La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Aunque no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
La importancia que tiene la elaboración de las leyes mediante mecanismos democráticos es la siguiente.
En una democracia, son los ciudadanos los que eligen libremente a sus gobernantes. Los gobernantes elegidos, juntos con los miembros del Congreso, deben comprometerse honestamente a luchas por los intereses del pueblo, y para ello, deben debatir en el Congreso las leyes que más convengan para crear paz social y desarrollo económico en el país.
Esas leyes deben ser debatidas y votadas, siempre pensando en los intereses de la gente, del ciudadano común, y no para favorecer a los intereses de las grandes empresas privadas o multinacionales, que nada más están interesadas en ganar más dinero a expensas de la gente pobre.
Si no se elaboran las leyes mediante mecanismos democráticos, entonces los intereses particulares y la corrupción serán los que dicten la forma de gobernar a un país.
A three-car accident occurred in a city in the Northern District of State A. The cars were driven by a citizen of State B who resides in the Southern District of State B, a citizen of State A who resides in the Southern District of State A, and a citizen of State C who resides in the Northern District of State C. The State B citizen filed a negligence action against the other two drivers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of State A. Although the two defendants believed that venue was improper, neither filed a pre-answer motion objecting to venue. They instead proceeded to file their answers, responding to the merits of the claim. The State C defendant, however, included in her answer a motion to dismiss the action for improper venue. How should the court rule on the State C defendant's motion to dismiss for imprope
Answer:
The motion should be granted, given that a defendant can raise objections to venue in their answer, where the Rule 12(b) pre-answer motion is not asserted by the defendant and that the venue is improper, given that the Southern District of State A is not the location of any of the events for which the claim is being made, and that one of the defendant is not a resident of State A
Explanation:
A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives. While still in State A, the plaintiff's auto was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant, a citizen of State B. The plaintiff suffered personal injuries and damage to his vehicle amounting to approximately $90,000. The plaintiff filed suit in the federal district court for State A and obtained proper service of process on the defendant. Under the laws of State A, the driver of a vehicle that strikes another vehicle in the rear is presumed to have acted negligently, regardless of the surrounding circumstances. Neither the law of State B nor the federal statutes or case law has adopted such a rule. Should the court apply the presumption in question
Answer: Yes, because the presumption at issue operates upon elements of the prima facie case.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario illustrated in the question, the court should apply the presumption. It should be noted the federal court should be able to apply the state law where the court sits in a case that relates to the diversity of the citizenship under the Erie doctrine.
In this case, the court should apply the presumption in question because the presumption at issue operates upon elements of the prima facie case. It should be noted that the matters that has to do with prima facie case are substantive therefore state law should be applied to such scenarios.
La pieza de abajo está muy arriba coherencia ejemplo
Explanation:
Coherence is defined as anything that is logical, continuous, and makes more sense world in general. An argumentation with no contradictions is an example of coherence. Congruency is the characteristic of being intellectually integrated, consistent, and understandable. His tale was disjointed.
Answer:
La pieza que se encuentra arriba esta en lo bajo
Creo que es asi, perdon.
ADMINISTRADORES LEAN ESTO PORFAVOR
Quisiera que tengan en cuenta a las personas que ponen de admins tuve el problema con una persona la cual me puntos,me amenazó y acoso,y al final a mi me borraron todo,mis preguntas,mis respuestas,TODO y ella que ponía preguntas como "busco novio" no le borraron nada,esa persona hasta me amenazó diciéndome que sabía dónde vivía y que sabía quienes verán mis padres,les pido de favor hacer esta app más segura para los usuarios y menos injusta ya que a mi me borraron todo cuando ella fue quien me amenazó y hasta ella misma dijo que hera amiga de un administrador hasi que vean quienes son administradores por favor,porque esto no es justo.
Answer:
wow espero que se solucione este problema que tuviste
Explanation:
Who do you think plays the most challenging role in a criminal trial ?explain.
Answer:
The Judge.
Explanation: I believe the judge plays the most challenging role since they are the ones who would ultimately have to decide weather or not the person is innocent or guilty Which in some cases is difficult to decide.
So I believe the judge plays the more challenging role in a criminal trial
The Judge plays the most challenging role in a criminal trial.
What is Criminal Trial?In a criminal trial, the accused and their defense attorney appear in court with the government prosecutor to decide the case in front of the judge. Find out what criminal trials are for and what their five key elements are: voir dire, opening remarks, witness testimony, closing arguments, and jury deliberation.
The voir dire phase of the trial procedure is the first step. This is how the jury is chosen. In order to decide whether there is anything that would make a possible juror's service on that particular case inappropriate, the attorneys for both sides ask the potential jurors various questions about the case during this approach.
Hence, the Judge is the most impotent in criminal law cases.
To learn more about Criminal Trials follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/11694967
#SPJ2
Four common types of distractions are
A. food, drink, interesting topics, and loud noises
B. teenagers, vehicles, construction, and stop lights
C. tech, personal, passenger, and emotional
D. food, tech, passenger, and emotional
Answer:
A. All these are sources of distractions. A delicious food, a tasty drink, an engrossing topics and noise pollution
During the trial of a personal injury case, the plaintiff calls a witness to testify that he saw the defendant spill a slippery substance in the roadway. Following the testimony of the witness, the defendant calls the witness's neighbor, who testifies that the witness has a poor reputation for truthfulness in the community. The plaintiff's attorney then cross-examines the neighbor, asking her, in good faith, if she committed the crime of false pretenses last year. Last year, the neighbor had in fact been charged with and convicted of the crime of false pretenses. The defendant's attorney objects to this question. Should the objection be sustained
Answer: No
Explanation:
False pretense refers to the false representation of the past or present facts with an intention to defraud people or fabricate the information. According to the given situation defendant's neighbor statement recording cannot be implemented for conviction because the being a witness she is convicted for false pretenses for herself claiming that the defendant is false pretense in order to attain injury by spilling the slippery substance on the roadway to get slipped on it and inflict self injuries.
What are the Bill of Rights made up of?
Answer:
Answer to the following question is as follows;
Explanation:
The Us Bill of Rights, influenced by Jefferson and authored by James Madison, was accepted, and the first 10 constitutional amendments entered law in 1791.
The first ten amendments of the United States Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. It outlines the rights of Americans in regard to their government. Individual ’s dignity rights and freedoms, such as freedom of expression, press, and religion, are guaranteed.
Mr krabs went to the store
Answer:
yes he did
Explanation:
maybe
Answer:
and got money
Explanation:
Which type of laws are passed by Congress and affect all states?
federal laws
or
state laws
Answer:
Federal laws are bills that have passed both houses of Congress, been signed by the president, passed over the president's veto, or allowed to become law without the president's signature. Individual laws, also called acts, are arranged by subject in the United States Code. Regulations are rules made by executive departments and agencies, and are arranged by subject in the Code of Federal Regulations.Explanation:
hope it will help you Mark Me as brilliant
how did john get the alcohol
Answer:
Get first aid advice about alcohol poisoning. Learn about what alcohol positioning is,
To achieve bipartisanship, what do both major parties have to do?
work together
work against each other
have healthy debate
campaign strongly
Answer:
Work together
Explanation:
: )
It's impossible to pick out a drunk driver until it is too late.
A. True
B. False
Which of the following would an accused be automatically tried by jury?
a) Disturbing the peace
b) Murder charges
c) Drug possession charges
d) Assault and battery charges
e)Trespassing charges
B.. murder...
family want answers, why, how...
motive...
xbfrnd, spouse, b...
consider defense........
tatiana tarasoff was killed by prosenjit poddar, a graduate student at the university of california. tatiant's parents sued; the case was heard by the supreme court of california. the tarasoff case is important because
Answer:
esp
Explanation:
1. What is Ms. Roman’s employment background?
Ms. Roman's employment background is that she's been a police officer for 25 years.
2. What statistics from police academies in the state of New Jersey were alarming to Ms. Roman?
The statistics from the police academies in the state of New Jersey that were alarming to Ms. Roman are the rates between 65 and 80 percent of women are failing due to the physical fitness test.
3. What was a major reason for women failing at the police academies?
A major reason for women failing at the police academies are recruits needing to pass the fitness exam within 10 short workouts and only have three weeks to try to pass due to a new policy.
4. What had these police recruits been required to do in order to reach the point in the process that allowed them to take the physical fitness test?
Police recruits were required to pass very lengthy background checks, medical exams, psychological exams, and clearly quit any other job.
5. What data does Ms. Roman share about women serving as police officers? What data does she share about women working as police chiefs?
The data Ms. Roman shares about women serving as police officers is that less than 13% of the police officers hadn't changed much in the past 20 years. Only 3% of women were police chiefs in 2013.
6. How are other countries doing when it comes to female representation in the police force compared to the US?
When female representation in the police force compares to the US some countries have nearly twice as many women police officers.
7. According to research, what are some positive results to having female police officers on the force?
Positive results to having female police officers on the force include female police officers tending to have more of a positive influence, great job performance, trustworthiness, and fairness in the police force.
8. What does Ms. Roman define as the main problem with the different policy agencies and their standards?
Ms. Roman defines that the main problem in different policy agencies and their standards is that the the differing policy agencies and their standards is that the main focus is on physical strength.
9. What should police academies also focus on, aside from physical strength, when recruiting officers?
Other than physical strength police academies should focus on problem-solving skills, community policing, and interpersonal communication skills.
10. What are some ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force? How must the testing process be changed to ensure women are not unfairly excluded from the force?
Some ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force could be good salary package and suitable environments. When it comes to good salaries for the police force and an environment that feels safe and suitable with lack of sexual harassments then more women will join, some just cause they want to not for the "encouragement". The testing process could be conducted under fair supervision in order to ensure that women are not being unfairly justed from the force.
3. V o F. Justificar.
a) El ser humano existe.
b) La verdadera libertad es hacer lo que quiero sin importar las consecuencias, soy libre!
c) Las áreas de la persona son cuerpo, mente y lo biológico. v
d) Las tres dimensiones de la persona están en constante interrelación
Answer: C
Explanation: Las áreas de la persona sin cuerpo mente y lo biológico
1 - Una persona comete un delito a 100 millas de la costa de Punta del Este, cuando estaba en viaje hacia ese balneario. ¿Dónde debe ser juzgado? Explica.
Answer:
Si una persona comete un delito a 100 millas de la costa de Punta del Este, cuando estaba en viaje hacia ese balneario, deberá ser juzgado por el juez con competencia territorial en el territorio donde se cometió el delito, sin importar hacia dónde se dirigía la persona. Esto es así pues en derecho penal, será siempre competente el juez del lugar del delito, en tanto es quien conoce las vicisitudes y particularidades de la zona, teniendo estadísticas precisas de los crímenes que allí se cometen.
The defendant is on trial for fraudulently signing a check for $10,000. The defendant has denied that she signed the check. The prosecutor calls the landlord of the apartment building in which the defendant has resided for three months before her arrest. The landlord intends to testify that it is the defendant's signature on the check, and he bases his opinion of the authenticity of her signature on the ground that he saw her sign the lease to his apartment. Should the trial court find this testimony admissible
Answer: Yes. because the landlord has previously seen the signature.
Explanation:
In this situation, the trial court should find this testimony admissible due to the fact that the landlord has previously seen the signature.
Since the landlord intends to testify based on the fact that he saw her sign thesame signature on the lease to his apartment, then this should be admissible by the court as it's an evidence to show that she was the one involved in the fraudulent signing of the check.
Which act could be considered an acceptance of the social contract?
-paying the electric bill in exchange for using electricity
-viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts
-observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
-paying the water bill in exchange for taking a shower
Answer:
c. observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
Explanation:
Viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts could be considered an acceptance of the social contract. Thus, option B is correct.
What is a social contract?A social contract is an unspoken arrangement of the obligations of the populace or the governing body. The agreement's conditions can change significantly.
One could argue that consuming news channel broadcasts in return for ads signify endorsement of the social contract. People must engage with each other in this condition of affairs, therefore citizens establish an agreement between themselves to govern this contact.
The social contract hypothesis is not only the oldest but also the most well-known of the explanations for how the state came into existence. The core of this thesis is that men without prior governmental organization agreed to a deal that led to the creation of the state.
Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about the social contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18597938
#SPJ5
A 15-year-old sophomore high school student became pregnant, and the school board required her to attend a special program for pregnant students instead of her regular classes. The girl did not want to attend a special program; rather, she wanted to attend her regular classes. She sued the school district in federal district court, demanding that she be allowed to attend her regular classes. Before her case came to trial, the girl gave birth to the child. Subsequently, the district reinstated her in her regular classes. When her suit comes before the federal district court, what should the court do
Answer:
No case; she gave birth and made the case moot.
1. If your vehicle breaks down while moving, pull off the road as far as
ten feet
the shoulder
the ditch
possible
Effective and thorough traffic safety education involves
family, community, industry, government, and personal
factors such as motivation, and perceptive abilities.
Answer:
maturity.
Explanation:
Traffic safety education can be defined as a form of road safety education that comprises both an informal and formal education that is typically focused on teaching, enhancing and improving the attitude, skills, knowledge, understanding, values, and insight of a road user such as pedestrians, drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists, etc.
Basically, traffic safety education are necessary and essential for safe traffic procedures, participation and commitments by road users and commuters.
Hence, an effective and thorough traffic safety education involves an active participation by family, community, industry, government, and personal factors such as motivation, maturity, and perceptive abilities.
Can someone help me with this word search?
The plaintiff was severely injured when a tire on her car blew out and caused her to lose control of the car. She filed an action in federal district court against the manufacturer of the tire, alleging that the tire was defective. The plaintiff intends to introduce remnants of the tire into evidence at trial as part of her proof that the tire was defective. In what way are the remnants subject to discovery
Answer:
Everything she uncovers through her Mechanic is Discovery and MUST be disclosed!
1. Write short notes Welfare Fund under Labour Rules, 2049.
Answer:
xigrsfzizrhzvorxjbxigfxhv
Explanation:
dHfzuf jfhbkvgxnzh ydj ys
can my sister enroll me in school without custody in Florida?
A patient properly filed a medical malpractice claim against a doctor in federal district court. The complaint simply asserted negligence as the grounds for relief without any facts supporting the claim. The doctor filed a pretrial motion for a more definite statement, which the court denied. Immediately thereafter, and without submitting an answer, the doctor filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacked personal jurisdiction. Will the court grant this motion to dismiss
Answer:
No. The Plaintiff should re-file with more substantiating evidence.
Alabama permit test
Answer:
Alabama is a state located on the south of the United States. With an area of 135,765 km2, Alabama is the 30th largest state in the United States, the 24th most populous state in terms of population (4.9 million) and 27th in terms of population density of 37 inhabitants per km2.
The territory of Alabama was explored by the Spaniards in the 16th century, the first permanent European settlement was founded by the French in 1702 (near today's city of Mobile). Until 1763, this coastal area was part of their Louisiana colony, then, until 1783, part of British West Florida. At that time, the territory of Alabama was divided by the United States and Spain (as part of Florida). In 1798, Mississippi territory was created in the United States, which by 1812 had spread to the entire territory of today's Mississippi and Alabama. Five years later, its own territory was separated, which subsequently became a US state. It got its name from the river of the same name, named after the Alabama Indian culture. On December 14, 1819, Alabama became the 22nd state of the United States. During the Civil War, Alabama was part of the Confederation from 1861 to 1865, and was rejoined the Union in 1868.
While in a department store, a man picked up a sweater and slipped it under his shirt. The man then started for the door. A woman, who also was shopping in the store, saw the man take the sweater. The woman grabbed a baseball bat from the sporting goods aisle and chased the man into the parking lot. The woman began swinging the bat at the man's head, hoping to knock him out and thus prevent the theft. The man pulled a knife from his pocket and stabbed the woman, killing her. The man was arrested and charged with murder. At trial, will the man most likely be found guilty
Answer:
D). No, because the man was acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
In the given situation, the man would not be considered guilty of murdering the woman and this is because the action took place when was defending himself from the attacks made by that woman on him. However, the man was attempting to steal the sweater at the store yet the deadly attack made by the woman on his head with the baseball bat cannot be justified in any case. Her act would be categorized under 'dangerous felony' and therefore, the use of a knife by the man was enforced on him to save himself. Hence, the action was in 'self-defense' and he will not be punished for it as it was the woman who initiated the physical violence and harm and he just reacted. Thus, option D is the correct answer.
