pls help Using the pattern learned for the square of a binomial, square (3x-5y^2) Explain the pattern.

The pair of functions that are inverses of each other is B. f(x) = 2x - 9 and g(x) = x + 9/2.

To determine if two functions are inverses of each other, we need to check if the composition of the functions results in the identity function, which is f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x.

Let's analyze the given options:

A. f(x) = 5 + x and g(x) = 5 - x

To check if they are inverses, we compute f(g(x)) = f(5 - x) = 5 + (5 - x) = 10 - x, which is not equal to x. Similarly, g(f(x)) = g(5 + x) = 5 - (5 + x) = -x, which is also not equal to x. Therefore, these functions are not inverses.

B. f(x) = 2x - 9 and g(x) = x + 9/2

By calculating f(g(x)) and g(f(x)), we find that f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x, which means these functions are inverses of each other.

C. f(x) = 3 - 6 and g(x) = x + 6/2

Similar to option A, we compute f(g(x)) and g(f(x)), and find that they are not equal to x. Hence, these functions are not inverses.

D. f(x) = x/3 + 4 and g(x) = 3x - 4

After evaluating f(g(x)) and g(f(x)), we see that f(g(x)) = x and g(f(x)) = x. Therefore, these functions are inverses of each other.

In summary, the pair of functions that are inverses of each other is B. f(x) = 2x - 9 and g(x) = x + 9/2.

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/782311

#SPJ8

Answer:

Ricardo's reasoning is not correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Find who got the better deal by dividing the price by the number of pounds of pretzels:

16.80/7 = $2.40 a pound

12.75/5 = $2.55 a pound

So, Josue got the better deal because he only spent $2.40 a pound on the pretzels, while Ricardo spent $2.55 a pound.

Ricardo did not get the better deal, because he spent more per pound on the pretzels.

Ricardo's reasoning is not correct.

Answer: 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Sqrt (7- -5)^2+(-5-4)^2 =

Sqrt (12)^2+(-9)^2 =

Sqrt 225 = 15

2/3 * 15 = 30/3 = 10

Answer:

1200 ×90÷8 is not correct ans

Answer:

hshdhdhdshejiwiwiwiwiwi

Answer:

0.025 ;

(-0.7198 ; 0.7698)

Step-by-step explanation:

From the table :

_____________ private schls ___ public schls

Sample size, n _____ 80 __________ 520

P, NBC teachers ___ 0.175 ________ 0.150

P1 = P of  private school teachers

P2 = P of public school teachers

Difference in proportion :

P1 - P12 = 0.175 - 0.150.= 0.025

The 90% confidence interval for 2 - sample proportion :

C.I = (p1-p2) ± [Zcritical * √(p1(1-p1)/n1 + (p2(1-p2)/n2)]

Zcritical at 90% = 1.645

C.I = 0.025 ± [1.645 * √((0.175*0.825)/80 + (0.150*0.850)/520)]

C.I = 0.025 ± [1.645 * √(0.0018046875 + 0.0002451)]

C.I = 0.025 ± 1.645 * 0.0452755

C.I = 0.025 ± 0.07448

C.I = (-0.7198 ; 0.7698)

Answer:

A. The distribution of sample means of the differences will be approximately normal if there are at least 30 years of data in the sample​ and/or if the population of differences in winning times for all years is normal.

Step-by-step explanation:

In other to perform a valid paired test, one of the conditions required is that, data for both groups must be approximately normal. To attain normality, the population distribution for the groups must be normal or based on the central limit theorem, the sample size must be large enough, usually n > 30. Hence, once either of the two conditions are met, the paired sample will be valid.

Answer:

-2(2x-4) = -4x+8 or 2(2x-4) ≠ 4x ; -4x+8 ≠ 4x

Step-by-step explanation:

Did you accidentally write =4x after your expression? If so, then let me explain why my answer is correct. I used distributive property of multiplication, so I multiplied -2 with 2x to get -4x, and -2 multiplied with -4 to get 8. So my final answer was -4x+8. If you did not accidentally put -4x, then my answer would be, 2(2x-4) ≠ 4x or -4x+8 ≠ 4x. Hope this helped.

Answer:

[tex]9\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a 30-60-90 triangle.

It's good to remember this. The side length opposite to the 60 degree angle is always the base multiplied by [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Answer:

9√3.

Step-by-step explanation:

tan 60 = √3

So w/9 =√3

w = 9√3

Answer:

a) 0.0038 = 0.38% probability that the mean weight of the sample is less than 5.97 ounces.

b) Given a mean of 6.05 ounces, it is very unlikely that a sample mean of less than 5.97 ounces, which means that the true mean must be recalculated.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

Mean of 6.05 ounces and a standard deviation of .18 ounces.

This means that [tex]\mu = 6.05, \sigma = 0.18[/tex]

Sample of 36:

This means that [tex]n = 36, s = \frac{0.18}{\sqrt{36}} = 0.03[/tex]

a. Find the probability that the mean weight of the sample is less than 5.97 ounces.

This is the p-value of z when X = 5.97. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{5.97 - 6.05}{0.03}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.67[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.67[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0038.

0.0038 = 0.38% probability that the mean weight of the sample is less than 5.97 ounces.

b. Suppose your random sample of 36 cans of salmon produced a mean weight that is less than 5.97 ounces. Comment on the statement made by the manufacturer.

Given a mean of 6.05 ounces, it is very unlikely that a sample mean of less than 5.97 ounces, which means that the true mean must be recalculated.

Answer:

4th option

Step-by-step explanation:

The relationship is linear,

putting the value of x in the right side of the equation of option 4, you'll get the value of the left side

putting, x=1

y+4=-1/2(x-1)

y=-1/2(1-1)-4

y=-4

putting, x=7

y+4=-1/2(7-1)

y=-1/2(6)-4

y=-6/2-4

y=-3-4

y=-7

Answer: 1.00022048

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 1       y = -4

Step-by-step explanation:

-7x + 3 = -x - 3

-7x = -x - 6

-6x = -6

x = 1

y = - (1) - 3

y = -1 - 3

y = -4

Answer:

(3/2,10)

Step-by-step explanation:

Mid point is ((10-7)/2,(13+7)/2)=(1.5,10)

Answer:

The sum of 4 consecutive odd number is 80

Let X be the first of these numbers

Then the next odd number is X+2

The third is X+4The fourth is X+6

All of these add up to 80

(X) + (X+2) + (X+4) + (X+6) = 80

Using the commutative and associative laws, let's transform this equation into

(X + X + X + X) + (2 + 4 + 6) = 804X + 12 = 80

Subtract 12 from both sides of the equation gives4X = 68

Divide both sides by 4 gives

X = 17

Going back to the original question:What are the 4 consecutive odd numbers: 17, 19, 21, 23Checking our answer:17 + 19 + 21 + 23 = 80 Correct!

Answer:

x=13.2

Step-by-step explanation:

cos(43)=x/18

x=18×cos(43)

x=13.2

Answered by GAUTHMATH

Answer:

The fraction is undefined when x=-2

Step-by-step explanation:

The fraction will be undefined when the denominator is zero

x+2 = 0

x+2-2 = 0-2

x = -2

The fraction is undefined when x=-2

Answer:

as to me 5

Step-by-step explanation:

ask someone else to say that I am not sure if you have any questions or need any further information please contact me at the end of the world

Answer:

squaring a number is multiplying it by itself twice and cubing a number is multiplying the number three times itself

Step-by-step explanation:

for example 2²=2×2

=4

and 2³=2×2×2

=8

Answer: x=4, -1

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming you meant [tex]x^3-7x^2+8x+16[/tex], the zeros of the question are x = 4 and -1.

Step 1. Replace f(x) with y.

[tex]y = x^3-7x^2+8x+16[/tex]

Step 2. To find the roots of the equation, replace y with 0 and solve.

[tex]0 = x^3-7x^2+8x+16[/tex]

Step 3. Factor the left side of the equation.

[tex](x-4)^2 (x+1)=0[/tex]

Step 4. Set x-4 equal to 0 and solve for x.

[tex]x-4=0[/tex]

Step 5. Set [tex]x+1[/tex] equal to 0 and solve for x.

[tex]x=-1[/tex]

The solution is the result of [tex]x-4=0[/tex] and [tex]x+1=0[/tex].

[tex]x=4,-1[/tex]

Answer: 90 sides

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's say the circle has a center at  A and B and C are at the vertices of a polygon. Since this figure is inscribed in a circle, we can draw two radii through the vertices. Because all radii are congruent, we know segment BA is congruent to Segment CA. If a triangle has at least 2 congruent sides, we can identify the triangle as an isosceles triangle. With this we can conclude <ACB is congruent to <ABC. By the definition of congruent angles, m<ACB = M<ABC. Let's say m<ACB = x. By the Triangle Sum Theorem, 40 + x + m<ABC = 180. By substitution, 40 + x + x = 180. When we solve we get x =70. Since radii bisect interior angles we know that each interior angle of this polygon is 140 degrees. If we plug in 140 to our equation, [tex]\frac{(n-2)180}{n}[/tex]  where n is the number of sides, we get n = 90. So we can conclude this polygon has 90 sides

Answer:

y = -1/4x+1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 4x - 3

This is in slope intercept form, y = mx+b where the slope is m

The slope is 4

Perpendicular lines have slopes that are negative reciprocals

-1/4 is the slope of the perpendicular line

y = -1/4x+b

Using the point (2,0)

0 = -1/4(2)+b

0 = -1/2+b

b = 1/2

y = -1/4x+1/2

Answer:

Quotient is x² - x - 2

Remainder is 0

To find the cost, we must:

Doing this, we get that the cost is: $3,815, and the correct option is B.

Carpet:

The carpet can be divided into:

----------------------------------------------

Area of the rectangle:

The area of a rectangle of dimensions l and w is given by:

[tex]A_r = lw[/tex]

In this question, the dimensions are l = 56 ft, w = 38 ft, so the area, in square feet, is:

[tex]A_r = 56*38 = 2128[/tex]

-------------------------------------------

Area of a right triangle:

The area of a right triangle of legs a and b is given by:

[tex]A_t = \frac{ab}{2}[/tex]

In this question, the legs are a = 56, b = 38, so the area, in square feet, is:

[tex]A_t = \frac{56(33)}{2} = 924[/tex]

----------------------------

Total area:

The total area is the sum of the area of the rectangle with the area of the right triangle, thus:

[tex]A = A_r + A_t = 2128 + 924 = 3052[/tex]

-------------------------

Cost:

Each square foot costs $1.25.

There are 3,052 square feet. So, the cost is:

[tex]C = 1.25*3052 = 3815[/tex]

Thus, the cost is $3,815, and the correct option is B.

A similar question is found at https://brainly.com/question/13209573

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We are finding the probability, which is a percentage, of each of these intervals on our standard bell curve. In order to find this percentage, we need to find the z-score that provides this percentage. To find the z-score:

[tex]z=\frac{x_i-\bar{x}}{\sigma}[/tex] which is the number in question minus the mean, all divided by the standard deviation. We're first looking for the probability that the gas mileage on a certain model of car is less than 26 mpg.

To find this z-score:

[tex]z=\frac{26-28}{4}=-.5[/tex] Depending upon which table you look at for the z-score determines how you will find it. The z-score that measure from the value and to the left of it is what we need. This decimal is .3085375, or 30.8538%.

Onto b., which is for the percentage of cars that have gas mileage over 34 mpg. Find the z-score, and this time, we look to the right of the value for the percentage:

[tex]z=\frac{34-28}{4}=1.5[/tex] and to the right of 1.5 standard deviations we will find .0668072, or 6.68072%

Then finally c., which wants the probability that the gas mileage on one of these cars is greater than 22 but less than 34 mpg. To do this we have to find the z-scores of each and then do some subtracting. First the z-scores:

[tex]z=\frac{22-28}{4}=-1.5[/tex] The percentage of data that lies to the right of that z-score is .9331927

The z-score for the other value, 34, was already found as 1.5, having .0668072 of the data to the right of that z-score. We subtract the smaller from the larger to determine what's left in-between:

.9331972 - .0668072 = .86639, or as a percentage, 86.639% of the cars fall into this interval for gas mileage.

Answer:

$2000

Step-by-step explanation:

let x be the money she invested

lets assume this was for 1 year

0.09(x/2) + 0.07(x/2) = 160

multiply each side by 2 to cancel the denominators:

0.09x + 0.07x = 320

0.16x = 320

x = 2000

Answer: $2000

Let the amount of money she invested be x

Lets assume the time of investment as 1 year

ATQ

0.09(x/2) + 0.07(x/2) = 160

0.09x + 0.07x = 320

0.16x = 320

x = 2000

Must click thanks and mark brainliest

Answer:

أنت مجنون ، هل تعرف ذلك؟

Step-by-step explanation:

بنسلفانيا

Answer:

B  at -1 minus we go to - ∞

at -1 plus  we to + ∞

Step-by-step explanation:

         x^2 -x

g(x) = ---------

         x+1

Factor out x

         x(x-1)

g(x) = ---------

         x+1

As x is to the left of -1

   x is negative (x-1) is negative

        x+1  will be slightly negative

g(-1 minus) = -*-/ -  = -  and we know that the denominator is very close to zero  we are close to infinity  so we go to - ∞

As x is to the right of -1

   x is negative (x-1) is negative

        x+1  will be slightly positive

g(-1 plus) = -*-/ +  = +  and we know that the denominator is very close to zero  we are close to infinity  so we go to  ∞