QUESTION 18
Indicate the correct statement:
(1) An ex parte application is the motion application used when there is no dispute of facts
(2) Action proceedings is another type of motion application and the procedure is started by a
notice of motion
(3) In criminal cases a procedure is started with action proceedings
(4) The parties in a criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant
Answer:
2 or 4 is correct
Explanation:
step by step explanation
The correct statement in the given question is (4) statement.
Statement (1) - Ex Parte Application
Ex parte application is used in civil procedure and is used to refer to motions for orders that can be granted without waiting for the response from the other side.
These orders are only in place until further hearing can be held such as temporary restraining order .
Under U.S.A law , court are hesitant to make ex parte motion because according to 5th amendment and 14th amendment, there is a guarantee of right to due process and ex parte leads to the violation of excluded party's right to due process.
Statement (2)- Action Proceedings
Action Proceedings refers to a judicial proceedings where a party brings a civil or criminal case against another party, an action has been brought against the other party.
It is not a type of motion application and is used in cases such as:
- presence of material disputes in facts
- it is instituted by summons
- evidence to be relied upon in supporting the claim and is not disclosed in the statement
- exchange of pleadings are involved
-evidence in the form of testimonies and documentary is given to prove the claims
- more expensive and time consuming
Statement (3)- Arrest
In criminal cases a procedure is started with Arrest.
An arrest is made with an arrest warrant and may be made with or without warrant if probable cause and exigent circumstances are presented at the time of Arrest.
The right to make warrantless arrests are commonly defined and limited by statutes subject to due process guaranteed by U.S.A Constitution.
Statement (4)- Prosecutor and Defendant
These both terms are related strictly to Criminal Law.
Prosecutor- Legal representative of the prosecution in the states with the criminal law system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law.
A lawyer who initiates prosecution of criminal offences and present s the case for prosecution in a criminal proceedings
Defendant- Defendant is a person who is the party either accused of committing a crime or criminal prosecution
Thus the parties in criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant.
To learn more about Prosecution and Defendant here
https://brainly.com/question/11980088
#SPJ3
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
What is the first step when investigating an arson?
Photograph the scene of the fire.
Question witnesses who observed the fire burning.
Identify the "plant"—the material used to set the fire.
Identify the point of origin of the fire.
Answer:
identify the plant - the material that used to set the fire
Ms. Y went to Alluta Hotel together with her friends for the celebration of her birthday. At the close of the event her friends could not find some of their items and some complained of stomach upset from the food and beverage served. Given their social media presence, Ms. Y and her friends posted their complaints online. Discuss the legal issues arising from this situation.
Answer:
may be that ms.y and her friend is just spreading rumor about that hotel .. maybe she already had some issues with the people there ..and they were just doing it as a revenge ... it doesn't makes sense when we think no one complain except both of them
mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại tròn xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật đúng hay sai? Giải thích
Answer:
Sai lầm
Explanation:
Mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại trong xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật.
Sai. Các quan hệ xã hội của chúng ta được điều chỉnh bơi các quy phạm đao đức và các quy phạm pháp luật, mà các quy phạm đạo đức thì có thể đượec thể chế hóa và đưa lên thành các quy phạm pháp luật nhưng không phải quy phạm đạo đức nào cũng được dưa lên thành luật cả. Tồn tại xã hội quyết định ý thức xã hội cho nên các quy tắc ứng xử đựoc coi là các chuẩn mực đạo đứa đó đó không nhất thiết phải được xem là pháp luật mà nó song song tồn tại trong xã hội
Chủ thể nào bắt buộc là cá nhân đủ điều kiện theo quy định pháp luật:
a. Cổ đông sáng lập công ty cổ phần c. Thành viên hợp danh
b. Thành viên của công ty hợp danh d. Thành viên công ty TNHH
Answer:
What's this bro
Explanation:
kichdi aaaaaaa
In determining whether a witness is credible, an investigator should (check all that apply):
A. observe the witness's demeanor while speaking
B. refrain from reaching conclusions about a witness's veracity
C. consider the witness's bias and motive to testify
D. consider whether the individual has the ability to make an effective witness
Which of the following parties is permitted to view all entries in the Notary Signing Agent Notary journal?
A) Contracting Companies and Lenders
B) Borrowers and signing Parties
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Answer:
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Explanation:
Which of the following is not an instruction that would be given to witnesses to prepare them for trial?
If asked to give exact times or measurements, "approximate" your responses.
It is best to elaborate and give detailed answers to questions.
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand.
Always tell the truth and testify with confidence.
Answer:
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand
Explanation:
Judges are very smart and with your actions while on the witness stand tell them what you mean. so your explanation should. be of reasonable doubt.
the law enacted by the military is called what
How Can We Get Khula in Pakistan?
http://www.advocateinlahore.com/khula-procedure-in-pakistan/
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish
Explanation:
QUESTION 11
Which of the following is an important consideration in setting up the proper environment to complete tasks on time?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the options for this question.
However, we can help you to answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
In general terms. there is an important consideration in setting up the proper environment to complete tasks on time. This consideration is to learn to establish priorities.
Yes, this is the most important thing when setting up the proper environment to complete tasks on time.
Time management is a must for leaders, directors, managers, and coaches. These people in top positions in corporations must create a good plan, establish clear goals, followed up by strategies and tactics to accomplish those goals, and being productive.
For this to happen, they have to establish priorities, focus on the task at hand, establish a proper environment that is conducive to the activities that need to be done, and eliminate distractions to foster the correct habits that create productivity.
Answer:
Explanation: a limited distractions
b free from distractions
c a cluttered work space
d working whenever time allows
civil cases cannot be tried by what?
A judge
A judge and jury
Third party arbitrator
An arbitrator not agreed upon
In a civil trial, a judge or jury examines the evidence to decide whether, by a "preponderance of the evidence," the defendant should be held legally responsible for the damages alleged by the plaintiff.
Can an impaired driver crash into you or someone you love? Yes or no
what role correctional officials have to play in offenders life?
Answer:
The Correctional Official is the single most important person who mediates between an offender and society. The Official is expected to be a good role model for others in her or his presence. It is this official who holds the power over an offender's head. S/he can use this power to humiliate, and degrade the offender
Are foreign policy and domestic policy two faces of the same coin.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Foreign policy and domestic policy are considered as the two faces of a coin because any change in both of these policies will impact on the macroeconomic variables of both the nation.
what is the IUPAC name for C(CH3)4
Answer:
2,2-dimethylpropane
Explanation:
Draw the structure of the compound. You will get a carbon atom in center surrounded by 4 methyl groups. Now take one linear chain. It's propane derived because of 3 carbons. Now two methyl groups are attached to second carbon atom. So you will get 2,2-dimethylpropane
Answer:
2,2 Dimethyl propane is the IUPAC name
Can somebody help me
Kathy receives her real estate license. Within a month of receiving her license, she gets a new job offer she can’t refuse. She decides to continue to hold a license but not practice or do any real estate work or collect any referrals at this time. She is willing to renew her license, do her continuing education, and pay the same fee for her license. What should Kathy do?
Seek an involuntary inactive license.
Answer: Seek an involuntary inactive license.
Explanation:
You are indeed right that she should seek an Involuntary Inactive license which is shows that she is not practicing and therefore has not met the requirements needed for her to continue practicing real estate work.
She might be ready to renew her license but the requirements are such that she would have to do some real estate work. If and ever she is willing to come back to real estate, she can then renew her license, pay the fee and meet other requirements.
an agreement enforceable by law is called as
Answer:
Contract
Explanation:
an agreement enforceable by the court of law is called as contract
g Which type of case would be appealed automatically to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Group of answer choices A capital felony conviction with imposed death sentence A state jail (fourth-degree) felony conviction A first-degree felony conviction A civil case involving a sum of over $100,000
Answer:
A capital felony conviction with imposed death sentence.
Explanation:
The Texas Court of the Criminal Appeals is the last and the highest court of appeal incase of any criminal matters. It is situated in the Supreme court building with the Presiding judge. The court exercises a discretionary review over the criminal cases.
The only cases the Court must hear are only those cases that involves the sentence of a capital punishment or a denial of a bail. A capital felony of conviction which imposed a death sentence to the accused can be automatically appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
Many New Orleans officers responding to crime in the wake of Hurricane Katrina wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges. Which nineteenth-century organization was among the first to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms with its three-quarter-length royal blue coats, white trousers, and top hats?
Answer:
The first London Metropolitan Police
Explanation:
On the 29th of August, 2005, New Orleans was hit with a fatal natural disaster, which was called Hurricane Katrina and it resulted in the widespread destruction of properties through flooding and storm.
During the Hurricane Katrina, many police officers serving in New Orleans wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges while responding to criminal activities.
The first London Metropolitan Police was established by Robert Peel in 1829, under the Metropolitan Police Act of 1829.
The first London Metropolitan Police is a nineteenth-century organization and it is considered to be among the first paramilitary unit to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms.
Additionally, the first London Metropolitan Police wore royal blue coats of three-quarter-length, white trousers, and top hats to match.
Appellate courts Group of answer choices are made up of judges only. will, on occasion, seat juries, but only when dealing with cases and controversies dealing with federal questions. are courts exclusively of original jurisdiction and, hence, seat juries as a matter of court to make determinations of fact in reaching verdicts. often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts. seat a jury in criminal cases but never in civil matters.
Answer:
often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
There are different types of courts and these includes;
I. Trial court.
II. Circuit court.
III. Appeal court.
IV. Supreme court.
An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).
A criminal case can be defined as a lawsuit brought before a court of competent jurisdiction against someone who has been accused of committing a crime.
Typically, appellate courts (court of appeals) often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
A grand jury can be defined as a group of citizens that are legally saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the evidence in a criminal case. Thus, grand jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Hence, if the grand jury serves an indictment in a criminal case, the suspect is formally accused of committing the crime. This simply means that, the grand jury has ascertained that there are enough evidence to indict an accused.
However, if in a criminal case, the grand jury offers no indictment, the case wouldn't go to trial at the time.
An act under the other acts exception must have occurred
prior to the commission of the crime for which the defendant
is being charged.
True
False
An act under the other acts exception must be occurred prior to the commission of the crime for which the defendant is being charged. Therefore, the given statement is true.
What do you mean by an act?The term act encompasses now no longer best physical acts, including turning at the water or shopping for a gun; however additionally refers to extra intangible acts including adopting a decree, edict, law, judgment, award, or determination.
Therefore, an act under the other acts exception must be occurred prior to the commission of the crime for which the defendant is being charged. Therefore, the given statement is true.
learn more about act here:
https://brainly.com/question/25791968
#SPJ2
Ways to avoid emotional stress when
driving include:
a Always have the radio off
b Obey the rules-of-the-road
c Never change lanes
d Always go
with the flow
Answer:
I will go with D always go with the flow
Discuss the difference between foriegn policy and domestic policy
Answer:
Domestic policies are those that affect or apply to people or institutions within a particular country and tend to be internal. Foreign policy has to do with policies between two or more nations and is external. It focuses on building networks with other countries.
HELP PLEASEEEE ILL MARK BRAINLIEST !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What would be the best illustration of how federal labor regulations protect American citizens
which can impact trade?
a. Government issues a nation-wide consumer recall for one car company to replace two million faulty brake systems in its cars and trucks.
b. EPA charges fines a regional electricity company for exceeding its EPA pollution guidelines for the year.
c. Anti-discrimination laws make it illegal to discriminate against women who apply for jobs working on an
oceanic oil rig.
d. Federal Trade Commission forces the phone company to refund one million dollars to consumers who paid
an illegal internet user fee.
What would be the best illustration of how federal labor regulations protect American citizens
What would be the best illustration of how federal labor regulations protect American citizenswhich can impact trade?
a. Government issues a nation-wide consumer recall for one car company to replace two million faulty brake systems in its cars and trucks.
A police officer stopped a driver who had run a red light. Upon approaching the car, the officer noticed a strong odor of alcohol and immediately asked whether the driver had been drinking. The driver admitted having had several alcoholic drinks that evening. The driver, charged with driving while intoxicated, moved to suppress the officer's testimony regarding the driver's statement about his drinking. The driver argued that the officer had elicited the statement without providing the requisite Miranda warnings. The prosecutor has responded that the statement should be allowed in the prosecution's case-in-chief or, at a minimum, should be allowed as impeachment in the event the driver testifies and denies drinking. How should the court rule regarding the driver's statement admitting his drinking
Answer:
Police Officer Stopping a Driver Who Had Run a Red Light
The driver's statement should be allowed, as pleaded by the prosecution, because the driver was not in custody for Miranda purposes when the free admission of drinking alcohol was made.
Explanation:
The driver freely disclosed his statement about having several alcoholic drinks that evening. At the time he made the statement, the driver was not under custody, he was not under arrest, and he was not suspected of driving under intoxication. The officer stopped him because he had run a red light (another traffic offense) and only noticed the strong odor of alcohol after the traffic offense was committed. Possibly, the alcohol odor could have emanated from another source altogether.
Which of the following documents is required for any type of search according to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
arrest order
arrest warrant
search warrant
seizure warrant
Mr. Farhan has sent goods to Mr. Basit, good are held by Mr. Kashif a Carrier now Mr. Farhan wants to stop the goods plz advice on which grounds he can stops the goods
Answer:
go to mr.kashif to buy good
