Suppose f(x)=x^2 and g(x)=(1/2x)^2. Which statement best compares the graph of g(x) with the graph of f(x)?

Answer:

3x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

it can not cleared clear but it can not cleared

Answer:

14=-2x-4

18=-2x

x=-9

Hope This Helps!!!

Answer:

C. 3rd quartile

Step-by-step explanation:

Percentile:

A data belonging to the xth percentile means that the data is greater than x% of the values of the data-set, and smaller than (100 - x)%.

Point below 75% of the cases lie:

This is the 75th percentile, which is the 3rd quartile, as 75 = 3*100/4. Thus, the correct answer is given by option c.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

                    Statements                                        Reasons

1). ΔABC with side lengths a, b, c, and h      1). Given

2). Area = [tex]\frac{1}{2}bh[/tex]                                                 2). Triangle area formula

3). [tex]\text{sin}C=\frac{h}{a}[/tex]                                                    3). Definition of sine

4). asin(C) = h                                                4). Multiplication property of

                                                                          equality.

5). Area = [tex]\frac{1}{2}ba\text{sin}C[/tex]                                         5). Substitution property

6). Area = [tex]\frac{1}{2}ab\text{sin}C[/tex]                                         6). Commutative property of

                                                                           multiplication.

Hence, proved.

Answer:

Cluster sample

Step-by-step explanation:

i did it before

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

You can apply the proportion of 9/6 to 4 to get 6:

6*(9/6)= 9

So

4*(9/6) = Length LA

6= Length LA

Answer:

Option C, or [tex]2\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

Explanation:

We can see that the Line FM in the smaller triangle dialates to Line LK in the bigger triangle by the scale factor of:

FM/LK

6/9 or 2/3

So we would know that to find out the value of LA in the bigger triangle we would have to dialate it’s corresponding side FI in the smaller triangle by the same scale factor:

4 * 2/3

=> [tex]2\frac{2}{3}[/tex] = LA

Hope this helps!

Answer:

You have a total of $11.50

Step-by-step explanation:

We first subtract $19.75 by $8.25 and the result will be $11.50

Answer:

11.50

Step-by-step explanation:

19.75-8.35= 11.50

May I have the brainiest?

Hello!

3a = 7b =>

=> 3 × a = 7 × b =>

=> a/b = 7/3

Good luck! :)

Answer:

A

≈

16.4

Answer:

Yes it is. Graph will go down as it moves from left to right.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

just insert a base of two at on both sides and solve.

The solution of the logarithmic equation ㏒ (x + 5) / ㏒ 2 = 4 will be 11.

The allocation of weights to the important variables that produce the calculation's optimum is referred to as a direct consequence.

The logarithmic equation is given below.

㏒₂(x + 5) = 4

Simplify the equation, then we have

㏒ (x + 5) / ㏒ 2 = 4

㏒ (x + 5) = 4 × ㏒ 2

㏒ (x + 5) = ㏒ 2⁴

Take antilog on both sides, then we have

(x + 5) = 2⁴

(x + 5) = 16

x = 11

The solution of the logarithmic equation ㏒ (x + 5) / ㏒ 2 = 4 will be 11.

More about the solution of the equation link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/545403

#SPJ2

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  7.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Corresponding sides are proportional, so ...

  UV/VW = LM/MN

  x/6 = 15/12

  x = 6(15/12) = 15/2

  x = 7.5

Answer:

Time of flight of first rocket = 60 seconds

Time of flight of second rocket = 40 seconds

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the time of flight of first rocket be t1.

Since the second rocket is launched 20 seconds later, then it means that;

t1 = t2 + 20

Where t2 is the time of flight of the second rocket.

When destruction has occurred, it means that both of the rockets would have covered the same distance.

We know that;

Distance = speed × time

Thus;

2000t1 = 3000t2

We know that t1 = t2 + 20

Thus;

2000(t2 + 20) = 3000t2

2000t2 + 40000 = 3000t2

3000t2 - 2000t2 = 40000

1000t2 = 40000

t2 = 40000/1000

t2 = 40 seconds

Thus;

t1 = 40 + 20

t1 = 60 seconds

Given:

Edge of a cubic box = n inches.

He decided to make the box 1 inch taller and 2 inches longer, while keeping its depth at n inches.

To find:

How many cubic inches greater than the box he originally planned to build?

Solution:

Edge of a cubic box is n inches, so the volume of the original cube is:

[tex]V_1=(edge)^3[/tex]

[tex]V_1=n^3[/tex]

According to the given information,

New width of the box = n+1

New length of the box = n+2

New height of the box = n

So, the volume of the new box is:

[tex]V_2=Length\times width\times h[/tex]

[tex]V_2=(n+2)(n+1)n[/tex]

[tex]V_2=(n^2+2n+n+2)n[/tex]

[tex]V_2=(n^2+3n+2)n[/tex]

[tex]V_2=n^3+3n^2+2n[/tex]

Now, the difference between new volume and original volume is:

[tex]V_2-V_1=n^3+3n^2+2n-n^3[/tex]

[tex]V_2-V_1=3n^2+2n[/tex]

So, the volume of new box is 3n^2+2n cubic inches more than the original box.

Therefore, the correct option is A.

Answer:

D. No angle opposite the sides is given

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

See attachment for triangle

Required

Why the law of sines cannot be used

From the attached image of a triangle, we can see that all sides are given while none of the angles are given.

Since none of the angles are given, then law of sines doesn't apply

Answer:

5000

Step-by-step explanation:

Add the number of adults first: 27+23=50

Then multiply the number of adults by 100 for the fee.

50*100 = 5000

Answer:

within the two days a total of 5000$ where collected in the two days

Solution:

R= 100 per adult

1 adult = 100

27(R)+ 23(R) = 27(100)+ 23(100)

27(100)+23(100) =5000

or add both 27 and 23 and multiple by 100

50•100 = 5000

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  6.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of the rhombus is the length of the long diagonal: 12 cm.

Perhaps you want the length of one side. We recognize the given lengths as the legs of a 5-12-13 right triangle. Since each side is the hypotenuse of a right triangle whose legs are half the diagonals, the side length of the rhombus will be half of 13 cm.

The side lengths of the rhombus are 6.5 cm.

Answer: Hi some data is missing attached below is the missing data

answer:

WMA = 174.53

Step-by-step explanation:

Determine the three-week weighted moving average with weights

( 1/2, 1/3, 1/6 )

Weighted moving average ( WMA ) = 174.53

MSE = ∑ (xi - WMA)^2 / n

        = 9.71

attached below is the detailed solution/table

Solution :

Nominal variable

A nominal variable is defined as a variable which is used to [tex]\text{nam}e \text{ or label or categorize some particular attributes }[/tex]  which are being measured.

An ordinal variable is the one in which the order matters, but the difference between any two orders does not matter.

In interval ratio variable is defined as the variable where the difference between any two values is meaningful.

The level of measurement  for each of the following are :

1) Variables that are categorized in categories so that it is ordinal data.

2) Data scaled with the two categories her or his,  so it is a nominal data.

3) Number of votes categorized in the intervals so it is Interval type data.

4) nominal data.

Answer: 12

Step-by-step explanation:

The first step to dividing fractions is to find the reciprocal (reverse the numerator and denominator) of the second fraction. Next, multiply the two numerators. Then, multiply the two denominators. Finally, simplify the fractions if needed.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  1,222,200

Step-by-step explanation:

A search using a computer program found ...

  5432 × 225 = 1,222,200

__

1000 mod 225 = 100

4 × 225 = 900

This suggests that if we have some number of thousands whose digits total 9, that we will have the number of interest. Of course, we can add 200 to some number of thousands with a digit total of 7. The smallest such digit total will be had with the number 1222 using the specified digits {0, 1, 2}. This gives rise to the result above: 1222×1000 +200 = 1,222,200. It also explains why moving the 1 to the right will also give a multiple of 225.

Answer:

O 4x+2y=8.

Hope this helps you

Answer:

No, it is not possible.

Step-by-step explanation:

AB // CD and BC is transversal.

∠ABC = ∠BCD   ---> Alternate interior angles are equal.

Here, it is different which is not possible.