PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Rulers of the early modern era differed in their methods of establishing authority in that most of them were absolute monarchs that possessed huge kingdoms due to their conquests and imperialistic ideas.

The early modern era is considered to be from the 15th century to the 18th century and the Age of Enlightenment in Europe. During that period in the history of humanity, Europe was ruled by powerful kings that ruled over many territories in different parts of the world. It was the time of navigation and exploration that made possible the discovery of new routes to India, Africa, and the discovery of the Americas. Kings invested a lot of money in this exploration because it was the way to conquer new lands and exploit their raw materials and natural resources for the benefit of their kingdoms. These Kings -more than leaders- were absolutists that exerted total power over their subjects, who had limited or no rights.

The rulers of the early modern era were differentiated in their methods of establishing authority in absolute monarchs that possessed kingdoms due to their conquests and imperialistic ideas.

The early modern era has been considered from the 15th century to the 18th century in Europe. During that period in the history of humanity, Europe was ruled by powerful kings that ruled over many territories in different parts of the world.

It was the time of navigation and exploration that made possible the discovery of new routes to India, Africa, and the discovery of the Americas. Kings invested a lot of money in this exploration.

it was the way to conquer new lands and exploit their raw materials and natural resources for the benefit of their kingdoms. These Kings -more than leaders- were absolutists that exerted total power over their subjects, who had limited or no rights.

To know more about the rulers of the modern era, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/16229717

Answer:A: He identified the growing number of conflicts that involved fresh water.

Explanation: Boutros-Ghali's prediction has been correct. Water continues to be a major cause of fighting between countries in the middle east.

Answer:

The answer is A im doing the assignment right now :)

Explanation:

Answer:

I think Mac was talking about if they would treat the Japanese well, then they will not be looking for revenge.  After World War 1, they treated the Germans really bad in the peace deal and France had ruthless occupation in the Rhineland of Germany. That why the NAZI party took power, people today wonder how can such people vote Hitler in and this is why. If they would treat the Japanese like how they treated the Germans after World War 1 , there would be no peace between the Japaneses and the Americans. America fought world war 2 not to bring japan horrific occupation but a occupation with justice.

Explanation:

The U.S had some Reconstruction plans that would save japan from a new dictatorship. Many people wanted japan to fall and have a ruthless occupation as revenge. What I mean by "ruthless" is take the wealth away from japan and as much of the land resources as possible for revenge. Mac Arthur knew this would not only cause unrest but revenge.

Answer:

The Himalayas, the highest mountain range in the world, defines the northern border of this region, which divides India and China.

the answer is Capitalist

Answer:

D______________________

Answer:

Melanin is a pigment that is produced by cells known as melanocytes in the skin of most animals, including humans. ... The difference, then, in the production of melanin is affected by: Exposure to UV radiation: Melanin is produced as a response to UV radiation in order to prevent damage to the DNA in the integument.

Answer:

you explain the main points of the passage/argument without going into extreme detail

Explanation:

Answer:

Summarizing tips

use your own words.

only note the most important points, using key words and phrases.

read the original text multiple times, ensuring you don't miss any critical points.

ensure a summary is much shorter than the original source.

include the original source in the references for a written document.

Explanation:

Answer:

Option A. 81.5%

Explanation:

Population mean, [tex]\mu = 6.75[/tex]

Standard deviation, [tex]\sigma = 0.55[/tex]

The question is to find [tex]p(5.65 < \bar{x} < 7.30)[/tex]

The z value is given by the formula:

[tex]z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

z - value corresponding to the mean, [tex]\bar{x} = 5.65[/tex]:

[tex]z_1 = \frac{5.65 - 6.75}{0.55}\\z_1 =-2.0[/tex]

z - value corresponding to the mean, [tex]\bar{x} = 7.30[/tex]:

[tex]z_1 = \frac{7.30 - 6.75}{0.55}\\z_1 =1.0[/tex]

[tex]p(5.65\leq \bar{x} \leq 7.30) = p(-2.0 \leq z \leq 1.0)\\p(-2.0 \leq z \leq 1.0) = p(z\leq 1) - p(z\leq -2)\\ p(-2.0 \leq z \leq 1.0) = 0.84134 - 0.02275\\p(-2.0 \leq z \leq 1.0) = 0.81859 \\p(-2.0 \leq z \leq 1.0) = 0.82[/tex]

Probability that an employee’s hourly wage is between $5.65 and $7.30 = 81.5%

The probability that an employee’s hourly wage is between $5.65 and $7.30 is 81.5%.

Z score is used to determine by how many standard deviation the raw score is above or below the mean. It is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma} \\\\\mu=mean,\sigma=standard\ deviation,x=raw\ score\\\\\mu=6.75,\sigma=0.55\\\\For\ x=5.65\\\\z=\frac{5.65-6.75}{0.55}=-2\\\\\\For\ x=7.30\\\\z=\frac{7.30-6.75}{0.55} =1[/tex]

P(-2 < z < 1) = P(z < 1) - P(z < -2) = 81.5%

The probability that an employee’s hourly wage is between $5.65 and $7.30 is 81.5%.

Find out more on Z score at: https://brainly.com/question/25638875

Answer: It was suffering from a period of unrest. (B)

Answer:

`its B

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

A democracy the people elect representatives to discuss and debate the laws and bill's that dictate our country

Answer: it’s the third one

Explanation:

I just answered it

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

it is a

Explanation:

Answer:

C. the powers of congress were weak

Explanation:

that would be my answer. hope this helps!!! :)

D the person above me is right!

Answer: A publisher has printed more copies of a book than people want to read.

Explanation:

Answer:

Being a member of the United Nations is like being a citizen of the world community because you are helping protect certain parts of the world and so it puts you as a citizen of the world community.

Explanation:

Money market mutual funds provide investors with liquidity. That's because these funds are invested in securities that mature in short periods of time and can be liquidated for cash.

Explanation:Hope this helps!!

Answer:

By the end of October 1940, Hitler called off his planned invasion of Britain and the Battle of Britain ended. Both sides suffered enormous loss of life and aircraft. Still, Britain weakened the Luftwaffe and prevented Germany from achieving air superiority. It was the first major defeat of the war for Hitler

Answer: The statemate in the western front began after german failed to quickly defend France.

Answer:

The 16th Ammendment

Explanation:

Answer:

what's the wrest

Explanation:

Answer:

heyy its b i just took the test

Explanation:

Answer:

Lincoln was worried about Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, and Delaware because they were all border states during the civil war. He was worried that they would transform into complete slave states. If they did, the north wouldn’t have much more land and the north would have lost the civil war. He wanted to contain them.

Answer:

Independent

Explanation:

The responsibility of the judicial branch is to interpret the laws.

First, let's break down the three branches of government.

The three branches of the US Government are the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.

Each branch of the government carries out a certain part of the law-making process.

-The Legislative branch (The House of Representatives and the Senate) are in charge of creating laws.

-The Executive (The President and other close advisors) are in charge of enforcing laws.

-The Judicial branch, at a national level, is the Supreme Court. Since courts rule whether or not somebody is breaking the law, it makes sense that the Supreme Court would rule whether or not somebody is going against what the law states. The Supreme Court looks back at the Constitution and decides  whether or not something is against what it states, therefore interpreting the laws.

Hope this helped! :)

Answer:

B interpret the laws

Explanation:

the answer is False

Explanation:

Answer:

World War I contributed to the Russian Revolution. The Russian economy, while showing improvement prior to the start of World War I, was still not strong enough to deal with the effects of a long war. By the end of 1916, the Russian economy was faltering. Food shortages were common in Russian cities.

Explanation:

Answer:

Speaker 4 would most likely agree with President Ronald Reagan's national security policies.

Explanation:

In its foreign policy, Reagan sought to restore U.S. national pride and influence. During the first five years, Reagan's foreign policy was marked by strong anti-communist rhetoric, the acceleration of the arms race, and efforts to curb the spread of communism in developing countries. According to the so-called Reagan doctrine, the United States had to support anti-communist forces in the world, especially in Latin America. Indeed, Reagan began to support friendly governments, regardless of what they did in their own country. Reagan supported Nicaragua’s anti-communist guerrillas, which seek to overthrow the country’s Marxist regime. He also supported anti-communist guerrillas in Angola and Cambodia, as well as Afghan insurgents in Afghanistan. In 1983, Reagan sent troops to Grenada to overthrow the Marxist regime and stabilize the country.

The gap between Reagan and the Soviet Union was poor during Reagan’s first term. Countries were on opposite sides in conflicts in Central America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. Reagan called the Soviet Union the “kingdom of evil” and in 1983 launched the design of the Strategic Defense Initiative missile defense system. He also deployed cruise missiles and medium-range nuclear missiles to European NATO countries in response to similar measures taken by the Soviet Union, which led the Soviet Union to withdraw from disarmament negotiations.

Speaker 4 would most likely agree with President Ronald Reagan's National Security Policies.

In his presidential speech, he talked about national security policy, in which he suggested that United States will never be an Aggressor. It will maintain strength in order to defend against any aggression.

This policy is similar to what the Speaker 4 says "Increased defensive strength will discourage aggression by others".  Hence this option is correct.

Learn More about Ronald Reagan here:

https://brainly.com/question/14130764

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Meiji leaders did not introduce communism as the new social system. The correct option is b.

Meiji is an era of Japanese history that extended from October 23, 1868 to July 30, 1912. The Meiji era was the first half of the Empire of Japan, when the Japanese people moved from being an isolated feudal society at risk of colonization by Western powers to the new paradigm of a modern, industrialized nation state and emergent great power, influenced by Western scientific, technological, philosophical, political, legal, and aesthetic ideas.

As a result of such wholesale adoption of radically different ideas, the changes to Japan were profound, and affected its social structure, internal politics, economy, military, and foreign relations. The period corresponded to the reign of Emperor Meiji.

It was preceded by the Keiō era and was succeeded by the Taishō era, upon the accession of Emperor Taishō.

Learn more about Meiji, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11486151

#SPJ2

Answer:

Cornelius Vanderbilt started his rail empire by borrowing $100 to buy a small ferry boat, he quickly earned the reputation of a shrewd businessman. He always got ahead by any means necessary by hook or crook, it was pretty much win or lose. No middle ground. His single ship quickly became a fleet of ships and he was christened “The Commodore.”

He quickly understood the power of transportation – own the infrastructure and call the shot. At this peak, he does the unthinkable; he sold all his ships and invested in railroads. In today’s speak; he disrupted/reinvented himself/business. He saw the future and was willing to bet everything on it. His decision paid off greatly and he became the richest man in America with a net worth of $68M, which will roughly translate to about $75B today. He would be the 3rd richest man in the world today, just after Buffet.

Then around 1806, tragedy struck! Vanderbilt lost his favourite son, George, in a war. He was devastated. The loss of his child had far-reaching consequences, almost threatening his empire. Vanderbilt’s rivals sensing this, swooped in. They wanted to take the old man out. Vanderbilt sent his other son, William, to carry out a trade negotiation; his rivals laughed him away and sent him back to his father. Vanderbilt, upon hearing this, was very upset. He called his son into a room, pulled out a map and declared ‘‘they want war, I will give them war.’’

Vanderbilt owned the only rail bridge in NYC then; it was the gateway to the country’s largest port and market. He understood this leverage and he wasn’t going to spare anything that will bring his competition to their knees. You don’t mess with Vanderbilt and expect to walk away unscarred. This was an opportunity to teach William what it meant to be a Vanderbilt. Vanderbilt commanded his son to close the bridge, essentially blocking other rail operators access into the country’s biggest port and market.

New York City was a gateway into the continent, with this move, he was asserting his power as the rail king. He said to his son “we are going to watch them bleed.” And bled, they did. The presidents of the rival companies had no option than to sell, their stock holdings were on a free fall. William, sensing another opportunity, came to his dad and informed him about the free fall, Vanderbilt commanded him to buy everything he could. He dealt his rivals a knockout punch. In just days, he bought out all his rivals, creating the largest, single rail company in America.

Vanderbilt wasn’t contented with being the rail king; he wanted the world to know about it. He built the Central depot. It will harmonize Harlem, Hudson and Central, he wanted it in the heart of New York. This rail magnet also pioneered the concept of a hostile takeover. As time passed, he came to the realization that at the end of the day, transportation will be a bigger business than owning railroads.

Explanation: