Capacity and authority are two important concepts with regards to the normal day to day functioning of a company. With the aid of authoritative text, critically discuss the form and substance of these concepts.
Capacity occurs in the form of abilities whereas authority occurs in the form of power.
Capacity refers to the ability of a person to use the given information for making a decision. A person that lacks capacity it means that its mind is impaired and he is unable to make a decision at that time while on the other hand, authority is the legitimate power that a person or a group of persons possess and use it over other people. In capacity, the person has something in the form of abilities whereas in authority, the person has something in the form of power which they used to implement its decision over other people.
https://brainly.com/question/24353112
When a bomb is suspected of being planted in a room, how is a search for the bomb generally conducted?
by starting at one end of the room, fanning out, and then proceeding until reaching the other end
by type of material: metal objects are inspected first, then plastic, then all others
by height, starting below hip level then working upward, sweeping around the room at each level
by dividing the room into quadrants, then sweeping one quadrant at a time
Answer:
how u doing
Explanation:
................................
what has 4 eyes but cant see?
Answer:
MISSISSIPPIExplanation:
mark me brilliant
a learning style through which a skill is acquired when a student learns through experience is called
The theft of currency over a long period of time that tends to be commissioned for a modest amount of money but may not be considered to be financially damaging is called
ATM burglaries.
embezzlement.
forgery.
credit card fraud.
Answer:
the answer is embezzlement
Qualifications for Jury Service
• Never have been convicted of a felony
• Not be currently on active duty in the military
• Not be already serving on another jury
• Be able to read and write in English
. ?
Which other qualification must a citizen meet before he or she can serve on a
jury?
A. Be at least 18 years old
B. Have completed military service
C. Not be enrolled in college
There are several qualifications for a citizen to be able to serve in a jury and one of them is that they should A. Be at least 18 years old.
What are the requirements to serve on a jury?Only people who are aged 18 and above can serve in a jury because they are considered to be more mentally mature.
The person also has to be able to read and write in English and should have a clean record.
#SPJ5
Find out more on jury duty at https://brainly.com/question/5137364.
A. Be at least 18 years old
How far should you stop from The nearest railroad crossing if a flagger is warning of a upcoming train
Which of the following crimes is a low-profile crime that typically involves stealing a large amount of money over a long period of time?
burglary
larceny
fraud
embezzlement
Answer:
the answer is embezzlement
Can i study law after 10 in nepal ?
Answer:
Ten Plus Two (+2) program in Law is a two years program offered by National Examination Board (NEB). If someone is seeking to start their career in the administrative/legal sector then a degree in Law provides the perfect platform for putting you on the right path.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
ookkokjshshhsjsjs
WHAT IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTIONS OF ANY LEGAL SYSTEM?
Answer:
I think the answer for this question is money
A plaintiff sues her employer for sexual harassment. During the trial, the plaintiff attempts to introduce into evidence company records that include written complaints from other employees alleging that they too were sexually harassed by the employer. The defense objects to the admission of the records on the basis of hearsay. Should the objection be sustained?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The evidence is most likely valid and can be useful so the judge shouldn't Sustain it.
No, Hearsay rule is the rule prohibiting hearsay (out of court statements offered as proof of that statement) from being admitted as evidence because of the inability of the other party to cross-examine the maker of the statement.
What is considered hearsay evidence?Hearsay evidence is evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated.
Why hearsay is admissible?The hearsay rule does not exclude the evidence if it is an operative fact. Language of commercial offer and acceptance is also admissible over a hearsay exception because the statements have independent legal significance. Double hearsay is a hearsay statement that contains another hearsay statement itself.
To learn more about Hearsay rule, refer
https://brainly.com/question/18407390
#SPJ2
What Is Actual Process of Divorce Certificate in Pakistan
Answer:
Divorce certificate Pakistan is issued when your divorce proceedings from the court of arbitration council get finalized
jails never hold more than 1,000 prisoners
true or false
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. This is despite the national incarceration rate being at its lowest in 20 years. About 25% of the world’s total prison population is in the United States, which holds about 2.19 million prisoners as of 2019 (1.38 million in federal and state prisons, 745,200 in jails).
It false, i got the unit 8 for this question and it false
Explanation:
You must submit a report to the DMV within 15 days of a traffic accident on a Traffic accident report form. True or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Quizlet - Unit 6 Lesson 3: Procedures When Involved In An Accident
First question.
QUESTION 18
Indicate the correct statement:
(1) An ex parte application is the motion application used when there is no dispute of facts
(2) Action proceedings is another type of motion application and the procedure is started by a
notice of motion
(3) In criminal cases a procedure is started with action proceedings
(4) The parties in a criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant
Answer:
2 or 4 is correct
Explanation:
step by step explanation
The correct statement in the given question is (4) statement.
Statement (1) - Ex Parte Application
Ex parte application is used in civil procedure and is used to refer to motions for orders that can be granted without waiting for the response from the other side.
These orders are only in place until further hearing can be held such as temporary restraining order .
Under U.S.A law , court are hesitant to make ex parte motion because according to 5th amendment and 14th amendment, there is a guarantee of right to due process and ex parte leads to the violation of excluded party's right to due process.
Statement (2)- Action Proceedings
Action Proceedings refers to a judicial proceedings where a party brings a civil or criminal case against another party, an action has been brought against the other party.
It is not a type of motion application and is used in cases such as:
- presence of material disputes in facts
- it is instituted by summons
- evidence to be relied upon in supporting the claim and is not disclosed in the statement
- exchange of pleadings are involved
-evidence in the form of testimonies and documentary is given to prove the claims
- more expensive and time consuming
Statement (3)- Arrest
In criminal cases a procedure is started with Arrest.
An arrest is made with an arrest warrant and may be made with or without warrant if probable cause and exigent circumstances are presented at the time of Arrest.
The right to make warrantless arrests are commonly defined and limited by statutes subject to due process guaranteed by U.S.A Constitution.
Statement (4)- Prosecutor and Defendant
These both terms are related strictly to Criminal Law.
Prosecutor- Legal representative of the prosecution in the states with the criminal law system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law.
A lawyer who initiates prosecution of criminal offences and present s the case for prosecution in a criminal proceedings
Defendant- Defendant is a person who is the party either accused of committing a crime or criminal prosecution
Thus the parties in criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant.
To learn more about Prosecution and Defendant here
https://brainly.com/question/11980088
#SPJ3
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
What is the first step when investigating an arson?
Photograph the scene of the fire.
Question witnesses who observed the fire burning.
Identify the "plant"—the material used to set the fire.
Identify the point of origin of the fire.
Answer:
identify the plant - the material that used to set the fire
Ms. Y went to Alluta Hotel together with her friends for the celebration of her birthday. At the close of the event her friends could not find some of their items and some complained of stomach upset from the food and beverage served. Given their social media presence, Ms. Y and her friends posted their complaints online. Discuss the legal issues arising from this situation.
Answer:
may be that ms.y and her friend is just spreading rumor about that hotel .. maybe she already had some issues with the people there ..and they were just doing it as a revenge ... it doesn't makes sense when we think no one complain except both of them
mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại tròn xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật đúng hay sai? Giải thích
Answer:
Sai lầm
Explanation:
Mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại trong xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật.
Sai. Các quan hệ xã hội của chúng ta được điều chỉnh bơi các quy phạm đao đức và các quy phạm pháp luật, mà các quy phạm đạo đức thì có thể đượec thể chế hóa và đưa lên thành các quy phạm pháp luật nhưng không phải quy phạm đạo đức nào cũng được dưa lên thành luật cả. Tồn tại xã hội quyết định ý thức xã hội cho nên các quy tắc ứng xử đựoc coi là các chuẩn mực đạo đứa đó đó không nhất thiết phải được xem là pháp luật mà nó song song tồn tại trong xã hội
Chủ thể nào bắt buộc là cá nhân đủ điều kiện theo quy định pháp luật:
a. Cổ đông sáng lập công ty cổ phần c. Thành viên hợp danh
b. Thành viên của công ty hợp danh d. Thành viên công ty TNHH
Answer:
What's this bro
Explanation:
kichdi aaaaaaa
In determining whether a witness is credible, an investigator should (check all that apply):
A. observe the witness's demeanor while speaking
B. refrain from reaching conclusions about a witness's veracity
C. consider the witness's bias and motive to testify
D. consider whether the individual has the ability to make an effective witness
Which of the following parties is permitted to view all entries in the Notary Signing Agent Notary journal?
A) Contracting Companies and Lenders
B) Borrowers and signing Parties
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Answer:
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Explanation:
Which of the following is not an instruction that would be given to witnesses to prepare them for trial?
If asked to give exact times or measurements, "approximate" your responses.
It is best to elaborate and give detailed answers to questions.
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand.
Always tell the truth and testify with confidence.
Answer:
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand
Explanation:
Judges are very smart and with your actions while on the witness stand tell them what you mean. so your explanation should. be of reasonable doubt.
The way to the house ?
Answer:
what is the house in question
Explanation:
do yo have a screen shot
Red is a union official. He is faced with a problem when a union member breaks a union bylaw. To address the union member’s fault, Red and union officials meet together and decide to kick the union member out of the union. Which of the following is true
Answer:
red is a union official
Explanation:
that one is true
the law enacted by the military is called what
How Can We Get Khula in Pakistan?
http://www.advocateinlahore.com/khula-procedure-in-pakistan/
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish
Explanation:
If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will, could Attorney Porquine successfully defend himself due to Kripto not having standing to sue? Why or why not?
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
No, Sandy Porquine cannot defend himself successfully. This is because Kripto is the designated beneficiary in the contract between Emma Jones and Sandy Porcupine. Beneficiaries intended to seek a court resolution (have a duty to prosecute) if their contract rights are violated. Sandy Porquine also couldn't apply this theory effectively, Kripto had obtained a right.
give a description of a recent (2018-2020) example of how xenophobia has displayed itself in community's
Answer:
https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/09/17/they-have-robbed-me-my-life/xenophobic-violence-against-non-nationals-south
A writing sample that has been made to look like someone else's handwriting is a:
Answer:
cursive
Explanation:
