n the expression below, the letters A,B, C, D and E represent the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4
and 5 in some order.
A×B +C ×D +E
What is the largest possible value of the expression?

Answer:

m = 65

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

- 13 = [tex]\frac{m}{-5}[/tex] ( multiply both sides by - 5 )

65 = m

Answer:

Below,...!

Step-by-step explanation:

1 = Variable

2 = Exponent

3/4 = Coefficient

1. True

2. False

3. True

4. FaLSE

Answer:

4 + (-3-8)

4 + (-11)

4 (+ × -) 11

4 - 11

- 7

Therefore the answer is -7

Answer:

4 + (-3-8)

4 + (-11)

4 (+ × -) 11

4 - 11

- 7

Therefore the answer is -7

Answer:

1/23

Step-by-step explanation:

5/23 - 4/23 would be 1/23. When the denominators of the fractions are the same, you can just subtract the numerators.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

the Andrew's going to be 12 because you have to

know all the sides of cube

Answer:

$137.33

Step-by-step explanation:

$115.78 + $15.00 = $130.78

$130.78 + $7.50 = $138.28

$138.28 - $35.90 = $102.33

$102.33 + $20.00 = $122.33

$122.33 + $15.00 = $137.33

Chow,...!

Step-by-step explanation:

(p+1)³

p³+3×p²×1+3×p×1²+1³

p³+3p²+3p+1

I hope it helped U

stay safe stay happy

I hope it will be helpful to you .

Answer:

I don't believe any of these are correct.

I think the real order is:

-9/4, -1, [tex]\sqrt{6}[/tex], 1/4, 3.9

But I would choose D if I were you.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

natural numbers start from one but it says greater than 70 so it will start from 71 but to any number as long as it is greater than 70

Answer:

[tex]4\sqrt{6}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{sin\left(90\right)}{x}=\:\frac{sin\left(60\right)}{\left(\frac{\left(6\cdot \:sin\left(90\right)\right)}{sin\left(45\right)}\right)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

formular 1/2 × base × height

1/2 × 2 × 8

16/2 = 8 ft

ans 8 ft

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a = 2 ft ;   b = 8 ft ;  C = 91

[tex]Area = \dfrac{abSin \ C}{2}\\\\ =\dfrac{2*8*Sin \ 91}{2}\\\\=8* 0.99\\\\= 7.92\\\\= 8 \ ft^{2}[/tex]

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

if the pattern continues it looks like the equation f(x)=10x+1000 so you would need 100 hours to make 2000 dollars

Answer:

the balance is 56$

Step-by-step explanation:

its still 56$ because there isn't anything mention to tamara has buy something so he doesnt lose any money.

Answer:

Sides = 8 each and base = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Let congruent legs = x, then the base is x - 2 so,

P = x + x + (x - 2)

22 = 3x - 2

24 = 3x

8 = x (sides)

base = 8 - 2 = 6

Answer:

bro please help me make me brianliest I think c

Answer:

Dan is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

First, I calculated the amount of hours that the graph shows in total, coming up with a total of 3,085 hours. I do this by multiplying the number of adults surveyed by the number of hours they spent. So for the first column, (80+70)*1, second column, (90+80)*2, third column, (135+130)*3, fourth column, (140+135)*4, and fifth column, (65+75)*5 if you get what I mean. Then I add up all values. Knowing that there were two sets of 500 American adults interviewed already, I came to the conclusion that 1,000 total adults were surveyed. Finally, I divided the total number of hours(3,085) by the total number of adults interviewed (1,000) to get a mean of 3.085 hours, rounding it to 3 hours and proving that Dan is correct.

Answer:

[tex]x+17[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

Let [tex]x[/tex] represent "the number".

The sum of a number and seventeen

⇒ [tex]x+17[/tex]

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Lamar's next step is x^2 — 12x + 6 = 0

The solution to the equation is x = ± 6√30

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution is 8 in

Let´s call dimensions of the box

According to the problem statement

y = x + 3     and    h = 4 in

The volume of the box is:

V = x×y×h       V = 360 in³

Then  V = x × ( x + 3 ) × 4     ( by substitution of y as a function of x )

360 = x × ( x + 3 ) × 4

Simplifying by 4

90 =  x × ( x + 3 )

90 = x² + 3x

We got a second degree equation, solving for x

x² + 3×x - 90 = 0

x₁,₂ = ( -3 ± √ (3)² + 4×90 )/2   ⇒   x₁,₂ = ( - 3 ± 19,21 )/2

x₁   ⇒  is a negative value    x = - 11,1  so we dismiss such solution

x₂  = 16.21/2

x₂  =  8.1 in

rounding to the nearest integer number we get the value for the length f the box

x₂ = 8 in        ⇒ x = 8 in

Note: In Brainly.com in search bar ask for cube dimensions

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

g(x) = 0

0=-5x+5

5x=5

x=1

Answer:

x = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

given:

[tex]g(x) = -5x + 5[/tex]

solve for x, when:

[tex]g(x) = 0[/tex]

replace x with 0

~~~~~~~~~~~~

➡️ [tex] x = -5(0) + 5 [/tex]

➡️ [tex] x = 0 + 5[/tex]

➡️ [tex]x = 5 [/tex]

Answer:

B) 74

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an icoseles triangle because of the 2 lines in each side. This makes <Y equal to <Z

Given:

<Y = <Z

All triangle angles add up to 180 so:

<W + <Y + <Z = 180

<W + 53 + 53 = 180

<W + 106 = 180

<W = 180 - 106

<W = 74

Answer:

4(5x _ 2y ) ^

Step-by-step explanation:

It is above in a photo .

Answer:

Yes of course I will help you

Answer:

29, 31, 33

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{\sf - \frac{7}{68} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{3}{8} \div (-\frac{51}{24} \div \frac{7}{12} )\\\\While \ changing \ \div \ into \ \times, \ we \ will\ switch \ the \ denominator \ and \ numerator \ after \ \div \ sign\\\\= \frac{3}{8} \div (\frac{-51}{24} \times \frac{12}{7} )\\\\= \frac{3}{8} \div (\frac{-51}{2} \times \frac{1}{7} )\\\\= \frac{3}{8} \div \frac{-51}{2 \times 7} \\\\= \frac{3}{8} \div \frac{-51}{14} \\\\= \frac{3}{8} \times \frac{14}{-51} \\\\= \frac{1}{4} \times \frac{7}{-17} \\\\[/tex][tex]\displaystyle = \frac{1 \times 7}{4 \times (-17)} \\\\= \frac{7}{-68} \\\\= - \frac{7}{68} \\\\\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]

Hope this helped!

Answer:

= -7/68

Step-by-step explanation:

1- first simplify the fractions in the bracket

= 3/8 (-17/8 7/12)

2- then calculate within the brackets

= 3/8 (-51/14)

3- lastly multiply & divide

3/8 (-51/14) = -7/68

Answer:

h(-2) = 224

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data. ... Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false.

Step-by-step explanation: