the trial brought the issue of evolution to the forefront of American public discourse and highlighted the tensions between science and religion.
b) One development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition was the rise of organized crime. Prohibition, which banned the sale and consumption of alcohol, was enacted in 1919 with the ratification of the 18th Amendment. However, the law was widely flouted, and many people continued to drink and buy alcohol illegally. Organized crime syndicates, such as the mafia, saw an opportunity to profit from the demand for alcohol and began to smuggle and sell it on a large scale. This led to an increase in violence and corruption, and many Americans began to view prohibition as a failure.
c) An important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods was the introduction of quotas. The Immigration Act of 1924 established a quota system that limited the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from each country. The quotas were based on the percentage of each nationality that was already present in the United States in 1890, which favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe and restricted those from Southern and Eastern Europe. This marked a departure from earlier policies that had favored open immigration and reflected a growing nativist sentiment in American society.
For more such questions on American society
https://brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ11
1. After reading the topics, summarize some of the reasons that global migrations occurred in the
1750-1900 time period:
2. How do you think industrialization played a role in increased migrations in this time period?
3. How did environmental factors play a role in increased migrations in this time period?
4. How do you think global capitalism played a role in increased migrations during this time period?
Answer:
1. Global migrations occurred in the 1750-1900 time period due to various reasons such as economic opportunities, religious persecution, political instability, wars, and natural disasters.
2. Industrialization played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. As industrialization led to the growth of factories and manufacturing industries, there was a need for more labor. This led to the migration of people from rural areas to urban centers in search of work.
3. Environmental factors such as droughts, floods, famines, and other natural disasters also played a role in increased migrations during this time period. These environmental factors often led to crop failures and food shortages, which forced people to migrate to other areas in search of food and better living conditions.
4. Global capitalism also played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. The growth of capitalist economies and the search for new markets and resources led to colonization and imperialism. This, in turn, led to the forced migration of people from colonized territories to other parts of the world as laborers or slaves. Additionally, the growth of international trade and commerce led to the migration of skilled laborers and entrepreneurs in search of economic opportunities in other countries.
Relevance of understanding the philippine poetry and prose during the spanish colonial period
Understanding Philippine poetry and prose during the Spanish colonial period is important because it provides insight into the country's cultural and historical identity.
Literature during this period reflects the struggles and resistance of Filipinos against Spanish colonization, as well as their attempts to preserve their own cultural traditions and values. It also shows how Philippine literature was shaped by Spanish influence and how it evolved over time. Moreover, it highlights the role of literature in shaping the Filipino consciousness and in promoting nationalism and social awareness. By studying Philippine literature during the Spanish colonial period, we gain a better understanding of our cultural heritage and the ongoing struggle for social and political liberation.
To know more about Spanish colonial period click here:
brainly.com/question/4488404
#SPJ4
After the fall of France in 1940, what was the only nation left fighting Germany?
Soviet Union
Great Britain
United States
Italy
Switzerland
Answer:
Explanation:
Great Britain was the only nation left fighting Germany after the fall of France in 1940.
identify the statements that describe the marbury v. madison decision and its significance.
Answer:
Marbury v. Madison, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1803, was the legal decision that established the use of judicial review. In that case, the Supreme Court found that Congress's Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court established the principle that it has the authority to declare a law unconstitutional and so null and void.
dr kings tome and style contrast with the kinds of political speech we most often hear today. why do you think that is and what does it say about his contect and ourds
Dr. King's speeches were unique in that they were rooted in strong moral values, emphasized the importance of unity, and advocated for nonviolent civil disobedience. His approach stands in stark contrast to the divisive and often partisan language used in modern political discourse. This speaks to the timelessness of Dr. King's message and the continued relevance of his work today.
Dr. King's tone and style contrast with the types of political speech we mostly hear today. Why do you think that is, and what does it say about his context and ours?Dr. King's tone and style differ from the types of political speeches we hear today because his speeches have a more profound and meaningful approach. Dr. King's speeches focused on the human experience rather than the politics of it. The context in which Dr. King gave his speeches was quite different from the context in which political speeches are given today. Dr. King was focused on ensuring civil rights for all individuals, regardless of race, and he used his speeches to inspire and motivate people to work together to achieve this goal.Dr. King's speeches are seen as classic and memorable, and his words still inspire people today. The current political speeches have a negative and partisan approach, which only serves to widen the gap between different groups of people. The current political speeches often lack empathy, and it only highlights the divisive nature of the politics today. It says that Dr. King believed in unity and bringing people together, and he wanted everyone to be treated equally. It says that our current society needs to focus more on inclusivity and empathy, rather than being negative and divisive. Dr. King believed that everyone has the right to be heard and to live in a world that is just and equal, and his speeches have played a significant role in bringing positive change.
For more such questions on civil disobedience
https://brainly.com/question/8144430
#SPJ11
The policy of appeasement made Hitler stop his attacks and avoided war.
What is the best definition of a "city-
state?"
A. The capital of a kingdom.
B. A palatial complex of buildings that housed a
monarch.
C. An independent, self-governing territory.
city-state, a political device consisting of an unbiased town having sovereignty over contiguous territory and serving as a centre and chief of political, economic, and cultural life.
What is the dictionary definition of city-state?city-state. noun. a kingdom consisting of a sovereign town and its dependencies. Among the most famous are the terrific impartial cities of the historic world, such as Athens, Sparta, Carthage, Thebes, Corinth, and Rome.
A city-state is an independent, self-governing united states contained completely inside the borders of a single city. The ancient empires of Rome, Carthage, Athens, and Sparta are regarded early examples of city-states.
Learn more about city-state here:
https://brainly.com/question/14500968#SPJ1Help! 50 points + Branliest!
Explain how the policy of appeasement leads to Hitler’s taking of the Sudentenland in Czechoslovakia and how this lead to the beginning of World War II. (200 Words)
Answer:
The policy of appeasement was the approach taken by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany in the years leading up to World War II. Instead of confronting Adolf Hitler's territorial ambitions in Europe, these nations sought to appease him by making concessions with the hope of avoiding war. This policy, however, ultimately failed and contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
One of the most notable examples of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, in which Britain and France allowed Germany to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia. This was done without the consultation of the Czechoslovakian government and was an attempt to appease Hitler's territorial demands. The British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, famously declared upon his return from Munich that he had achieved "peace for our time."
However, Hitler's occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 demonstrated the failure of the policy of appeasement. This aggression led to Britain and France realizing the futility of appeasement and declaring war on Germany on September 3, 1939, beginning World War II.
The policy of appeasement ultimately failed because it gave Hitler the impression that he could act aggressively and that the other European powers would not respond. It also allowed Hitler to re-arm Germany and consolidate his power without opposition. The failure of appeasement taught the world a valuable lesson that aggressive dictators cannot be appeased, and that the only way to stop them is to confront them directly.
after the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black americans from voting.
After the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting.
After the Civil War, the Southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications, and this permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting. This period was known as the Jim Crow era, which began in 1877 and lasted until the mid-1960s.
It was a time when many African Americans were barred from voting due to laws and regulations that aimed to prevent them from doing so.
These laws and regulations included literacy tests, poll taxes, and property ownership requirements, all of which made it difficult, if not impossible, for many African Americans to vote.
In some cases, even African Americans who met the qualifications required by law were denied the right to vote due to poll taxes, intimidation, or outright fraud. As a result, many black Americans were effectively excluded from the political process for many years.
To know more about civil war refer here
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
As with World War I, what American foreign policy debate recurred, but which
German actions like that in the photograph started pulling American public
opinion into a more unified direction?
(A) Issue of increasing import tariffs, regarding foreign trade
(B) Continued implementation of Manifest Destiny
(C) Isolationism vs. intervention
(D) Imperialism vs. anti-imperialism
Answer:
What ensued was a radical shift in U.S. foreign policy, which promoted a stance of isolationism that would last until World War II. Warren Harding won the 1920 presidential election on the promise of staying out of global affairs, and by arguing that the United States needed normalcy and a focus on internal problem
on march 3, 1918, what treaty did russia sign with germany and the central powers ending their involvement in world war 1?
Answer:
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (also known as the Treaty of Brest in Russia) was a separate peace treaty signed on 3 March 1918 between Russia and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire), that ended Russia's participation in World War I.
Explanation: I really hope this helps!! Mark me brainliest!!
Have a good evening!! :))
tes
According to the Supreme Court, why was the plaintiff declared in error (line 3) in this case?
A Because he was enslaved
B. Because he was under 21 years old
C. Because he was not living in the state he sued in
D. Because he was a black person, regardless of free or enslaved status
Answer: Without knowing the specific case being referred to, it is difficult to provide an accurate answer. Please provide more context or information so that I can assist you better.
The Constitution provides that the _____________ will be allocated electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College. Select one:
a. State of Virginia
b. State of Washington
c. U. S. Territory of Puerto Rico
d. District of Columbia
The correct option is d. District of Columbia. The Constitution of the United States provides that the District of Columbia (DC) will be allocated electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College.
This means that during presidential elections, DC residents are able to participate in the electoral process and cast their votes for the President of the United States. The allocation of electors to DC is based on the same formula as for states, with DC being granted three electors. This provision was established through the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution in 1961, which granted residents of DC the right to vote in presidential elections.
Learn more about The Constitution here: brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
