On November 29, 1937, several individuals gathered at the headquarters of the Committee for Industrial Organization (CIO) in Jersey City, New Jersey to initiate a recruitment drive and discuss the National Labor Relations Act. Acting on the orders of Mayor Frank Hague, police seized the group's recruitment materials and refused to allow the meeting to take place. Hague argued that he was enforcing a 1930 city ordinance that forbade gatherings of groups that advocated obstruction of the government by unlawful means. Hague referred to CIO members as "communists." Arguing that the ordinance violated the First Amendment protection of freedom of assembly, the group filed suit against several city officials, including Hague. A district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit agreed and invalidated the ordinance. In Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (1939), the Supreme Court concluded that the actions taken by police clearly violated the First Amendment as it applied to the states. "Citizenship of the United States would be little better than a name if it did not carry with it the right to discuss national legislation and the benefits, advantages, and opportunities to accrue to citizens therefrom." Relying on the Court's previous ruling in the Slaughter House Cases, Justice Roberts wrote that freedom of assembly is "a privilege inherent in citizenship of the United States" and that no "contrary view has ever been voiced" by the Court. Source: Oyez, Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (1939) Identify a constitutional provision that is common to both Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (1939) and Schenck v. United States (1919). Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization led to a different holding than the holding in Schenck v. United States. Explain how an interest group could use the holding in Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization to further its agenda.

The First Amendment's ability to assemble was infringed, the Supreme Court found, by forbidding a group of individuals from organizing political gatherings in a public space.

When it secured the right of access to public spaces for citizens engaging in free speech and free assembly, the case helped establish the precedent for what is now known as the public forum doctrine.

The question in Hague was whether the First and Fourteenth Amendments were violated by a Jersey City ordinance that forbade a group of residents from gathering in a public space.

To talk about and hand out literature about the National Labor Relations Act without a permission. The group was described as “communist” and a threat to the city by Mayor Frank Hague.

Therefore,  A method used by courts to assess the constitutionality of speech restrictions implemented on government property.

Learn more about Industrial Organization here:

https://brainly.com/question/10513115

#SPJ2

In your own words, describe why Herophilus and Erasistratus were so important to human anatomy.

Black walnut trees produce a nontoxic chemical that becomes highly toxic when it is exposed to air or soil. How does this chemical help black walnut trees compete with plants growing nearby? A.By attracting herbivores to the other plants B.By suppressing the growth of the other plants C.By increasing the photosynthesis rates in the other plants \ D.By limiting the amount of water available to the other plants

NEED ANSWERS ASAP
Which of the following has had the most profound effect on how people receive their news?
A:changes in attitudes about the role of media corporations
B:The rise and popularity of social media
C:Decrease in the cost of access to information
D:The governments increased role in providing news to the public

Seniors at a public high school can pay for a block on a wall to paint as they please to leave their mark. Some students choose to include Bible verses on their blocks. A group of parents lodge a complaint with the school board, saying that their children have to walk by the wall and should not have religious speech forced on them. The parents say that since it is a public school, the practice violates the establishment clause. The school board orders the existing verses to be painted over and bans the use of religious speech on the blocks. A group of students challenge the ban, claiming that it violates their right to free expression and free exercise of religion. Prepare an essay in the form of an argument on whether or not the local school board has violated the students' rights under the Constitution. In your essay, you must: Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning Support your claim or thesis with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information: At least ONE piece of evidence must be from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) At least ONE piece of evidence must be from Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) or Engel v. Vitale (1962) Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal

What trends/characteristics of humanity changed over time and which ones remained the same? Think of human ability to communicate, organize, create, destroy, etc. Has to be two paragraphs long

What is the area called where an enzyme attaches to a substrate? A.Socket B.Opening Site C.Attachment Site D.Active Site

(URGENT) The difference between a psychological disorder and what is "normal": A. may vary from culture to culture B. changes from year to year C. is very clearly defined D. does not change

what part of a cell determines a persons blood type

Active managerial control and HACCP are two systems to help food service establishments control risks and hazards as food flows from the
point of purchase to the point of service.
O True
O False