Answer:
Islam also spread into West Africa through the activities of Muslim clerics, marabouts and scholars or mallams. These clerics or learned men founded their own religious centres which attracted students from all parts of the Western Sudan and who on the completion of their studies and training went back to their own homes to win converts.
Explanation:
One factor that favored the spread of Islam to west Africa was trade along the gold salt route. Gold was sought after for its beauty, but salt was necessary for survival. Salt made bland food tastier and could be used to preserve food. As a result, salt was extremely precious. In fact, Africans have been known to break apart salt slabs and use the fragments as currency.
Why did Islam spread to Africa?Arab oral history holds that it was Muslim immigrants from the Arab peninsula who originally brought Islam to Africa. Following this, a military invasion led by Muslim Arab General Amr ibn al-Asi took place about seven years after the passing of the prophet Mohammed in 639.
Islam was first introduced to West Africa in a gradual and peaceful manner by Muslim academics and traders. Early expeditions crossed the Sahara in phases. The southernmost end of the road saw the ultimate purchase of goods by local non-Muslims after passing through networks of Muslim vendors.
Learn more about Islam in West Africa here:
https://brainly.com/question/496722
#SPJ6
Which of these statements is true about making changes to the Constitution
1. It’s a slow progress but changes are rarely rejected
2. It’s fast and easy
3. It’s possible but difficult
4. Changes were never made to happen
Which one ?
Answer:
3
Explanation:
constitution is difficult
which indian tribe taught the pilgrims how to cultivate the land and were invited to the thanksgiving meal?
Answer: The Wampanoag
Pls help!! American Revolutionary War
Answer:
Mark me as Brainliest
Explanation:
A
why might the colonists be to blame for the french and indian war
Answer:
With the French and Indian War over, many colonists saw no need for soldiers to be stationed in the colonies. Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens
Explanation:
They also just want someone to blame
How does the excerpt contribute to the power of Banneker’s message to Jefferson?
Select the two correct answers.
Banneker quotes a biblical figure to establish his moral superiority over Jefferson and white Americans.
Banneker compliments Jefferson’s intelligence and awareness with the intention to engage him as an ally in the fight to abolish enslavement.
Banneker makes a religious reference to encourage Jefferson to empathize with enslaved persons.
Banneker suggests that by walking in the shoes of persons denied their basic rights, Jefferson and white Americans will feel compelled to end enslavement.
Answer:
I just took the test hope this helps:)
Explanation:
Answer:
Check out my pic attached. I hope this helps!
Explanation:
Study the following quote. Then answer the question that follows. "I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation to show a single advantage that this continent can reap by being connected with Great Britain. ... Our corn will fetch its price in any market in Europe." This quote from Thomas Paine's Common Sense
A: argues that ties to Great Britain are essential to maintain prices for corn grown in the colonies
B: states that breaking away is a good idea as long as they continue to trade with Great Britain
C: challenges those who wish to break away from Great Britain to find other countries to trade with
D: reassures colonial farmers that they can earn a profit from their goods without Great Britain's help
Answer:
D
Explanation:
ANSWER ONLY IF YOU KNOW!!!
Answer:
d.
Explanation
The long growing season and warm, damp climate of the Southern Colonies made the region perfect for growing tobacco and rice. Many southern planters became very wealthy exporting these cash crops to other colonies and countries.
Which sentence from Barrio Boy gives the word mother a negative connotationWhich sentence uses the denotation of the word heart?
Answer:Well I need a picture of the answer it could be to help you, please.
Explanation:
please help me right now
what is the summary for ending the slave trade in the slave trade
Answer:Two hundred years ago this month, the United States abolished the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Eric Foner, a historian at Columbia University, takes listeners inside the historical moment tied to one of America's darkest eras.
The struggle to end the transatlantic slave trade and slavery was achieved by African resistance and economic factors as well as through humanitarian campaigns. The most prominent abolitionists in Britain, notably Thomas Clarkson and William Wilberforce, were great publicists.
Explanation:
In 2-3 paragraphs, explain the historical significance of the Brown v. Board of Education case in the larger context of minority rights. Consider the following in your response:
What is the significance of the “equal protection” clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Why did both Plessy and Brown use that clause in their suits?
What impact did Plessy v. Ferguson have on minority rights? What was the significance of “separate but equal”?
What impact did Brown v. Board of Education have on minority rights?
How does the ruling in the Brown v. Board of Education case connect to the idea of the balance between majority and minority described in Thomas Jefferson’s First Inaugural Address?
What checks and balances protect the rights of the minority?
The historical significance of the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case repudiated the legal huddle posed by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that legalized the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The case took to the cleaners the impossibility of offering "equal protection" according to the Fourteenth Amendment while maintaining "separate but equal" facilities for blacks and whites.
The Plessy v. Ferguson decision used the "equal protection" clause to entrench the Jim Crow laws. On the other hand, the Brown v. Board of Education case used the "equal protection" clause to upturn the Jim Crow laws. Thus, different interpretations of the same clause can birth different approaches to human relationships.
The Plessy v. Ferguson case killed all the efforts of racial harmony promoted by Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation. It showed the evil extent humans undertake to defend their whims and caprices. The Plessy decision killed minority rights by creating a misplaced "separate but equal" camouflage on human rights.
On the other hand, Brown v. Board of Education became the catalyst for minority rights movements, galvanizing people of color to redress centuries of racial discrimination.
The ruling in the Brown v. Board of Education case supports Thomas Jefferson's idea that while the majority should reasonably have their way, minorities must not lose their human rights on the altars of the majority. According to Thomas Jefferson, if the rights of minorities are denied or not protected, it becomes naked oppression.
The "checks and balances" that protect the rights of the minority are in the US Constitution, especially in the Amendments. Specifically, the Constitution underscored that all races are equal and possess inalienable rights.
Thus, to allow racial segregation through the creation of "separate but equal" facilities is injustice and a denial of liberty.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/19475596 and https://brainly.com/question/15806678
PLEASE HURRY, IS DUE IN TWO HOURS 75 PTS!!!!
1. What was the original intent of the Roman Republic? Why did the Romans decide to have that form of government?
2. Why do you think eventually the Romans were not successful in their republic? Why is this important for all to know today? In other words, why do you think you were asked to do this specific project? Why are these ideas important?
3. Find examples in our world today where governments are meant to be a democracy or a republic and are not following those ideals. Who and why? (at least 2 examples here)
4. What is democracy and how is that different from a republic? (Please use your own words here – not just definitions.) Why is this difference important to know?
Part III:: Each question is worth 10 points and is a full paragraph that uses FADE.
Consider where democracy is going right now and when there have been problems in the past with democracies.
Answer:1. What was the original intent of the Roman Republic? Why did the Romans decide to have that form of government? The Roman Republic began in 509 B.C. when the Romans expelled the Etruscan kings and set up their own government. Having witnessed the problems of the monarchy on their own land, and aristocracy and democracy among the Greeks, they opted for a mixed form of government, with three branches.
2. Why do you think eventually the Romans were not successful in their republic? Why is this important for all to know today? In other words, why do you think you were asked to do this specific project? Why are these ideas important? Economic problems, government corruption, crime and private armies, and the rise of Julius Caesar as emperor all led to its eventual fall in 27 BCE. Rome's continued expansion resulted in money and revenue for the Republic.
3. Find examples in our world today where governments are meant to be a democracy or a republic and are not following those ideals. Who and why? (at least 2 examples here). The United States and Nigeria are examples of presidential democracies. The executive branch includes the president and his cabinet. Along with the judicial and legislative branch, the three branches of government work to keep checks and balances, but the president has final say.
4. What is democracy and how is that different from a republic? (Please use your own words here – not just definitions.) Why is this difference important to know? The major difference between a democracy and a republic is that a republic is a form of government whereas a democracy is an ideology that helps shape how a government is run. Put another way: a republic is the system of government that allows a country to be democratic!
Explanation:
sorry if this dont help
What landforms bordered Egypt on the east and west,and how did these contribute to the development of ancient Egyptian civilization
Answer:
With its natural borders - the Sahara Desert to the west, the mountainous Eastern Desert and the Red Sea to the east, the Mediterranean Sea edging the marshy Delta to the north and the Cataracts to the south, ancient Egyptians were reasonably free from invaders.
Explanation:
The Mayans and the ancient Egyptians were alike because they both:
rose to power at the same time
lived in similar climates
consisted mainly of farmers
did not use slaves
I'm stuck between C and B
Answer:
Pretty sure it's A (they live in similar climates)
Explanation:
The major cause for the decline in the worldwide catch of fish since 1990 is:
Answer:
Shrinking industrial landings
Which statement best describes the impact of the election of 1912?
A. Woodrow Wilson lost the election to William Howard Taft
B. The Democrats won the presidency due to the split in the Republican Party
C. William Howard Taft lost the republican nomination to Theodore Roosevelt.
D. The Republicans lost the office after Theodore Roosevelt won as the progressive candidate.
Answer:B is correct becuase many republicans split and made the progressive party in 1912.
Explanation:
What are Reserve Banks?
Reserve Banks are
that help the
carry out Its duties.
Answer:
Reserve banks are REGIONAL BANKS that help the CENTRAL BANK carry out its duties.
Answers capitalized.
Answer:
1. regional banks 2. central bank
Explanation:
What were President Eisenhower's aims in the Vietnam war?
Answer: He wanted to invest huge sums of money and prestige in transforming South Vietnam into a showcase of a new “free Asia.” Spending billions of dollars
Explanation:
Answer:
To invest huge sums of money prestige in transforming South Vietnam into a showcase a new free Asia.
Write a paragaph in which you consider whether or not John Brown was "crazy. " Your paragraph should be 5-7 sentences.
Answer:
Paragraph in explanation
Explanation:
Yes, John Brown was "crazy". For one, he thought he could take down slavery by himself and a army he would slowly grow. He would start a "invasion" of the south and free slaves and use those slaves for his army. He also thought violence was the key to ending slavery. He would stop at nothing to end slavery including breaking the law and arguably committed treason.
explain how slavery was used so often in the production of sugarcane and tobacco. what was causing these items to be in such high demand?
Answer:
The conditions required for cultivating different cash crops largely shaped regional labor experiences and population demographics for enslaved Africans in the New World. European settlers experimented with a range of crops and export goods, often with significant influences from American Indians and Africans, but eventually market competition and environmental constraints determined which major cash crop different plantation regions primarily exported. The most lucrative cash crops to emerge from the Americas in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were sugar, tobacco, and rice. Cotton agriculture did not become a major feature of the U.S. southern economy until the early nineteenth century.
Explanation:
What is the significance of the naval race between Germany and Great Britain
Which of the following BEST summarizes a common argument against admitting California as a free state?
A.
It would force the federal government to cover the debts of building the western railroads.
B.
It would disrupt the existing balance of power between slave states and free states.
C.
It would encourage other territories to enter the union as free states.
D.
It would tip the balance of free and slave states in favor of free states.
Based on the historical account, the statement that BEST summarizes a common argument against admitting California as a free state is "It would disrupt the existing balance of power between slave states and free states."
Before the admittance of California as a free state in 1850, the number of States in the United States was 30, with 15 each serving as slave states and free states, respectively.
However, as California was admitted as a free state, making it the 16th free state, many Southern states who were slave states felt that it would affect the power balance or decision structure in the Senate.
This made the US Congress to guaranteed the slave states that there would be no federal restrictions of slavery on Utah or New Mexico.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option B. "It would disrupt the existing balance of power between slave states and free states."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/21773386
Answer:
1. The South resented the tariffs encouraged by the North because these tariffs
: increased the cost of imports the South relied on.
2. Which of the following BEST summarizes a common argument against admitting California as a free state?
: It would encourage other territories to enter the union as free states.
3. Which of the following BEST describes the outcome of the Compromise of 1850?
: It established an equal number of slave and free states.
4. The Fugitive Slave Act challenged the sovereignty of free states by
: making their officials complicit in preserving the institution of slavery.
Explanation:
!00% correct
The Failure of Compromise Quick Check
All of the following statements about the Atakapans are true except:
a.
They lived exclusively in Texas.
b.
They lived along the Gulf of Mexico.
c.
They had their own unique language.
d.
They fished, hunted, and gathered plants for food.
What aspect of Missouri‘s new state constitution grants to derail its admittance to the union and the entire Missouri compromise
It admitted Missouri as a slave state grants to derail its admittance to the union and the entire Missouri compromise.
What is Missouri compromise?The Missouri Compromise was a piece of federal legislation in the United States that struck a balance between northern states' aspirations to stop the spread of slavery in the nation and southern states' desires to do so.
In order to maintain the country's balance between slave and free states, this legislation accepted Maine as a non-slave state and Missouri as a slave state. In the remaining Louisiana Territory, above the 36° 30' latitude line, slavery was prohibited.
Although the Missouri Compromise succeeded in maintaining the peace for the time being, it was unable to address the crucial issue of slavery and its future in the country.
The Missouri Compromise was opposed by the South because it established a precedent for Congress to pass legislation pertaining to slavery, and by the North because it implied the spread of slavery into new areas.
To learn more about Missouri compromise
https://brainly.com/question/14020956
#SPJ2
What problems did Elizabeth I face in her own country
hiw did young Americans react to the war, and how did their reaction shape cultural developments
the New Testament includes
a. four accounts of Jesus' life
b. only the writings of Paul
c. a dozen Gospels
d. wise proverbs
Answer:
a. Four accounts of Jesus's life.
Explanation:
The four accounts are the 4 books, which include:
The Gospel of Matthew
The Gospel of Mark
The Gospel of Luke
The Gospel of John
~
how does the sedition act of 1918 impact the war effort? explain.
Answer:
The Sedition Act of 1918 curtailed the free speech rights of U.S. citizens during times of war.
Passed on May 16, 1918, as an amendment to Title I of the Espionage Act of 1917, the act provided for further and expanded limitations on speech. Ultimately, its passage came to be viewed as an instance of government overstepping the bounds of First Amendment freedoms.
President Woodrow Wilson, in conjunction with congressional leaders and the influential newspapers of the era, urged passage of the Sedition Act in the midst of U.S. involvement in World War I. Wilson was concerned about the country’s diminishing morale and looking for a way to clamp down on growing and widespread disapproval of the war and the military draft that had been instituted to fight it.
The provisions of the act prohibited certain types of speech as it related to the war or the military. Under the act, it was illegal to incite disloyalty within the military; use in speech or written form any language that was disloyal to the government, the Constitution, the military, or the flag; advocate strikes on labor production; promote principles that were in violation of the act or support countries at war with the United States.
The targets of prosecution under the Sedition Act were typically individuals who opposed the war effort, including pacifists, anarchists, and socialists. Violations of the Sedition Act could lead to as much as twenty years in prison and a fine of $10,000. More than two thousand cases were filed by the government under the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, and of these more than one thousand ended in convictions.
The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of many of the individuals prosecuted. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. established the “clear and present danger” test in Schenck v. United States (1919). In upholding Socialist Charles Schenck’s conviction, Justice Holmes wrote that “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” The Court also unanimously upheld convictions in Debs v. United States (1919) and Frohwerk v. United States (1919).
In Abrams v. United States (1919), the Court reviewed the conviction under the act of Jacob Abrams, who, along with four other Russian defendants, was prosecuted for printing and distributing leaflets calling for workers to strike in an effort to end military involvement in the Soviet Union. The Court in late 1919 upheld the conviction.
However, in this instance Holmes, along with Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissented from the majority, arguing that the “clear and present danger” test was not met under the circumstances arising in the case. Specifically, Holmes felt that Abrams had not possessed the necessary intent to harm the U.S. war effort. In contrast to his majority opinion in Schenck, Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams urged that political speech be protected under the First Amendment.
The Sedition Act of 1918 was repealed in 1920, although many parts of the original Espionage Act remained in force.
Hope this helps, have a nice day/night! :D
Read the excerpt from Iqbal.
Hussain Khan looked at us and growled, "What do you think you're looking at? Get back to work."
We bent to our looms, but then we quickly peeked over our shoulders. Hussain brought the new boy over to an empty loom in the row next to mine, pulled out a rusty shackle, and locked it on the boy's right ankle.
"This will be your place, here's where you'll work," he said.
Based on the excerpt, which inference can be made about the setting?
Answer:
b. Children are used to working in unfair conditions.
Explanation: is correct!
Answer:
its b
Explanation:
What are the characteristics of traditional religion in Africa?
Answer:
There have been many attempts at describing African Traditional Religion according to its main characteristics. Turaki (1999:69) lists the following main characteristics: belief in a Supreme Being • belief in spirits and divinities • the cult of ancestors • the use of magic, charms and spiritual forces.
Explanation:
Why did medicine occur at the time period in ancient china? Why did Egypt and china develop this concept for the time period?
Answer:
the origin of Chinese medicine emerged in the shamanistic era of the Shang dynasty period ( 1766 to 1122 BC). during this time the religious deity was called Shang Di who was believed to live in heaven in an imperial court accompanied by dead ancestors.
