Please help

Find the value of x,
m∠5 = x-6, m∠4 = 2x+4, m∠2 = 2x-26

Answer:

Total earning last month with x articles is:

This is same amount as 2000

The equation is:

Answer:

The actual dimensions of the floor are 12,5m by 1,8m.

Step-by-step explanation:

Scale problems are solved by proportions, using a rule of three.

Scale of 1:50

This means that each cm on the cupboard has a real dimension of 50 cm

25 cm on the cupboard:

So the real dimension is:

25*50 = 1250 cm = 12,5m

3.6 cm

The real dimension is:

3.6*50 = 160 cm = 1,8 m

The actual dimensions of the floor are 12,5m by 1,8m.

Answer:

No it is not since there is 15 defectice parts in 2machines and there is 8 broken parts in the one machine

Hope This Helps!!!

Answer:

It should be the top right one

(with 6ft as the height)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It must be the lower to the left choice.

Step-by-step explanation:

As you can see, the net we have is composed of only triangles.

So we should be choosing a figure with a triangular base.

Our answers are narrowed down into the top right and lower left choices because both figures have triangular bases.

The other person down there chose the top right choice and was incorrect, so the answer should be the lower to the left figure.

Also, its the lower left figure because look at the triangular base, it is an isosceles meaning that two sides have the same length.

If the net says that the long side measures 9 ft, then the other two sides should be the same length and shorter than 9 ft. So the answer is the lower left figure.

Hope this helps

Answer:

The slant height of the cone affected is two times the slant height of original cone

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that

If the height and base radius of a cone are increased by a factor of  to create a similar cone

then

the scale factor is equal to  

therefore

the slant height of the cone affected is equal to the slant height of the original cone multiplied by the scale factor

Find the slant height of the original cone

Let

l-----> slant height of original cone

la-----> slant height of the cone affected

Applying the Pythagoras theorem

so

The slant height of the cone affected is two times the slant height of original cone

(I GOT THIS FROM SOMEONE ELSES ANSWER IN 2017 SO I HOPE THIS HELPS)

The slant height of the larger cone is double the slant height of the smaller cone.

Option B is the correct answer.

It is a shape of a Christmas tree where there is a base of radius r and a top point called the apex.

The volume of a cone is 1/3 πr²h

We have,

The slant height of the cone is affected by a factor of 2.

When the height and base radius of a cone are multiplied by 2, the dimensions of the new cone are doubled.

Therefore,

The slant height of the larger cone is double the slant height of the smaller cone.

Learn more about cones here:

https://brainly.com/question/13798146

#SPJ5

Answer:

5,5,6,6,13

Step-by-step explanation:

Mode means most often.  The 5 numbers has 2 modes 5 and 6

This means that 4 of the numbers must be 5,5,6,6

Median means the middle number must be 6

5,5,6,6,x is the only way to to get the middle number to be 6

We need to average to 7

(5+5+6+6+x) /5 = 7

(5+5+6+6+x) /5  *5= 7*5

(5+5+6+6+x) =35

22+x = 35

x = 35-22

x = 13

The other number is 13

Answer:

The level of significance is the

b. maximum allowable probability of Type I error.

Step-by-step explanation:

The significance level provides the maximum probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.  It is the same as a type I error (also known as false-positive).  This error occurs when a researcher or investigator rejects a true null hypothesis that is supposed to be accepted.  It is the opposite of a type II error (false-negative), which occurs when the researcher fails to reject a false null hypothesis.

The sample statistic that must have changed after the correction was made is mean. Because mean is based on all the observation in the data. So changing any value in the data will impact mean.

Changing the highest salary in the data will have no impact on median because median lies at the center of data.

Changing the highest salary in the data will have no impact on mode because mode is the most frequently occurring value in the data.

Changing the highest salary in the data will have no impact on minimum because minimum is the smallest value in the data.

Hence the only statistic which will change is mean.

Answer: A-Mean

Step-by-step explanation:

A.) Mean

B.) Median

C.)  Mode

D.)  Minimum

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 3x² -5x - 1

f'(x) =2*3x - 5*1 +0

     = 6x - 5

f'(4) = 6*4 - 5

      = 24 - 5

      = 19

Answer:

La suma de las dos matrices cuadradas de dimensión 2 es [tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

Considerando que se tratan de dos matrices de igual dimensión y cuyos elementos son números reales, conocemos que la adición entre dos matrices consiste en las sumas de los elementos de igual posición, esto es, los elementos que están localizados en las mismas filas y columnas, entonces, la suma es:

[tex]\vec A = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1&2\\-1&0\end{array} \right][/tex], [tex]\vec B = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-2&9\\3&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\vec U = \vec A + \vec B = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 + (-2)&2+9\\-1 + 3&0 + 5\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

La suma de las dos matrices cuadradas de dimensión 2 es [tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex].

Answer:

a) 0.15 / 0.09

b) 0.15 / 1

c) 0.15 / 0.23

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(x+3)(x+1)=1

x²+3x+x+3=1

x²+4x+2=0

x²+4x+4=-2+4

(x+2)²=2

x+2=±√2

x=2+√2

and x=2-√2

so x≠-3

and x≠-1

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Step-by-step explanation:

At the null hypothesis, we test if there was no increase, that is, the mean is 0, so:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there was an increase, that is, the mean is greater than 0, so:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 0[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, s is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0[/tex]

104 companies, adjusted for inflation, in a recent year. The mean increase in real compensation was x¯=6.9%, and the standard deviation of the increases was s=55%.

This means that [tex]n = 104, X = 6.9, s = 55[/tex]

Value of the test-statistic:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{6.9 - 0}{\frac{55}{\sqrt{104}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = 1.28[/tex]

P-value of the test:

The p-value of the test is a right-tailed test(test if the mean is greater than a value), with 104 - 1 = 103 df and t = 1.28.

Using a t-distribution calculator, this p-value is of 0.1017.

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Answer:

Pvalue = 0.1505

y = 0.550x1 + 3.600x2 + 7.300

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data :

Study Hours GPA ACT Score

5 4 27

5 2 18

5 3 18

1 3 20

2 4 21

Using technology, the Pvalue obtained using the Fratio :

F = MSregression / MSresidual = 30.228571/ 8.190476 = 3.69

The Pvalue for the regression equation is:

Using the Pvalue from Fratio calculator :

F(1, 3), 3.69 = 0.1505

Using the Pvalue approach :

At α = 0.01

Pvalue > α ; Hence, we fail to reject H0 and conclude that ; There is not enough evidence to show that the relationship is statistically significant.

The regression equation :

y = A1x1 + A2x2 +... AnXn

y = 0.550x1 + 3.600x2 + 7.300

x1 and x2 are the predictor variables ;

y = predicted variable

Answer:

See Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Question,

Thus,

The distance that you get reception is the length of the chord created by the intersection of the circle defining the edge of transmission and the line defining the car trip.

And,

The Transmitter at the origin

City to the north at (0,93)  & City to the east at (78,0)  

the Slope is M=(-93/78)

Intercept is B= y - mx ⇒  93 - (-93/78)(0) = 93

The equation of the line between the cities is y = (-93/78)x + 93

Now, Solve the above two Equations

The intersection is gotten from the picture or solving:

x^2 + [(-93/78)*x + 93]^2 = 69^2

Now,

From the Pythagorean theorem the total distance of the trip is:  

d1 = √(93^2 + 78^2) ≈ 121.37miles  

And the distance when the signal is picked up is:

d2 =√ [(67.952-23.627)^2 + (64.82 - 11.98)^2] ≈ 68.96 miles

You will pick up a signal from the transmitter in (d2/d1)*100 = 56% of the drive.

Answer:

The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_1: \mu_M - \mu_W \neq 0[/tex], considering M for men and W for women.

Step-by-step explanation:

He uses the data to conduct a hypothesis test to determine if the mean percent of expenditures that goes toward housing (including fuel and light) is different for men and women.

At the null hypothesis, we test if there is not difference, that is, the difference of the mean is 0, so:

[tex]H_0: \mu_M - \mu_W = 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there is a difference, that is, the difference of the means is different of 0, so:

[tex]H_1: \mu_M - \mu_W \neq 0[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to first find the model for this particular situation, knowing that this is an exponential decay problem. The main equation for exponential growth/decay (as far as population goes for our problem) is

[tex]y=a(b)^x[/tex] where a is the initial population, b is the rate of decrease in the population which can also be written as (1 - r), y is the population after a certain amount of time, x, goes by. We will let year 2015 = 0 so year 2021 can = 6. This keeps our numbers lower and doesn't change the answer!

Our initial population in the year x = 0 is 62500. Our rate of decay is

(1 - .016) so our b value is .984

Filling in to find our model:

[tex]y=62500(.984)^x[/tex]

Now we can use that model and sub in a 6 for x to find the population in the year 2021:

[tex]y=62500(.984)^6[/tex] and

y = 62500(.9077590568) so

y = 56734.9 or, rounded to the nearest person, 56735

Answer:

hlo how are u?whats ur day is going

Answer:

14.077 feet to the nearest thousandth.

Step-by-step explanation:

First let's work out the multiplier:

6 + 5 + 2 = 13.

61/2 = 30.5

- so the multiplier is 30.5/13 = 2.34615

The longest piece refers to the 6 in the ratio its length

= 6 * 2.34615

= 14.0769 ft.

Answer:

[tex]P = 8 + 2\sqrt{26}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]W = (-2, 4)[/tex]

[tex]X = (2, 4)[/tex]

[tex]Y = (1, -1)[/tex]

[tex]Z = (-3,-1)[/tex]

Required

The perimeter

First, calculate the distance between each point using:

[tex]d = \sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^2 + (y_1 -y_2)^2[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]WX = \sqrt{(-2- 2)^2 + (4-4)^2 } =4[/tex]

[tex]XY = \sqrt{(2- 1)^2 + (4--1)^2 } =\sqrt{26}[/tex]

[tex]YZ = \sqrt{(1- -3)^2 + (-1--1)^2 } =4[/tex]

[tex]ZW = \sqrt{(-3--2)^2 + (-1-4)^2 } =\sqrt{26}[/tex]

So, the perimeter (P) is:

[tex]P = 4 + \sqrt{26} + 4 + \sqrt{26}[/tex]

[tex]P = 8 + 2\sqrt{26}[/tex]

Answer:

its D.

Step-by-step explanation:

took test

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertical angles have the same measure, so ...

  m∠A = m∠B

  (5x -9)° = (8x -30)°

  21 = 3x . . . . . . . . . divide by °, add 30-5x

  7 = x . . . . . . . . . . divide by 3

Answer:

volume =l×b×h

45cm×32cm×35cm=48,960cm³

Answer:

The z-score for the trainee is of 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

The mean of the test scores is 72 with a standard deviation of 5.

This means that [tex]\mu = 72, \sigma = 5[/tex]

Find the z-score for a trainee, given a score of 82.

This is Z when X = 82. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{82 - 72}{5}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2[/tex]

The z-score for the trainee is of 2.

I can't see the diagram sorry.

Step-by-step explanation:

Is there supposed to be a picture attached?

Answer:

[tex]\frac{-2x+11}{(x-4)(x+1)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't think we can factor this so we'll have to multiply to make the denominators the same

[tex]\frac{3(x+1)}{(x^2-3x-4)(x+1)}-\frac{2(x^2-3x-4)}{(x+1)(x^2-3x-4)}\\\\\frac{3x+3-(2x^2-6x-8)}{(x^2-3x-4)(x+1)}=\frac{-2x^2+9x+11}{(x^2-3x-4)(x+1)}\\-2x^2+9x+11=(x+1)(-2x+11)\\\\x^2-3x-4=(x+1)(x-4)\\\frac{(x+1)(-2x+11)}{(x+1)(x-4)(x+1)}=\frac{-2x+11}{(x-4)(x+1)}[/tex]

Answer:

0.0098 = 0.98% probability that the sample proportion will differ from the population proportion by greater than 0.04

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

Suppose the true proportion is 0.06.

This means that [tex]p = 0.06[/tex]

235 are sampled

This means that [tex]n = 235[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = p = 0.06[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.06*0.94}{235}} = 0.0155[/tex]

What is the probability that the sample proportion will differ from the population proportion by greater than 0.04?

Proportion below 0.06 - 0.04 = 0.02 or above 0.06 + 0.04 = 0.1. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, these probabilities are equal, which means that we can find one of them and multiply by 2.

Probability the proportion is below 0.02.

p-value of Z when X = 0.02. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.02 - 0.06}{0.0155}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.58[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.58[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0049.

2*0.0049 = 0.0098

0.0098 = 0.98% probability that the sample proportion will differ from the population proportion by greater than 0.04

Solution :

Using the TI-84 PLUS calculator

a). Area : 0.41

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.41,75,9)

= 72.95209525

Therefore, the 41st percentile of the scores is 72.95209525

b).  Area : 0.74

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.74,75,9)

= 80.79010862

Therefore, the 74st percentile of the scores is 80.79010862

c). 8%

So,  Area : 0.92

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.92,75,9)

= 87.64564405

Therefore, X =  80.79010862

Answer:

$36.5 money ms.weaver spent for the items

Answer: This problem is a fraction since we have several equal parts that make up one whole. The problem asks us to talk about the relationship of white pieces to the whole. Since we know the whole is made up of 7 pieces (4 blue parts and 3 white parts = 7 total parts), then 7 will be our denominator (number on the bottom of the fraction).

Now that we have our number on the bottom, we need to look back at the question to carefully decide what parts of the whole we are looking at. The question wants to know how many of the parts are white. We know that 3 of the parts are white, so that is our numerator (number of the top of the fraction).

Our final answer is 3/7 or "three-sevenths." Said another way, three of the seven pieces are white.

Step-by-step explanation: