Lara opened a savings account 1 year ago. The account earns 11% interest, compounded
continuously. If the current balance is $7,000.00, how much did she deposit initially?
Round your answer to the nearest cent.

Answer:

3x, 4x | 5, 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: x=211/1296

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]{ \rm{s = 12( v_{0} + v_{1} )t}} \\ \\{ \boxed { \rm{t = \frac{s}{12(v_{0} + v_{1})} \: \: }}}[/tex]

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

i think its right

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this problem, we need to find out how many seats there are in total, and then multiply that by the price per ticket.

To find the total number of seats, we need to add up the number of seats in each row. We can use the formula for an arithmetic sequence to do this:

S = n/2 * (a + l)

where S is the sum of the sequence, n is the number of terms, a is the first term, and l is the last term.

In this case, we have:

n = 20 (since there are 20 rows)

a = 25 (since there are 25 seats in the first row)

d = 2 (since the difference between each row is 2 seats, the common difference is 2)

We can use d to find the last term as well:

l = a + (n-1)*d

l = 25 + (20-1)*2

l = 25 + 38

l = 63

Now we can plug these values into the formula:

S = 20/2 * (25 + 63)

S = 10 * 88

S = 880

So there are 880 seats in total.

To find the total sales, we just need to multiply by the price per ticket:

total sales = 880 * $32

total sales = $28,160

Therefore, the total sales for a one-night concert with all seats taken would be $28,160.

The volume of the solid whose base is the region inside the circle with radius 3 if the cross sections taken parallel to one of the diameters are equilateral triangles is 81/2*\sqrt3 by using the slicing method.

To find the volume of the solid whose base is the region inside the circle with radius 3, we need to integrate the area of the cross sections taken parallel to one of the diameters, which are equilateral triangles.

Let's consider a cross section of the solid taken at a distance x from the center of the circle.

Since the cross section is an equilateral triangle, all its sides have the same length.

Let  this length be y. Since the triangle is equilateral, its height can be found using the Pythagorean theorem as follows:

[tex]height = \sqrt{(y^2 - (y/2)^2)} = \sqrt{(3/4y^2)}= \sqrt{3/2y}[/tex]

Therefore, the area of the cross section at a distance x from the center of the circle is:

[tex]A(x) = (1/2)y\sqrt{3/2y} = \sqrt{3/4y^2}[/tex]

Now, we need to integrate this area over the range of x from -3 to 3 (since the circle has radius 3):

[tex]V = \int\ [-3,3]\sqrt{3/4*y^2} dx[/tex]

To find the limits of integration for y, we need to consider the equation of the circle:

[tex]x^2 + y^2= 3^2[/tex]

Solving for y, we get:

[tex]y =\pm\sqrt{(3^2 - x^2)}=\pm\sqrt{(9^2 - x^2)}[/tex]

Since we want the cross sections to be equilateral triangles, we know that y is equal to the height of an equilateral triangle with side length equal to the diameter of the circle, which is 2*3 = 6. Therefore, we can write:

[tex]y = 3*\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Substituting this into the integral, we get:

[tex]V = \int\ [-3,3] \sqrt{3/4*(3\sqrt3)^2} dx[/tex]

[tex]= \int\ [-3,3] 27/4*\sqrt{3} dx[/tex]

Integrating, we get:

[tex]V = [27/4\sqrt{3x}]*[-3,3][/tex]

[tex]= 81/2*\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Therefore, the volume of the solid is [tex]81/2*\sqrt3[/tex]cubic units

To practice more questions about 'volume of solid':

https://brainly.com/question/20284914

#SPJ11

A bin can hold 28 pounds. each toy car weighs 7 ounces., so the bin can hold 64 toy cars.

To determine the number of toy cars the bin can hold, we must first convert the weight limit of the bin and the weight of the toy cars to a uniform unit of measure.

We'll then divide the weight limit of the bin by the weight of one toy car. After that, we'll multiply the resulting value by the number of ounces in one pound (16).

Here's how to solve the problem:

1 pound = 16 ounces

Therefore, a bin that can hold 28 pounds can hold:28 × 16 = 448 Ounces

The weight of one toy car is 7 ounces.

Divide the weight limit of the bin (448 ounces) by the weight of one toy car (7 ounces):

448 ÷ 7 = 64

Therefore, the bin can hold 64 toy cars.

Learn more about weight limit at

https://brainly.com/question/14375094

#SPJ11

The expected value of cases in which juries got the right decision is 150, and the variance is 375.

1. Since 25% of defendants in the state are innocent, that means that 75% of the defendants are guilty.
2. This means that in the given year, 150 out of the 200 people put on trial will be guilty.
3. Thus, the expected value of cases in which juries got the right decision is 150.
4. The variance of the number of cases in which juries got the right decision is calculated by taking the expected value and subtracting it from the total number of people put on trial, which is 200.
5. The result of the calculation is 375, which is the variance of cases in which juries got the right decision.

See more about variance at: https://brainly.com/question/9304306

#SPJ11

The first 4 terms of the sequence represented by the expression 3n + 5

is 8, 11, 14 and 17.

Sequence:

In mathematics, an array is an enumerated collection of objects in which repetition is allowed and in case order. Like a collection, it contains members (also called elements or items). The number of elements (possibly infinite) is called the length of the array. Unlike sets, the same element can appear multiple times at different positions in the sequence, and unlike sets, order matters. Formally, a sequence can be defined in terms of the natural numbers (positions of elements in the sequence) and the elements at each position. The concept of series can be generalized as a family of indices, defined in terms of any set of indices.

According to the Question:

Given, aₙ = (3n+5).

First four terms can be obtained by putting n=1,2,3,4

a 1=(3×1+5) = 8

a 2 =(3×2+5) = 11

a 3 =(3×3+5) = 14

a 4 =(3×4+5) = 17

First 4 terms in the sequence are 8, 11, 14, 17.

Learn more about Sequence:

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ4

In the following question, among the given options, Option (b) "Parabola B is wider than Parabola A" and option (d) "The line of symmetry of Parabola A is to the left of that of Parabola B" are the true statements.

The following statements are true about the parabolas: c. the parabolas have the same line of symmetry, and d. the line of symmetry of parabola A is to the right of that of parabola B.

Parabola A and Parabola B have the x-axis as the directrix, with the focus of Parabola A at (3,2) and the focus of Parabola B at (5,4). As the focus of Parabola A is to the left of the focus of Parabola B, the line of symmetry for Parabola A is to the right of the line of symmetry of Parabola B.

Parabola A and Parabola B may have different widths, depending on their equation, but this cannot be determined from the information given.

For more such questions on Parabola

https://brainly.com/question/29635857

#SPJ11

Sure, I can help you with this. To calculate the amount that Customer five will end up paying with their $5.00 off coupon and 4.5% sales tax, we will use the following formula: final amount = original amount - coupon - (original amount * tax rate).

In this case, the original amount is $5.00, the coupon is $5.00, and the tax rate is 4.5%. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

final amount = 5.00 - 5.00 - (5.00 * 0.045)

final amount = 5.00 - 5.00 - 0.225

final amount = 4.775

Therefore, Customer five will end up paying $4.775 after their coupon and the sales tax.

a. S = {(1, -1), (2, 1)}Let's begin by calculating the determinant of the matrix composed of the vectors of S, and checking if it is equal to 0. Because the two vectors are not colinear, they should span R2.|1 -1||2 1| determinant is not 0, therefore S spans R2. No geometric description is required for this example.

b. S = {(1, 1)} The set S contains one vector. A set containing only one vector cannot span a plane because it only spans a line. Therefore, S does not span R2. Geometric description: S spans a line that passes through the origin (0, 0) and the point (1, 1).c. S = {(0, 2), (1, 4)} Let's again begin by calculating the determinant of the matrix composed of the vectors of S, and checking if it is equal to 0.|0 2||1 4| determinant is 0, thus S does not span R2. In this scenario, S only spans the line that contains both vectors, which is the line with the equation y = 2x.

Geometric description: S spans a line that passes through the origin (0, 0) and the point (1, 2).

Learn more about geometric description:

https://brainly.com/question/28159445

#SPJ11

The Trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule are two methods used to approximate the value of a definite integral. The Trapezoidal rule approximates the integral by dividing the region between the lower and upper limits of the integral into n trapezoids, each with a width h. The approximate value of the integral is then calculated as the sum of the areas of the trapezoids. The Simpson's rule is similar, except the region is divided into n/2 trapezoids and then the integral is approximated using the weighted sum of the area of the trapezoids.

For the given integral 4 x x2 1 0 dx, with n = 200, the Trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule approximate the integral to be 7.4528 and 7.4485 respectively, rounded to four decimal places. The exact value of the integral is 7.4527. The difference between the exact and approximate values is very small, thus indicating that both the Trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule are accurate approximations.

for such more questions on approximate value

https://brainly.com/question/201331

#SPJ11

The most appropriate statistical test to assess whether a correlation exists between the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale and a previously validated visual analog scale is the (C) Spearman rank correlation.

Correlation refers to the connection between two variables in which a modification in one variable is linked to a modification in the other variable. Correlation can be positive or negative.

Spearman rank correlation- A non-parametric approach to test the statistical correlation between two variables is Spearman rank correlation, also known as Spearman's rho or Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. This is based on the ranks of the values rather than the values themselves. The results are denoted by the letter "r".

The formula for Spearman's rank correlation coefficient:

Rs = 1 - {6Σd₂}/{n(n₂-1)}

Where, Σd₂ = the sum of the squared differences between ranks.

n = sample size

Thus, the most appropriate statistical test to assess whether a correlation exists between these two measurements is the (C) Spearman rank correlation.

To know more about the "Spearman rank correlation": https://brainly.com/question/14646555

#SPJ11

An inequality representing the amount that the island of Martinique can received for hurricane relief efforts, where x is the number of days is y ≤ 32,000 + 4,500x.

Inequality is an algebraic statement that two or more mathematical expressions are unequal.

Inequalities can be represented as:

The total amount received by the island = $32,000

The daily receipt of donations = $4,500

Let the number of days = x

Let the funds raised for aid = y

y ≤ 32,000 + 4,500x

Thus, the inequality for the funds that the island can fundraise for hurricane relief aid by the end of the month is y ≤ 32,000 + 4,500x.

Learn more about inequalities at https://brainly.com/question/24372553.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula for compound interest:

A = P*e^(rt)

where A is the final amount, P is the principal (initial investment), e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828), r is the interest rate (expressed as a decimal), and t is the time (in years).

For Sophie's account, we have:

P = $92,000

r = 6 1/8% = 0.06125 (as a decimal)

t = 14 years

A = 92000*e^(0.06125*14)

A = $219,499.70 (rounded to the nearest cent)

For Damian's account, we have:

P = $92,000

r = 6 5/8% = 0.06625/12 = 0.005521 (as a monthly decimal rate)

t = 14*12 = 168 months

A = 92000*(1+0.005521)^168

A = $288,947.46 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Now we can subtract Sophie's final amount from Damian's final amount to find the difference:

Difference = $288,947.46 - $219,499.70

Difference = $69,447.76

Therefore, Damian would have about $69,448 more in his account than Sophie, to the nearest dollar.

The tangential component of the acceleration vector at point t = 1 is aT(1) = 233/3 and The normal component of the acceleration vector at point t = 1 is aN(1) = (1/3)√10459

The acceleration vector can be found from the following formula:

[tex]a(t) = r''(t) = (-3,-10t,-8t3).[/tex]

To find the tangential component of the acceleration vector, we first need the velocity vector v(t).

[tex]v(t) = r'(t) = (-3,-10t,-8t3) .[/tex]

Next, we need to normalize the velocity vector using the following formula:

[tex]T(t) = v(t) / ||v(t)||,[/tex]

Where ||v(t)|| is the magnitude of the velocity vector.

[tex](1) = (-3,-10,-8) / \sqrt{(3^2 + 10^2 + 8^2)} = (-3/3, -10/3, -8/3) = (-1 , -10/3, -8/3) .[/tex]

Then, the tangential component of a(1) is:

[tex]aT(1) = a(1) T(1) = (-3, -10, -8) (-1, -10/3, -8/3) = 3 + 100/3 + 64/3 = 233/3.[/tex]

To find the normal component of a(1), we simply need to find the magnitude of the tangential component and subtract it from the magnitude of the acceleration vector.

[tex]aN(1) = \sqrt{ (a^2 - aT(1)^2)} = \sqrt{(3^2 + (10)^2 + (8)^2 - (233/3)^ 2)}  = \sqrt{(9 + 100 + 64 - 54289/9)} = \sqrt{(10459/9)} = (1/3)\sqrt{10459}[/tex]

Therefore, the tangential and normal components of the acceleration vector at the point t = 1 are:

[tex]aT(1) = 233/3[/tex] and [tex]aN(1) = (1/3)\sqrt{10459}[/tex]

See more information about acceleration vector in: https://brainly.com/question/29811580

#SPJ11

a block slides along a track that descends through distance h. The track is frictionless except for the lower section. There the block slides to a stop in a certain distance d because of friction. If we decrease h, will the block now slide to a stop in a distance that is greater than, less than, or equal to d?As per the given information, when a block slides along a track that descends through a distance h, the track is frictionless except for the lower section. There the block slides to a stop in a certain distance d because of friction. Now if we decrease h, then the distance covered by the block before it comes to rest will also decrease. So the block will slide to a stop in a distance that is less than d. Hence the answer is less than d.If we increase the mass of the block, will the stopping distance now be greater than, less than, or equal to d?

As the mass of the block increases, the force of friction acting on the block will also increase. Hence the stopping distance will also increase. So the stopping distance now will be greater than d. Hence the answer is greater than d.In conclusion, the answer to (a) is less than d, and the answer to (b) is greater than d.

for such more questions on conclusion

https://brainly.com/question/26093731

#SPJ11

Answer:

The 2nd equation is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

You don't even have to solve. DE is not 58, it's 40.

The 2nd equation is false.

Answer:

The point z = 3+4i is plotted as a blue dot, and the two square roots are plotted as a red dot and a green dot. The magnitudes of z and its square roots are shown by the radii of the circles centered at the origin.

Step-by-step explanation:

qrt(z) = +/- sqrt(r) * [cos(theta/2) + i sin(theta/2)]

where r = |z| = magnitude of z and theta = arg(z) = argument of z.

Calculate the magnitude of z:

|r| = sqrt((3)^2 + (4)^2) = 5

And the argument of z:

theta = arctan(4/3) = 0.93 radians

Now, find the two square roots of z:

sqrt(z) = +/- sqrt(5) * [cos(0.93/2) + i sin(0.93/2)]

= +/- 1.58 * [cos(0.47) + i sin(0.47)]

= +/- 1.58 * [0.89 + i*0.46]

Using a calculator, simplify this expression to:

sqrt(z) = +/- 1.41 + i1.41 or +/- 0.2 + i2.8

In data analytics, a population refers to all possible data values in a certain dataset.

Data analytics is a set of procedures and processes for examining datasets in order to draw conclusions from the information they contain, often aided by specialized systems and software. Organizations use data analytics to aid decision-making, increase efficiency, and evaluate outcomes.

The population and sample are two concepts in statistics. The population and sample are two concepts in statistics. The population is the entire set of objects or individuals being studied, while the sample is a subset of the population that is chosen for analysis. The sample is a subset of the population, chosen at random or according to some other criteria in order to represent the population as a whole.

Learn more about dataset here: https://brainly.com/question/30034464

#SPJ11

Answer:

(-2,9)

Step-by-step explanation:

when moving it 5 units left on the x axis it would be 5-7

So in turn you would be given (-2,9)

Because the y stays the same you would still have (?,9)

The result (recurrent value), A = sum j=1 to 89 ln(j), is true for every n. This is the desired result.

As in T(n) = T(n/2) + n, T(0) = T(1) = 1, a recurrence or recurrence relation specifies an infinite sequence by explaining how to calculate the nth element of the sequence given the values of smaller members.

We can start by proving the base case in order to demonstrate the first portion through recurrence. Let n = 1. Next, we have:

Being true, ln(a1) = ln(a1). If n = k, let's suppose the formula is accurate:

Sum j=1 to k ln = ln(prod j=1 to k aj) (aj)

Prod j=1 to k aj * ak+1 = ln(prod j=1 to k+1 aj)

(Using the logarithmic scale) = ln(prod j=1 to k aj) + ln(ak+1)

Using the inductive hypothesis, the property ln(ab) = ln(a) + ln(b)) = sum j=1 to k ln(aj) + ln(ak+1) = sum j=1 to k+1 ln (aj)

(b), we can use the just-proven formula:

A = ln(1, 2,...) + ln + ln (89)

= ln(j=1 to 89) prod

sum j=1 to 89 ln = ln(prod j=1 to 89 j) (j).

To know more about hypothesis visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ1

The parabolic trajectory of the falling prey can be described by the equation y = 228 – x2/57, where y is the height above the ground and x is the horizontal distance traveled in meters. In this case, the prey was dropped at a height of 228 m and flying at 19 m/s. To calculate the total distance traveled by the prey, we can use the equation for the parabola to solve for x.

We can rearrange the equation y = 228 – x2/57 to solve for x, which gives us[tex]x = √(57*(228 – y))[/tex]. When the prey hits the ground, the height (y) is 0. Plugging this into the equation for x, we can calculate that the total distance traveled by the prey is[tex]x = √(57*(228 - 0)) = √(57*228) = 84.9 m.\\[/tex] Expressing this answer to the nearest tenth of a meter gives us the final answer of 84.9 m.

for such more questions on  parabolic trajectory

https://brainly.com/question/13244761

#SPJ11

By using differentials to estimate the maximum error when measuring the volume of the sphere if the possible error in measuring the radius is 0.5. It will be 32,572.03 in³. Which is option (d).

The possible error in measuring the radius of the sphere is 0.5 in

The formula for the volume of a sphere is given by V(r) = 4/3πr³

The volume of the sphere when r=72 in is given by V(72) = 4/3π(72)³

When r= 72 + 0.5 in= 72.5 in, the volume of the sphere can be calculated using the formula:

V(72.5) = 4/3π(72.5)³

The difference between these two volumes, V(72) and V(72.5), gives us the maximum error while measuring the volume of a sphere. It can be calculated as follows:

V(72.5) - V(72) = 4/3π(72.5)³ - 4/3π(72)³= 4/3π [ (72.5)³ - (72)³ ]= 4/3π [ (72 + 0.5)³ - 72³ ]= (4/3)π [ 3(72²)(0.5) + 3(72)(0.5²) + 0.5³ ]≈ (4/3)π [ 777.5 ]= 3.28 × 10⁴ in³

Therefore, the maximum error while measuring the volume of a sphere with a radius of 72 in, where the possible error in measuring the radius is 0.5 in, is approximately 3.28 × 10⁴ in³ or 32,572.03 in³. Therefore coorect option is (D).

To know more about the maximum error: https://brainly.com/question/13370015

#SPJ11

The upper bound of a + b can be found by adding the upper bounds of a and b.

For a = 5cm, the nearest whole number is 5. The upper bound would be the midpoint between 5 and 6, which is 5.5.

For b = 3cm, the nearest whole number is 3. The upper bound would be the midpoint between 3 and 4, which is 3.5.

So the upper bound of a + b is:

5.5 + 3.5 = 9

Therefore, the upper bound of a + b is 9cm.

Answer: 12.84

Step-by-step explanation:

if x = 3.2 and y = 6.1  and Z = 0.2

then plug in the numbers

(3.2)(0.2) + (6.1)(2)

0.64 + 12.2 = 12.84

Any variable next to a number means multiplication.

if I was wrong lmk

Solve the equation [tex]7/11=18/x+1[/tex] we find the solution is [tex]x = 27.2857[/tex]

Your example is an equation since an equation is any statement with an equals sign. Equations are frequently utilized for mathematical equations since mathematicians like equal signs. A set of instructions for achieving a certain result is called an equation.

A number, a constant, or a mix of numbers, variables, and operation symbols make up an expression. Two expressions joined by such an assignment operator form an equation.

we can cross-multiply,

[tex]7(x+1) = 11(18)[/tex]

Expanding the left side,

[tex]7x + 7 = 198[/tex]

Subtracting [tex]7[/tex] from both sides,

[tex]7x = 191[/tex]

Dividing both sides by [tex]7[/tex],

[tex]x = 191/7[/tex]

Therefore, the solution to the proportion is

[tex]x = 27.2857[/tex]

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

The probability of getting tails in the three coins would be 0.125 or 12.5%.

To calculate the probability of an event happening, first, we need to identify the rate of the desired outcome versus the total possible outcomes. Moreover, to determine the total probability of two or more events happening we need to calculate the probability of each event and then multiply the results.

Probability of getting tails in any of the three coins:

1 / 2 = 0.5

Total probabilityy:

0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.125 or 12.5%

Learn more about probability in https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

The reason why the terms a and m have to be relatively prime integers is that it is the only way to make sure that ax≡1 (mod m) is solvable for x within the integers modulo m.

Theorem:"If a and m are relatively prime integers and m > 1, then an inverse of a modulo m exists. Furthermore, this inverse is unique modulo m. (That is, there is a unique positive integer a less than m that is an inverse of a modulo m and every other inverse of a modulo m is congruent to a modulo m.)"If a and m are relatively prime integers and m > 1, then an inverse of a modulo m exists. Furthermore, this inverse is unique modulo m. (That is, there is a unique positive integer a less than m that is an inverse of a modulo m and every other inverse of a modulo m is congruent to a modulo m.)The inverse of a modulo m is another integer, x, such that ax≡1 (mod m).

This theorem has an interesting explanation: if a and m are not co-prime, then there is no guarantee that ax≡1 (mod m) has a solution in Zm. The reason for this is that if a and m have a common factor, then m “absorbs” some of the factors of a. When this happens, we lose information about the congruence class of a, and so it becomes harder (if not impossible) to undo the multiplication by .This is the reason why the terms a and m have to be relatively prime integers.

To know more about function click here :

https://brainly.com/question/12976257

#SPJ11