Answer:
TESTÍCULO
Explanation:
What is mass casulty
Answer:
A mass causality refers to an event or incident that occurs and overwhelmes the medical resources available at a moment.
such as;
[tex]{ \sf{ - \: terrorist \: action}} \\ { \sf{ - \: shooting \: massacre}}[/tex]
So i have to make trial balance and im kinda confused with 'interest'. So which side did it go to? Credit or debit? It didn't state the interest as received or expense/paid. someone told me to look at the bank but hey i need more explanation T^T
Answer:
debit
explanation:
The interest on capital is on credit side of a trial balance as it is a liability from the point of view of company or enterprise and it comes in the debit side
Which of the following would be considered anthropogenic impacts on the natural environment?
a. air pollution
b. introduction of invasive species
c. burning of fossil fuels
d. all of the above
Answer:
D. All of the above.
Which of the following is the last step in creating a budget. Determine savings r debt. Identifying variable expenses. Identify income r identify fixed expenses which one the answer
Answer:
The first step in creating a budget is to identify the amount of money you have coming in.
Estimate Expenses.
Estimate Income.
Determine Savings.
Balance Budget.
Explanation:
MAY BE THIS.
explain the symbiotic relationship that exists between science and technology
Answer:
science is the study of the natural world by scientific method i.e collecting data through a systematic process.and technology is is where we apply science to create devices that can solve problems and perform different tasks.technology is literally the application of science.
I hope this helps
If enough experimental data supports a hypothesis, then it:
O A. Is proven 100% true.
O
B. Is falsified.
OC. Is accepted as true until prolan false.
OD. Becomes an Observational Law
Answer: C) Is accepted as true until proven false
==========================================================
Explanation:
We cannot prove the hypothesis to be 100% true because there might be data out there that we haven't accounted for, or some scenario that we haven't thought of yet. There's always going to be room for uncertainty and doubt. Keep in mind that such doubt does not necessarily mean that the theory is automatically false.
So all of this rules out choice A.
Choice B is ruled out as well because data supporting a hypothesis doesn't falsify the hypothesis. The term "falsify" means "to prove false" as you'd expect.
Choice C is the answer because the data seems to support the hypothesis and again we leave room for error. It's quite possible that in some unspecified date in the future, there are better methods of measurement to get a better sense of what's going on.
Choice D is ruled out because a law refers to something like the law of gravity. It's something you observe but it doesn't explain why something works. It doesn't provide the underlying mechanics of what's going on. We simply just report what we see which is exactly what an observation is.
