Katie approximated the volume and the surface area for a ball she was using for some exercises by assuming the ball is a sphere. She was surprised when the numerical value of the volume in cubic inches was the same as the numerical value of the surface area in square inches. What is the radius of the ball?

Answer:

240 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

60*4=240

Answer: 240

Step-by-step explanation: If she is traveling 60 miles per hour you can multiply it by 4, which is 240.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 4 4

4 4 6

4 6 6

4 6 4

6 6 6

6 6 4

6 4 4

6 4 6

Answer:

[tex]7.2b+6.5>4.8b-8.1[/tex]

Multiply both sides by 10

[tex]72b+65>48b-81[/tex]

Subtract both sides by 65

[tex]72b>48b-146[/tex]

Subtract both sides by 48b

[tex]24b>-146[/tex]

Divide both sides by 24

[tex]b>-\frac{73}{12}[/tex]

OAmalOHopeO

Answer:

x = 14.5/a

Step-by-step explanation:

ax – 2 = 12.5

Add 2 to each side

ax – 2+2 = 12.5+2

ax = 14.5

Divide by a

ax/a = 14.5/a

x = 14.5/a

f(x) = -x² + x + 14

f(2) = -2² + 2 + 14 = -4 + 16 = 12

f(2) = 12

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

f (x) = -x^2 + x + 14

Let x= 2

f(2) = - (2)^2 +2+14

     = -4 +2+14

  = -2 +14

  = 12

Answer:

.93 calories per serving

Step-by-step explanation:

220 ÷ 3 = 73.3333333 calories per serving

3 ÷ 220 = 0.0136363636

362 ÷ 5 = 72.4

5 ÷ 362 = 0.0138121547

73.3333333 - 72.4 = 0.9333333 = around .93

Answer:

First, solve for two points as an equation instead of an inequality to find the boundary line for the inequality.

For:

x

=

0

y

=

0

+

5

y

=

5

Or

(

0

,

5

)

For:

x

=

−

2

y

=

−

2

+

5

y

=

3

Or

(

−

2

,

3

)

We can now plot the two points on the coordinate plane and draw a line through the points to mark the boundary of the inequality.

The boundary line will be solid because the inequality operator contains an "or equal to" clause.

graph{(x^2+(y-5)^2-0.125)((x+2)^2+(y-3)^2-0.125)(y-x-5)=0 [-20, 20, -10, 10]}

Now, we can shade the left side of the line.

graph{(y-x-5) >= 0 [-20, 20, -10, 10]}

70

Step-by-step explanation:

here,

area of parallelogram =base ×height

so,

base is given 10 cm and height is given 7 cm

Now

base ×heights

10×7

70

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's go over each option with the process of elimination!

A. A data set will always have exactly one mode.

Contradiction: 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6

in this data set, both 2 and 3 are modes, so it is incorrect.

B. A data set can have multiple means.

True, example as A.

C. A data set will have at least one mode.

Contradiction: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

There are no modes in here.

D. A data set will never have a mode.

Contradiction: 2, 2, 3, 4, 5

The mode is 2.

The only true statement is answer B.

I hope this helped! :D

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

if a data set had 1,1,3,4,4 how would you have 2 modes, 1,4. If you had 1,1,2,2,3,3 you would have 1,2,3 as your modes

a is wrong, c is wrong, d is wrong

a:my example has more that one

c:i have no explanation

d:is well already wrong

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

when logarithms of the same base (the base in this case is 'b') are being subtracted, divide the arguments ( 'a' and 'd')

Answer:

the sum of c minus 2 multiplied by d ------> (c-2)d

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Confidence Level - "P" values  

99%  2.58

Confidence Interval - "P" values  

(0.5289 , 0.6097 )  

Reference=0.523 Reject H0

Answer:

7.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the total cost and divide by the number of pizzas

22.50/ 3 pizzas

7.50 per pizza

[tex] \rm \longrightarrow \:Cost \: \: of \: \: 1 \: \: pizzas \: = \frac{Cost \: \: of \: \: 3 \: \: pizzas }{Total \: \: pizzas }[/tex]

[tex]\rm \longrightarrow \:Cost \: \: of \: \: 1 \: \: pizzas \: = \frac{22.50 }{3 } \\ [/tex]

[tex]\rm \longrightarrow \:Cost \: \: of \: \: 1 \: \: pizzas \: = \cancel\frac{22.50 }{3 } \: \: ^{7.5} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\rm \longrightarrow \:Cost \: \: of \: \: 1 \: \: pizzas \: = \: 7.5 [/tex]

Hence, the cost of 1 pizza is $7.5

The Pascal triangle terms and binomial are related by the binomial theorem fomrula:

The row of the Pascal triangle is the same as

where n is the same as the row of the Pascal triangle.

For example,

.

is the same as the 2nd row of the Pascal triangle.

.

Also know the leading coefficient and last term degree will be the nth row of the Pascal triangle.

The first term, a will be 1 less than the previous terms and the second term, b will be 1 more than the previous terms. For example, look at

.

Another example is

.

The third row of Pascal Triangle

.

.

Pascal's triangle provides a systematic way to determine the coefficients of binomial expansions, making it a valuable tool in algebra and combinatorics.

Binomial expansions are directly related to Pascal's triangle.

Pascal's triangle is a triangular arrangement of numbers in which each number is the sum of the two numbers directly above it. The first and last numbers in each row of Pascal's triangle are always 1.

The coefficients of the terms in a binomial expansion correspond to the numbers in Pascal's triangle. Each row of Pascal's triangle represents the coefficients of the corresponding power of the binomial.

For example, in the expansion of (a + b)², the coefficients are 1, 2, and 1. These coefficients can be found in the third row of Pascal's triangle: 1, 2, 1. Similarly, in the expansion of (a + b)³, the coefficients are 1, 3, 3, and 1, which can be found in the fourth row of Pascal's triangle: 1, 3, 3, 1.

In summary, Pascal's triangle provides a systematic way to determine the coefficients of binomial expansions, making it a valuable tool in algebra and combinatorics.

Learn more about Pascal's triangle here;

https://brainly.com/question/29549939

#SPJ2

Explanation:

Each equation given to you is in y = mx+b form (aka slope intercept form).

The slope m is what we'll focus on.

The first equation has slope of 1, while the second equation has slope -1.

The two slopes multiply to -1. This is a property of any pair of perpendicular lines, as long as neither line is vertical nor horizontal.

Or you could note that -1 is the negative reciprocal of 1, or vice versa.

So there are a few options to see why the lines are perpendicular.

Answer:

Take the Cubits and multiply

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a problem i had so just fill it in to your numbers etc.

A= 43.3 cubits squared

SA= the base of A +1/2 (p x slant h)

SA= 43.3 cubits squared + 1/2 (30 x 14 cubits)

To sum it up u can message me ur numbers and ill help

===========================================================

Work Shown:

(whole length)*(external part) = (whole length)*(external part)

(EG)*(FG) = (SG)*(HG)

(2x+4)*(4) = (x+5)*(5)

8x+16 = 5x+25

8x-5x = 25-16

3x = 9

x = 9/3

x = 3

Use this x value to find EF

EF = 2x

EF = 2*3

EF = 6

For more information, search out "secant secant formula". It's not a typo that I wrote "secant" twice.

Hi! I ran into a similar problem so i will try, but sorry if i get it wrong, so basically all you do i

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

- 2x² + 5x - 3 ← factor out - 1 from each term

= - 1(2x² - 5x + 3) ← factor the quadratic

Consider the factors of the product of the coefficient of the x² term and the constant term which sum to give the coefficient of the x- term.

product = 2 × 3 = 6 and sum = - 5

The factors are - 2 and - 3

Use these factors to split the x- term

2x² - 2x - 3x + 3 ( factor the first/second and third/fourth terms )

2x(x - 1) - 3(x - 1) ← factor out (x - 1) from each term

(2x - 3)(x - 1)

Then

- 2x² + 5x - 3 = - 1(2x - 3)(x - 1) → A

Answer:

[tex]End = (4, 9)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]Start = (2,6)[/tex]

Transformation: 2 units right and 3 units down

Required

The new point

First, we take the right translation;

When a point is translated right by 2 units, the rule is:

[tex](x,y) \to (x + 2, y)[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex](2,6) \to (2 + 2, 6)[/tex]

[tex](2,6) \to (4, 6)[/tex]

Next, we take the down translation;

When a point is translated down by 3 units, the rule is:

[tex](x,y) \to (x, y + 3)[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex](4,6) \to (4, 6+3)[/tex]

[tex](4,6) \to (4, 9)[/tex]

Hence, the endpoint is:

[tex]End = (4, 9)[/tex]

Answer:

Open in answr appOpen_in_app

(i)

15

7

=

30

x

⇒x=

15

7×30

=14

(ii)

3

x

=

18

12

⇒x=

18

12×3

=2

(iii)

x

30

=

24

45

⇒x=

45

30×24

=16

(iv)

16

8

=

x

25

⇒x=

8

25×16

=50

Step-by-step explanation:

yeah

Answer:

By the time her daughter is 21 years old 300 EUR will have been deposited into the account.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since a woman deposits 100 EUR in her daughter's bank account on her first birthday, and on every subsequent birthday, she deposits 10 EUR more than she deposited the previous year, so on her second birthday, she deposits 110 EUR, and on her third birthday she deposits 120 EUR, to determine, by the time her daughter is 21 years old, how much money has been deposited in her account, the following calculation must be performed:

100 + (20 x 10) = X

100 + 200 = X

300 = X

Therefore, by the time her daughter is 21 years old 300 EUR will have been deposited into the account.

Step-by-step explanation:

Claim: There's 14 Goats and 9 Chickens!!

Data:

Working with the Provided Information.

Let the Number of goats be x

let the Number of Chickens be y

x + y = 23..... (i)

Since the goat Possesses Two Pair of Legs... Which is a Total of 4 Legs... We say Let its Contribution be 4x.

The Chicken has Only a Pair Of Legs...Which is a total of 2 legs.... We say let its contribution be 2y

4x + 2y = 74 .....(ii)

BRINGING BOTH EQUATIONS TOGETHER.

x + y = 23

4x + 2y = 74

From Eqn i

x= 23 - y

Substitute into eqn ii

4(23 - y ) + 2y = 74

92 - 4y + 2y = 74

92 - 2y = 74

2y = 92 - 74

2y = 18

y= 9.

Substitute y into any of the eqns to get x

x + y = 23

x + 9=23

x = 23 - 9

x = 14

This simply proves that there are 14 Goats and 9 Chickens!!!.

HAVE A GREAT DAY!

Answer:

what are the questions

Step-by-step explanation:

You can model the ellipse with the equation

(x/6)² + (y/5)² = 1

If you're comfortable with calculus, read on.

Let x = 6 cos(t ) and y = 5 sin(t ), with 0 ≤ t ≤ π/2. Then the curve C parameterized by (x(t), y(t)) traces out one quarter of the ellipse. The arc length of this curve is given by the integral,

[tex]\displaystyle\int_C\mathrm ds = \int_0^{\pi/2}\sqrt{x'(t)^2+y'(t)^2}\,\mathrm dt \\\\ = \int_0^{\pi/2}\sqrt{36\sin^2(t)+25\cos^2(t)}\,\mathrm dt \\\\ = \int_0^{\pi/2}\sqrt{25+11\sin^2(t)}\,\mathrm dt \\\\ = 5\int_0^{\pi/2}\sqrt{1+\frac{11}{25}\sin^2(t)}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

Unfortunately, you cannot find the exact value of this integral. (Well, you can, but it involves introducing a special kind of function; I'll link it in a comment.)

But you can approximate it, and the integral above comes out to about 8.657.

I'm not sure if there's a simpler, purely geometric way to estimate the arc length. But since the semiaxes (5 ft and 6 ft) are fairly close, you could try a circle with a radius somewhere in between. The arc length would range between 7.854 ft and 9.425 ft. If the material isn't too expensive, you can always overshoot and trim off the excess or repurpose it.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (0, 8)

Step-by-step explanation:

The y-value of the y-intercept is the function value when x=0. That is the constant in the equation, since x=0 will make all of the x-terms be zero.

  y-intercept = 8

Answer:

the correct answer is 16ft^2

Answer:

If the amount is P, with the interest rate of 12%, the interest over the year is:

In this case the quarterly interest rate is:

With the same amount and 3% quarterly rate, the yearly interest would be:

The quarterly interest rate in this case is:

If the quarterly interest rate is r, it should be little less than 3% to yield a 12% yearly rate.

So Kraig is wrong.