PPPLLLEEEEAAAASSSSEEEEE ANSWER FAST
The following shape is based only on squares, semicircles, and quarter circles. Find the area of the shaded part.

Answer:

Steven ate 3 pieces

Step-by-step explanation:

If Johnny ate 3/4 , then Steven at 1 - 3/4  or 1/4

12 * 1/4 = 3

Steven ate 3 pieces

Answer:

3 slices of pizza

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 12 total slices of pizza. In order to find how much Johnny ate, we must multiply 12 by 3/4.

12/1 × 3/4 OR 12 × 0.75 = 9

Johnny ate 9 slices of pizza.

Then, we have to subtract 9 from 12 to determine how many slices Steven ate.

12 - 9 = 3

Steven ate 3 slices of pizza.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

A simple random sample n = 28

sample standard deviation S = 12.65

standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex] = 11.53

Level of significance ∝ = 0.05

The objective is to test the claim that the number of pieces in a set has a standard deviation different from 11.53.

The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as follows:

Null hypothesis:

[tex]H_0: \sigma^2 = \sigma_0^2[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis:

[tex]H_1: \sigma^2 \neq \sigma_0^2[/tex]

The test statistics can be determined by using the following formula in order to test if the claim is statistically significant or not.

[tex]X_0^2 = \dfrac{(n-1)S^2}{\sigma_0^2}[/tex]

[tex]X_0^2 = \dfrac{(28-1)(12.65)^2}{(11.53)^2}[/tex]

[tex]X_0^2 = \dfrac{(27)(160.0225)}{132.9409}[/tex]

[tex]X_0^2 = \dfrac{4320.6075}{132.9409}[/tex]

[tex]X_0^2 = 32.5002125[/tex]

[tex]X^2_{1- \alpha/2 , df} = X^2_{1- 0.05/2 , n-1}[/tex]

[tex]X^2_{1- \alpha/2 , df} = X^2_{1- 0.025 , 28-1}[/tex]

From the chi-square probabilities table at 0.975 and degree of freedom 27;

[tex]X^2_{0.975 , 27}[/tex] = 14.573

[tex]X^2_{\alpha/2 , df} = X^2_{ 0.05/2 , n-1}[/tex]

[tex]X^2_{\alpha/2 , df} = X^2_{0.025 , 28-1}[/tex]

From the chi-square probabilities table at 0.975 and degree of freedom 27;

[tex]X^2_{0.025 , 27}=[/tex] 43.195

Decision Rule: To reject the null hypothesis if [tex]X^2_0 \ > \ X^2_{\alpha/2 , df} \ \ \ or \ \ \ X^2_0 \ < \ X^2_{1- \alpha/2 , df}[/tex] ; otherwise , do not reject the null hypothesis:

The rejection region is [tex]X^2_0 \ > 43.195 \ \ \ or \ \ \ X^2_0 \ < \ 14.573[/tex]

Conclusion:

We fail to reject the null hypothesis since  test statistic value 32.5002125  lies  between 14.573 and 43.195.

Answer:

$225.54 (hope it help)

Step-by-step explanation:

for 2nd week

$150 for the first week and a raise of 6% each week

which means 150+6%

6% of 150 is 9 (150x0.06)

150+9=159

and it repeats

for 3rd week

6% of 159 is 9.54 (159x0.06)

159+9.54=168.54

for 4th week

6% of 168.54 is 10.1124 (168.54x0.06)

168.54+10.1124=178.652

for 5th week

6% of 178.652 is 10.71912 (178.652x0.06)

178.652+10.71912=189.37112

an easier to do it is to just do 178.652 + 6% on your calculater

and I'll skip all the way to the 8th since you know the formula

212.777390432+6%=225.544033858

225.544033858≈225.54

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

● 8 ÷ (3-x)

Dividing by 3-x is like multiplying by 1/(3-x)

● 8 × (1/3-x)

● 8 /(3-x)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Putting 6 into the first (left) machine will give an output of ...

  y = √(6 -5) = √1 = 1

Putting 1 into the second (right) machine will give an output of ...

  y = 1² -6 = -5

This answers the second question, but not the first question.

__

If we put 6 into the right machine first, we get an output of ...

  y = 6² -6 = 30

Putting 30 into the left machine, we get an output of ...

  y = √(30 -5) = √25 = 5 . . . . . the desired output.

The input must go into the right machine first, then its output goes into the left machine to get a final output of 5 from an input of 6.

__

b) The left machine cannot produce negative outputs, so achieving an output of -5 with the arrangement used in part A is not possible. (green curves in the attached graph)

However, as we have shown above, inputting 6 to the left machine first, following that by processing with the right machine, can produce an output of -5. (purple curve in the attached graph)

Answer:

9%

Step-by-step explanation:

12x=6y eq 1

18x=9y eq 2

Step-by-step explanation:

(f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)

= x/2-3 + 4x²+x+4

= ..........

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the approximate value of y when

x = 13 and z = 195 we must first find the relationship between them

The statement

y varies jointly with x and z is written as

where k is the constant of proportionality

From the question

y = 2

x = 11

z = 110

We have

2 = 11(110)k

2 = 1210k

Divide both sides by 1210

[tex]k = \frac{1}{605} [/tex]

So the formula for the variation is

[tex]y = \frac{1}{605} xz[/tex]

When

x = 13

z = 195

y is

[tex]y = \frac{1}{605} (13)(195)[/tex]

[tex]y = \frac{507}{121} [/tex]

y = 4.1900

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer:

O a piece of a line with two endpoints

Step-by-step explanation:

O a piece of a line with two endpoints

A piece of a line with two endpoints.

In geometry, a line segment is a part of a line this is bounded by distinct end points and includes every point on the line this is between its endpoints.

Learn more about line segments here https://brainly.com/question/2437195

#SPJ2

Answer:

L = 29,550 mm (as per BS8110 the length is to the nearest 25)

Step-by-step explanation:

Lets make it so simple and easy.

Let A = 600mm

Let B = 300mm

Let C = 16 as number turns

Let d = 20mm

L = [tex]\sqrt{(3.14 * (600 - 20))^{2} + 300^{2}[/tex]  x 16

L = 29,550 mm (as per BS8110 the length is to the nearest 25)

Answer:

A:$2478

B:$728

Total:$3206

Step-by-step explanation:

2.95x3000=8850

1.30x2000=2600

8850x0.28=2478

2600x0.28=728

2478+728=3206

Answer:

first = flour, second = oats, third = sugar

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the labels are "wrong", we know that the third drawer doesn't have oats or flour, therefore it has sugar. Since the first doesn't have oats, it must have flour and that makes the second drawer oats.

Answer:

first drawer has flour, second has oats, third is sugar

Step-by-step explanation:

on the first drawer, it is labelled oats, so it cannot be oats. on the second it cannot be flour, and on the third it cannot be oats or flour, which means it HAS to be sugar leaving oats and flour to be in either the first, or second.

i know it may sound a little confusing but please let me know if you dont understand

Answer:

20000 kg

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that 1 kg = 2.2 lb approximately.  Then:

22 tons        1 kg        2000 lb

------------ * ------------ * --------------  =  20000 kg

      1           2.2 lb          1 ton

[tex](f\circ g)(2)=\dfrac{1}{4\cdot2+9}=\dfrac{1}{17}\\\\(f+g)(2)=\dfrac{1}{2}+4\cdot2+9=\dfrac{1}{2}+17=\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{34}{2}=\dfrac{35}{2}[/tex]

Answer: 22,103

Step-by-step explanation:

Compound interest is the interest calculated on the initial principal and the accumulated interest.

The amount in the account at the end of two years is $22,050.

Compound interest is the interest calculated on the initial principal and the accumulated interest.

We have,

Principal = $20,000

Rate = r = 5%

It is compounded yearly.

Time = t = 2 years.

The formula for the amount having compound interest:

A = P [tex]( 1 + \frac{r}{n} )^{nt}[/tex]

A = 20,000 [tex](1 + \frac{5}{100\times1})^{2\times1}[/tex]

A = 20,000 ( 1 + 5/100 )²

A = 20,000 ( 105/100 )²

A = (20,000 x 105 x 105) / (100 x 100)

A = 2 x 105 x 105

A = $22,050

Thus the amount in the account at the end of two years is $22,050.

Learn more about compound interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/14740098

#SPJ2

Answer:

[tex](\frac{3}{4})*(\frac{8}{9})*(\frac{15}{16})*(\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49})*(\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}) = \frac{11}{20}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex](\frac{3}{4})*(\frac{8}{9})*(\frac{15}{16})*(\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49})*(\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100})[/tex]

Required

Simplify

For clarity, group the expression in threes

[tex]((\frac{3}{4})*(\frac{8}{9})*(\frac{15}{16}))*((\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

Evaluate the first group [Divide 8 by 4]

[tex]((\frac{3}{1})*(\frac{2}{9})*(\frac{15}{16}))*((\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 9 by 3]

[tex]((\frac{1}{1})*(\frac{2}{3})*(\frac{15}{16}))*((\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[tex]((\frac{2}{3})*(\frac{15}{16}))*((\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 15 by 3]

[tex]((\frac{2}{1})*(\frac{5}{16}))*((\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 16 by 2]

[tex]((\frac{1}{1})*(\frac{5}{8}))*((\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[tex](\frac{5}{8})*((\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

Evaluate the second group [Divide 35 and 25 by 5]

[tex](\frac{5}{8})*((\frac{24}{5})*(\frac{7}{36})*(\frac{48}{49}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 49 by 7]

[tex](\frac{5}{8})*((\frac{24}{5})*(\frac{1}{3})*(\frac{4}{7}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 24 by 3]

[tex](\frac{5}{8})*((\frac{8}{5})*(\frac{1}{1})*(\frac{4}{7}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[tex](\frac{5}{8})*((\frac{8}{5})*(\frac{4}{7}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

Merge the first and second group

[tex]((\frac{5}{8})*(\frac{8}{5})*(\frac{4}{7}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[tex](1*(\frac{4}{7}))*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}))[/tex]

Evaluate the last group [Divide 99 by 9]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*((\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{9})*(\frac{11}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 63 by 9]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*((\frac{7}{64})*(\frac{80}{1})*(\frac{11}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 64 and 80 by 8]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*((\frac{7}{8})*(\frac{10}{1})*(\frac{11}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 10 and 4 by 2]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*((\frac{7}{4})*(\frac{5}{1})*(\frac{11}{100}))[/tex]

[Divide 100 by 5]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*((\frac{7}{4})*(\frac{1}{1})*(\frac{11}{20}))[/tex]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*((\frac{7}{4})*(\frac{11}{20}))[/tex]

[tex](\frac{4}{7})*(\frac{7}{4})*(\frac{11}{20})[/tex]

[tex]1*(\frac{11}{20})[/tex]

[tex]\frac{11}{20}[/tex]

Hence;

[tex](\frac{3}{4})*(\frac{8}{9})*(\frac{15}{16})*(\frac{24}{25})*(\frac{35}{36})*(\frac{48}{49})*(\frac{63}{64})*(\frac{80}{81})*(\frac{99}{100}) = \frac{11}{20}[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability is the likelihood or chance that an event will occur.

Probability = expected outcome of event /total outcome

Since the population consists of 100 elements, the total outcome of event = 100.

If random sample of 20 element is drawn from the population, the expected outcome = 20

On the first selection, the probability of any particular element being selected = 20/100 = 1/5

Answer:

Graph 2

Step-by-step explanation:

As you can see the first equation is present with a negative slope, and none of the graphs have a line plotted with a negative slope, besides the second graph. That is your solution.

Answer:

less than

Step-by-step explanation:

If the normality requirement is not satisfied​ (that is, ​np(1​ - p) is not at least​ 10), then a​ 95% confidence interval about the population proportion will include the population proportion in​ _less than__ 95% of the intervals.

The confidence interval consist of all reasonable values of a population mean. These are value for which the null hypothesis will not be rejected.

So, let assume that If the 95%  confidence interval contains the value for the hypothesized mean, then the sample mean  is reasonably close to the hypothesized mean. The effect of this is that the p- value is going to be greater than 0.05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

On the other hand,

If the 95%  confidence interval do not contains the value for the hypothesized mean, then the sample mean  is far away from the hypothesized mean. The effect of this is that the p- value is going to be lesser than 0.05, so we reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

30 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

let x be the lenght of the two sides of equal lenghts, so the other is x+3

and the perimeter is x+x +x +3

P=3x+3

P=3(x+1)

93=3(x+1)

31=x+1

x=30

so the shorter sides are of 30 centimeters and the longest is 33

Answer:

40 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

If it takes her 8 minutes to mow 1/6 of it, we can find the total amount of time it  will take by multiplying 8 by 6, since 1/6 times 6 is 1 (1 represents the whole lawn mowed)

8(6) = 48

The question asks for how many more minutes it will take, so subtract 48 by 8.

48 - 8 = 40

= 40 minutes

Answer:

40 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use ratios to solve

8 minutes          x minutes

------------------- = ----------------

1/6 yard                 1 yard

Using cross products

8 * 1 = 1/6 x

Multiply each side by 6

8*6 = 1/6 * x * 6

48 = x

48 minutes total

She has already done 8 minutes

48-8 = 40 minutes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: 4 - 9x +21

Factorizing this expression, we have;

              4 -3(3x - 7)

i. Chang's expression: 4 - 3(3x + 7)

This is not an equivalent expression, because by expansion of the bracket, the expression gives: 4 -9x -21

ii. Benjamin's expression: 4 + 3(3x + 7)

This is not an equivalent expression, because by expansion of the bracket, the expression gives: 4 +9x +21

iii. Habib's expression: 4 + 12x

This is not an equivalent expression, because the expression is not related to the given question

Comparing the three student's answers with the appropriate expression, none of the student's is an equivalent expression.

This expression that is  equivalent to the given question is;

            4 -3(3x - 7) = 4 -9x + 21

Answer:

1,2,4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I noticed that to babysit my cousin was the chore that doled out the most, and I wonder why pet my dog is even a chore. Do they not love their pets?

Answer:

[tex]\large \boxed{\sf No}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 365 days in 1 year.

The average person lives for about 78 years.

Multiply 78 by 365 to find the value in days.

[tex]78 \times 365= 28470[/tex]

The average person lives for about 28470 days.

Answer:

A - 3.3%

Step-by-step explanation:

From the graph

Where x= 0

Amount =$ 450

It shows that$450 is the capital

Then

When x= 3

Amount=$494.55

So interest generated within 3 years

= $494.55-$450

=$ 44.55

When x= 9

Amount = $583.65

So interest generated within 9 years

= $583.65-$450

=$ 133.65

PRT/10= Interest

450*x*3/100= 44.55

1350x= 4455

X= 4455/1350

X= 3.3

So the rate is =3.3%

Answer:

[tex]x > -1[/tex] or

[tex]x > 2[/tex] or

[tex]x > 3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex](x + 1)(x - 2) (x - 3) > 0[/tex]

Required

Solve; with steps

[tex](x + 1)(x - 2) (x - 3) > 0[/tex]

Start by splitting the inequality as follows

[tex]x + 1 > 0[/tex] or [tex]x - 2 > 0[/tex] or  [tex]x - 3 > 0[/tex]

Solve the inequalities one after the other

Solving: [tex]x + 1 > 0[/tex]

Subtract 1 from both sides

[tex]x + 1 - 1 > 0 - 1[/tex]

[tex]x > -1[/tex]

Solving: [tex]x - 2 > 0[/tex]

Add 2 to both sides

[tex]x - 2 +2 > 0 +2[/tex]

[tex]x > 2[/tex]

Solving: [tex]x - 3 > 0[/tex]

Add 3 to both sides

[tex]x - 3 +3> 0+3[/tex]

[tex]x > 3[/tex]

Hence, the solution to the inequality is

[tex]x > -1[/tex] or

[tex]x > 2[/tex] or

[tex]x > 3[/tex]

A C B because all elements of A are not found in B

Answer:

Those ratios could be 3:1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

population Mean = 15000

standard deviation= 1200

sample size n = 100

sample mean = 16000

The null and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as follows:

[tex]\mathtt{H_o : \mu = 15000 }\\ \\ \mathtt{H_1 : \mu > 15000}[/tex]

Using the standard normal z statistics

[tex]z = \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \dfrac{16000 -15000}{\dfrac{1200 }{\sqrt{100}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \dfrac{1000}{\dfrac{1200 }{10}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \dfrac{1000\times 10}{1200}[/tex]

z = 8.333

degree of freedom = n - 1 = 100 - 1 = 99

level of significance ∝ = 0.05

P - value from the z score = 0.00003

Decision Rule: since the p value is lesser than the level of significance, we reject the null hypothesis

Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence  that the Dean claim for his graduate students earn more than average salary of $15,000

Dean's Claim of Average Salary = 16000, ie greater than 15000 : is correct

Null Hypothesis [ H0 ] : Average Salary = 15000

Alternate Hypothesis [ H1 ] : Average Salary > 15000

Hypothesis is tested using t statistic.

t = ( x - u ) / ( s / √ n ) ; where -

x = sample mean , u = population mean , s = standard deviation, n = sample size

t = ( 16000 - 15000 ) / ( 1200 / √100 )

= 1000 / 120

t  {Calculated} = 8.33,

Degrees of Freedom = n - 1 = 100 = 1 = 99

Tabulated t 0.05 (one tail) , at degrees of freedom 99 = 1.664

As Calculated t value 8.33 > Tabulated t value 1.664 , So we reject the Null Hypothesis in favour of Alternate Hypothesis.

So, conclusion : Average Salary > 15000

To learn more, https://brainly.com/question/17099835?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

This year:

dads: 36 years

Alex: 6 years

Step-by-step explanation:

a = d/6

a+4 = (d+4)/4

a = Alex´s actual age  

d = actual age of the dad

d/6 + 4 = (d+4)/4

4{(d/6) + 4} = d+4

4*d/6 + 4*4 = d+4

4d/6 + 16 = d + 4

4d/6 = d + 4 - 16

4d = (d-12)*6

4d  = 6*d +6*-12

4d = 6d - 72

4d - 6d = -72

-2d = -72

d = -72/-2

d = 36

a = d/6

a = 36/6

a = 6

probe:

a+4 = (d+4)/4

6 + 4 = (36+4)/4

10 = 40/4