Answer:
$8050
Explanation:
The direct materials quantity variance is the difference between the standard cost and the actual quantity at standard price. This variance in quantity is as a result of the difference between the actual and expected quantity of materials used. The formula for direct materials quantity variance is given as:
Direct materials quantity variance = Standard Price x (Standard Quantity – Actual Quantity)
Given that: Standard Price = $0.23, Standard Quantity = 535000, Actual Quantity = 500000.
Direct materials quantity variance = $0.23 × (535000 - 500000) = $8050
Frederick Company has two service departments (Cafeteria Services & Maintenance). Frederick has two production departments (Assembly Department & Packaging Department.) Frederick uses a step allocation method where Cafeteria Services is allocated to all departments and Maintenance Services is allocated to the production departments. All allocations are based on total employees. Cafeteria Services has costs of $255,000 and Maintenance has costs of $175,000 before any allocations. What amount of Maintenance total cost is allocated to the Packaging Department? (round to closest whole dollar) Employees are: Cafeteria Services 4 Maintenance 5 Assembly Department 10 Packaging Department 10
Answer:
The Total allocation of maintenance cost of packaging department is $87,500
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
The Total Maintenance cost is $175,000 before allocation.
Total employees of in Production Department is= 10 Assembly + 10 Packaging= 20
Hence, Total maintenance cost per employee = $175,000 / 20
Total maintenance cost per employee =$8,750
Therefore, the Total allocation of maintenance cost of packaging department= Total maintenance cost per employee× Employees Packaging Department
Total allocation of maintenance cost of packaging department=$ 8,750 X 10 employees= $87,500
In conducting the audit procedures for the search for unrecorded liabilities, the materiality/scope for this area was accessed by the auditors at $5,000. Adjustments are only recorded for individual items equal to or exceeding materiality. The company fiscal year end is December 31, 2019 and the last day of fieldwork is estimated to be February 1, 2020. Below is an item from the check/cash disbursement register, which is not recorded in the accounts payable subsidiary ledger at December 31, 2019. Daniel Breen, Esquire Check Number 1334 Check Date 1/6/2020 Amount $6,000 Nature of the Expenses: Corporate legal services for December 2019 Required: Determine if this check/cash disbursement is recorded in the proper accounting period. This transaction requires an accounting adjustment to the financial statements for the fiscal year ending 12/31/2019 - If you believe that statement is correct - answer "Yes" This transaction does NOT require an accounting adjustment to the financial statements for the fiscal year ending 12/31/2019 - If you believe that statement is correct - answer "No."
Answer:
"No."
This transaction does NOT require an accounting adjustment to the financial statements for the fiscal year ending 12/31/2019 - If you believe that statement is correct - answer "No."
Explanation:
The check disbursement does not require an adjustment to the financial statements for the fiscal year ending 12/31/2019, because the check is dated 1/6/2020.
Adjusting entries are changes to the journal entries which tries to match transactions to their correct accounting periods. A check dated January 6, 2020 does not belong to the fiscal year ending December, 2019.
Adjusting entries are usually for Accrued Revenue, Accrued Expenses, Deferred Revenue, Prepaid Expenses, and Depreciation Expenses.
Stone Company changed its method of pricing inventories from FIFO to LIFO. What type of accounting change does this represent? A change in accounting estimate for which the financial statements for prior periods included for comparative purposes should be restated. A change in accounting principle for which the financial statements for prior periods included for comparative purposes should be presented as previously reported. A change in accounting estimate for which the financial statements for prior periods included for comparative purposes should be presented as previously reported. A change in accounting principle for which the financial statements for prior periods included for comparative purposes should be restated.
Answer:
A change in accounting principle for which the financial statements for prior periods included for comparative purposes should be presented as previously reported.
Explanation:
Since the accounting method is being changed from FIFO to LIFO, any adjusting of prior year balances would be impractical. If the change is from LIFO to FIFO, then it makes more sense to adjust prior year balances. By impractical, it means that any changes would be too difficult and expensive to determine, and the value of the change is insignificant (materiality principle).
Generally US GAAP rules require that changes from FIFO to LIFO be disclosed in the footnotes only.
A bakery buys sugar from a big distributor to use in baking cakes. Typically, they use 3663 bags of sugar in a year. The price of sugar is typically $14 per bag. The cost to the bakery for placing an order is $26, and the annual carrying cost is $17 per bag. The distributor has offered the bakery the following volume discount schedule: Order Size Discount rate on the original price 1--449 0 percent 450--799 5 percent more than 800 10 percent We are trying to find how many bags of sugar should the store order, whenever they place a new order of sugar.Assume 364 days a year and 52 weeks a year. IMPORTANT: Note, the discounts off of original price are reported. You need to calculate the actual prices. Keep two decimal places in your calculations.If we ignore the discounts, how many bags of sugar should we order
Maritime Sail Makers manufactures sails for sailboats. The company has the capacity to produce 37 comma 000 sails per year and is currently producing and selling 25 comma 000 sails per year. The following information relates to current production: Sales price per unit $ 185 Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing $ 60 Selling and administrative $ 20 Total fixed costs: Manufacturing $ 700 comma 000 Selling and administrative $ 250 comma 000 If a special pricing order is accepted for 5 comma 700 sails at a sales price of $ 160 per unit, fixed costs remain unchanged, and there are no variable selling and administrative costs for this order, what is the change in operating income?
Answer:
Increase in operating income = $456,000
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
Operating Income Statement
Particular Existing New order Total
Current selling 25,000 5,700 30,700
Selling price per unit $185 $160
Manufacturing variable cost per unit $60 $60
Selling and administrative variable cost per unit $20 $20
Contribution margin per unit(CMPU)= $105 $80
(sale price - variable cost)
Contribution margin $2,625,000 $456,000 $3,081,000
(sale units × CMPU)
Manufacturing fixed cost $700,000 $700,000
Selling and administrative fixed cost $250,000 $250,000
Net operating income $1,675,000 $2,131,000
So, Difference in net income are as follows:
Increase in operating income = $2,131,000 - $1,675,000
= $456,000
A large bakery makes cakes for freezing and subsequent sale. The bakery can produce cakes at the rate of 484 cakes per day. The bakery sets up the cake-production operation and produces until a predetermined number (Q) have been produced. When not producing cakes, the bakery uses its personnel and facilities for producing other bakery items. The setup cost for a production run of cakes is $100. The cost of holding frozen cakes in storage is $9 per cake per year. The annual demand for frozen cakes, which is constant over time, is 54600 cakes. Assume 364 days a year and 52 weeks a year. What is the "daily" demand rate
Answer:
150
Explanation:
The computation of the daily demand rate is shown below:
Daily demand rate = Annual demand for frozen cakes ÷ total number of days in a year
= 54,600 cakes ÷ 364 days
= 150
By dividing the annual demand from the total number of days in a year we can get the daily demand rate and the same is shown above
Riegel Company uses the LCNRV method, on an individual-item basis, in pricing its inventory items. The inventory at December 31, 2014, consists of products D, E, F, G, H, and I. Relevant per unit data for these products appear below.
Item D Item E Item F Item G Item H Item I
Estimated selling price $120 $110 $95 $90 $110 $90
Cost 75 80 80 80 50 36
Cost to complete 30 30 25 35 30 30
Selling costs 10 18 10 20 10 20
Using the LCNRV rule, determine the proper unit value for statement of financial position reporting purposes at December 31, 2014, for each of the inventory items above.
Answer:
The answer is 75 that is what i put and got it correct
Alpine Thrills Ski Company recently expanded its manufacturing capacity. The firm will now be able to produce up to 32,000 pairs of cross-country skis of either the mountaineering model or the touring model. The sales department assures management that it can sell between 26,000 and 30,000 units of either product this year. Because the models are very similar, the company will produce only one of the two models.
The following information was compiled by the accounting department.
Model
Mountaineering Touring
Selling price per unit $ 149.00 $ 137.00
Variable costs per unit 87.70 87.70
Fixed costs will total $622,400 if the mountaineering model is produced but will be only $526,200 if the touring model is produced. Alpine Thrills Ski Company is subject to a 50 percent income tax rate.
Required:
Compute the contribution-margin ratio for the touring model. (Round your final answer to 2 decimal places.)
If Alpine Thrills Ski Company desires an after-tax net income of $41,620, how many pairs of touring skis will the company have to sell? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answer to the nearest whole unit.)
How much would the variable cost per unit of the touring model have to change before it had the same break-even point in units as the mountaineering model? (Round your intermediate calculations and final answer to 2 decimal places.)
Suppose the variable cost per unit of touring skis decreases by 15 percent, and the total fixed cost of touring skis increases by 15 percent. Compute the new break-even point. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answer up to nearest whole unit.)
Answer:
35.98%
12,362 pairs
$2.53
9,688 pairs
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
1)
As we know that
Contribution margin ratio = (Contribution margin per unit) ÷ (Selling price per unit) × 100
where,
Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - variable cost per unit\
So,
Selling price = $137.00
Variable cost = $87.70
Contribution Margin = $137.00 - $87.70 = $49.30
Contribution margin ratio = $49.30 ÷ $137.00
= 35.98%
2)
Net Income after tax = $41,620
Income Before tax = $41,620 ÷ 50%
= $83,240
Now Pairs of touring skis will be sold by company = (Income before tax + fixed cost) ÷ Contribution Margin
= ($83,240 + $526,200) ÷ $49.30
= 12,362 pairs
3)
Break-even of mountaineering model
= Fixed cost ÷ (Selling price per unit - variable cost per unit)
= $622,400 ÷ ($149 - $87.70)
= $10,153
Now Let Variable cost be Y
$10,153 = $526,200 ÷ ($137 - Y)
Y = $85.17
Therefore, Variable cost per unit decreased by
= ($87.70 - $85.17)
= $2.53
4)
New Fixed cost
= Fixed cost × increased percentage
= $526,200 × 1.15
= $605,130
New variable cost per unit
= $87.70 × 0.85
= $74.54
New Break-even point = New Fixed cost ÷ Contribution Margin
= $605,130 ÷ ($137-$74.54)
= 9,688 pairs
Suppose the interest rate is 4.3 %. a. Having $ 400 today is equivalent to having what amount in one year? b. Having $ 400 in one year is equivalent to having what amount today? c. Which would you prefer, $ 400 today or $ 400 in one year? Does your answer depend on when you need the money? Why or why not? a. Having $ 400 today is equivalent to having what amount in one year?
Answer: a. $417.2. b. $383.51. c. $400 today.
Explanation:
a. Present value = $400
Interest rate = 4.3%
Future value= PV(1+r)^n
= 400(1+0.043)^1
= 400(1.043)
= $417.2
b. FV = $400
PV = Unknown
Interest = 4.3%
Future value= PV(1+r)^n
400 = PV(1+0.043)^1
400 = PV(1.043)
PV = 400/1.043
PV = $383.51
c. I'll prefer $400 today.
My answer does not depend on me needing money presently, I can actually invest the $400 today and get more value when it's a year. I'll have made more than $400.
A company sells goods to a customer who will pay the full amount in 30 days.How should the company record the sale
Answer:
Credit sales
Debit receivables
Explanation:
This is a sales on account transaction which affect the sales and receivables account.
When this transaction occurs , the company has definitely made a sale which will lead to an inflow of cash in 30 days time, even though the income is recognized immediately according to the accrual method of accounting
To record this , the sales account is credited with the value of the goods sold and the account receivable is debited for with the same amount.
The receivable is a record of payment being owed to the company by its customers.
Elgin Battery Manufacturers had sales of $1,000,000 in 2009 and their cost of goods sold represented 70 percent of sales. Selling and administrative expenses were 10 percent of sales. Depreciation expense was $100,000 and interest expense for the year was $10,000. The firm's tax rate is 30 percent. What is the dollar amount of taxes paid
Answer:
$27,000
Explanation:
The dollar amount of taxes paid is the earnings before tax multiplied by the tax rate.
The earnings before tax=sales-costs of sale-selling and administrative expenses-depreciation expense-interest expense
sales is $1,000,000
costs of sales=$1000,000*70%=$700,000
selling and administrative expenses=10%*$1,000,000=$100,000
depreciation expense=$100,000
interest expense=$10,000
earnings before tax=$1,000,000-$700,000-$100,000-$100,000-$10,000=$90,000
taxes paid=$90000 *30%=$27,000
On January 1, 2021, Legion Company sold $250,000 of 6% ten-year bonds. Interest is payable semiannually on June 30 and December 31. The bonds were sold for $163,976, priced to yield 12%. Legion records interest at the effective rate. Legion should report bond interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021, in the amount of: (Round your answer to the nearest dollar amount.)
Answer:
The bond interest expense to be shown in profit or loss as t 30 June 2021
$9,838.56
Explanation:
The bond interest expense is the actual finance cost of using the funds made available by bondholders while the coupon payment is the portion of the finance cost paid to them periodically.
Interest expense=bonds cash proceeds*yield to maturity*6/12
bonds cash proceeds is $163,976
yield to maturity is 12%
interest expense=$163,976*12%*6/12=$9,838.56
Answer:
$9,838.56
Explanation:
Interest Expense using effective interest rate method can determined by multiplying the carrying value of the bond and yield rate of the bond because the bonds issued on the discount has different interest expense than the interest payment made to bond holder.
As the interest is paid semiannually the interest expense will be calculated for only 6 months.
Interest expense=Cash proceeds on issuance of bond x YTM x 6/12
As per given data
Cash proceeds are $163,976
YTM is 12%
Interest expense=$163,976 x 12% x 6/12=$9,838.56
Which one of the following is not true when the economy is in macroeconomic equilibrium? A. When the economy is at long-run equilibrium, actual GDPequalspotential GDP. B. When the economy is at long-run equilibrium, firms will have excess capacity. C. When the economy is at long-run equilibrium, total unemploymentequalsfrictional unemploymentplusstructural unemployment. D. When the economy is at long-run equilibrium, SRASequalsADequalsLRAS.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
Throughout the macroeconomic equilibrium, the aggregate supply curve becomes equivalent to something like the supply curve, the real GDP seems to be comparable to potential Output (GDP), however, if frictional as well as systemic unemployment seems to be the maximum total poverty throughout the longer term.Consequently, whenever the economy seems to be in macroeconomic equilibrium, the argument which is not accurate would be that the businesses would have excess power.So that Option C is the right answer.
Exercise 4-20 (Algo) Statement of cash flows; indirect method [LO4-8] Presented below is the 2021 income statement and comparative balance sheet information for Tiger Enterprises. TIGER ENTERPRISES Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 ($ in thousands) Sales revenue $ 15,500 Operating expenses: Cost of goods sold $ 5,100 Depreciation expense 410 Insurance expense 950 General and administrative expense 3,500 Total operating expenses 9,960 Income before income taxes 5,540 Income tax expense (2,216 ) Net income $ 3,324 Balance Sheet Information ($ in thousands) Dec. 31,2021 Dec. 31, 2020 Assets: Cash $ 640 $ 370 Accounts receivable 835 1,000 Inventory 825 770 Prepaid insurance 140 40 Equipment 3,300 2,650 Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,180 ) (770 ) Total assets $ 4,560 $ 4,060 Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity: Accounts payable $ 385 $ 530 Accrued liabilities (for general & administrative expense) 385 570 Income taxes payable 365 320 Notes payable (due 12/31/2022) 1,100 800 Common stock 1,120 970 Retained earnings 1,205 870 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 4,560 $ 4,060 Required: Prepare Tiger’s statement of cash flows, using the indirect method to present cash flows from operating activities. (Hint: You will have to calculate dividend payments). (Enter your answers in thousands. Amounts to be deducted should be indicated with a minus sign.)
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of the cash flow statement is presented below:
TIGER ENTERPRISES
Cash flow statement
Cash flow from operating activities
Net income $3,324
Adjustment made
Add: Depreciation expenses $410
Add: Decrease in account receivable $165 ($835 - $1,000)
Less: Increase in inventory -$55($825 - $770)
Less: Increase in prepaid insurance -$100 ($140 - $40)
Less: Decrease in account payable -$145 ($385 - $530)
Less: Decrease in accrued liabilities -$185 ($385 - $570)
Add: Increase in income taxes payable $45 ($365 - $320)
Net cash provided by operating activities $3,459
Cash flow from investing activities
Purchase of equipment -$650 ($3,300 - $2,650)
Net cash used by investing activities -$650
Cash flow from financing activities
Issuance of the note payable $300 ($1,100 - $800)
Issuance of the common stock $150 ($1,120 - $970)
Dividend paid -$2,989 ($870 + $3,324 - $1,205)
Net cash used by financing activities -$2,539
Increase in cash $270
Add: Beginning cash balance $370
Ending cash balance $670
The items which shown in a positive sign reflects the cash inflow and the items which shown in a negative sign reflects the cash outflow ,
Smart Stream Inc. uses the total cost method of applying the cost-plus approach to product pricing. The costs of producing and selling 10,000 units of cell phones are as follows: Variable costs per unit: Fixed costs: Direct materials $150 Factory overhead $350,000 Direct labor 25 Selling and administrative expenses 140,000 Factory overhead 40 Selling and administrative expenses 25 Total variable cost per unit $240 Smart Stream desires a profit equal to a 30% return on invested assets of $1,200,000. a. Determine the total costs and the total cost amount per unit for the production and sale of 10,000 cellular phones.
Answer:
Smart Stream Inc.
a) Total costs:
Variable costs:
Direct materials = $1,500,000 ($150 x 10,000)
Direct labor = $250,000 ($25 x 10,000)
Factory overhead = $400,000 ($40 x 10,000)
Selling and Administrative = $250,000( $25 x 10,000)
Total variable costs = $2,400,000 ($240 x 10,000)
Fixed Costs:
Factory overhead = $350,000
Selling and admin = $140,000
Total fixed costs = $490,000
I) Total costs = variable plus fixed costs = $2,890,000 ($2,400,000 + 490,000)
II) Total cost per unit = $289 ($2,890,000/10,000)
Explanation:
The total cost method includes all the costs in arriving at the unit cost before adding the desired profit to arrive at the selling price of a product.
Total costs include the cost of goods sold and the expenses incurred in running the business for the period.
It is unlike the product cost-plus and variable cost-plus approaches to product pricing. For the product cost-plus approach, only the costs of production is taken into consideration for arriving at the selling price. In that case, the costs of direct materials and labor, and factory overheads would be considered, while variable and fixed selling and administrative costs are excluded. The unit cost would have been $250.
The variable cost-plus approach considers only the variable elements of costs to arrive at the selling price. These include the direct materials and labor costs, and variable element of the factory overhead and selling and administrative expenses. The unit cost would have been $240 as stated in the question.
These different cost-plus pricing approaches are more suitable for some industries than others. No matter the choice made, it must be noted that they result in different selling prices and can affect the competitiveness of a company.
A bidding firm, A, is worth $27,000 as a stand-alone entity. A target firm, B, is worth $12,000 as a stand-alone entity, but $18,000 if it is acquired and integrated with Firm A. Several other firms are interested in acquiring Firm B, and Firm B is also worth $18,000 if it is acquired by these other firms. If A acquired B, would this acquisition create value? If yes, how much? How much of this value would the equity holders of A receive? How much would the equity holders of B receive?
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
Firm A’s worth as a stand-alone entity = $27,000
Firm B’s worth as a stand-alone entity = $12,000
But if Firm A acquired Firm B it’s increase worth of Firm B at $18000.
Firm A is acquired Firm B, this acquisition create value of
= $18,000 - $12000
= $6000.
With this acquisition equity holders of Firms received $18,000 which is $6,000 more than Firm B stand alone.
Check all true statements regarding CMBS:
a.CMBS have less exposure to prepayment risk than RMBS
b.Loans in a CMBS deal are recourse loans The multifamily/apartment CRE sector never uses CMBS for financing as it relies on RMBS
c.CMBS are the main source of financing for commercial real estate loans
d.The number of commercial mortgages in a CMBS deal are usually lower than the number of residential mortgage in a RMBS deal
Answer: A and D only
Explanation:
CMBS Loan are also referred to as a Conduit Loan, this is a type of real estate loan usually commercial, which is secured by a first-position mortgage on a commercial property. These loans are usually packaged, and sold by a Conduit Lender, commercial banks, investment banks, and syndicates of banks.
Loans in a CMBS are always bigger so they are less in a CMBS deal. Sometimes it’s onlyone loan in a Single Asset (SA) CMBS deal
Prepayments are discouraged in CMBS through defeasance,prepayment penalties or yield maintenance fees.
Answer:
a.CMBS have less exposure to prepayment risk than RMBS
d. The number of commercial mortgages in a CMBS deal are usually lower than the number of residential mortgage in a RMBS deal
Explanation:
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) as the name implies are mortgage backed securities that are secured with commercial mortgages while Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) are mortgage backed securities secured by residential property.
a) CMBS are based on mortgages which usually have a fixed term contract in place meaning that prepayment is less of a thing with CMBS than with RMBS so the former does indeed have a less exposure to prepayment risk than the latter.
d) This is indeed true because both packages have to look appealing to investors but can only use different amounts to reach the minimum threshold. This is because Commercial Mortgages pay more than Residential Mortgages so more RMBS have to be pulled together to form an attractive investment as opposed to CMBS. This is why the number in CMBS are usually less than that of RMBS.
The reported net incomes for the first 2 years of Sandra Gustafson Products, Inc., were as follows: 2014, $147,000; 2015, $185,000. Early in 2016, the following errors were discovered.
1. Depreciation of equipment for 2014 was overstated $17,000.
2. Depreciation of equipment for 2015 was understated $38,500.
3. December 31, 2014, inventory was understated $50,000.
4. December 31, 2015, inventory was overstated $16,200.
Prepare the correcting entry necessary when these errors are discovered. Assume that the books are closed. (Ignore income tax considerations.)
Answer:
Debit 2016 Beginning retained earning for $37,700;
Credit Accumulated depreciation for $21,500, and
Credit Inventory for $16,200.
Explanation:
The entries will affect the 2016 beginning Retained earning except for the December 31, 2014 inventory which was understated by $50,000 which was a self correcting error at the end of 2015.
Accumulated depreciation = Understatement of 2015 depreciation - Overstatement of 2014 depreciation = $38,500 - 17,000 = $21,500
The entries will affect the 2016 beginning retained earning as follows:
Details Dr ($) Cr ($)
Beginning retained earning 37,700
Accumulated depreciation 21,500
Inventory - 2015 Overstatement 16,200
To correct the error discovered in the accounts. .
An analysis and aging of the accounts receivable of Raja Company at December 31 reveal these data: Accounts receivable: $800,000 Allowance for doubtful accounts per books before adjustment (credit): $50,000 Amounts expected to become uncollectible : $65,000 What is the cash realizable value of the accounts receivable at December 31, after adjustment? Select one: a. $685,000. b. $750,000. c. $800,000. d. $735,000.
Answer:
The correct option is D,$735,000
Explanation:
The cash realizable value of accounts receivable for the year is the accounts receivable of $800,000 less the amount expected to become uncollectible in the current year which $65,000.
The realizable value of accounts receivable =$800,000-$65,000=$735,000
The allowance for doubtful accounts before adjustment was already dealt with in previous year,I mean the difference between last year allowance and this year was accounted for by posting $15,000 into allowance account thereby leading a closing balance of $65,000.
On January 1, 20X6, Nichols Corporation issued 10-year bonds at par to unrelated parties. The bonds have a 10% stated rate, face value of $300,000, and pay interest every June 30 and December 31. On December 31, 20X9, Harn Corporation purchased all of Nichols' bonds in the open market at a $6,000 discount. Harn is Nichols' 80 percent owned subsidiary. Harn uses the effective interest method of amortization. The consolidated income statement for the year 20X9 should report with respect to the bonds:
I. interest expense of $30,000.
II. a gain of $6,000
a. I and II
b. II but not I
c. Either I or II
d. Neither I nor II
Answer:
a. I and II
Explanation:
As there is an interest expense of $30,000 i.e come from
= $300,000 ×10%
= $30,000
This would be reflected on the consolidated income statement for the year 20X6. And the extraordinary gain which generally disclosed to the financial statement notes
Therefore in the given situation it is being considered as only a gain, not as an extraordinary gain
Hence, both the amounts i.e interest expense and the gain will be reported in consolidated income statement for the year 20X6
As of December 31, 2019, Sheridan Company had $3500 of raw materials inventory. At the beginning of 2019, there was $3000 of materials on hand. During the year, the company purchased $315000 of materials; however, it paid for only $252500. How much inventory was requisitioned for use on jobs during 2019
Answer: $314,500
Explanation:
When calculating how much of a material of any sort was used, the following formula should be used,
= Beginning inventory + Purchases - Ending inventory
This is the same formula largely used to calculate Cost of Goods sold.
Here, the figure to be concerned about is the actual materials used not the ones paid for.
Plugging in figures into the formula then,
= 3,000 + 315,000 - 3,500
= $314,500
Thus $314,500 was the inventory requisitioned for use on jobs during 2019.
Lakeside Components wishes to purchase parts in one month for sale in the next. On June 1, the company has 15,000 parts in stock, although sales for June are estimated to total 13,600 parts. Total sales of parts are expected to be 10,500 in July and 12,700 in August. Parts are purchased at a wholesale price of $30. The supplier has a financing arrangement by which Lakeside Components pays 60 percent of the purchase price in the month when the parts are delivered and 40 percent in the following month. Lakeside purchased 14,000 parts in May. Required: a. Estimate purchases (in units) for June and July. b. Estimate the cash required to make purchases in June and July.
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Beginning inventory (parts)= 15,000 parts
Sales June= 13,600
Sales July= 10,500
Sales August= 12,700
Parts are purchased at a wholesale price of $30.
Purchasing arrangement:
60 percent on the month of the purchase.
40 percent in the following month.
Lakeside purchased 14,000 parts in May.
A) To calculate the purchase for June and July, we need to use the following formula:
Purchases= sales + desired ending inventory - beginning inventory
June= 13,600 - 15,000= -1,400
July= 10,500 - 1,400= 9,100
B) Cash Required:
Purchase from the month
Purchase from the month before
June:
Purchase from the month= 0
Purchase from the month before= (14,000*30)*0.4= 168,000
July:
Purchase from the month= (9,100*30)*0.6= 163,800
Purchase from the month before= 0
Journalize the following transactions assuming the perpetual inventory system:
July 3 Sold merchandise on account for $3,750 terms.
The cost of the goods sold was $2,000. July 5 Issued credit memo for $1,050 for merchandise returned from sale on July 3. The cost of the merchandise returned was $610. July 12 Received check for the amount due for sale on July 3 less return on July 5. July 17 Sold merchandise for $7,000 plus 6% sales tax to cash customers. The cost of the goods sold was $3,830.
Answer:
General Journal
Perpetual Inventory system
Date Particulars Debit Credit
July 3 Account Receivable $3,750
Sales $3,750
Sold merchandise on account for $3,750 terms.
Cost of Goods Sold $ 2000
Merchandise Inventory $2000
The cost of the goods sold was $2,000.
July 5 Sales Returns $1,050
Account Receivable $1,050
Issued credit memo for $1,050 for merchandise returned from sale on July 3.
Merchandise Inventory $610
Cost of Goods Sold $ 610
The cost of the merchandise returned was $610.
July 12 Bank (cash) $2700
Account Receivable $2700
Received check for the amount due for sale on July 3 less return on July 5. ($3,750- $1,050 )=$2700
July 17 Cash $ 7420
Sales $ 7420
Sold merchandise for $7,000 plus 6% sales tax to cash customers. As sales tax is added to the sales a combined entry is made . ( 6%* 7000= $ 420)
Cost of Goods Sold $ 3830
Merchandise Inventory $3830
The cost of the goods sold was $3,830.
Answer:
Please see the Journal entries below.
Explanation:
July 3
Debit: Accounts Receivables $3,750
Debit: Cost of Goods Sold $2,000
Credit: Sales Revenue $3,750
Credit: Inventory $2,000
To record sales on Account.
July 5:
Debit: Sales Revenue $1,050
Debit: Inventory $610
Credit: Cost of Goods Sold $610
Credit: Accounts Receivables $1,050
To record credit memo.
July 12
Debit: Cash ($3,750 - $1,050) $2,700
Credit: Accounts Receivables $2,700
To record payment of sales.
July 17
Debit: Accounts Receivables $7,420
Debit: Cost of Goods Sold $3,830
Credit: Sales Revenue $7,000
Credit: Sales Tax Payable $420
Credit: Inventory $3,830
To record sales and cost of goods sold.
The classical dichotomy and the neutrality of money
The classical dichotomy is the separation of real and nominal variables. The following questions test your understanding of this distinction.
Maria spends all of her money on paperback novels and beignets. In 2011 she earned $27.00 per hour, the price of a paperback novel was $9.00, and the price of a beignet was $3.00.
Which of the following give the nominal value of a variable?
1-The price of a beignet is $3.00 in 2011.
2-Maria's wage is $27.00 per hour in 2011.
3-The price of a beignet is 0.33 paperback novels in 2011.
Which of the following give the real value of a variable?
1-The price of a paperback novel is 3 beignets in 2011.
2-Maria's wage is 9 beignets per hour in 2011.
3-The price of a paperback novel is $9.00 in 2011.
Suppose that the Fed sharply increases the money supply between 2011 and 2016. In 2016, Maria's wage has risen to $54.00 per hour. The price of a paperback novel is $18.00 and the price of a beignet is $6.00.
In 2016, the relative price of a paperback novel is _________
Between 2011 and 2016, the nominal value of Maria's wage (increases/decreases/remains the same) and the real value of her wage ____________
Monetary neutrality is the proposition that a change in the money supply ________ nominal variables and ______ real variables.
Answer:
1. Relative price = $3
2. Increases
3. affects , not affect
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
1) The relative price of a paperback novel in 2016 = Maria,s wage ÷ Price of a paperback novel
= $54÷$18
= $3
2) Between 2011 and 2016, the nominal value increases and the real value of Maria's wage remains the same.
3)Monetary neutrality is proposition that the change in the money supply affects the nominal variables but it does not affect the real variables.
Bottum Corporation, a manufacturing Corporation, has provided data concerning its operations for May. The beginning balance in the raw materials account was $23,500 and the ending balance was $43,000. Raw materials purchases during the month totaled $70,000. Manufacturing overhead cost incurred during the month was $114,500, of which $2,700 consisted of raw materials classified as indirect materials. The direct materials cost for May was:
Answer:
Direct Materials Used In May $ 50,500
Explanation:
Bottum Corporation
We add the beginning inventory with the purchases and subtract the ending inventory to get the direct materials used.
Beginning balance Raw materials $23,500
Add Raw materials purchases $70,000
Less Ending balance Raw materials $43,000
Direct Materials Used In May $ 50,500
The cost of the purchases remains the same that is $ 70,000 but the direct materials used during May are $ 50,500
Answer:
$47,800
Explanation:
Direct materials cost= beginning raw material inventory + raw material purchases - ending raw materials
$23,500 + $70,000- $43,000 - 2700 = $47,800
How long do foodbourne illnesses last
Answer:
5-7 days
Explanation:
Immune-comprised individuals may experience a more serious illness. Severe diarrhea (often bloody diarrhea), abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Usually little or no fever. Can begin 2 to 8 days, but usually 3-4 days after consumption of contaminated food or water and last about 5 to 7 days depending on severity.
Answer:
about a week
Explanation:
Can begin 2 to 8 days, but usually 3-4 days after consumption of contaminated food or water and last about 5 to 7 days depending on severity.
Accompanying a bank statement for Borden Company is a credit memo for $21,200 representing the principal ($20,000) and interest ($1,200) on a note that had been collected by the bank. The company had been notified by the bank at the time of the collection but had made no entries. Journalize the entry that should be made by the company to bring the accounting records up to date. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. Cash Notes Receivable Interest Revenue
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
The above transaction refers to a Note being collected by a bank on behalf of the company. This means that the company's cash balance has therefore increased leading to a journal entry of,
DR Cash $21,200
CR Note Receivables $20,000
CR Interest Revenue $1,200
(To record Note Received by Bank).
Oklahoma enacts a law requiring all businesses in the state to donate 10 percent of their profits to Protestant churches that provide services to indigent persons. Price-Lo Mart files a law suit to block the enforcement of the law. The court will probably decide that this law violates: a. the Free Exercise clause. b. the Supremacy clause. c. the Equal Protection clause. d. the Establishment clause.
Answer: d. the Establishment clause.
Explanation:
The Establishment Clause was put in place as a limitation by the United States Congress to prevent excesses or stop it from passing legislation forcing an establishment, religion, which broadly made it illegal for the government to promote theocracy or promote a specific religion with taxes. As this is the case with the state asking business to donate 10% of their profit to Protestant.
Answer:
The establishment clause.
Explanation:
Establishment clause, also called establishment-of-religion clause, clause in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbidding Congress from establishing a state religion. It prevents the passage of any law that gives preference to or forces belief in any one religion. It is paired with a clause that prohibits limiting the free expression of religion.
As the citizenry became more diverse, however, challenges arose to existing laws and practices, and eventually, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine the meaning of the establishment clause.
Though not explicitly stated in the First Amendment, the clause is often interpreted to mean that the Constitution requires the separation of church and state.
During the month of June, Whispering Boutique recorded cash sales of $302,810 and credit sales of $130,219, both of which include the 7% sales tax that must be remitted to the state by July 15. Prepare the adjusting entry that should be recorded to fairly present the June 30 financial statements.
Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
1. Sales revenue Dr, $28,656 ($121,700 + $287,673) × 7%
To Sales tax payable $28,656
(Being sales tax payable is recorded)
Here we debited the sales revenue as it decreased the revenue while we credited the sales tax payable as it increased the liabilities so that the proper posting could be done
Working note
Credit sales = $130,219 × 100 ÷ 107
= $121,700
Cash sales = $302,810 × 100 ÷ 107
= $287,673
A division is considering the acquisition of a new asset that will cost $2,950,000 and have a cash flow of $740,000 per year for each of the four years of its life. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis with no salvage value. Ignore taxes. Required: a. & b. What is the ROI for each year of the asset's life if the division uses beginning-of-year asset balances and net book value for the computation? What is the residual income each year if the cost of capital is 8 percent?
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of ROI for each year of the asset's life and residual income each year is shown below:-
Year Investment base ROI Residual income
1 $2,950,000 8% -$233,500
2 $2,212,500 11% -$233,500
3 $1,475,000 17% -$115,500
4 $737,500 34% -$56,500
ROI = Net income ÷ Total investment × 100
Net Income = Cash flow - Depreciation
Residual income = Net income - (Investment × Cost of capital)
Depreciation = Investment base ÷ 4 years
The return on investment and the residual income can be find out by using the excel spreadsheet. Kindly find it in the attachment
