Please help me!! :)

Answer:

The united states government protected freedom of religion of all faiths

Explanation:

I just did it

Answer:

the us government protected freedom of religion for all faiths

Explanation:

ap3x

Answer:

the Speaker

Explanation:

the Speaker acts as leader of the House and combines several roles: the institutional role of presiding officer and administrative head of the House, the role of leader of the majority party in the House, and the representative role of an elected member of the House

Answer: 1. They hoped to create a Utopian Society

         That's one. (At least I'm guessing it is), try to solve the other ones from your textbook, they always have the answers, no matter how well hidden it is :)

Answer:

Because they didnt have drugs to fight malaria

Explanation:

Malaria was a big deal and very big in Africa too.

Answer:

Mainnnnnnne weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Explanation:

Answer:

Which best compares the first wave of immigration to america in the 1600s to the third wave in the early 1800s a. in the 1600s immigrants were seeking land and religious freedom and in the early 1800s they were escaping famine and political problems.

Explanation:

Answer:

im pretty sure its main idea

Explanation:

Answer:

Main idea

Explanation:

The compromise of 1850 was the bill passed by the US for the confrontation between slaves and the state. The compromise was unable to resolve the regional conflict in the US.

The 1850 compromise was insufficient to reconcile the north and south because geographical differences still existed, and thus did not resolve the differences.

The south required slaves to work the land, which was a major factor in the abolition of slavery.

Meanwhile, the predominantly industrial north thrived on factories and thus did not require slaves.

Furthermore, the 1850 compromise resulted in the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act, which was not enforced by the north.

This clearly demonstrates the ideological differences between the north and the south, which have yet to be resolved.

Learn more about the 1850 compromise, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8165267

Answer:

Development of what people stand for can be pretty screwed up, especailly in the American government of BOTH political parties. Democracy is a fragile thing and can be taken backwards very easily. Other nations as well depending on what leaders make of society and how they think it should be.

Answer:

Explanation:

Given textual and archaeological evidence, it is thought that thousands of Europeans lived in Imperial China during the period of Mongol rule.[1] These were people from countries traditionally belonging to the lands of Christendom during the High to Late Middle Ages who visited, traded, performed Christian missionary work, or lived in China. This occurred primarily during the second half of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th century, coinciding with the rule of the Mongol Empire, which ruled over a large part of Eurasia and connected Europe with their Chinese dominion of the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368).[2] Whereas the Byzantine Empire centered in Greece and Anatolia maintained rare incidences of correspondence with the Tang, Song and Ming dynasties of China, the Roman papacy sent several missionaries and embassies to the early Mongol Empire as well as to Khanbaliq (modern Beijing), the capital of the Mongol-led Yuan Dynasty. These contacts with the West were preceded by rare interactions between the Han-period Chinese and Hellenistic Greeks and Romans.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Go with the answer A

Answer:

Louis XIV had two main advisors. Jean-Baptise Colbert, his financial advisor, and Marquis de Louvois, his war advisor.

Explanation:

Answer: Louis XIV had two main advisors. Jean-Baptize Colbert, his financial advisor, and Marquis de Louis, his war advisor.

Explanation: yay!

Answer:

expedition took them up the Missouri River to its headwaters, then on to the Pacific Ocean via the Columbia River, and it may have been influenced by the purported transcontinental journey of Moncacht-Apé by the same route about a century before.

Answer:

Hope this help

Explanation:

Answer:

They forbid or require certain actions.

Explanation:

process of elimination, the legislative branch makes laws, laws, as far as being approved goes, are in the hand of the government, not the police. And of course there is going to be criticism about anything and everything.

Protecting innocent life from harm should be the main justification for going to war and recovering stolen property. punishing those who have committed crimes.

War is commonly understood to be an aggressive confrontation involving states or countries. Various factors can cause nations to engage in war. It has been stated that a country will engage in war if it believes the gains of war exceed the drawbacks and in the absence of an alternative.

Wars that are undertaken to halt the rise of a morally reprehensible power are justified even though they are eradicating an evil that might eventually bring misery to a larger population. War for self-defense can indeed be justified against since doing so leaves you open to attack.

Learn more about war, Here:

https://brainly.com/question/3445478

#SPJ1

Answer:

great britain  and france if im right can i have brainliest

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it's maybe c.

Explanation:

pls correct me if I'm wrong