In which quadrant of the coordinate graph does point J lie?

Answer:

Sady needs $455 more dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

1,000-545=455

Answer:1/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Two and ten divided by two equals 1 and 5 so 1/5

Answer:

B D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

55

Step-by-step explanation:

The measures of the angles are 23, 83, and 74 degrees. 97 degrees is not the measure one of the angle measures of the triangle option (B) is correct.

When two lines or rays converge at the same point, the measurement between them is called a "Angle."

It is given that:

The angle measures of a triangle are 2y + 3 degrees, 9y – 7 degrees, and 7y + 4 degrees.

As we know,

The sum of the interior angle of the triangle is 180 degrees

2y + 3 + 9y - 7 + 7y + 4 = 180

18y = 180

y = 10

2y + 3 = 2(10) + 3 = 23 degres

9y - 7 = 9(10) - 7 = 83 degrees

7y + 4 = 7(10) + 4 = 74 degrees

Thus, the measures of the angles are 23, 83, and 74 degrees. 97 degrees is not the measure one of the angle measures of the triangle option (B) is correct.

The question is incomplete.

The complete question is in the picture, please refer to the attached picture.

Learn more about the angle here:

brainly.com/question/7116550

#SPJ2

Answer:

A) 0.030

B) 0.026

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this HELP! :)

Answer:

1. –X + Y = -22X – Y = 6

2. X + Y = 5-2X + Y = -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12/5 just flip the numbers :D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Around 1000 students would buy a schoo lunch.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that in one class, 14 students bring lunch from home, and 20 buy lunch in the school. This will be our sample.

In total we have 20 + 14 = 34 students, this will be our 100%.

The percentage of students that bring lunch from home can be estimated as the quotient between the number of students that bring lunch from home and the total number of students, times 100%.

p1 = (14/34)*100% = 41.18%

And the percentage of students that buy lunch at school can be computed in the same way:

p2= (20/34)*100% = 58.82%

Then, out of the 1700 students in middle school, we can estimate that around 58.82% of them will buy lunch in the school.

Then the exact number will be:

N = (58.82%/100%)*1700 = 1000

Around 1000 students would buy a schoo lunch.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

look at the png

Answer:

New neurons are born not from mature nerve cells but rather develop from neural stem cells that remain in our brains throughout life. Indeed, in some brain areas, there is continual turnover of neurons - old ones die and new ones are born - and these new neurons can participate in circuits that underlie learning.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

trueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Answer:

-4.5, -3 1/2, -3, -2.5, 4 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

the higher the numbers as a negative, the smaller they are! :)

Answer:

from least to greatest

Step-by-step explanation:

1. -4.5

2.-3 1/2

3. -3

4.-2.5

5. 4 1/2

HAVE A NICE DAY HOPE U GET A A+

Answer:

1.7 × 10⁻⁴

Step-by-step explanation:

The question relates to a two sample z-test for the comparison between the means of the two samples  

The null hypothesis is H₀:  μ₁ ≤ μ₂

The alternative hypothesis is Hₐ: μ₁ > μ₂

[tex]z=\dfrac{(\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2)-(\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}-\dfrac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex]

Where;

[tex]\bar {x}_1[/tex] = 13.5

[tex]\bar {x}_2[/tex] = 12

σ₁ = 2.5

σ₂ = 1.5

We set our α level at 0.05

Therefore, our critical z = ± 1.96

For n₁ = n₂ = 23, we have;

[tex]z=\dfrac{(13.5-12)-(0)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{2.5^{2} }{23}-\dfrac{1.5^{2}}{23}}} = 3.5969[/tex]

We reject the null hypothesis at α = 0.05, as our z-value, 3.5969 is larger than the critical z, 1.96 or mathematically, since 3.5969 > 1.96

Therefore, there is enough statistical evidence to suggest that Alyse time is larger than Jocelyn in a 1 mile race on a randomly select day and the probability that Alyse has a larger time than Jocelyn is 0.99983

Therefore;

The probability that Alyse has a smaller time than Jocelyn is 1 - 0.99983 = 0.00017 = 1.7 × 10⁻⁴.

Refer the below solution for better understanding.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Standard Deviation, [tex]\rm \sigma_1 = 2.5\; and\;\sigma_2= 1.5[/tex]

Calculation :

The null Hypothesis is [tex]\rm H_0: \mu_1\leq\mu_2[/tex]

The alternative Hypothesis is [tex]\rm H_a: \mu_1>\mu_2[/tex]

Now,

[tex]z = \dfrac{(\bar{x_1}-\bar{x_2})-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}-\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}} }[/tex]  --------------- (1)

putting the values of

[tex]\bar{x_1}=13.5,\;\bar{x_2}=12,\;\sigma_1=2.5,\;\sigma_2=1.5[/tex]

in equation (1)

[tex]z=\dfrac{(13.5-12)-(0)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{2.5^2}{23}-\dfrac{1.5^2}{23}} }[/tex]

z = 3.5969

We reject the null hypothesis at

[tex]\alpha =0.05[/tex]

z-value is larger than the critical z.

3.5969 > 1.96

Therefore, there is enough statistical evidence to suggest that Alyse time is larger than Jocelyn in a 1 mile race on a randomly select day.

The probability that Alyse has a larger time than Jocelyn is 0.99983

Therefore, the probability that Alyse has a smaller time than Jocelyn is

[tex]1-0.99983 = 0.00017 = 1.7\times10^-^4[/tex]

For more information, refer the link given below

https://brainly.com/question/20165896?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Yes. It is inversely proportional.

Step-by-step explanation:

In your question, the constant of proportionality already jump out at us which is to get y, we have to multiply x by 7. Therefore the constant of proportionality is y=7x.

Answer:

5,5,10, and 60

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the remaining numbers

80-60= 20

10 + 10 = 20

Break it up to get 4 numbers total

5 + 5 + 10 = 20

20 + 60 = 80

Answer: [tex]-4 * (n+3) \geq 28[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Negative four -> [tex]-4[/tex]

Times the sum of a number and 3 -> [tex]-4 * (n + 3)[/tex]

Is at least 28 -> [tex]-4 * (n+3) \geq 28[/tex]

Answer:

First, use the equation of the trend line to find the IQ that is expected by the GPA. Next, use the other equation of the trend line to find the SAT that is predicted by the IQ.

Step-by-step explanation:

have a great day!

Answer:

First, use the equation of the trend line to find the IQ that is expected by the GPA. Next, use the other equation of the trend line to find the SAT that is predicted by the IQ.

Step-by-step explanation:

it was correct on edge

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

The constant of proportionality bus the amount earned by Ronnie, E, all over the corresponding hours he used in working, h.

Constant of proportionality = [tex] \frac{E}{h} [/tex]

From the graph given, when h = 5, E = 40.

Therefore:

Constant of proportionality = [tex] \frac{E}{h} = \frac{40}{5} = 8 [/tex]

Answer:

170 cm is the tallest

Answer:

240/4 hours will be 8 baskets

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

36 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

13.00

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=20

Step-by-step explanation:

so 5/4 is 1.25

so 25/x=1.25

so to find x we do 25/1.25

when we do that we get 20 so then to check if it's right we divide 25/20 and we get 1.25 so it's right

Answer:

yeet

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

From my observations, AOB looks like an isosceles triangle, so A=18 and B=18. Since a triangle must add up to 180. We do 180-18-18=144. O= 144. Then, triangle BOC looks like an isosceles triangle as well. So, we do 180-144= 36 so O = 36 and then we 180-36=144/2 because two sides have the same angles giving us 72 degrees for angles B and C = 72 and for O= 36

So,

x = 72

y = 36

Answer: 7^16

Step-by-step explanation: