One number is 4 times a first number. A third number is 100 more than the first number. If the sum of the three numbers is 370, find the numbers.
The three numbers are
(Use a comma to separate answers as needed.)

Answer:

A strawberry cost 30 cents

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Orange= 18 cents

Pineapple = 27 cents

Apple = 15 cents

Strawberry = ?

From the given:

Orange has 6 letters multiplied by 3

=6 * 3

=18 cents

Pineapple has 9 letters multiplied by 3

=9 * 3

=27 cents

Apple has 5 letters multiplied by 3

= 5 * 3

= 15 cents

Therefore, cost of the strawberry=

Strawberry has 10 letters. Multiply the 10 letters by 3

That is,

10 × 3

= 30 cents

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

-456 +456

( - , + ) = -

so answer is 0

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

bc i know

Answer:

82

Step-by-step explanation:

Plug in the variables into the equation and solve for B but remember your order of operations when solving multiplication/division before addition/subtraction.

B = 4*25-9*2

B = 100-18

B = 82

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Two such terms are 7x^3*y^9 and -3x*y^5

Their quotient is

7x^3*y^9

--------------

 -3x*y^5

This can be simplified as follows:

The numerical coefficients become -7/3.

x^3/x = x^3*x^1 = x^(3 - 1) = x^2 (we subtract the exponent of x in the denominator from the exponent of x in the numerator).

Next, y^9*y^5 = y^4.

The quotient in final reduced form is then (-7/3)x^2*y^4

Answer:

58

Step-by-step explanation:

By the property of intersecting secants outside of a circle, we have:

x° = 1/2( 141° - 25°) = 1/2 * 116° = 58°

Therefore, x = 58

Answer:

1/3(a+b)

hope it helps :>

Answer:

Median: 14.6, Q1: 6.1, Q3: 27.1, IR: 21, outliers:  none

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: order the data from the least to the largest.

2.8, 3.9, 5.3, 6.1, 6.5, 7.1, 12.5, 14.6, 16.4, 16.4, 20.8, 27.1, 28.1, 30.9, 53.5

Step 2: find the median.

The median is the middle value, which is the 8th value in the data set.

2.8, 3.9, 5.3, 6.1, 6.5, 7.1, 12.5, [14.6,] 16.4, 16.4, 20.8, 27.1, 28.1, 30.9, 53.5

Median = 14.6

Step 2: Find Q1,

Q1 is the middle value of the lower part of the data set that is divided by the median to your left.

2.8, 3.9, 5.3, (6.1), 6.5, 7.1, 12.5, [14.6], 16.4, 16.4, 20.8, 27.1, 28.1, 30.9, 53.5

Q1 = 6.1

Step 3: find Q3.

Q3 is the middle value of the upper part of the given data set.

2.8, 3.9, 5.3, 6.1, 6.5, 7.1, 12.5, [14.6], 16.4, 16.4, 20.8, (27.1), 28.1, 30.9, 53.5

Q3 = 27.1

Step 4: find interquartile range (IR)

IR = Q3 - Q1 = [tex] 27.1 - 6.1 = 21 [/tex]

Step 5: check if there is any outlier.

Formula for checking for outlier = [tex] Q1 - 1.5*IR [/tex]

Then compare the result you get with the given values in the data set. Any value in the data set that is less than the result we get is considered an outlier.

Thus,

[tex] Q1 - 1.5*IR [/tex]

[tex]6.1 - 1.5*21 = -25.4[/tex]

There are no value in the given data set that is less than -25.4. Therefore, there is no outlier.

Answer:

50%

Step-by-step explanation:

22 is half of 44.

So, this means 50% of 44 is 22.

Answer:

The median would be 7.0.

Step-by-step explanation:

The median of a set of numbers means it is the middle number. since this set has 7 numbers you would need to find the number that is in the middle of the set. This would be the 4th number since it is in the middle. 7.0 is your answer.

Answer:

95 times digit 9 appears in all integers from 1 to 500.

Step-by-step explanation:

No. of 9 from

1-9: 1 time

10-19:  1 time

20-29: 1 time

30-39: 1 time

40-49: 1 time

50-59: 1 time

60-69: 1 time

70-79: 1 time

80-89 : 1 time

from 90 to 99

there will be one in 91 to 98

then two 9 in 99

thus, no of 9 from 90 to 99 is 10

Thus, total 9's from 1 to 99 is 9+10 = 19

Thus there 19 9's in 1 to 99

similarly

there will be

19 9's in 100 to 199

19 9's in 200 to 299

19 9's in 300 to 399

19 9's in 400 to 499

Thus, total 9's will be

19 + 19 + 19+ 19 + 19 + 19 = 95

Thus, 95 times digit 9 appears in all integers from 1 to 500.

Answer: C. 400  in^2

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the surface area or the area of the base which is in the shape of  a square and has a side length of 10 in. So square 10 to find the area.

Area of base:  10 * 10 = 100

Next find the area of one of the triangles.

As we could see the triangle has a slant height of 15 in and a base of 10. To find the area of a triangle we multiply the base times the height and multiply it by half.

Area of one triangle.  15 * 10 = 150 * 1/2 = 75  

Since one side of the triangle has a surface area of 75 inches we will multiply it by 4 since there are four triangles to find the total surface area of the four faces.

75 * 4 = 300  

We now know that the the 4 triangles surface area dd up to 300 so we will add it to the area of the base which is 100 to find the whole surface area of the figure.

300 + 100 = 400

Answer:

[tex]a_{i} = \frac{(-3)^{i}}{4\cdot i!}[/tex] converges.

Step-by-step explanation:

The convergence analysis of this sequence is done by Ratio Test. That is to say:

[tex]r = \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}}[/tex], where sequence converges if and only if [tex]|r| < 1[/tex].

Let be [tex]a_{i} = \frac{(-3)^{i}}{4\cdot i!}[/tex], the ratio for the expression is:

[tex]r =-\frac{3}{n+1}[/tex]

[tex]|r| = \frac{3}{n+1}[/tex]

Inasmuch [tex]n[/tex] becomes bigger, then [tex]r \longrightarrow 0[/tex]. Hence, [tex]a_{i} = \frac{(-3)^{i}}{4\cdot i!}[/tex] converges.

Answer:

Yes you can

Step-by-step explanation:

To eliminate the denominator

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

We cannot be certain that x + 3 > 0

If it was negative then the sign of the inequality would change.

To solve find the critical values of the numerator/ denominator, that is

x = 2 and x = - 3

The domain is the split into 3 intervals

(- ∞, - 3 ), (- 3, 2), (2, + ∞ )

Use test points from each interval to determine valid solution

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

time = 49 hours

speed =  7 miles/hour

speed = distance / time

∴ distance = speed × time

= 7 × 49

= 343 miles

Answer:

Area of ΔEDF = 2.7 in²

Step-by-step explanation:

It's given in the question,

ΔBAC ~ ΔEDF

In these similar triangles,

Scale factor of the sides = [tex]\frac{\text{Measure of one side of triangle BAC}}{\text{Measure of one side of triangle EDF}}[/tex]

                                        [tex]=\frac{\text{BC}}{\text{EF}}[/tex]

                                        [tex]=\frac{3}{2}[/tex]

Area scale factor = (Scale factor of the sides)²

[tex]\frac{\text{Area of triangle BAC}}{\text{Area of triangle EDF}}=(\frac{3}{2})^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{6}{\text{Area of triangle EDF}}=(\frac{9}{4})[/tex]

Area of ΔEDF = [tex]\frac{6\times 4}{9}[/tex]

                       = 2.67

                       ≈ 2.7 in²

Therefore, area of the ΔEDF is 2.7 in²                            

Answer:

6.25

Step-by-step explanation:

2.5 *2.5=6.25

Answer:

6.25cm^2.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the area of a square, you multiply the two sides, 2.5✖️2.5.

This gives the area of 6.25cm^2.

Hope this helped!

Have a nice day:)

Answer:

B. 259

Step-by-step explanation:

6^(i - 1) for i = 1 to 4

sum = 6^(1 - 1) + 6^(2 - 1) + 6^(3 - 1) + 6^(4 - 1) =

= 6^0 + 6^1 + 6^2 + 6^3

= 1 + 6 + 36 + 216

= 259

Answer: B. 259

Answer:

y=-6x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu \geq[/tex] 30 points

    Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] < 30 points

(b) Type I error is that we conclude that test-takers who had completed the training showed a mean increase smaller than 30 points but in actual, the program raises SAT scores by an average of at least 30 points.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a test-preparation company advertises that its training program raises SAT scores by an average of at least 30 points.

A random sample of test-takers who had completed the training showed a mean increase smaller than 30 points.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = average SAT score.

(a) So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu \geq[/tex] 30 points

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] < 30 points

Here, the null hypothesis states that the training program raises SAT scores by an average of at least 30 points.

On the other hand, the alternate hypothesis states that test-takers who had completed the training showed a mean increase smaller than 30 points.

(b) Type I error states the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis given the fact that null hypothesis is true.

According to the question, the Type I error is that we conclude that test-takers who had completed the training showed a mean increase smaller than 30 points but in actual, the program raises SAT scores by an average of at least 30 points.

The consequence of a Type I error is that we conclude the test-takers have low SAT scores but in actual they have an SAT score of at least 30 points.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 30 + 25 = 180

x + 55 = 180

x = 125

y + 125 = 180

y = 55

Answer:

2.086

Step-by-step explanation:

Log 122 is equal to 2.086

Answer:

y<(x-2)^2

Step-by-step explanation:

To graph this inequality, we first identify the function.

This is a quadratic function y=x^2

The function is translated horizontally to the right two. (x-2)^2

It is also a dotted line, <.

Answer:

[tex]78,\!624,\!000[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

Note the requirements:

Because of that, permutation would be the most suitable way to count the number of possibilities.

There are [tex]\displaystyle P(26,\, 3) = \frac{26!}{(26 - 3)!} = 26 \times 25 \times 24 = 15,\!600[/tex] ways to arrange three out of [tex]26[/tex] distinct letters (without replacement.)

Similarly, there are [tex]\displaystyle P(10,\, 4) = \frac{10!}{(10 - 4)!} = 10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7= 5,\!040[/tex] ways to arrange four out of [tex]10[/tex] distinct numbers (also without replacement.)

Therefore, there are [tex]15,\!600[/tex] possibilities for the three-letter section of this password, and [tex]5,\!040[/tex] possibilities for the four-digit section. What if these two parts are combined?

Consider: if the first three letters of the password were fixed, then there would be [tex]5,\!040[/tex] possibilities. However, if any of the first three letters was changed, the result would be another [tex]5,\!040\![/tex] possibilities, all of which are different from the previous [tex]5,\!040\!\![/tex] possibilities. These two three-letter sections along will give [tex]2 \times 5,\!400[/tex] possibilities. Since there are [tex]15,\!600[/tex] three-letter sections like that, there would be [tex]15,\!600 \times 5,\!400 = 78,\!624,\!000[/tex] possible passwords in total. That gives the number of possible passwords that satisfy these requirements.

Answer:

Yes , it satisfies the hypothesis and  we can conclude that c = 1 is an element of [0,2]

c = 1 ∈ [0,2]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

[tex]f(x) = 4x^2 -3x + 2, [0, 2][/tex]

which is read as the function of x = 4x² - 3x + 2 along the interval [0,2]

Differentiating the function with respect to x is;

f(x) = 8x - 3

Using the Mean value theorem to see if the function satisfies it, we have:

[tex]f'c = \dfrac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}[/tex]

[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{f(2)-f(0)}{2-0}[/tex]

since the polynomial function is differentiated in [0,2]

[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(4(2)^2-3(2)+2)-(4(0)^2-3(0)+2)}{2-0}[/tex]

[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(4(4)-3(2)+2)-(4(0)-3(0)+2)}{2-0}[/tex]

[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(16-6+2)-(0-0+2)}{2-0}[/tex]

[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(12)-(2)}{2}[/tex]

[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{10}{2}[/tex]

8c -3  = 5

8c = 5+3

8c = 8

c = 8/8

c = 1

Therefore, we can conclude that c = 1 is an element of [0,2]

c = 1 ∈ [0,2]

Answer with  explanation:

A x% confidence interval interprets that a person can be x% confident thatthe true mean lies in it.

Here, Credit card companies is using the collection agency to justify the cost of , the agency must collect an average of at least $200 per customer.

i.e. [tex]H_0:\mu \geq200,\ \ \ H_a:\mu<200[/tex]

The 90% confidence interval on the mean collected amount was reported as ($190.25, $250.75) .

I recommend that we can be 90% sure that the true mean collected amount  lies in ($190.25, $250.75).

Also, $200 lies in it such that it is more far from $250.75 than $190.25, that means there are large chances of having an average is at least $200 per customer.

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

2(4+10)+20

2(14)+20

28+20

48

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{n = 108\ nickels}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the nickels with Katy be n

So, the condition is

n = 6 (Shaun nickels)

While Nickels of Shaun = 18 , So

n = 6 (18)

n = 108 nickels

Answer:

[tex]40.97<\mu<43.03[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Th formula for calculating the confidence interval of a population is expressed as shown;

CI = xbar ± Z*S/√n where;

xbar is the mean or average sample

Z is the z-score at 90% confidence

S is the standard deviation

n is the sample size

Given parameters

xbar = 42

Z at 90% CI = 1.645

S = 5

n = 64

Substituting the values into the formula will give;

CI = 42±(1.645*5/√64)

CI = 42±(1.645*5/8)

CI = 42±(1.645*0.625)

CI = 42±1.028125

CI = (42-1.028125, 42+1.028125)

CI = (40.971875, 43.028125)

Hence the 90% confidence interval for the population is approximately (40.97, 43.03) i.e [tex]40.97<\mu<43.03[/tex]

Answer: 0.0476

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : Two friends and 5 other people compete with each other for first and second chair in an orchestra.

Total people in this competition= 2+5=7

By permutation , Number of ways to arrange 7 people= 7!

Also, number of ways for two friends end up as first and second chair together= 2 × 5!   [ 2 ways to arrange friends on first and second chair and 5! ways to arrange others]

I.e. Required probability = [tex]\dfrac{2\times5!}{7!}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{2!\times5!}{7\times6\times5!}\\\\=\dfrac{1}{7\times3}\\\\=\dfrac{1}{21}\\\\=0.0476[/tex]

Hence, the probability that the two friends end up as first and second chair together = 0.0476

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

He does not have enough to loose 2,000,000 at that point, so this whole problem is nonsense.