Multiply and show work

Answer:

60 miles/hour

Step-by-step explanation:

960÷16

=60 hours

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  B  2/6

Step-by-step explanation:

2 of the 6 possible outcomes are ones that are of interest. A "fair" die means the mutually-exclusive outcomes have equal probability, so ...

  P(4 or 5) = P(4) +P(5) = 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6

Answer:

306 square meters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide the shape into 2 rectangles.

Lets do the one that is sticking to the top first.

The area is 6 * 15, which is 90.

Lets do the second rectangle. The area is:

27 * 8, which is 216.

Add them all up (90 + 216), which is 306.

Answer:

306m²

Step-by-step explanation:

Split the shape into two rectangles with the accureate lengths

The top-most of the two rectangles with length 6m and width 15m:

6 x 15 = 90 m² (area of rectangle A)

The bottom rectangle:

27(full length) x 8m(full width) = 216m²

Add the two areas together for the full shape

216 + 90 = 306m²

Hi there!  

»»————-　★　————-««

I believe your answer is:  

[tex]w = 5, -5[/tex]

»»————-　★　————-««  

Here’s why:  

⸻⸻⸻⸻

Therefore:

[tex]w =\pm5[/tex]

⸻⸻⸻⸻

»»————-　★　————-««  

Hope this helps you. I apologize if it’s incorrect.  

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Arrival rate = ∧ = 2.2 customers per hour  

Service rate = u = 5 customers per hour  

1. Probability that one customer is receiving a haircut and one customer is waiting  

P(2 customers)=(∧/u)^2 * (1-∧/u)=(2.2/5)^2 * (1-2.2/5)=0.1936*0.56= 0.108416

2. Probability that one customer is receiving a haircut and two customers are waiting  

P(3 customers)= (∧/u)^3 * (1-∧/u)=(2.2/5)^3 * (1-2.2/5)= 0.085184  

* 0.56= 0.04770304

3. Probability that more than two customers are waiting  

P(more than 3 customers)=1- P(less than 3 customers) =  

1- [P(0)+P(1)+P(2)+P(3)]=  

= 1- [(1-2.2/5) +2.2/5*(1- 2.2/5) + 0.108416+0.04770304]=1-0.9625=0.0375

Answer:

Rewrite in vertex form and use this form to find the vertex  

(

h

,

k

)

.

(

2

,

3

)

Step-by-step explanation:

Using a linear approximation, the estimated cube root of 217 is  6.00925.

Given that the number is,

The cube root of 217

Now, for the cube root of 217 using a linear approximation, use differentials.

So, the derivative of the function [tex]f(x) = x^{(1/3)[/tex] at a known point.

Taking the derivative of [tex]f(x) = x^{(1/3)[/tex], we get:

[tex]f'(x) = (\dfrac{1}{3} )x^{-2/3[/tex]

Now, we can choose a point near 217 to evaluate the linear approximation.

Let's use x = 216, which is a perfect cube.

Substituting x = 216 into the derivative, we get:

[tex]f'(216) = (\dfrac{1}{3} )(216)^{-2/3[/tex]

            [tex]= 0.00925[/tex]

Next, use the linear approximation formula:

Δy ≈ f'(a)Δx

Since our known point is a = 216 and we want to estimate the cube root of 217,

since 217 - 216 = 1

Hence, Δx = 1

Δy ≈ f'(216)

Δx ≈ 0.00925 × 1

      ≈ 0.00925

Finally, add this linear approximation to the known value at the known point to get our estimate:

Estimated cube root of 217 ;

f(216) + Δy = 6 + 0.00925

                 = 6.00925

Therefore, the estimated cube root of 217 is 6.00925.

To learn more about the linear approximation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2272411

#SPJ4

Answer:

Freezers made up [tex]\frac{6}{25}[/tex] = 24% of the appliances sold in January.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that:

10 + 8 + 12 + 12 + 8 = 50 parts were sold in January.

Freezers made up what part of the appliances sold in January?

12 of those were freezers, so:

[tex]\frac{12}{50} = \frac{6}{25} = 0.24[/tex]

Freezers made up [tex]\frac{6}{25}[/tex] = 24% of the appliances sold in January.

Answer:

veoba

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.0853 > 0.05, which means that there is not enough evidence to reject the manufacturer's claim based on this observation.

Step-by-step explanation:

A manufacturer of nails claims that only 4% of its nails are defective.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of 4%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p = 0.04[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is more than 4%, that is:

[tex]H_a: p > 0.04[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

4% is tested at the null hypothesis

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.04, \sigma = \sqrt{0.04*0.96}[/tex]

A random sample of 20 nails is selected, and it is found that two of them, 10%, are defective.

This means that [tex]n = 20, X = 0.1[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.1 - 0.04}{\frac{\sqrt{0.04*0.96}}{\sqrt{20}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 1.37[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

Considering an standard significance level of 0.05.

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion above 0.1, which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of z = 1.37.

Looking at the z-table, z = 1.37 has a p-value of 0.9147

1 - 0.9147 = 0.0853

The p-value of the test is 0.0853 > 0.05, which means that there is not enough evidence to reject the manufacturer's claim based on this observation.

Answer:

Considering an standard significance level of 0.05.

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion above 0.1, which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of z = 1.37.

Looking at the z-table, z = 1.37 has a p-value of 0.9147

1 - 0.9147 = 0.0853

The p-value of the test is 0.0853 > 0.05, which means that there is not enough evidence to reject the manufacturer's claim based on this observation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

11 and 33

Step-by-step explanation:

The the smaller number be [tex]x[/tex]. Since the other number is 3 times as large as the other, we can represent the large number as [tex]3x[/tex]. Because they add up to 44, we have the following equation:

[tex]x+3x=44[/tex]

Combine like terms:

[tex]4x=44[/tex]

Divide both sides by 4:

[tex]x=\frac{44}{4}=\boxed{11}[/tex]

Substitute [tex]x=11[/tex] into [tex]3x[/tex] to find the larger number:

[tex]11\cdot 3=\boxed{33}[/tex]

Therefore, the two numbers are 11 and 33.

Answer:

4th option

Step-by-step explanation:

tanZ = [tex]\frac{opposite}{adjacent }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{XY}{ZY}[/tex]

Answer:

4.17%

(1/4)(1/3)(1/2)(1)

alternative you can say that there are 24 permutations of

4 items and that you have to guess 1 of them 1/24 = 4.17%

Step-by-step explanation:

0.25  

0.333333333  

0.5  

1  

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1) 6m+8n

4) 21x+14y

7) 14c+16d

10) d+3e

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is 35/64(in fraction) but in decimals it's 0.55

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Common Ratio=-3

Step-by-step explanation:

To find any common ratio in a sequence, always take the second number in the sequence and divide it by the first number. However, you must be careful because the common ratio should only be negative if the values in the sequence are alternating between negative and positive. Therefore, if the sequence of numbers is simply decreasing in value, this does not mean that the common ratio is negative. The common ratio would still be positive. If the sequence is decreasing in value, this means that the common ratio would be a fraction or a decimal less than one.

Answer:

a) 8:3, b) no formula is there, c) 30

Step-by-step explanation:

because 200/75=8:3

because there formula being obtained

because 300/24=12.5

375/12.5=30

Answer:

total pencil = 5 orange pencils + 8 yellow pencils + 4 green pencils

= 17 pencils

P (g n y) = 4/17 + 8/17

= 0.706

Step-by-step explanation:

1. first find the total number of pencils

2. since there is a replacement the demoinator remains the same

3. find the probability of each green and yellow

4. add the two probability

Answer:

By similar triangles:    BE/20 = 18/25    BE 14.4

Also, (ED + 26) / 26 = 18/14.4

ED = 6.5   and AD = 32.5

Step-by-step explanation:

12/100=30/x

12x=3000

x=250

hiii! !!

Answer:

The answer is "0.18"

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]10\% \ of \ 50= 5 \text{are left handed}\\\\45\ \text{are right handed}\\\\[/tex]

If the probability exactly 4 were heft handed

 [tex]=^{50}_{C_4}\times (\frac{5}{50})^4 \times (\frac{45}{50})^{4b}\\\\=^{50}_{C_4} \times (0.1)^4 \times (0.9)^{4b}\\\\=230300 \times (0.1)^4 \times (0.9)^{4b}\\\\=0.181 \approx 0.18[/tex]

Answer:

Solution given:

[tex]x_{1},y_{1}=(8,-8)[/tex]

[tex]x_{2},y_{2}=(-1,-5)[/tex]

Now

Distance between them is:

d=[tex]\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})²+(y_{2}-y_{1})²}[/tex]

d=[tex]\sqrt{(-1-8)²+(-5+8)²}=3\sqrt{10}[/tex]

Distance between them is [tex]\bold{3\sqrt{10}}[/tex]

Answer:

C. 0.48

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability = number of required outcome

_______________________

number of possible outcome

= total volleyball game events

_______________________

total sophomore + junior

= 66/137

= 0.48

Answer: D) 0.31

Step-by-step explanation:

Let A denote the event that a person is a sophomore.

Let B denote the event that a person has attended volleyball game.

A∩B denote the event that a person is a sophomore and attend volleyball game.

Let P denote the probability of an event.

We are asked to find:

P(A∩B)

From the table provided to us we see that:

A∩B=42

Hence,

P(A∩B)=42/137=0.3065 which is approximately equal to 0.31. Therefore ur answer will be 0.31.

Answer:

D. Critical value =± 0.707; there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between heights of mothers and heights of their daughters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.693

The sample size, n = 8

The degree of freedom used for linear correlation :

df = n - 2

df = 8 - 2 = 6

Using a critical value calculator for correlation Coefficient at α = 0.05

The critical value obtained is : 0.707

The test statistic :

T = r / √(1 - r²) / (n - 2)

T = 0.693 / √(1 - 0.693²) / (8 - 2)

T = 0.693 / 0.2943215

T = 2.354

Since ;

Test statistic < Critical value ; we fail to reject the null and conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between heights of mothers and heights of their daughters.

Answer: hello your question is incomplete below is the complete question

The Two vectors;  A = 5i + 6j +7k and B = 3i -8j +2k.

answer;

angle = 102°

Step-by-step explanation:

multiplying the vectors

A.B = |A| * |B|* cosθ

hence : Cosθ = (Ai*Bi )+ (Aj*Bj) + ( Ak*Bk/ (√A^2 *√B^2 )

                       = 15 - 48 + 14 /(√25+26+29) * (√9+64+4)

                      = -0.206448454

θ = cos^-1 ( -0.206448454) = 101.9° ≈ 102°

Answer:

I am taking this graph because this question looked similar to this one.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer should be B.

The intersection point is (3,3)

Hello,

2 points of the line: (2,0) and (0,3)

[tex]\Delta\ y=3-0=3\\\Delta\ x=0-2=-2\\\dfrac{\Delta\ y}{\Delta\ x} =\dfrac{-3}{2} \\\\y-0=\dfrac{-3}{2}*(x-2)\\\\\boxed{y=-\dfrac{3x}{2}+3}\\[/tex]