Pls help me I don’t have much time

Answer:

b they make people think in a detailed and critical way

Sad moods affect people's thinking as they make people think in a detailed and critical way. Thus, option B is correct.

The emotional mood created by the author's word choice is known as mood. Pay a close look at the way that authors portrays the circumstances, the environment, how a personality responds to the situations, and how the tension or issue is ultimately resolved or all the negative aspect.

If a person is a mood is sad and is thinking very much just will affect his mental health. Whenever a person has said he evaluates things in depth and in a critical manner. It depends upon the what if a thing or what if there would be another decision that could be taken. This happened is feeling low. Therefore, option B is the correct option.

Learn more about mood, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27450024

#SPJ5

Answer:

This prologue functions less as the voice of fate than the first one does. Instead it builds suspense by laying out the problem of the two lovers and hinting that there may be some way to overcome it: “But passion lends them power, time means, to meet, / Temp'ring extremities with extreme sweet” (2. Prologue.

Explanation: Brainliest please

Answer:

A summary for "The Purple Balloon" is discussed below in complete details.

Explanation:

When a child enhances informed of his indeterminate death (children manage to understand long before the rest of us even crave to acknowledge it) and is given the opportunity to describe his sentiments, he will frequently paint a blue or purple balloon, delivered and unencumbered, on its way skyward.

Answer:

c When she blushed, it gradually became more indistinct, and finally vanished amid the triumphant rush of blood that bathed the whole cheek with its brilliant glow.

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

Answer: the answer is C my friend

Have a marvelous day

Explanation:

Answer:

I think first one because it does not talk only about americas highways

Answer:

3. Morosely

Explanation:

The meaning of the word ruefully mentioned in the above sentence means that morosely. Thus, option third is correct.

The term morosely refers to the situation when a person feels bad and makes the behavior of the person upset. Morosely is an adverb which has a cranky undertone.

The word is taken from the Latin language morosus which means "peevish." It is having a glum and dismal demeanor.

The term rueful expresses regret seriously yet with a sense of humor. Rueful appears frequently in descriptions of sorrowful grins or contrite smiles. The word itself is derived from the verb rue, which meaning "to regret."

Therefore, it can be concluded that The term ruefully, as used in the preceding sentence, denotes morosely. Hence, option third is correct.

Learn more about morosely here:

https://brainly.com/question/793775

#SPJ6

Um... You have to include the text that goes along with this story so that we can answer the question correctly. I don't want to make you mad about this because I know that there are people who would get mad about this sort of thing but I just wanted to let you know that without the text we won't be able to answer your question the correct way, meaning that you would likely get it wrong.

Thanks for reading this and have a Merry Christmas,

Miri

Answer:

more options!

Explanation:

Answer:

C. News Anchors

Answer:

Counterclaim is B: “meat based ... can be expensive.”

Explanation:

Answer:

Its a noun

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer would be an adjective.

Explanation:

Enjoy!

Answer:

1-5

2-6

3-7

4-2

5-7

6-3

7-1

8-4

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

brainliest pls

Answer/Explanation:

Come is the verb of this sentence. Though an irregular verb it used very often.

Milk is the subject.

"Comes from cows" is the dependent clause.

Answer:B

Mark me brainliest if this helps,

Until the past decade, scientists, research institutions, and government agencies relied solely on a system of self-regulation based on shared ethical principles and generally accepted research practices to ensure integrity in the research process. Among the very basic principles that guide scientists, as well as many other scholars, are those expressed as respect for the integrity of knowledge, collegiality, honesty, objectivity, and openness. These principles are at work in the fundamental elements of the scientific method, such as formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment to test the hypothesis, and collecting and interpreting data. In addition, more particular principles characteristic of specific scientific disciplines influence the methods of observation; the acquisition, storage, management, and sharing of data; the communication of scientific knowledge and information; and the training of younger scientists.1 How these principles are applied varies considerably among the several scientific disciplines, different research organizations, and individual investigators.

The basic and particular principles that guide scientific research practices exist primarily in an unwritten code of ethics. Although some have proposed that these principles should be written down and formalized,2 the principles and traditions of science are, for the most part, conveyed to successive generations of scientists through example, discussion, and informal education. As was pointed out in an early Academy report on responsible conduct of research in the Suggested Citation:"2 SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES AND RESEARCH PRACTICES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.×

Add a note to your bookmark

health sciences, “a variety of informal and formal practices and procedures currently exist in the academic research environment to assure and maintain the high quality of research conduct” (IOM, 1989a, p. 18).

Physicist Richard Feynman invoked the informal approach to communicating the basic principles of science in his 1974 commencement address at the California Institute of Technology (Feynman, 1985):

[There is an] idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school—we never explicitly say what this is, but just hope that you catch on by all the examples of scientific investigation. It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty—a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid—not only what you think is right about it; other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked—to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.

Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can—if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong—to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. In summary, the idea is to try to give all the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution, not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another. (pp. 311-312)

Many scholars have noted the implicit nature and informal character of the processes that often guide scientific research practices and inference.3 Research in well-established fields of scientific knowledge, guided by commonly accepted theoretical paradigms and experimental methods, involves few disagreements about what is recognized as sound scientific evidence. Even in a revolutionary scientific field like molecular biology, students and trainees have learned the basic principles governing judgments made in such standardized procedures as cloning a new gene and determining its sequence.

In evaluating practices that guide research endeavors, it is important to consider the individual character of scientific fields. Research fields that yield highly replicable results, such as ordinary organic chemical structures, are quite different from fields such as cellular immunology, which are in a much earlier stage of development and accumulate much erroneous or uninterpretable material before the pieces fit together coherently. When a research field is too new or too fragmented to support consensual paradigms or established methods, different scientific practices can emerge

Answer:

Either A or B

Explanation:

Once a scientist has finished with their experiment, Other scientists usually repeat the experiment to see if it's correct, and usually talk about it and see, if it's wrong, what could be done to fix it.

Answer:

Use a semicolon and a comma to join two independent clauses, creating a compound sentence.

Explanation:

You have to use a comma and a semicolon in a compound sentence because it helps construct your writing or essay better. Also, FANBOYS is another way to help you with your writing.

Answer:

what do you think of when you think of this picture?

1: We need to study to get knowledge and to get employment and job opportunities.

2:To get knowledge and to make my career.

3:Teacher teach us to give knowledge and to improve us

4: 8

5: I learn different things.

6: Yes

7: interesting. I love reading.

8: It means to make you a successful person in the future.

9: Same answer like, she want to see us as a successful person. And I also want to make them feel proud.

10:LoL....

Answer:

In lines 15- 31, what is Mercutio saying about Benvolio? What might his tone of voice be here? Mercutio says Benvolio says he will not do something and then ends up doing it anyway. Mercutio may be talking in an angered or serious tone.

Answer:

DrPepper is a carbonated soft drink. It was created in the 1880s by pharmacist Charles Alderton in Waco, Texas, and first served around 1885. Dr Pepper was first nationally marketed in the United States in 1904 and is now also sold in Europe, Asia, North and South America, and Australia, as well as New Zealand and South Africa as an imported good. Variants include Diet Dr Pepper and, beginning in the 2000s, a line of additional flavors.

Explanation:

Answer:

........

.

uxvxhudjdhdhruufhfbfvtvnrixidjnsi2ojsjw09q2u8egtvh5if7urgruhfhrhfyrhfisjenzkowkdbdhfcgh4bfitvrhkd

............hfuchhfuxuaiiwhebduxjzojsna

Explanation:

nznbzbxbubfbchbvnxmosnekowkwmwk..z..c.k.•¿¿.¿•♡♡jokdnxuakmzskxkdmofm.

f jjdjjfjjxn

bzuebdbb€♡♤•》》•♤j*,$,#&'jxndhxuw992h3hht778uczvdjjdjsjs7hddhjdn

Answer:

It's just saying do you think people like being around u for long periods of time

Explanation:

Answer:

Ok so like its asking if you are a tolerant person or do you accept other people's different beliefs and ideas even if you dont agree with them?

Explanation:

Answer:

Researchers at the Occidental Research Bureau have struggled for three decades to produce an artificial leaf able to absorb CO₂ from the atmosphere and convert it into chemical energy. Yet now it seems that they have at long last achieved their goal.

Explanation:

The correct auxiliary in that sentence is have since it is referring to the researchers. In other words, it is a third person in the plural, so the correct auxiliary is have.

The term man-made is not wrong, but it would be better to use the word artificial, which means that nature did not create it.

Answer:

0f what question are you talking

Answer:

Help anwer my question https://brainly.com/question/19718319

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:it is certainly not for lack of riding day and night ... “for surely if they lack adventures of the Holy Grail, the rest will find none. ... chapel, which appeared to be in such a state of ruin that no one frequented it. ... who asked me for a joust since I left Camelot. and since this knight asks for it, ...

Answer:

Despite the initial difficulties inherent in using farming tools designed for humans, the animals cooperate to finish the harvest — and do so in less time than it had taken Jones and his men to do the same. Boxer distinguishes himself as a strong, tireless worker, admired by all the animals. The pigs become the supervisors and directors of the animal workers. On Sundays, the animals meet in the big barn to listen to Snowball and Napoleon debate a number of topics on which they seem never to agree. Snowball forms a number of Animal Committees, all of which fail. However, he does prove successful at bringing a degree of literacy to the animals, who learn to read according to their varied intelligences. To help the animals understand the general precepts of Animalism, Snowball reduces the Seven Commandments to a single slogan: "Four legs good, two legs bad." Napoleon, meanwhile, focuses his energy on educating the youth and takes the infant pups of Jessie and Bluebell away from their mothers, presumably for educational purposes.

The animals learn that the cows' milk and windfallen apples are mixed every day into the pigs' mash. When the animals object, Squealer explains that the pigs need the milk and apples to sustain themselves as they work for the benefit of all the other animals.

Analysis

While the successful harvest seems to signal the overall triumph of the rebellion, Orwell hints in numerous ways that the very ideals that the rebels used as their rallying cry are being betrayed by the pigs. The fact that they do not do any physical work but instead stand behind the horses shouting commands suggests their new positions as masters — and as creatures very much like the humans they presumably wanted tooverthrow.

When Squealer explains to the animals why the pigs have been getting all the milk and apples, he reveals his rhetorical skill and ability to "skip from side to side" to convince the animals that the pigs' greed is actually a great sacrifice: Appealing to science (which presumably has proven that apples and milk are "absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig") and lying about pigs disliking the very food they are hoarding, Squealer manages a great public-relations stunt by portraying the pigs as near-martyrs who only think of others and never themselves. "It is for your sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples," Squealer explains, and his dazzling pseudo-logic persuades the murmuring animals that the pigs are, in fact, selfless.

Squealer's rhetorical question, "Surely there is no one among you who wants to see Jones back?" is the first of many times when Squealer will invoke the name of Jones to convince the animals that — despite any discontentment they may feel — their present lives are greatly preferable to the ones they led under their old master. Orwell's tone when describing the animals' reaction to Squealer ("The importance of keeping the pigs in good health was all too obvious") is markedly ironic and again signals to the reader that the pigs are slowly changing into a new form of their old oppressors.

Explanation:

That's the passage! You can look through that for the answer pls mark brainliest please

Answer: transitive

Explanation:

Answer:

INTRANSITIVE

Explanation:

I just did this lesson and the correct answer is intransitive!!!!

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question

Read this student's rough draft.

I learned the game of chess under the wise tutelage of my  Uncle Ray. He's a chess master, and he dominates the  West Side Park tournaments each spring. Uncle Ray  explained bishops, rooks, and pawns for me as my parents  were teaching me my alphabet. I learned how to protect my queen as my peers learned to ride bicycles, Ray instructed  me daily on chess theory and end game strategy .

Which concluding sentence best reflects the writer's voice?

He taught me about chess legend Garry Kasparov, and  together we dissected his games .

I like chess because it's super fun, and someday I'll beat my uncle at his own game.

He is a fantastic teacher, and he has the skills to crush  the competition in any tourney .

The next local tourmament is being sponsored by the  Rotary club and the entry fee is ten dollars.

Answer: He taught me about chess legend Garry Kasparov, and  together we dissected his games .

Explanation:

The chosen sentence is the best to reflect the writer's voice because it keeps a similar tone and the same past tense. While the other choices are in the present tense, only this one keeps the past tense in which the writer refers to uncle Ray. Furthermore, it keeps the same rather formal and eloquent tone, as if the writer was an adult talking about childhood memories.

a-He taught me about chess legend Garry Kasparov, and  together we dissected his games .