Answer:
A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo
b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar
c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Explanation:
A) Remoto es la única palabra que no sigue la línea de algo de hace años, antiguo y viejo. Remoto es algo que remite a lejanía pero no en el sentido del resto de las palabras. Entonces, las palabras que siguen el mismo significado son: Viejo, Antiguo, Arcaico, Añejo
B) Disminuir es la única palabra que significa lo opuesto a todo el resto. Aumentar, Incrementar, Crecer y Ampliar significan que algo aumenta o crece en tamaño, mientras disminuir es el antónimo de esas palabras.
C) Atacar es el antónimo de la serie de palabras que implican cuidado y protección, el mantener a alguien o a algo seguro. La serie de palabras iguales son: Defender, Proteger, Cuidar y Resguardar.
law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law. With specific reference to the law of contract discuss.
Answer:
The reference about the law used is its clarity, efficiency and specificity.
Explanation:
When people claim that "law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law," they mean that the law allows us to get specific answers from right and wrong, and not assumptions and concepts about what is right and wrong within. of a society, that is, if the law does not tolerate assumptions, the theory has no place within the law.
This can be seen, because a theory is an assumption about how something happens and an assumption of the events that cause it to happen.
The law is something clear, direct, dynamic and practical, which shows a certainty and not an assumption.
What was The first state to pass insurance legislation
Answer:
Massachusetts
Explanation:
Law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law. In two pages, Discuss with specific references to the law of contract.
Answer:
Check Explanation since we have to discus it.
''LAW OF CONTRACTS are made BASED ON REAL LIFE CASES''.
Explanation:
LAW IS A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE, THEORY HAS NO PLACE IN LAW.
Law is truly a practical discipline because at one time in our various lives we all have actually observe the law. Here, our reference is going to be on the LAW OF CONTRACT.
CONTRACT is a form of aggreement between two or more people. Contract may be written or maybe spoken. Contracts are enforceable under the law if there is a physical evidence that shows that their is surely an agreement.
We all at some point in our lives make agreements and sign a contract(written) or even just with mouth for instance your oath to be law abiding to school rules and regulations and many more.
When contract are breached, the LAW OF CONTRACT is being used in determining the guilty and the innocent. These laws are that is LAW OF CONTRACTS are made BASED ON REAL LIFE CASES which makes law LAW to be A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE.
Almost everyday in our various lives, we all practice law, hence LAW IS A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE, THEORY HAS NO PLACE IN LAW.
Suppose that during construction, Lafayette asked Carl Davidson to rent space in a warehouse that was close to the bridge so that she could work on her sculptures near the site where they would eventually be installed. Carl Davidson signed the rental contract in his own name rather than the name of the LLC. The other members of Davidson Masonry were not aware of the rental agreement. In this situation, would a court likely hold that Davidson Masonry was liable on the contract that Carl Davidson had entered
Answer: Yes, a court would likely hold that Davidson Masonry was also liable on the contract that had been entered by Carl Davidson.
Explanation:
Yes, I believe that Davidson Masonry would also be bound by the contact that has been entered into by Lafayette. Carl Davidson did so for the purpose and goal of the project that they were all working on in their joint venture.
Even though Carl Davidson entered into this separate agreement without the knowledge of Davidson Masonry’s, Carl still did so while in the joint venture with them and also for the purposes of the joint venture project. Therefore, Davidson Masonry would likely be bounded by a court to this contract.
