PLEASE ANSWER!!! Brainliest to whoever answers at first!Order the following expressions by their values from least to greatest.

Answer:

absolutely convergent

Step-by-step explanation:

given data

sin(n)/3^n

solution

we have given term [tex]\frac{sin(n)}{3^n}[/tex]

when n = 1

and we know that

value of sin(n) ≤ 1

so that we can say that

[tex]\frac{sin(n)}{3^n}[/tex]  ≤  [tex]\frac{1}{3^n}[/tex] or [tex](\frac{1}{3})^n[/tex]

here [tex]\frac{1}{3^n}[/tex]  is converges this is because common ratio in geometric series

here r is [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]  and here it satisfy that -1 < r < 1

so it is converges

and

[tex]\frac{sin(n)}{3^n}[/tex]  is also similar

so it is  converges

and here no [tex](-1)^n[/tex]  term is

so we can say series is absolutely convergent

Answer:

Solution : Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the equations r² = x² + y², x = r cos(θ), and y = r sin(θ) that can be used to solve this problem. In this case we only need the second two equations (  x = r cos(θ), and y = r sin(θ) ) as we don't need to apply the concept of circles etc here.

Given : x = - 9,

( Substitute r cos(θ) for x )

r cos(θ) = - 9,

r = - 9 / cos(θ)

( Remember that sec is the reciprocal of cos(θ). Substitute sec for 1 / cos(θ) )

r = - 9 sec(θ)

Therefore the third option is the correct solution.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this help

Answer: it says that if two different paths connect the same two points.

Step-by-step explanation:

It says that is two different paths connect the same two points, and a function holomorphic everywhere in between the two paths, then the two path integrals of the functions will be same.

Answer:

One possible answer is:

f(x) = (2/x) + 3 and g(x) = x².

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:

We are to write this equation as y = f(g(x)).  This means we want it to be a composite of functions; in f(x), we take the value of g(x) and use in place of x.

If we let g(x) = x², this means everywhere we see an x in f(x), we will replace it with x².  To make our equation y = 2/x² + 3, working backward we would substitute x for x²; this would give us f(x) = 2/x + 3.

Answer:

BDC is half of mBC = 11°

Easily you see that C is A + BDC = 23°

Since C = 23° so mDC is twice = 46°

x

Answer:  Statement 1: postulate; Statement 2: definition

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, Statement 1:If parallel lines have a transversal, then corresponding angles are congruent.

which is a fact, and hence it is postulate.

Statement 2: A line has an infinite number of points extending in opposite directions.

which is an explanatory statement of a 'line', hence it is 'definition.

So the correct option is Statement 1: postulate; Statement 2: definition

Answer:statement 1 and statement 2 postulate

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(7 x 2.85) + 5v = 28.70. 19.95 + 5v = 28.70. 5v = 28.70 - 19.95. 5v = 8.75. v = 8.75/5. v = 1.75. A pint of veggies costs $1.75.

Answer:

44°

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

m<DOC = 44°

m<COB = 80°

Required:

Angle measure of arc DC

SOLUTION:

A central angle is said to be equal to the angle measure of the arc it intercepts or corresponds with. Therefore, angle measure of arc DC = m<DOC.

measure of arc DC = 44°

Answer:

137, 280 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 5,280 feet in a mile.

26 * 5,280 = 137,280

There are 137, 280 feet in 26 miles.

There are 137,280 feet in 26 miles.

The unitary method is a method for solving a problem by the first value of a single unit and then finding the value by multiplying the single value.

We know that there are 5,280 feet in a mile.

So, the solution would be;

26 x 5,280 = 137,280

Thus, There are 137,280 feet in 26 miles.

Learn more about the unitary method;

https://brainly.com/question/23423168

#SPJ2

Answer:

=  -2w + 22

Step-by-step explanation:

  -3(2w - 6) + 4(w+1)

= (-3*2w -3*-6) + (4*w + 4*1)

=  -6w + 18 + 4w + 4

= -6w + 4w + 18 + 4

= -2w + 22

Answer:

There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the claim that the population mean is not equal to 88.9.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following hypothesis below;

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = population mean.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 88.9      {means that the population mean is equal to 88.9}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu\neq[/tex] 88.9     {means that the population mean is different from 88.9}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviation;

                             T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~  [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean = 81.3

             s = sample standard deviation = 13.4

            n = sample size = 7

So, the test statistics =  [tex]\frac{81.3-88.9}{\frac{13.4}{\sqrt{7} } }[/tex]   ~ [tex]t_6[/tex]

                                     =  -1.501

The value of t-test statistics is -1.501.

Also, the P-value of the test statistics is given by;

                    P-value = P([tex]t_6[/tex] < -1.501) = 0.094

Since the P-value of our test statistics is more than the level of significance as 0.094 > 0.01, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will not fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that the population mean is equal to 88.9.

There are 2 sides per coin, and 3 flips, so 2^3 = 8 total items in the sample space

Tracing each branch from left to right will help form the 8 different outcomes. For instance, if you go along the upper most path of the upper tree, then you'll get HHH meaning you got 3 heads in a row. The next branch down would be HHT, and so on.

Answer:

9%

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the rule of 72.  If you want the money to double in 8 years, it will need to be at 9 percent interest rate to reach this goal.

Answer:

51.

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = x^2 + 2x + 3 and g(x) = x + 4.

f(g(x)) = (x + 4)^2 + 2(x + 4) + 3

= x^2 + 4x + 4x + 16 + 2x + 8 + 3

= x^2 + 8x + 16 + 2x + 11

= x^2 + 10x + 27.

x = 2.

f(g(2)) = 2^2 + 10 * 2 + 27

= 4 + 20 + 27

= 31 + 20

= 51.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

ray is the answer for this

opposite rays form a line because they provide the two opposite directions in which the line extends infinitely.

Opposite rays are two rays that have the same endpoint but extend in opposite directions. When these opposite rays are extended infinitely in both directions, they form a straight line. A line is a set of points that extends infinitely in both directions, and opposite rays provide the two distinct directions in which the line can be extended.

The concept of opposite rays is derived from the concept of a line. A line can be defined as a straight path that extends infinitely in both directions. Opposite rays are a pair of rays that share a common endpoint and extend infinitely in opposite directions along this line.

For example, consider a line segment AB. If we extend one side of the line segment from point A and the other side from point B, we obtain two opposite rays: one from point A to infinity and the other from point B to infinity. Together, these opposite rays form the line on which the line segment AB lies.

Learn more about lines at:

https://brainly.com/question/24607467

#SPJ6

[tex](f\circ g)(2)=\dfrac{1}{4\cdot2+9}=\dfrac{1}{17}\\\\(f+g)(2)=\dfrac{1}{2}+4\cdot2+9=\dfrac{1}{2}+17=\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{34}{2}=\dfrac{35}{2}[/tex]

Answer:

7:41

Step-by-step explanation:

8:08 - 7 Minutes = 8:01

8:01 - 20 Minutes = 7:41

Answer:

t= 0.4933

t ≥ t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306

Since the calculated value of t= 0.4933 is less than t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306 therefore we accept the null hypothesis at 5 % significance level . On the basis of this we conclude that the book had no effect on their scores.

Step-by-step explanation:

We state our null and alternative hypotheses as

H0: ud= 0 Ha: ud≠0

The significance level is set at ∝= 0.05

The test statistic under H0 is

t= d`/ sd/√n

which has t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom

The critical region is t ≥ t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306

Computations

Student       Scores before      Scores after    Difference           d²

                        reading book                    ( after minus before)

1                          720                   740             20                       400

2                        860                   860              0                           0

3                        850                   840             -10                       100

4                        880                   920             40                       1600

5                        860                   890             30                        900

6                        710                    720              10                         100

7                       850                    840              -10                       100

8                      1200                  1240             40                        1600

9                      950                    970              20                           40

∑                    6930                  8020           140                         4840

d`= ∑d/n= 140/9= 15.566

sd²= 1/8( 4840- 140²/9) = 1/8 (4840 - 2177.778) = 2662.22/8= 332.775

sd= 18.2422

t= 3/ 18.2422/ √9

t= 0.4933

Since the calculated value of t= 0.4933 is less than t ( 0.025 ,8 ) = 2.306 therefore we accept the null hypothesis at 5 % significance level . On the basis of this we conclude that the book had no effect on their scores.

Answer/Step-by-step explanation:

Given, [tex] b(x) = (\frac{6}{7})^{x} [/tex]

The table for the function are:

When x = -2

[tex] b(-2) = (\frac{6}{7})^{-2} [/tex]

[tex] b(-2) = \frac{1}{(\frac{6}{7})^{2}} [/tex]

[tex] b(-2) = \frac{1}{(\frac{36}{49})} [/tex]

[tex] b(-2) = 1*\frac{49}{36} [/tex]

[tex] b(-2) = \frac{49}{36} [/tex]

When x = -1

[tex] b(-1) = (\frac{6}{7})^{-1} [/tex]

[tex] b(-1) = \frac{1}{(\frac{6}{7})} [/tex]

[tex] b(-1) = 1*\frac{7}{6} [/tex]

[tex] b(-2) = \frac{7}{6} [/tex]

When x = 0

[tex] b(0) = (\frac{6}{7})^{0} [/tex]

[tex] b(0) = \frac{6^0}{7^0} [/tex]

[tex] b(0) = \frac{1}{1} [/tex]

[tex] b(0) = 1 [/tex]

When x = 1

[tex] b(1) = (\frac{6}{7})^{1} [/tex]

[tex] b(1) = \frac{6}{7} [/tex]

When x = 2

[tex] b(2) = (\frac{6}{7})^{2} [/tex]

[tex] b(2) = \frac{6^2}{7^2} [/tex]

[tex] b(2) = \frac{36}{49} [/tex]

should be 2 3 andd 5

think of the - (- as a plus sign (this is what i was always taught) to add them so it would in turn be (-5) + 12 which equals 7 and choice 3 and 5 also equal this

Answer:

  subtracting 56 instead of adding (or adding wrong)

Step-by-step explanation:

She wrote ...

  x - 56 = 230

  x - 56 - 56 = 230 -56 . . . . correct application of the addition property*

  x = 230 -56 . . . . . . . . . . . . incorrect simplification

Correctly done, the third line would be ...

  x -112 = 174

This would have made Sherina realize that the error was in subtracting 56 instead of adding it. The correct solution would be ...

  x - 56 + 56 = 230 + 56 . . . using the addition property of equality

  x = 286 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . correct simplification on both sides

__

There were two errors:

  1) incorrect strategy --- subtracting 56 instead of adding

  2) incorrect simplification --- simplifying -56 -56 to zero instead of -112

We don't know whether you want to count the error in thinking as the first error, or the error in execution where the mechanics of addition were incorrectly done.

_____

* The addition property of equality requires the same number be added to both sides of the equation. Sherina did that correctly. However, the number chosen to be added was the opposite of the number that would usefully work toward a solution.

Answer:

D: Sherina should have added 56 to both sides of the equation.

Step-by-step explanation:

I got a 100% on my test.

I hope this helps.

A = 1 and 8

B = 2 and 4

C = 2 and 7

I’m pretty sure this is right? I’m still learning too :p

=======================================================

Explanations:

For the sake of simplicity, imagine that lines m and n are parallel. They don't necessarily need to be in order to answer this problem, but it might help with the terminology better.

When we use the term "interior" we basically mean the region between or inside the parallel lines. So "exterior" is everything but that, which is composed of two separate regions that don't overlap. Exterior angles shown in this diagram are

angle 1, angle 5, angle 4, angle 8

The "alternate" refers to the idea that we're on alternate sides of the transversal cutting line. One pair of alternate exterior angles is angle 1 and angle 8. We have angle 1 below the transversal while angle 8 is on the opposite side and above the transversal. For similar reasoning, angles 5 and 4 are alternate exterior angles as well.

---------------------------------

Notice how each line crosses to form an X shape, producing 4 angles that share the same common vertex point. For instance, angles 1, 5, 6 and 2 are all around the same point.

Angle 1 and angle 3 are corresponding angles because they

So in short, they are both in the same corner of each four corner angle configuration. They are both in the bottom left corner. This is the full list of all corresponding angle pairs

---------------------------------

As stated in the first section above, the interior region is between the parallel lines. Alternate interior angles alternate being above and below the transversal line.

So this applies to angle 2 and angle 7. It also works for angle 3 and angle 6.

Answer:

0=4×4−4×4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\mathrm{view \: explanation}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

1 = 4 ÷ 4

2 = (4 + 4) ÷ 4

3 = (4 + 4 + 4) ÷ 4

4 = 4 + 4 - 4

5 = (4 × 4 + 4) ÷ 4

6 = (4 + 4) - (4 ÷ 4) - (4 ÷ 4)

7 = (4 + 4) - (4 ÷ 4)

8 = 4 + 4

9 = (4 + 4) + (4 ÷ 4)

10 = (4 + 4) + (4 ÷ 4) + (4 ÷ 4)

Answer:

[tex]X=\begin{bmatrix}5\\ 14\\ -10\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Our approach here is to isolate X, and simplify this solution. We want to begin by subtracting matrix 2, as shown below, from either side - the first step in isolating X. Afterwards we can multiply either side by the inverse of matrix 1, the co - efficient of X, such that X is now isolated. We can then simplify this value.

Given,

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\\ -3&5&5\\ \:\:\:3&-2&-1\end{bmatrix}[/tex] : Matrix 1

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}3\\ -1\\ 8\end{bmatrix}[/tex] : Matrix 2

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\\ -3&5&5\\ 3&-2&-1\end{bmatrix}X+\begin{bmatrix}3\\ -1\\ 8\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}6\\ 4\\ 5\end{bmatrix}[/tex] ( Subtract Matrix 2 from either side )

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\\ -3&5&5\\ 3&-2&-1\end{bmatrix}X=\begin{bmatrix}6\\ 4\\ 5\end{bmatrix}-\begin{bmatrix}3\\ -1\\ 8\end{bmatrix}[/tex] ( Simplify )

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}6\\ 4\\ 5\end{bmatrix}-\begin{bmatrix}3\\ -1\\ 8\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}6-3\\ 4-\left(-1\right)\\ 5-8\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}3\\ 5\\ -3\end{bmatrix}[/tex] ( Substitute )

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\\ -3&5&5\\ 3&-2&-1\end{bmatrix}X=\begin{bmatrix}3\\ 5\\ -3\end{bmatrix}[/tex] ( Multiply either side by inverse of Matrix 1 )

[tex]X=\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\\ -3&5&5\\ 3&-2&-1\end{bmatrix}^{-1}\begin{bmatrix}3\\ 5\\ -3\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}5\\ 14\\ -10\end{bmatrix}[/tex] - let's say that this is Matrix 3. Our solution would hence be Matrix 3.

Answer:

a₃ = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

The numbers in the set are referred to as { a₁, a₂, a₃, ... }

Answer:

Answer:

3.1 rounded off to the nearest whole number is 3.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The  number of rainfalls is [tex]n =96[/tex]

The answer to the second question is  no it will not be valid this because from the question we are told that the experiment require one pH reading per rainfall so getting multiply specimens(used for the  pH reading) from  one rainfall will make the experiment invalid.

Step-by-step explanation:

from the question we are told that

    The  standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 0.5[/tex]

     The  margin of error is  [tex]E = 0.1[/tex]

Given that the confidence level is  95%  then we can evaluate the level of significance as

                  [tex]\alpha = 100 - 95[/tex]

                  [tex]\alpha = 5 \%[/tex]

                 [tex]\alpha =0.05[/tex]

Next we will obtain the critical value of [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table , the value is  [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = 1.96[/tex]

Generally the sample size is mathematically represented as

           [tex]n = [\frac{Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} * \sigma }}{ E} ]^2[/tex]

substituting values

             [tex]n = [\frac{1.96 * 0.5 }{ 0.1} ]^2[/tex]

            [tex]n =96[/tex]

The answer to the second question is  no the validity is null this because from the question we are told that the experiment require  one pH reading per rainfall so getting multiply specimens(used for the  pH reading) from  one rainfall will make the experiment invalid