Please help this is due tomorrow. Whoever helps I’ll give them brainliest

Answer:

Native Americans began harvesting the raw materials used to make muskets and gunpowder.

Explanation:

Native Americans began to hunt more beavers so they could trade the pelts for muskets. Native Americans stopped trading with other tribes because now they could use muskets to steal from one another.

Answer:

Native Americans began to hunt more beavers so they could trade the pelts for muskets.

Explanation:

The most prized piece of European weaponry to obtain was a musket, or light, long-barreled European gun. To trade with Europeans for these, native peoples intensified their harvesting of beaver, commercializing their traditional practice.

Answer:

1. By signing treaties with the locals and formulating military and trading partnerships

2. Divide and Rule policy

Explanation:

British secure its hold on India, By signing an agreement with the locals and formulating military and trading partnerships.

This helped them penetrate India through ordinary trade, as these local leaders assist the British in painting their subjects along with the British policies.

2. Colonial policies that led to the beginning of Indian Nationalism is through the British divide and rule policies. This policy incites a different sense of nationalism or staying alone among major categories of people, particularly between Muslims and Hindus.

Britain secure its hold on India by the policies like subsidiary Alliance, Doctrine of lapse, and divide and rule. Colonial Policies led to poverty and backwardness of India which made the demand for freedom prevalent.

Britain secure its hold on India based on the policy of Subsidiary Alliance and Doctrine of Lapse. According to Former, the Regional power comes into alliance with the British against any external threat, while later suggest the subordination of the Regional power through the policy of Doctrine of lapse meaning the Regional Power has no heir to govern the state, hence it comes under british rule.

These policies along with divide and rule, made India poverty stricken, with no political, and economical rights, Indians became more angry. Hence, it leads to Indian Nationalism.

Learn More about British Raj here:

https://brainly.com/question/779907

Answer: Freedom of Speech

Explanation: Freedom of speech means you are able to speak with freedom on your opinion so i believe protesting is equal to freedom of speech!

Answer:

freedom of assembly

Explanation:

this is guaranteed in the first amendment, and it allows people to to come together and form a group about their ideas and viewpoints

Answer:

fire escapes for each suite and a window for every room

Explanation:

I'm not 100% sure if thats right but I think it is

Answer:

Hubert Humphrey

Explanation:

Hubert Humphrey is a former United States Vice President who served between 1965 to 1969 under the Democratic party with Lyndon B Johnson as the President.

In 1968, he won the Democratic presidential nomination at the Democratic National Convention. He chose Edmund Muskie as his running mates but later lost the eventual election against the Republican Richard Nixon.

Answer:

Pipelines are an important industry to Canadians, providing jobs in communities large and small, as well as considerable tax revenues. Pipelines also contribute to our prosperity when we export oil and gas to other countries.

Explanation:

Answer:  His assent to laws.

Explanation: "The King removed judiciary powers from the people in Massachusetts and began paying the judges himself (with profit from the duties on the colonists). He became their new boss."

Answer:

Queen Elizabeth is famous for many things and heres some of those things she did in her era.Queen Elizabeth is considered by many as the "virgin queen" as she never married anybody for the sake of security within her life and family.If she had married someone foriegn they would have quite an influence too which she would not want considering she wanted to remain independent.Another thing Queen Elizabeth is famous for is how her forces defeated the Spanish Armanda and saved England from invasion which lead to England becoming a strong and independent nation.

Explanation:

Answer:

American criminal law is considered statutory and it compare to English common law is explained below in detail.

Explanation:

A statute is a law legislated by a parliament, and statutory law is the foundation of law emerging from ordinances. An ordinance—or the statutory law—may also be introduced as legislation. ... This is not correct of universal law, which is also recognized as “unwritten law, because it's not assembled in an individual source.

Answer:

A statute is a piece of legislation enacted by a legislature, and statutory law is the bedrock of law that emerges from ordinances. Legislation may also be enacted as an ordinance (or statutory law). ... This is not correct of universal law, which is also recognized as “unwritten law, because it's not assembled in an individual source."

Explanation:

Answer:

The book was on the table.

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

British and French prime ministers Neville Chamberlain and Edouard Daladier sign the Munich Pact with Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. The agreement averted the outbreak of war but gave Czechoslovakia away to German conquest. War seemed imminent, and France began a partial mobilization on September 24.

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

Answer:

Each of us is different in our own special way but we also have the common qualities that make us all humans. So each of us should be treated with respect and dignity and treat others in the same way. No persons should be discriminated against in their sexual and reproductive lives.

Explanation:

Answer:

The ability to have free speech and have opinions no matter what race,sex,anything they have its just common sense

Explanation:

Answer:

Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.

Explanation:

Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.

In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.

One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

The tone of the "Letter from Birmingham Prison" is astonishingly subdued when you consider the circumstances surrounding its creation. Many people criticized Dr. King throughout his career for being too submissive to white officials

Dr. King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a proclamation of black self-sufficiency. He argues that the clergymen and his audience should support his cause not because they are black, but because it is the right thing to do.

He also suggests that moderation is a reflection of the moderate's ignorant and unwitting sinfulness, and that patience is more effective than tension. Dr. King argues that moderation is the biggest obstacle towards equal rights in America, and that group mentality supports and enables immorality. This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, criticism of the church for supporting the status quo, and criticism of those who do not support individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

Therefore, we can conclude that these were the points Mr. King included in his letter,

Learn more about Dr King's letter here?

https://brainly.com/question/28768925

#SPJ3

Answer: I don't know if this is completely correct, so sorry if it's wrong

The Tea Party movement is an American fiscally conservative political movement within the Republican Party. Members of the movement have called for lower taxes, and for a reduction of the national debt of the United States and federal budget deficit through decreased government spending.

Explanation:

Answer:

Respect each other

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it's was the unity

Explanation:

Answer:

The United States didn't immediately annex Texas because Northerners opposed to slavery objected to the annexation of more slave territory and didn't want slave states to outnumber free states. Many Americans also feared that annexation would lead to war with Mexico. ... Mexico refused to negotiate on the US offer.

Following Texas' successful war of independence against Mexico in 1836, President Martin van Buren refrained from annexing Texas after the Mexicans threatened war. ... His efforts culminated on April 12 in a Treaty of Annexation, an event that caused Mexico to sever diplomatic relations with United States.

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

These reformers favored such policies as civil service reform, food safety laws, and increased political rights for women and U.S. workers. ... Throughout the 1890s, the U.S. Government became increasingly likely to rely on its military and economic power to pursue foreign policy goals

Explanation:

Answer:

Because the U.S. Constitution originally stipulated that the Federal Government would start on March 4th each year. FDR's first inauguration in 1933 was the last inauguration held in March. The inauguration date was changed with the passage of the 20th Amendment, which moved the date up to January 20th.

Explanation:

Answer:

The two countries share a maritime and land border. ... The long border between the two countries means that peace and security in that region are important to the U.S.'s national security and international trade. The U.S. is Mexico's biggest trading partner and Mexico is the U.S.'s third-largest trading partners.

Explanation:

Answer:

its a took the quiz

viset egept

Explanation:

Answer:

A,   because when you ed the little paragraph it tells you.

Answer:

Shakespeare

Explanation:

Hitler and King Henry VIII were not great men. I do not know much about Socrates so I am guessing it is shakespeare

William Shakespeare is one of the few men who have been quoted in the “last words of the great men”.

William Shakespeare was an English writer who wrote for numerous plays, dramas, and poems. He is referred to as the greatest writer ever in the history of all the writers in the English language.

Shakespeare not only wrote for plays and dramas, but has also represented himself as an actor in some of his self-written plays and dramas.

Because of his unimaginable contributions to the English literature, he was named in the “last words of the great men”.

Hence, option B; Shakespeare is one of the men who have been quoted in the “last words of the great men”.

Learn more about Shakespeare here:

https://brainly.com/question/25603233

#SPJ2

Answer: America

Explanation:

In his I Have a Dream Speech (1963), Martin Luther King, Jr. expressed his worries about the future of African Americans and called society to promote civil rights for every American beyond their race. To do so, King used the figure of speech known as personification, which refers to an object or animal that has been presented with human qualities. In this example, America, meaning the country or the American society, has been presented as capable of not honoring a promise.

Answer:

African Americans suffered during reconstruction because of the unrest in the new governments.

Their rights were not full and they were treated unfairly. They were segregated and faced White Supremecy groups such as the KKK (Ku Klux Klan).

Explanation:

Answer:

Political ethics (also known as political morality or public ethics) is the practice of making moral judgements about political action and political agents.