Represent each number line by an inequality.

In one of his experiments conducted with animals, Thorndike found that cats learned to escape from a puzzle box is increased gradually

To quantify the learning process, Thorndike used a mathematical formula known as the Law of Effect equation. The equation is:

B = f(log S1/S2)

where B represents the strength of the behavior, S1 represents the satisfaction of the positive consequence, and S2 represents the degree of frustration or negative consequence.

In the context of Thorndike's puzzle box experiment, the Law of Effect equation can be used to describe how the cat's behavior changed over time as it learned to escape the puzzle box more quickly and efficiently. Initially, the cat's behavior was weak because it did not know which actions would lead to a positive outcome.

To know more about puzzle box here

https://brainly.com/question/30470834

#SPJ4

The answer is A, rhombus.

a) Velocity vector v(t) = i - 2tj, Speed s(t) = sqrt(1 + 4t²), Acceleration vector a(t) = -2j. b) Velocity vector v(1) = i - 2j, Acceleration vector a(1) = -2j

This problem is about finding the velocity, speed, and acceleration vectors of an object moving in the xy-plane, described by a position vector r(t). We can find the velocity vector by taking the derivative of the position vector, and the speed by taking the magnitude of the velocity vector. The acceleration vector can be found by taking the derivative of the velocity vector. We can then evaluate the velocity and acceleration vectors at a given point by plugging in the coordinates of the point. This problem requires basic vector calculus and understanding of the relationship between position, velocity, speed, and acceleration vectors.

Learn more about graphs here: brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ4

Complete question is attached below

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Rounded to 0.56

2. Rounded

The likelihood function can be factored using Theorem 9.4 as L(p) = L(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn | p) = g(Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ, p) * h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn), where g(Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ, p) = p^Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ (1-p)^(n-Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ) and h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn) = 1. This satisfies the factorization criterion, and thus, Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ is a sufficient statistic for p.

To show that Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ is sufficient for p, we need to show that the likelihood function can be factored using Theorem 9.4 as:

L(p) = L(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn | p) = g(Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ, p) * h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn)

where g(Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ, p) is a function only of Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ and p, and h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn) is not a function of p.

First, we can write the joint probability mass function of X₁, X₂, ..., Xn as:

P(X₁ = x₁, X₂ = x₂, ..., Xn = x_n) = p^Σⁿᵢ=1xᵢ (1-p)^Σⁿᵢ=1(1-xᵢ)

Taking the product of these probabilities for all i, we get:

L(p) = L(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn | p) = Πⁿᵢ=1P(Xᵢ = xᵢ) = p^Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ (1-p)^Σⁿᵢ=1(1-Xᵢ)

Using the factorization criterion given in Theorem 9.4, we need to find functions g(u, p) and h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn) such that:

L(p) = L(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn | p) = g(Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ, p) * h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn)

Let's take g(u, p) = pᵘ(1-p)⁽ⁿ⁻ᵘ⁾, which only depends on u and p. Then:

L(p) = L(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn | p) = g(Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ, p) * h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn)

= p^Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ (1-p)^Σⁿᵢ=1(1-Xᵢ) * h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn)

We can see that the term Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ appears in the exponent of p, and Σⁿᵢ=1(1-Xᵢ) appears in the exponent of (1-p). Therefore, we can write:

L(p) = L(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn | p) = [p^Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ (1-p)^Σⁿᵢ=1(1-Xᵢ)] * [1]

where the second factor is a constant function of p. This satisfies the factorization criterion, with g(u, p) = pᵘ(1-p⁽ⁿ⁻ᵘ⁾ and h(X₁, X₂, ..., Xn) = 1.

Therefore, we have shown that Σⁿᵢ=1Xᵢ is a sufficient statistic for p.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

Complete question is in the image attached below

Answer:8

Step-by-step explanation:8x1=8

Answer: 90$

Step-by-step explanation:  50% of 60 is 30 so 60+30=90

The company's price-earnings ratio for a company that reported net income of $275,270 with $20,390 for preferred dividends and 36,000 shares of common stock, is 16.79.

The price-earnings ratio represents the per-dollar amount that an investor can expect to invest in a company in order to receive $1 of that company's net earnings.

The price-earnings (P/E) ratio is also referred to as the price multiple.

The price-earnings (P/E) ratio compares the market price with the earnings per share.

Net income = $275,270

Preferred Dividends = $20,390

Net income available to Common Stockholders = $254,880 ($275,270 - $20,390)

Number of common stock outstanding = 36,000 shares

Market price per share of common stock = $118.87

Earnings per share (Common Stock) = $7.08 ($254,880/36,000)

Price-earnings ratio = Market price per share/Earnings per share

= 16.79 ($118.87/$7.08).

Learn more about the price-earnings ratio at https://brainly.com/question/18484440.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Let's assume the original price of the stock was x.

When the company announced it overestimated demand, the stock price fell by 40%.

So, the new price of the stock after the first decline was:

x - 0.4x = 0.6x

A few weeks later, when the seats were recalled, the stock price fell again by 60% from the new lower price of 0.6x.

So, the new price of the stock after the second decline was:

0.6x - 0.6(0.6x) = 0.24x

Given that the current stock price is $2.40, we can set up the equation:

0.24x = 2.40

Solving for x, we get:

x = 10

Therefore, the stock was originally selling for $10.

Therefore, the length of segment AB is approximately 7.4 units.

Area is a mathematical concept that describes the size of a two-dimensional surface. It is a measure of the amount of space inside a closed shape, such as a rectangle, circle, or triangle, and is typically expressed in square units, such as square feet or square meters. The area of a shape is calculated by multiplying the length of one side or dimension by the length of another side or dimension. For example, the area of a rectangle can be found by multiplying its length by its width.

Here,

To find the radius of the circle, we can use the formula for the area of a sector:

Area of sector = (θ/360) x π x r²

where θ is the central angle of the sector in degrees, r is the radius of the circle, and π is approximately 3.14.

We're given that the area of sector COD is 50.24 square units and the central angle of the sector is 90°. So we can plug in these values and solve for r:

50.24 = (90/360) x 3.14 x r²

50.24 = 0.25 x 3.14 x r²

r² = 50.24 / (0.25 x 3.14)

r² = 201.28

r = √201.28

r ≈ 14.2

Therefore, the radius of the circle is approximately 14.2 units.

Next, we need to find the length of segment AB. Since AB is a chord of the circle, we can use the formula:

AB = 2 x r x sin(θ/2)

where θ is the central angle of the sector in degrees, r is the radius of the circle, and sin() is the sine function.

We're given that the central angle of sector COD is 30°. So we can plug in this value and the radius we found earlier to solve for AB:

AB = 2 x 14.2 x sin(30/2)

AB = 2 x 14.2 x sin(15)

AB ≈ 7.4

To know more about area,

https://brainly.com/question/22469440

#SPJ1

The ROC of a given signal's Z-transform can be determined without actually computing the Z-transform by identifying the maximum and minimum magnitude of the signal and checking for any poles of the Z-transform within the resulting annular region.

Let's take a signal as an example, suppose x[n] = {1, -2, 3, -4, 5}. In order to determine the ROC of its Z-transform, we are firstly required to first look for any regions in the complex plane where the sum of the absolute values of the Z-transform is found finite. It can be done by looking for the maximum and minimum magnitude of x[n] and denote them as R1 and R2 respectively. Then, the ROC of the Z-transform will be the annular region between R1 and R2, excluding any poles of the Z-transform that lie within this annular region.

In this case, the maximum absolute value of x[n] is 5 and the minimum is found being 1. So, the ROC of the Z-transform will be the annular region between |z| = 1 and |z| = 5. We can denote this as 1 < |z| < 5. We also need to check if there are any poles of the Z-transform within this annular region. Since we haven't actually computed the Z-transform, we cannot determine the exact location of any poles.

However, we can check for any values of z that would make the Z-transform infinite. For example, if x[n] is a causal signal (i.e., x[n] = 0 for n < 0), then the ROC cannot include any values of z for which |z| < 1, since this would make the Z-transform infinite.

So, the ROC of the Z-transform for the given signal x[n] can be written as 1 < |z| < 5, assuming that x[n] is a causal signal.

Learn more about Z-Transform :

https://brainly.com/question/14979001

#SPJ4

The complete question is :

Can you explain how to determine the ROCs (regions of convergence) for the Z-transform of a given signal without actually computing the Z-transform? Please provide an example signal with random data and demonstrate how to find its ROCs using this method.

Option A: The factor (96 − 2x) represents the length, in inches, of the uncovered portion of the bulletin board.

To obtain the area of a rectangle, you need to multiply the dimensions of the rectangle, which are the length and the width.

Hence the formula for the area of the rectangle is given as follows:

Area = Length x Width.

The area of the uncovered region is given by the total area subtracted by the area of the covered region.

Then the dimensions for the uncovered region are given as follows:

The area of the covered region is given as follows:

4x².

The area of the entire region is given as follows:

4x² - 288x + 4608.

Hence the correct statement is given by option A.

More can be learned about the area of a rectangle at brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

"The rate at which the bottom of the ladder moving along the ground at the point in time when the bottom of the ladder is 4 feet from the wall is calculated to be 3.464 ft/s."

At a pace of 2 feet per second, the lower end of the ladder is being pulled away from the wall.

At a specific moment, when the lower end of the ladder is 4 feet from the wall, we should determine the rate at which the bottom of the ladder is lowering.

From the point t, the bottom of the ladder is x m, the top of the ladder is y m from the wall.

x² + y² = 64

Differentiating the given relationship with regard to t,

2x dx/dt + 2y dy/dt = 0

x dx/dt + y dy/dt = 0

We need to find out dx/dt at x = 4.

dy/dt = -2

At x = 4, we have,

x² + y² = 64

16 + y² = 64

y² = 48

y = 4√3

Put in the known values to find out dx/dt,

x dx/dt + y dy/dt = 0

4 dx/dt + 4√3 (-2) = 0

4 dx/dt = 8√3

dx/dt = 2√3 = 3.464

Thus, the bottom of the ladder is calculated to be moving at the rate 3.464 ft/s.

The figure can be drawn as shown in the attachment.

To know more about speed:

https://brainly.com/question/13548149

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 30

Step-by-step explanation:

We know

The three angles must add up to 180°. We know one is 20°, so the other two must add up to 160°.

2x + 3x + 10 = 160

5x + 10 = 160

5x = 150

x = 30

Hey!
A: 50% Of people = 150 people prefer oranges.

B: 10% Of people = 15 people prefer pineapple.

C: 15% Of people = 20 people prefer blueberries.

D: 5% Of people = 5 people prefer apples.

E: 20% Of people = 22 people prefer strawberries

The proof that the lines CD and XY are parallel is shown below in paragraghs

Given that

∠CAY ≅ ∠XBD

This means that the angles CAY and XBD are congruent angles

The above means that

By the corresponding angles, we have

∠BXY = ∠AYX

∠ACD = ∠BDC

By the congruent angles above, the following lines are parallel

Line AC and BX

Line AY and BD

Line CD and XY

Hence, the lines CD and XY are parallel

Read more about proofs at

https://brainly.com/question/18286984

#SPJ1

Answer:

x²  + 4x - 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x(x + (1 + x) + 2x) - 3(x² - x + 2) ← simplify parenthesis on left

= x(x + 1 + x + 2x)  - 3(x² - x + 2)

= x(4x + 1) - 3(x² - x + 2) ← distribute parenthesis

= 4x² + x - 3x² + 3x- 6 ← collect like terms

= x² + 4x - 6

The length of JK is 18.333.

Since MN is parallel to JK, the angles formed by JLN and MLK are equal. Therefore, we can use the Triangle Proportionality Theorem, which states that if a line parallel to one side of a triangle divides the other two sides proportionally, then the triangles are similar.

Using the Triangle Proportionality Theorem, we can set up the following proportion:

[tex]$\frac{LK}{JL} = \frac{MN}{LN}$[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex]$\frac{7.2}{13.2} = \frac{10}{6}$[/tex]

We can cross-multiply to solve for JK:

[tex]$7.2 \cdot 6 = 13.2 \cdot 10$\\$43.2 = 132$\\$JK = \frac{132}{7.2} = 18.333$[/tex]

Therefore, the length of JK is 18.333.

Learn more about Triangle Proportionality Theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/11807262

#SPJ1

Therefore, the possible number of pens in the box is p, where p is greater than 135.

Inequality refers to a situation in which there is a difference or disparity between two or more things, usually in terms of value, opportunity, or outcome. Inequality can take many forms, including social, economic, and political inequality.

Inequalities are mathematical expressions that compare two values using the symbols < (less than), > (greater than), ≤ (less than or equal to), or ≥ (greater than or equal to). To solve an inequality, you need to isolate the variable (the unknown quantity) on one side of the inequality symbol and determine the range of values for which the inequality holds true.

Here are some general steps to solve an inequality:

by the question.

Let's say there are 'p' pens in the box. Each pack has more than 15 pens, so we can write the inequality:

p/9 > 15

Multiplying both sides by 9, we get:

p > 135

To learn more about inequality:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ1

36.92 lbs. of the $3.45 tea and 43.08 lbs. of the $2.15 tea are needed.

Let x and y be the amount of tea that sells fo 3.45 and 2.15 a pound respectively:

x+y=80....................eq 1

3.45x+2.15y=2.75(80)......eq 2

:

rewrite eq 1 to x=80-y and plug that value into eq 2

:

3.45(80-y) +2.15y=2.75(80)

:

276-3.45y+2.15y=220

:

-1.3y=56

:

y=43.07 pounds of $2.15 tea

:

28x=80-43.07=36.93 pounds of $3.45 tea

Let a= the pounds of the more expensive tea needed

Let b= the pounds of the less expensive tea needed

(1) a+%2B+b+=+80

(2) 345a+%2B+215b+=+80%2A275 (in cents)

--------------------------

In words, (2) says.

(lbs of 'a' tea x price/lb) + (lbs of 'b' tea x price/lb) =

(lbs of mixture x price/lb of mixture)

-------

Multiply both sides of (1) by 215 and then.

subtract from (2)

345a+%2B+215b+=+80%2A275

-215a+-+215b+=+-80%2A215

130a+=+80%2A60

130a+=+4800

a+=+36.92

and, from (1)

(1) a+%2B+b+=+80

36.92+%2B+b+=+80

b+=+80+-+36.92

b+=+43.08

36.92 lbs. of the $3.45 tea and 43.08 lbs. of the $2.15 tea are needed.

Learn more about value

https://brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ1

The mixture contains 34 pounds of black tea and 46 pounds of Earl Gray tea.

What is an algebraic expression?

An algebraic expression is a mathematical phrase that contains variables, constants, and mathematical operations.

Let's denote the amount of black tea in pounds by "x" and the amount of Earl Gray tea in pounds by "y".

Since the total amount of mixture is 80 lb, we have:

x + y = 80 ----(1)

We also know that the mixture sells for $2.75 a pound, so the total revenue from selling 80 lb of mixture is:

80 x $2.75 = $220

On the other hand, the cost of the mixture is the sum of the costs of the black tea and the Earl Gray tea, which is:

3.45x + 2.15y

Since the company wants to make a profit, the revenue must be greater than the cost, so we have:

3.45x + 2.15y < $220

We can simplify this inequality by dividing both sides by 0.1:

34.5x + 21.5y < 2200 ----(2)

Now we have two equations with two unknowns (equations (1) and (2)), which we can solve using substitution or elimination.

Substitution method:

From equation (1), we have:

y = 80 - x

Substituting this into equation (2), we get:

34.5x + 21.5(80 - x) < 2200

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

x < 34.5

Rounding x to the nearest pound, we get x = 34.

Substituting this value into y = 80 - x, we get y = 46.

Therefore, the mixture contains 34 pounds of black tea and 46 pounds of Earl Gray tea.

To learn more about algebraic expression from given link

https://brainly.com/question/19245500

#SPJ1

Based on the graph given, the function is not continuous at x = 1.

In mathematics, a function is a relation between a set of inputs (called the domain) and a set of possible outputs (called the range) with the property that each input is related to exactly one output. A function is typically represented using functional notation as f(x), which means that the output value of the function f corresponds to the input value x.  Functions can take many forms and can be represented graphically or algebraically. They are used to describe many real-world phenomena, including physical systems, economic trends, and social behavior. Functions are important in mathematics because they provide a framework for understanding relationships between variables and for solving problems in various areas of mathematics, science, and engineering.

Here,

At x = 1, there is a "hole" or a point of discontinuity in the graph where the function is undefined. This is because the function has a removable discontinuity at x = 1, meaning that the limit of the function exists at x = 1 but the function is not defined at that point.

Therefore, the value of x at which the function is not continuous is: 1

To know more about function,

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ1

The index of refraction of the material used in double slit experiment is 1.36.

The distance between adjacent maxima on a screen in a double-slit experiment is given by:

d sinθ = mλ

where d is the slit separation, θ is the angle between the screen and the line connecting the slits and the maxima, m is the order of the maximum, and λ is the wavelength of light.

The distance between adjacent maxima changes from 1.0cm to 0.50cm when the slit separation is cut in half, which means that the wavelength of light is also halved. Therefore, the ratio of the two wavelengths is:

λ1/λ2 = 2/1 = 2

The speed of light in the material is given as 2.2x10^8 m/s. The speed of light in a vacuum is c, so the index of refraction of the material is given by:

n = c/v

where v is the speed of light in the material. Therefore:

n = c/2.2x10^8 m/s = 1.36

The index of refraction of the material is 1.36.

To know more about index of refraction:

https://brainly.com/question/23750645

#SPJ4

_____The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below:

In a double slit experiment, it is observed that the distance between adjacent maxima on a remote screen is 1.0cm. The distance between adjacent maxima when the slit separation is cut in half decreases to 0.50cm. The speed of light in a certain material is measured to be 2.2x10^8 m/s. what is the index refraction of this material?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the limit of (n!)^(1/n) as n approaches infinity, we can use the Stirling's approximation for n!, which is:

n! ≈ (n/e)^n √(2πn)

where e is the mathematical constant e ≈ 2.71828, and π is the mathematical constant pi ≈ 3.14159.

Using this approximation, we can rewrite (n!)^(1/n) as:

(n!)^(1/n) = [(n/e)^n √(2πn)]^(1/n) = (n/e)^(n/n) [√(2πn)]^(1/n)

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we have:

lim (n!)^(1/n) = lim (n/e)^(n/n) [√(2πn)]^(1/n)

Using the fact that lim a^(1/n) = 1 as n approaches infinity for any constant a > 0, we can simplify the second term as:

lim [√(2πn)]^(1/n) = 1

For the first term, we can rewrite (n/e)^(n/n) as [1/(e^(1/n))]^n and use the fact that lim a^n = 1 as n approaches infinity for any constant 0 < a < 1. Thus, we have:

lim (n/e)^(n/n) = lim [1/(e^(1/n))]^n = 1

Therefore, combining the two terms, we have:

lim (n!)^(1/n) = lim (n/e)^(n/n) [√(2πn)]^(1/n) = 1 x 1 = 1

Hence, the limit of (n!)^(1/n) as n approaches infinity is 1.

Answer:1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

To subtract 1/9 - 1/14, we need to find a common denominator. The smallest number that both 9 and 14 divide into is 126.

So, we will convert both fractions to have a denominator of 126:

1/9 = 14/126

1/14 = 9/126

Now we can subtract them:

1/9 - 1/14 = 14/126 - 9/126

Simplifying the right-hand side by subtracting the numerators, we get:

5/126

Therefore, 1/9 - 1/14 = 5/126 as an improper fraction.

Answer:

1/9-1/14

=14-9/9*14

=5/126

= 25 1/5

Answer:

I'd be happy to help!

a. From the picture of the window, we can identify the following quadrilaterals:

Rectangle: ABCD (all angles are right angles and opposite sides are parallel and congruent)

Parallelogram: EFGH (opposite sides are parallel and congruent)

Trapezoid: BCGH (at least one pair of opposite sides are parallel)

b. To identify the parallelograms in the picture, we would need to know the following properties of parallelograms:

Opposite sides are parallel and congruent

Opposite angles are congruent

Diagonals bisect each other

Using these properties, we can identify the following parallelograms in the picture:

Parallelogram EFGH: Opposite sides EF and GH are parallel and congruent, and opposite sides EG and FH are also parallel and congruent. Additionally, angles E and G are congruent, and angles F and H are congruent.

Rectangle ABCD: Opposite sides AB and CD are parallel and congruent, and opposite sides AD and BC are also parallel and congruent. Additionally, angles A and C are congruent, and angles B and D are congruent. The diagonals AC and BD bisect each other, meaning that they intersect at their midpoints.

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the power property to simplify the expression (9¹⁺⁴)⁷⁺², we have 9^7/8

Given the expression

(9¹⁺⁴)⁷⁺²

To simplify this expression using the power of a power property, we need to multiply the exponents:

(9¹⁺⁴)⁷⁺² = 9(¹⁺⁴ ˣ ⁷⁺²)

Simplifying the exponents in the parentheses:

(9¹⁺⁴)⁷⁺² = 9⁷⁺⁸ or 9^7/8

Therefore, (9¹⁺⁴)⁷⁺² simplifies to 9^(7/8).

Read more about expression at

https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ1

The limit of f(x, y) as (x, y) approaches (0, 0) depends on the path taken, the limit does not exist, and we can conclude that the function f(x, y) do not have a limit as (x, y) → (0, 0).

To show that the function f(x, y) does not have a limit as (x, y) → (0, 0), we need to show that the limit does not exist, either because the limit is infinite or because the limit does not exist.

We are given that the limit of f(x, y) as (x, y) → (0, 0) when y → infinity is infinity. This means that as y approaches infinity, the function f(x, y) becomes arbitrarily large, regardless of the value of x. However, this does not imply that the limit of f(x, y) exists as (x, y) → (0, 0).

To see why, consider the sequence of points (x_n, y_n) = (1/n, n) as n approaches infinity. As y_n → infinity, we have

lim (x_n, y_n) → (0, 0) f(x_n, y_n) = infinity.

However, if we consider the sequence of points (x_n, y_n') = (1/n, n^2) instead, as n approaches infinity, we have

lim (x_n, y_n') → (0, 0) f(x_n, y_n') = 0.

To know more about arbitrarily here

https://brainly.com/question/19091235

#SPJ4

The symmetric equations of the line passing through a point and parallel to a vector are -(x - 4) = y + 1/4 = -(z - 9)/2. The line intersects the xy-, xz-, and yz-planes at (5, -9/4, 0), (15/4, 0, 23/2), and (0, -17/4, 11/2), respectively.

To find the symmetric equations of the line, we first need to find the direction vector of the line. Since the line is parallel to the vector <4, -1, 9>, any scalar multiple of this vector will be a direction vector of the line. So, let's choose the parameter t and write the vector equation of the line:

r = <4, -1, 9> + t<-1, 4, -2>

Expanding this vector equation component-wise, we get:

x = 4 - t

y = -1 + 4t

z = 9 - 2t

These equations can be rearranged to get the symmetric equations of the line:

-(x - 4) = y + 1/4 = -(z - 9)/2

To find the points in which the line intersects the coordinate planes, we substitute the corresponding variables with 0 in the equations for the line.

For the xy-plane, we set z = 0 and solve for x and y:

-(x - 4) = y + 1/4 = -(-9)/2

x = 5, y = -9/4

So, the line intersects the xy-plane at the point (5, -9/4, 0).

For the xz-plane, we set y = 0 and solve for x and z:

-(x - 4) = 0 + 1/4 = -(z - 9)/2

x = 15/4, z = 23/2

So, the line intersects the xz-plane at the point (15/4, 0, 23/2).

For the yz-plane, we set x = 0 and solve for y and z:

-(-4) = y + 1/4 = -(z - 9)/2

y = -17/4, z = 11/2

So, the line intersects the yz-plane at the point (0, -17/4, 11/2).

To know more about line intersection:

https://brainly.com/question/21445233

#SPJ4