Answer:
The variable cost per unit sold is closest to $14.85
Explanation:
In order to calculate the variable cost per unit sold we would have to use the following formula:
Total variable cost per unit=(Direct materials+Direct labor+Variable manufacturing overheads+Sales commissions+Variable adminsitrative expenses)
Therefore,Total variable cost per unit=$7.10+$4.00+$2.00+$1.25+$0.50
Total variable cost per unit=$14.85
The variable cost per unit sold is closest to $14.85
Milton Friedman argues that __________.
O corporations today should adopt a broader view of their social responsibilities than they have in the past.
O corporate officials have a social responsibility that goes beyond serving the interests of their stockholders.
O strict governmental controls are necessary if society is to maximize its overall economic well-being.
O a business's only social responsibility is to maximize profits within the rules of the game.
Answer:
Milton Friedman argues that a business's only social responsibility is to maximize profits within the rules of the game.
Explanation:
Milton Friedman is known to hold an opposing view when compared to that of John Keynes about economic theory.
Whereas Milton Friedman believes that the utmost responsibility of any company is to the shareholders, the Keynesian are more consumer focused.
Milton Friedman believes strongly in free capitalism and as a result does not advocate for any company offering corporate social responsibility to the society or public.
How Hard The Day, Inc. makes a product that has the following direct labor standards: Standard direct labor-hours 1.4 hours per unit Standard direct labor rate $ 12.00 per hour The company budgeted for production of 5,400 units in January, but actual production was 5,500 units. The company used 6,800 direct labor-hours to produce this output. The actual total direct labor cost was $82,960. The direct labor efficiency variance for January is:
Answer:
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $10,800 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard direct labor-hours 1.4 hours per unit
Standard direct labor rate $ 12.00 per hour
Actual production was 5,500 units.
The company used 6,800 direct labor-hours to produce this output.
To calculate the direct labor efficiency variance, we need to use the following formula:
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*standard rate
Standard quantity= 5,500*1.4= 7,700
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (7,700 - 6,800)*12
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $10,800 favorable
Granite Enterprises acquired a patent from Southern Research Corporation on January 1, 2021, for $3.4 million. The patent will be used for five years, even though its legal life is 20 years. Rocky Corporation has made a commitment to purchase the patent from Granite for $110,000 at the end of five years. Compute Granite's patent amortization for 2021, assuming the straight-line method is used
Answer:
$658,000
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
Granite Enterprises Patent acquired = $3.4 million
Used years = 5 years
Rocky corporation purchase after 5 years = $110,000
So, we can calculate the Granite's patent amortisation by using following formula:
Granite's patent amortisation = ($3,400,000 - $110,000) ÷ 5
= $3,290,000 ÷ 5
= $658,000
Medallion Cooling Systems, Inc., has total assets of $9,800,000, EBIT of $2,050,000, and preferred dividends of $201,000 and is taxed at a rate of 40%. In an effort to determine the optimal capital structure, the firm has assembled data on the cost of debt, the number of shares of common stock for various levels of indebtedness, and the overall required return on investment:
Capital structure/debt Cost of debt Number of stock shares Rate of return
0% 0% 200,000 12.3%
15 7.8 175,000 13.1
30 9.1 140,000 14.2
45 12.1 111,000 16.3
60 15.2 75,000 20.1
Calculate earnings per share for each level of indebtedness.
Answer:
Earnings per share:
0% debt = $5.145 per share
15% debt = $5.487 per share
30% debt = $6.203 per share
45% debt = $6.386 per share
60% debt = $6.570 per share
Explanation:
The earnings per share is the monetary value of how much each share of common stock outstanding has earned. The earnings per share can be calculated by dividing the Net Income attributable to common stockholders by the number of common stock shares outstanding.
Net Income attributable to Common stockholders = Net Income - Preferred stock dividends
Thus, Earnings per share = (Net Income - Preferred stock dividends) / Number of common stock shares outstanding
To calculate Earnings per share at each level of indebtedness, we first need to calculate the net income at each debt level. The net income will change as interest is deducted before calculating net income.
Net Income = EBIT - interest - tax
Total debt = Total assets * weightage of debt in capital structure
Tax = EBT * tax rate
a. 0% debt
Net Income = 2,050,000 - 0 - (2050000 * 0.4) = $1,230,000
Earnings per share = (1230000 - 201000) / 200000 = $5.145 per share
b. 15% debt
Total debt = 9,800,000 * 0.15 = 1470000
EBT = 2,050,000 - (1470000 * 0.078) = $1935340
Net Income = 1935340 - ( 1935340 * 0.4) = $1161204
Earnings per share = (1161204 - 201000) / 175000 = $5.487 per share
c. 30% debt
Total debt = 9,800,000 * 0.30 = 2940000
EBT = 2050000 - (2940000 * 0.091) = $1782460
Net Income = 1782460 - (1782460 * 0.4) = $1069476
Earnings per share = (1069476 - 201000) / 140000 = $6.203 per share
d. 45% debt
Total debt = 9,800,000 * 0.45 = 4410000
EBT = 2050000 - (4410000 * 0.121) = $1516390
Net Income = 1516390 - (1516390 * 0.4) = $909834
Earnings per share = (909834 - 201000) / 111000 = $6.386 per share
e. 60% debt
Total debt = 9,800,000 * 0.60 = 5880000
EBT = 2050000 - (5880000 * 0.152) = $1156240
Net Income = 1156240 - (1156240 * 0.4) = $693744
Earnings per share = (693744 - 201000) / 75000 = $6.570 per share
Consider two independent firms, BU1 and BU2, which transact with each other through spot market transactions in a competitive market. In a typical year, BU1 incurs total costs of $2 million in producing goods that BU2 buys. BU2 would be willing to pay up to $7.5 million for these goods, but because of the competitive market, ends up paying $5 million. What is the value captured by BU1 from these transactions?
Answer:
Value captured by BU1 = $5.5 million
Explanation:
Given:
Two firm = BU1 , BU2
BU1 cost of production = $2 million
BU2 will able to pay up-to = $7.5 million
BU2 will pay = $5 million:
Find:
Value captured by BU1 = ?
Computation:
⇒ Value captured by BU1 = BU2 will able to pay up-to - BU1 cost of production
⇒ Value captured by BU1 = $7.5 million - $2 million
⇒ Value captured by BU1 = $5.5 million
Based on the information given the value captured by BU1 from these transactions is $3 million.
The value captured by the seller (BU1)
Seller value =Value BU1 is willing to sell -Value at which he sold
Where:
Value BU1 is willing to sell=$5 million
Value at which he sold=$2 million
Let plug in the formula
Seller value=$5 million-$2 million
Seller value= $3 million
Inconclusion the value captured by BU1 from these transactions is $3 million.
Learn more here:https://brainly.com/question/24170754
At the beginning of 2020, Vaughn Company acquired a mine for $1,965,400. Of this amount, $115,000 was ascribed to the land value and the remaining portion to the minerals in the mine. Surveys conducted by geologists have indicated that approximately 11,010,000 units of ore appear to be in the mine. Vaughn incurred $195,500 of development costs associated with this mine prior to any extraction of minerals. It also determined that the fair value of its obligation to prepare the land for an alternative use when all of the mineral has been removed was $46,000. During 2020, 2,433,000 units of ore were extracted and 2,081,000 of these units were sold.
Compute the total amount of depletion for 2020.
Answer:
$462,270.00
Explanation:
The first task is to determine the depletion rate per unit of ore extracted from the mine.
depletion rate=total cost the mine/total units of ore extract
total cost of mine=acquisition cost-land value+development costs+removal cost
total cost of mine=$1,965,400-$115,000+$195,500+$46,000=$2,091,900.00
total units of ore extract is 11,010,000 units
depletion rate= 2,091,900.00/11,010,000=$0.19 per unit of ore
depletion amount in 2020=depletion rate*ore extracted in 2020=2,433,000*$0.19 =$462,270.00
Answer:
$408,903
Explanation:
Depletion is an estimated cost of a natural resource that is extracted. This resource is expensed as the extraction is made.
As per given data
Total Payment = $1,965,400
Land Value = $115,000
Value of Rights = $1,965,400 - $115,000 = $1,850,400
Estimated resources = 11,010,000 units
Resources extracted in the period = 2,433,000 units
Depletion expense is based on ratio of the amount of extraction in period to the total expected resource.
Depletion Expense = $1,850,400 x 2,433,000 / 11,010,000 units = $408,903
Which of the following is the most likely negative consequence of excessive change in an organization? Group of answer choices Staff being asked to do too much Staff being restricted to a single activity The operation of the organization at less than capacity The establishment of a system for prioritizing projects
Answer:
Staff being asked to do too much.
Explanation:
Excessive change in an organization is defined as a process when organizations pursue several differing, unrelated and sometimes changes that are conflicting simultaneously. It can also be, when an organization involves in introducing new changes before previous changes are being accomplished.
Additionally, when staffs or employees perceives change as being excessive, they react in various ways. Some of their reactions to excessive change includes;
• They become overwhelmed.
• Lack of motivation.
• They're stressed out.
• Frustration and anger builds among them.
• Inadequacy, uncertainty
and incompetence.
The lower level staffs and middle managers are most likely to experience, the negative consequence of excessive change in an organization because they're being asked to do too much.
Suppose the market for widgets can be described by the following equations: Demand: P equals 14minus2.00Q Supply: P equals 2.00Qminus4, where P is the price in dollars per unit and Q is the quantity in thousands of units. What is the equilibrium price and quantity? The equilibrium quantity is 4.5 thousand units and the equilibrium price is $ 5. (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) Suppose the government imposes a tax of $1 per unit to reduce widget consumption and raise government revenues. What will be the new equilibrium quantity? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit will the seller receive? The new equilibrium quantity will be 4.25 thousand units. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) The price paid by buyers will be $ 5.5. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) The amount kept by sellers will be $ 4.5. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Answer:
Explanation:
Demand P = 14 - 2Q
Supply P = 2Q - 4
Since Demand = Supply
14 - 2Q = 2Q - 4
Collect the like terms on either side
-2Q - 2Q = -4 - 14
-4Q = -18
Dividing both sides by -4, we will have
Q = -18/-4
Q = 4.50 units
P = 14 - 2Q
P = 14 - 2(4.5)
P = 14 - 9
P = $5.00
Therefore Equilibrium price is $5.00 and Equilibrium unit is 4.50
If the government impose a tax of $1 per unit. If price paid but buyer is P, then price received by seller will be (P - 1)
for demand
P = 14 - 2Q
2Q = 14 - P
Q = 7 - 0.5P
For supply
P = 2Q - 4
Q = 2 + 0.5P
Q = 2+ 0.5(P - 1)
Q = 2 + 0.5P - 0.5
Q = 2-0.5 + 0.5P
Q = 1.5 + 0.5P
if Demand = Supply
7 - 0.5P = 1.5 + 0.5P
Collect the like terms on either sides
-0.5P - 0.5P = 1.5 - 7
-1P = -5.5
Dividing both sides by -1, we will have
P = -5.5/-1
P = $5.50
Q = 1.5 + 0.5P
If we substitute 5.5 for P in the above eqn, we will have
Q = 1.5 + 0.5(5.5)
Q = 1.5 + 2.75
Q = 4.25 units
Blossom Companyhad the following transactions during 2022: 1. Issued $182500 of par value common stock for cash. 2. Recorded and paid wages expense of $87600. 3. Acquired land by issuing common stock of par value $73000. 4. Declared and paid a cash dividend of $14600. 5. Sold a long-term investment (cost $4380) for cash of $4380. 6. Recorded cash sales of $584000. 7. Bought inventory for cash of $233600. 8. Acquired an investment in Zynga stock for cash of $30660. 9. Converted bonds payable to common stock in the amount of $730000. 10. Repaid a 6-year note payable in the amount of $321200. What is the net cash provided by investing activities
Answer:
($26,280)
This represents net cash used up by investing activities
Explanation:
The cash flow statement categories the company's transactions in a financial period into 3 groups; these are operating, investing and financing.
The net profit/loss, depreciation, changes in current assets (other than cash) and liabilities are considered as operating activities including income taxes.
The sale of assets, interest received, purchase of investments are examples of investing activities while the issuance of stocks, debt principal deduction (loan settlement), issuance of debt securities etc are examples of financing activities.
An increase in assets other than cash is an outflow while an increase in liabilities is an inflow and vice versa.
Hence net cash provided by investing activities
= $4380 - $30660
= ($26,280)
Other activities are operating and financing activities.
Stellar Plastics is analyzing a proposed project with annual depreciation of $19,500 and a tax rate of 34 percent. The company expects to sell 12,000 units, plus or minus 5 percent. The expected variable cost per unit is $3.20 plus or minus 4 percent, and the expected fixed costs are $30,000 plus of minus 2 percent. The sales price is estimated at $7.50 a unit, plus or minus 4 percent. What is the operating cash flow for a sensitivity analysis using total fixed costs of $31,000
Answer:
$20,226
Explanation:
expected sales = 11,400 - 12,000 - 12,600
expected sales price = $7.20 - $7.50 - $7.80
expected variable cost = $3.072 - $3.20 - $3.328
total fixed costs = $31,000
if you use an excel spreadsheet you can calculate all the different possible simulations and combine all the expected sales x 3 different price levels x 3 different variable costs and 1 fixed cost. Once you get all the 27 possible solutions, you just get the average.
I attached it because there is no room here.
Byron Books Inc. recently reported $6 million of net income. Its EBIT was $12.6 million, and its tax rate was 40%. What was its interest expense? [Hint: Write out the headings for an income statement, and then fill in the known values. Then divide $6 million of net income by (1 - T) = 0.6 to find the pretax income. The difference between EBIT and taxable income must be interest expense. Use this same procedure to complete similar problems.] Write out your answer completely. For example, 25 million should be entered as 25,000,000. Round your answer to the nearest dollar, if necessary. Do not round intermediate calculations.
Answer:
he35
Explanation:
h
Brooke and John formed a partnership. Brooke received a 40% interest in partnership capital and profits in exchange for contributing land (basis of $30,000 and fair market value of $120,000). John received a 60% interest in partnership capital and profits in exchange for contributing $180,000 of cash. Three years after the contribution date, the land contributed by Brooke is sold by the partnership to a third party for $150,000. What gain must Brooke recognize on the land contribution when establishing the partnership
Answer:
$102,000
Explanation:
According to 26 US code Section 704(c) - Partner's distributive share :
Taxable gain to be recognized from sale = Sale value - ( Partner's share * Fair market value )
Brooke contributed the land, the gain realized before the land was contributed = $120,000 - $90,000 will be allocated entirely to her. She will also be allocated 40% of the gain after the contribution was made = ($150,000 - $120,000) x 40% = $30,000 x 40% = $12,000.
So the total gain recognized by Brooke will be $90,000 + $12,000 = $102,000.
Partnerships are pass through entities, the partners are taxed, not the partnership itself.
On January 1, 2011, G Corp. granted stock options to key employees for the purchase of 80,000 shares of the company's common stock at $25 per share. The options are intended to compensate employees for the next two years. The options are exercisable within a four-year period beginning January 1, 2013, by the grantees still in the employ of the company. No options were terminated during 2011, but the company does have an experience of 20% forfeitures over the life of the stock options. The market price of the common stock was $31 per share at the date of the grant. G Corp. used the Binomial pricing model and estimated the fair value of each of the options at $10. What amount should G charge to compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2011
Answer:
The amount should G charge to compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 is $320,000
Explanation:
In order to calculate the amount should G charge to compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 we would have to calculate the following formula:
amount should G charge to compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2011=Total compensation/2
Note: company does have an experience of 20% forfeitures over the life of the stock options, therefore, 100%-20%=80%
Total compensation= 80,000 options × $10 × 80%
Total compensation= $640,000
amount should G charge to compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2011=$640,000/2
amount should G charge to compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2011=$320,000
Marcellus Company is involved in a lawsuit. Footnote disclosure of the contingent liability which could arise does not have to be presented if the probability of Marcellus owing money as a result of the lawsuit is A) reasonably possible and the amount cannot be reasonably estimated. B) probable and the amount cannot be reasonably estimated. C) reasonably possible and the amount can be reasonably estimated. D) remote and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Answer:
The answer is option B) probable and the amount cannot be reasonably estimated.
Explanation:
Contingency liability is the likelihood that a liability might occur sometimes in the future in the face of uncertain circumstances. To validate a contingency liability, the fa cts presented has to be reasonably possible and reasonably estimated.
in the case of Marcellus Company, footnote disclosure of the contingent liability which could arise does not have to be presented if the probability of Marcellus owing money as a result of the lawsuit is probable and the amount cannot be reasonably estimated.
LaserLife Printer Company is a decentralized organization with several autonomous divisions. The division managers are evaluated, in part, on the basis of the change in their return on invested assets. Operating results for the Packer Division for 2019 are budgeted as follows:
Sale $5,000,000
Less variable costs 2,500,000
Contribution margin 2,500,000
Less fixed expenses 1,800,000
Net operating income $ 700,000
Invested capital for the division are currently $3,600,000. For 2019, the division can add a new product line for an investment of $600,000. The new product line will generate sales of $1,600,000 and will incur fixed expenses of $600,000 annually. Variable costs of the new product will average 60% of the selling price.
REQUIRED:
1. What is current ROI? Profit margin (or Return on sales)? Investment (or Capital) turnover?
2. What is the effect on ROI of accepting the new product line?
If the company's required rate of return is 6% and residual income (RI) is used to evaluate managers, would this encourage the division to accept the new product line? Explain and show computations.
Answer:
1. The current ROI is 19.44%. The Profit margin (or Return on sales) is 14%. TheInvestment (or Capital) turnover is 1.39 times.
2. The effect on ROI of accepting the new product line is 17.62%. ROI will be decreased by 1.82%
If the company's required rate of return is 6% and residual income (RI) is used to evaluate managers the residual income amount would be of $4,000 and so Managers should accept the new product line
Explanation:
1. To calculate the profit margin we have to use the following formula:
Profit margin= Net operating income/Sale
Hence, Profit margin = $700,000/$5,000,000 = 14%
ROI= Net operating income/Invested capital
Hence, ROI = $700,000/$3,600,000 = 19.44%
Investment (or Capital) turnover=Sale/Invested capital
Hence, Investment (or Capital) turnover = $5,000,000/$3,600,000 = 1.39 times
2. The Net operating income= ($5,000,000+$1,600,000)-($2,500,000+1,600,000*60%)-$(1,800,000+$600,000) = $740,000
Hence, ROI = $740,000/$4,200,000 = 17.62%
ROI will be decreased by (19.44-17.62) 1.82%.
In order to know if the division would accept the new product line If the company's required rate of return is 6% and residual income (RI) is used to evaluate managers, we would have to calculate the residual income as follows:
Residual income = operating income - invesed capital*required rate of return
= ($740,000-$700,000)-$600,000*6%
= $4,000
Therefore, Managers should accept the new product line.
If the government set a price ceiling of $40, there would be: Group of answer choices a shortage (or excess supply) of about 8 units a shortage (or excess supply) of about 12 units a surplus (or excess demand) of about 8 units a surplus (or excess demand) of about 12 units
Answer:
A surplus (or excess demand) of about 8 units
Explanation:
The picture attached shows the diagram necessary for the question which is part of the question. Solution is given below;
At the above ceiling at price of 40$
Quantity supplied will be 16
Quantity demanded will be 24
So when demand is more than supply than there will be a shortage in quantity by (24-16) 8 units.
When there is demand more than supply than it is an excess demand.
So surplus or excess demand by 8 units.
Martinez Company received the following selected information from its pension plan trustee concerning the operation of the company’s defined benefit pension plan for the year ended December 31, 2020.
January 1, 2020 December 31, 2020
Projected benefit obligation $1,517,000 $1,545,000
Market-related and fair value of plan assets 803,000 1,132,300
Accumulated benefit obligation 1,580,000 1,698,300
Accumulated OCI (G/L)—Net gain 0 (201,700 )
The service cost component of pension expense for employee services rendered in the current year amounted to $78,000 and the amortization of prior service cost was $118,300. The company’s actual funding (contributions) of the plan in 2020 amounted to $249,000. The expected return on plan assets and the actual rate were both 10%; the interest/discount (settlement) rate was 10%. Accumulated other comprehensive income (PSC) had a balance of $1,183,000 on January 1, 2020. Assume no benefits paid in 2020.
Determine the amounts of the components of pension expense that should be recognized by the company in 2020.
Answer:
$1,337,700
Explanation:
The computation of the amounts of the components of pension expense is shown below:
Service cost $78,000
Amortization of Prior Service cost $1,183,000 ($1,698,300 - $1,580,000)
Interest on PBO $157,000 ($1,517,000 ×10%)
Less: Expected return on plant assets $80,300 ($803,000 × 10%)
Pension expense $1,337,700
We simply applied the above formula so that the amount of pension expense could come
Assume that an economy is initially in long-run equilibrium. Explain the short-run effect of monetary policy that causes an increase in interest rates. As a result of higher interest rates, the A. long-run aggregate supply curve will shift left. B. aggregate demand curve will shift left. C. short-run aggregate supply curve will shift left. D. aggregate demand curve will shift right. The new equilibrium will be A. where the original aggregate demand curve intersects the original short-run aggregate supply curve. B. where the new aggregate demand curve intersects the original short-run aggregate supply curve. C. where the new aggregate demand curve intersects the original aggregate demand curve.
Answer:
As a result of higher interest rates, the
B. aggregate demand curve will shift left.The new equilibrium will be
B. where the new aggregate demand curve intersects the original short-run aggregate supply curve.Explanation:
A contractionary monetary policy will increase the interest rates, lowering investment and consumption. This will result in a leftward shift of the aggregate demand curve.
The new equilibrium (E1) will be at the point where the new aggregate demand curve (AD1) intersects the original short run aggregate supply curve (SRAS) and the long run aggregate supply curve (LRAS).
Matrix Corporation's balance sheet and income statement appear below: Comparative Balance Sheet Ending Balance Beginning Balance Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 23 $ 22 Accounts receivable 39 40 Inventory 43 44 Property, plant, and equipment 587 500 Less accumulated depreciation 359 347 Total assets $ 333 $ 259 Liabilities and stockholders' equity: Accounts payable $ 30 $ 26 Accrued liabilities 15 18 Income taxes payable 39 40 Bonds payable 109 120 Common stock 51 50 Retained earnings 89 5 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 333 $ 259 Income Statement Sales $ 972 Cost of goods sold 620 Gross margin 352 Selling and administrative expense 200 Net operating income 152 Gain on sale of equipment 14 Income before taxes 166 Income taxes 50 Net income $ 116 The company sold equipment for $20 that was originally purchased for $7 and that had accumulated depreciation of $1. It paid a cash dividend during the year and did not issue any bonds payable or repurchase any of its own common stock. Required: Determine the net cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the year using the indirect method.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income $116
Adjustment to reconcile net income to cash basis:
Depreciation expense ($359+1-347) $13
Gain on sale of equipment (14)
Decrease in account receivable (40-39) $1
Decrease in inventory (44-43) $1
Increase in account payable (30-26) $4
Decrease in accrued liabilities (18-15) (3)
Decrease in income tax payable (40-39) (1)
Net cash flow from operating activities $117
Markley Manufacturing calculated its predetermined overhead rate to be 120% of direct labor cost. During June, the company incurred $90,000 of factory labor costs, of which $85,000 is direct labor and $5,000 is indirect labor. Actual overhead incurred was $84,000. Compute the amount of manufacturing overhead applied during the month. Determine the amount of under- or over-applied manufacturing overhead.
Answer:
Applied Manufacturing Overheads are $102,000
Overapplied Manufacturing overheads are $18,000
Explanation:
Under or over applied manufacturing overhead can be determined by comparing the actual and applied manufacturing overheads.
Applied overheads can be calculated by multiplying pre-determined overhead rate and actual level of quantity. Predetermined overhead rate is calculated using estimated overhead and estimated activity on which overheads are applied.
In this question the predetermined overhead rate is 120% of direct labor cost.
Applied overhead = Direct labor cost x 120% = $85,000 x 120% = $102,000
Actual overheads incurred = $84,000
Overapplied Manufacturing overheads = $102,000 - $84,000 = $18,000
The economy is in equilibrium, TP = TE. Then, autonomous consumption rises. As a result, __________ rises, the __________ curve shifts __________, inventory levels unexpectedly __________, and business firms __________ the quantity of goods and services they produce. Group of answer choices consumption; TE; downward; fall; increase consumption; TE; upward; fall; increase consumption; TE; upward; rise; decrease investment; TE; upward; fall; increase investment; TP; leftward; fall; increase
Explanation:
The economy is in equilibrium, TP = TE. That is total production is equal to total production.
Then, autonomous consumption rises. As a result, consumption rises, the TE(total expenditure) curve shifts upwards, inventory levels unexpectedly falls, and business firms increases the quantity of goods and services they produce.
Dexter Industries purchased packaging equipment on January 8 for $116,600. The equipment was expected to have a useful life of three years, or 20,000 operating hours, and a residual value of $6,600. The equipment was used for 8,700 hours during Year 1, 7,380 hours in Year 2, and 3,920 hours in Year 3. Required: 1. Determine the amount of depreciation expense for the three years ended December 31 by (a) the straight-line method, (b) the units-of-activity method, and (c) the double-declining-balance method. Also determine the total depreciation expense for the three years by each method. (Note: For STRAIGHT-LINE ONLY, round the first two years to the nearest whole dollar, then round the third year as necessary. For DECLINING BALANCE ONLY, round the multiplier to five decimal places. Then round the answer for each year to the nearest whole dollar.) 2. What method yields the highest depreciation expense for Year 1
Answer:
Straight-line method: $36,667 yearly depreciation expense for 3 years. Unit-of-production method: Year 1 - $47,850, Year 2 - $40,590, Year 3 - $21,560Double-declining method: Year 1 - $77,737, Year 2 - $25,910, Year 3 - $6,353Total for 3 years is $110,000 for all the depreciation methods.
Explanation:
(A) Under straight-line method, depreciation expense is (cost - residual value) / Estimated useful life = ($116,600 - $6,600) / 3 years = $36,667 yearly depreciation expense.
Accumulated depreciation for 3 years is $36,667 x 3 years is $110,000.
(B) The unit-of-production method is used when the asset value closely relates to the units of output it is able to produce. It is expressed with the formula below:
(Original Cost - Salvage value) / Estimated production capacity x Units/year
At Year 1, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($116,600 - $6,600) / 20,000 operating hours x 8,700 hours = $47,850
At Year 2, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($116,600 - $6,600) / 20,000 operating hours x 7,380 hours = $40,590
At Year 3, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($116,600 - $6,600) / 20,000 operating hours x 3,920 hours = $21,560
Accumulated depreciation for 3 years is $47,850 +$40,590 + $21,560 = $110,000.
Note that this depreciation method results in higher depreciation charge when the asset is heavily used, at this time, it was in Year 1.
(C) The double-declining method is otherwise known as the reducing balance method and is given by the formula below:
Double declining method = 2 X SLDP X BV
SLDP = straight-line depreciation percentage
BV = Book value
SLDP is 100%/3 years = 33.33%, then 33.33% multiplied by 2 to give 66.67% or 2/3
At Year 1, 66.67% X $116,600 = $77,737
At Year 2, 66.67% X $38,863 ($116,600 - $77,737) = $25,910
At Year 3, 66.67% X $12,953 ($38,863 - $25,910) = $8,636. This depreciation will decrease the book value of the asset below its salvage value $12,953 - $8,636 = $4,317 < $6,600. Depreciation will only be allowed up to the point where the book value = salvage value. Consequently the depreciation for Year 3 will be $6,353.
Accumulated depreciation for 3 years is $77,737 + $25,910 + $6,353 = $110,000.
If the distribution of water is a natural monopoly, then a. a single firm cannot serve the market at the lowest possible average total cost. b. multiple firms would likely each have to pay large fixed costs to develop their own network of pipes. c. allowing for competition among different firms in the water-distribution industry is efficient. d. average cost increases as the quantity of water produced increases.
Answer:
The correct option is C) If the distribution of water is a natural monopoly, average cost increases as the quantity of water produced increases.
Explanation:
Natural monopoly occurs when there is a hig cost of entry into a particular market niche. The high cost is usually caused by expensive equipment and infrastructural set up for manufacturing as well as maintenance costs.
Therefore, If the distribution of water is a natural monopoly, average cost increases as the quantity of water produced increases.
Distribution of water falls into the category of natural monopoly. Due to the prevailing circumstances, Fixed cost is larger comparable to variable cost such that it is cheaper for a single firm to serve the market.
Which statement is false? Marginal cost and marginal productivity are inversely related. Marginal cost is the change in a firm's total cost due to a one unit change in output. Costs that are small and unimportant with little impact on profits are called marginal costs. A marginal cost curve will always intersect the average total cost curve at the minimum average total cost. Consider the table. Output 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total cost 100 110 115 125 140 160 190 230 280 340 420 What is the marginal cost of the fifth unit based on the table? $0 −$20 $20 $160
Answer:
Option (c) Marginal cost of fifth unit = $20
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
1)
Option (b) : Marginal cost is the change in the total cost of firm due to one unit change in output.
We can calculate the marginal cost by using following formula :
Marginal cost = Total cost ÷ Quantity
2)
Marginal cost of fifth unit = Total cost at unit 5 - total cost at unit 4
= $160 - $140
= $20
As marketing tools, how do blogs benefit companies? A. Demographic information about customers can be easily discovered. B. Blogs can offer a fresh, original, personal, and cheap way to enter into consumer conversations. C. Blogs are online selling platforms for people located in hard-to-reach places. D. Blogs provide companies with a platform to help portray wider merchandise. E. Blogs help reach a wider audience compared to other online direct marketing tools.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option B.
Explanation:
A blog seems to be a new website where items are frequently published being presented in reverse order, can give a new, initial, personal as well as inexpensive chance of engaging in conducting this survey.The benefit of utilizing a company blog though is that the content provides faith to your clients or clients to support you as well as your organization as such a professional in your specialized subject or area.The other choices have no relation to the given circumstance. So choice B seems to be the perfect solution to that.
On 3/1/14 Fox Corp bought back 1,000 shares of their common stock for $15 per share. There were no shares in the treasury prior to that. On 5/23/14 they sold 200 of those shares for $17 each. On 6/19/14 they sold another 400 shares of those shares for $10 per share. Consider writing out all of your entries on scratch paper to assist you in answering questions 31 and 32. What will the remaining balance in the treasury stock account be after all of the above transactions have been recorded
Answer:
For question (31) $ 6000 (32) The net impact on retained earning is 1600 (Which is a negative
Explanation:
Question 31
No. Rate Value
Purchase of Treasury Stock 1000 15 15000
Less: Sold on 5/23/14 200 15 3000
Less: Sold on 6/19/14 400 15 6000
Net remaining value 6000
Note: to calculate the closing value of treasury stock, rate of selling stock need to be taken same as of date of purchase.
For question 31 the answer is $ 6000
Question 32
Impact on retained earning on first sale
No. Rate Value
Sale VALUE 200 17 3400
Less: Purchase of Treasury Stock 200 15 3000
Credit Retained earning 400
Impact on retained earning on second sale
No. Rate Value
Sale VALUE 400 10 4000
Less: Purchase of Treasury Stock 400 15 6000
Debit Retained earning -2000
Net Impact on retained earning 1600 (Negative i.e. Debit)
Therefore the remaining balance in the treasury stock account be after all of the above transactions have been recorded is $6000
Note: Kindly find an attached copy of the complete question to this solution
Vaughn Manufacturing expects to purchase $180000 of materials in July and $170000 of materials in August. Three-fourths of all purchases are paid for in the month of purchase, and the other one-fourth are paid for in the month following the month of purchase. How much will August's cash disbursements for materials purchases be?
Answer:
The August's cash disbursements for materials purchases would be
$172,500.00 for Vaughn Manufacturing
Explanation:
The cash disbursements in the month of August consist of the three-fourth cost of the August purchases and the one-fourth of the July purchases since the 3/4 of the cost of materials purchased is paid in the same month as purchases and the balance of 1/4 of purchase cost in the succeeding month
Cash disbursements in August=($170,000*3/4)+($180,000*1/4)=$127500 +$45,000=$172,500.00
A company incurs $3,600,000 of overhead each year in three departments: Processing, Packaging, and Testing.
The company performs 800 processing transactions, 200,000 packaging transactions, and 2,000 tests per year in producing 400,000 drums of Oil and 600,000 drums of Sludge.
The following data are available:
Department Expected Use of Driver Cost
Processing 800 $1,500,000
Packaging 200,000 1,500,000
Testing 2,000 600,000
Production information for the two products is as follows:
Oil Sludge
Department Expected Use of Driver Expected Use of Driver
Processing 300 500
Packaging 120,000 80,000
Testing 1,600 400
The amount of overhead assigned to Sludge using ABC is
a. $1,800,000.
b. $1,657,500.
c. $1,942,500.
d. $1,380,000.
Answer:
its 1,800,000
because it the answer
The student-run newspaper asks students to visit a web page and respond to questions regarding a proposed tuition increase. Only responses to the questions are recorded. Summary statistics based on the survey responses are used in an article published the following week, and no one outside of the newspaper has access to the individual responses. The newspaper's survey is considered to be A) confidential. B) anonymous. C) both anonymous and confidential. D) neither anonymous nor confidential.
Answer:
C) both anonymous and confidential
Explanation:
As the student-run, the new paper and ask other students to visit a link firm the new paper and respond to those questions and the responses for only those questions were recorded. This indicates that the newspaper survey is anonymous and confidential as the ant student can fill the survey and the information that is confidential as none outside the newspaper has access to those responses.Discuss economic theory related to the quote above. Be sure to include a definition of Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) within your discussion. Locate and incorporate outside research that gives evidence and explanation as to the possible causes of these declines in the Labor Force Participation rate. Integrate biblical insights into your discussion board thread. In what way does scripture influence our decision to work
Answer:
The labor force is the group of individuals for employment. The labor force investment rate is the proportion of labor force partitioned by all out populace of the applicable age. As per month to month work survey, the labor force support rate keeps on falling. As indicated by different market analysts, this wonder is because of the blend of segment, basic, and repetitive elements. Also, due to LFPR , the support of youth and the primary age bunch is required to decay. Likewise, the investment paces of laborers of more seasoned age are additionally anticipated to increment, yet remain essentially lower than those of the prime age group. These aspects have applied descending weight on the general labor force support proportion over the 2012–2022 time period and the proportion is relied upon to decrease further, to 61.6% in 2022.
The drawn out issue of joblessness is because of repetitive and auxiliary reasons, when numerous individuals the segment organization of a nation mirrors the portions of men, ladies, and the distinctive age, race, and ethnic gatherings inside that populace. The case of the time of increased birth rates age in segment change influences the labor force investment rate. Consistently after 2000, the portion of the time of increased birth rates populace has moved into the 55-years-and-more seasoned age bunch which transfers from the principal age gathering to one with considerable lesser investment proportions, origins the general cooperation of the labor force to decay.
