Simplify 3 + 5(x - 4)

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

the numbers greater than nine are: 10,11,12

1,3,5,7,9

So that is nine numbers

9/12 can be simplified to 3/4 if you divide by 3

if you like my answer please give me the brainliest. I'm trying to boost my rank and I'm really close

Answer:

Ummmm 2 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  8x +6y -28

Step-by-step explanation:

The outside factor applies to each inside term, so the equivalent expression is ...

  -8(-x -3/4y +7/2) = 8x +6y -28

Applying the distributive property once again, we can also write the equivalent expression ...

  = 2(4x +3y -14)

__

There are an infinite number of other equivalent expressions. The problem statement is non-specific as to the acceptable form.

Answer:

Jumbo burger with fried is 75%

chicken with salad is 65%

Step-by-step explanation:

you first split the burger and sides. You add up the sides to find the salad. Then add up the sides and burgers

Answer:

What is the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwich with a Salad? Make an area or tree diagram to help with the problem.

Answer to question: 20% for Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries and 10.5% for Chicken Sandwich with a Salad.

Step-by-step explanation:

You are going to find the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwhich with a Salad by using a area model or a tree diagram. Although you ddin't ask me to solve it, I'm gonna help you with it anyways.

Sandwhiches:

50% - Jumbo Burger (JB)

30% - Chicken Sandwich (CS)

20% - Regular Burger (RB)

Sides:

40% - Curly Fries (CF)

35% - Salad (S)

25% - Regular Fries (RF)

Acronyms

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Curly Fries (CF) = JBCF

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Salad (S) = JBS

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Regular Fries (RF) = JBRF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Curly Fries (CF) = CSCF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Salad (S) = CSS

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Regular Fries (RF) = CSRF

Regular Burger (RB) + Curly Fries (CF) = RBCF

Regular Burger (RB) + Salad (S) = RBS

Regular Burger (RB) + Regular Fries (RF) = RBRF

Probability of combinations:

JBCF = 0.5 x 0.4 = 0.20

JBS = 0.5 x 0.35 = 17.5

JBRF = 0.5 x 0.25 = 12.5

CSCF = 0.3 x 0.4 = 12

CSS = 0.3 x 0.35 = 10.5

CSRF = 0.3 x 0.25 = 7.5

RBCF = 0.2 x 0.4 = 8

RBS = 0.2 x 0.35 = 7

RBRF = 0.2 x 0.25 = 5

Your tree diagram should look something like this:

         CF(40%)- outcome - JBCF (20%)

          /  

(50%)JB ---  S(35%)-  outcome - JBS (17.5%)

           \            

           RF(25%)-  outcome - JBRF (12.5%)

         CF(40%)- outcome - CSCF (12%)

          /

(30%)CS ---  S(35%)- outcome - CSS (10.5%)

            \

            RF(25%)- outcome - CSRF (7.5%)

           CF(40%)- outcome - RBCF (8%)

           /

(20%)RB ---  S(35%)- outcome - RBS (7%)

          \

          RF(25%)- outcome - RBRF (5%)

Hope this helps because this took forever :D

Answer:

  y = -7x +8

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope-intercept form of the equation of a line is ...

  y = mx +b

where m represents the slope, and b represents the y-intercept. The y-intercept is the value of y when x=0. Here, you have m=-7 and b=8. Your equation is ...

  y = -7x +8

Answer:

35%

Step-by-step explanation:

The total number of cinema seats can seat 280 people. Since 98 people take up 98 seats of the cinema, they are taking up 98 cinema seats out of the 280 cinema seats originally available.

As a fraction this would be written as  [tex]\frac{98}{280}[/tex] .

What you want to do is then divide 98 by 280 or 98/280, to get 0.35.

To get the percentage of seats filled, you must multiply the decimal you get by 100.

So it should look like this and your result should be 35%.

[tex]\frac{98}{280} = 0.35 *100=35[/tex]%

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \leq 120[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu > 120[/tex]  

b) [tex]t=\frac{130-120}{\frac{40}{\sqrt{80}}}=2.236[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1 = 80-1=79[/tex]

The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be:

[tex]p_v =P(t_{79}>2.236)=0.0141[/tex]  

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=130[/tex] represent the sample mean for the amount spent each shopper

[tex]s=40[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation

[tex]n=80[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =120[/tex] represent the value to verify

t would represent the statistic    

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value f

Part a

We want to verify if the shoppers participating in the loyalty program spent more on average than typical shoppers, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \leq 120[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu > 120[/tex]  

The statistic for this case would be given by:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]t=\frac{130-120}{\frac{40}{\sqrt{80}}}=2.236[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1 = 80-1=79[/tex]

The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be:

[tex]p_v =P(t_{79}>2.236)=0.0141[/tex]  

Answer:B. The regression line​ changes, but the change is small. C. There is no regression line for the second case because the data are in a pattern. D. The regression line is very similar in both cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The equation is,

[tex]y = - \frac{4}{3}x - \frac{2}{3} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

When a line is parallel to the other line, they will have the same gradient :

[tex]12x + 9y = 3[/tex]

[tex]9y = - 12x + 3[/tex]

[tex]y = - \frac{12}{9} x + \frac{3}{9} [/tex]

[tex]y = - \frac{4}{3} x + \frac{1}{3} [/tex]

We have already found the gradient. Next, we have to substitute the gradient and coordinates into the slope-form equation, y = mx + b :

[tex]y = mx + b[/tex]

Let m = -4/3,

Let x = -5,

Let y = 6,

[tex]6 = - \frac{ 4}{3} ( - 5) + b[/tex]

[tex]6 = \frac{20}{3} + b[/tex]

[tex]b = 6 - \frac{20}{3} [/tex]

[tex]b = - \frac{2}{3} [/tex]

Answer:

3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

add 5+1+3=9

and there is 3 cheese pizza so its 3 over 8.

Answer:

3/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is the garbage truck had 6 wheels

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the semitruck has 18 wheels and the semitruck had 3 times more wheels than a garbage truck all you would have to do is divide 18 by 3 and you will get 6 as your answer.

Hope this helps, its my first time answering.

Answer:

[2,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

[0,1), [0,1),[0,1),[0,1)

[1,2), [1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2)

[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3)

[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4)

answer would be A because it u factor it out you will get your initial equation

Answer:

The value increases

Step-by-step explanation:

the smaller the divisor, the larger the quotient.

Answer:

4/45.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are a total of 15 marbles in the bowl, so:

P(red) = 5/15 = 1/3

P(blue) = 4/15

Required probability = 1/3 * 4/15

= 4/45

Answer:

P(red, blue) = (5/15)*(4/15) = 4/45

Answer:24

Step-by-step explanation:

Height =4

Base=6

Area of parallelogram=base x height

Area of parallelogram=6 x 4

Area of parallelogram=24

Answer:2:1

Step-by-step explanation:

6.5:3.25

6.5/3.25=2/1

6.5:3.25=2:1

therefore n=2

Answer:

3218.75 a month

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so you use the formula: A= 3.14•r•2 next you plug in your values a=3.14•7•2 3.14•7= 28.98•2=43.96

Answer:

43.96

im dying on the question before that one it says "What issues are you having when it comes to area and circumference" you typed nothing really and here you are asking us whats the circles area lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

If Raven's monthly payment were $125, the amount of the loan that she is considering taking out  would be less than $43,205.56.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you think about it this way it may be more simple. If the APR stays constant then a greater payment will result in a greater loan. The opposite is also true meaning a lesser payment will result in a lesser loan. If the amount Raven pays is greater than $145 then the loan will be greater than $43,205.56. If the amount she pays is less than $145 then the loan will be less than $43,205.56. Of the options, only one of these situations will be present. In my case, the correct option was a payment of $125 will result in a lesser loan than $43,205.56.

Answer:

If Raven's monthly payment were $125, the amount of the loan that she is considering taking out  would be less than $43,205.56.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

~ 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real life ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      48       =           1      ⇒   x - centimeters of the snowflake in real life

       18                    x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

48 * x = 18,

x = 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real ife

Answer:

Probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe  their representative possesses low ethical standards is 0.417890.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the paper claims that 43% of all constituents believe their representative possesses low ethical standards.

Suppose 20 of a representative's constituents are randomly and independently sampled.

The above situation can be represented through binomial distribution;

[tex]P(X=r) = \binom{n}{r} \times p^{r} \times (1-p)^{n-r} ; x = 0,1,2,3,.....[/tex]

where, n = number of trials (samples) taken = 20 constituents

            r = number of success = more than eight but fewer than 12

            p = probability of success which in our question is probability that

                  all constituents believe their representative possesses low

                  ethical standards, i.e; p = 43%

Let X = Number of constituents who believe their representative possesses low ethical standards

So, X ~ Binom(n = 20 , p = 0.43)

Now, Probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe  their representative possesses low ethical standards is given by = P(8 < X < 12)

P(8 < X < 12)  =  P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11)

= [tex]\binom{20}{9} \times 0.43^{9} \times (1-0.43)^{20-9}+ \binom{20}{10} \times 0.43^{10} \times (1-0.43)^{20-10}+\binom{20}{11} \times 0.43^{11} \times (1-0.43)^{20-11}[/tex]

= [tex]167960 \times 0.43^{9} \times 0.57^{11}+ 184756 \times 0.43^{10} \times 0.57^{10}+167960 \times 0.43^{11} \times 0.57^{9}[/tex]

= 0.417890

Hence, the required probability is 0.417890.

The probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe their representative possesses low ethical standards is; C. 0.417890

We are given;

proportion; p = 43% = 0.43

sample size; n = 20

P(X = x) = ⁿCₓ * pˣ * (1 - p)ⁿ ⁻ ˣ

Thus the probability that more than eight but fewer than 12 of the 20 constituents sampled believe their representative possesses low ethical standards is;

P(8 < X < 12)  =  P(X = 9) + P(X = 10) + P(X = 11)

From online binomial probability calculator, we have;

P(8 < X < 12)  =  0.17419889 + 0.14455452 + 0.09913627

P(8 < X < 12)  = 0.417890

Read more about binomial probability at; https://brainly.com/question/15246027

Answer:

3cm+2cm+5cm=10cm

%=100

10*10=100

2cm*10=20%

Step-by-step explanation:

the shaded area is width of 2 2/10 or 20/100

Answer:

33%

Step-by-step explanation:

for if u want to do it 4cm then

4+3+3=10

100π cm^2

49π cm^2

16π cm^2

49π - 16π = 33π

33/100 =33%

Answer:

The mean will increase, after the outlier is removed.

Answer:

5%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the tax, we take the price times the tax rate

2 = 40* rate

Divide each side by 40

2/40 =rate

.05 = rate

Changing to percent form

5% = rate

Answer:

tax rate = 2 / 40  = 1 /20 = 0.05 *100 = 5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

[tex]X_{1}=6[/tex] represent the complaints with the old dough

[tex]X_{2}=16[/tex] represent the complaints with the new dough

[tex]n_{1}=385[/tex] sample 1 selected  

[tex]n_{2}=340[/tex] sample 2 selected  

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{6}{385}=0.0156[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the old dough

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{16}{340}=0.0471[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the new dough

[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \geq p_{2}[/tex]    

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} < p_{2}[/tex]    

The statitsic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{6+16}{385+340}=0.0303[/tex]  

Replacing the info provided we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Answer:

True? What are you asking

Step-by-step explanation:

But yes triangles are congruent by either of those

Answer:

you're not really asking anything, or is this a true/false statement

Step-by-step explanation: