the admission fee for a charity event is $7 for children and 10$ for adults. The event was attended by 700 people, and the total amount collected in admissions was $6,400.

Answer:

y = 14

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{15}{21} = \frac{5}{7} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{10}{x} = \frac{5}{7} [/tex]

[tex]x = 14[/tex]

Now,

10/15 = y/21

15y = 10*21

y = 210/15

y = 14

This is a Right answer...

I hope you understand..

Mark me as brainliest...

Answer: Interior angle: 150 degrees Exterior angle: 30 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

We use the angle formula to find the value of an interior angle: 180*(12-2)/12 = 150 degrees. Since an exterior angle is the supplement of an interior angle, the measure of an exterior angle is 180 - 150 = 30 degrees

Answer:

[tex]241^{257}\ mod\ 12 =1[/tex]

[tex]7 * 20 = 140[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{700}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Solving (a): 241^257 mod 12

To do this, we simply calculate [tex]241\ mod\ 12[/tex]

Because [tex]a\ mod\ b = a^n\ mod\ b[/tex]

The highest number less than or equal to 241 that is divisible by 12 is 240; So:

[tex]241\ mod\ 12 = 241- 240[/tex]

[tex]241\ mod\ 12 =1[/tex]

Hence:

[tex]241^{257}\ mod\ 12 =1[/tex]

Solving (b): 7 * 20

[tex]7 * 20 = 140[/tex]

Solving (c): Multiplicative inverse of 7 in 719

The position of 7 in 719 is 700

So, the required inverse is 1/700 ---- i.e. we simply divide 1 by the number

Answer:

14 to 132

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that there are 132 boys and 14 adults. Since the question is only asking for the ratio of adults to boys, we don't have to worry about the number of girls in this question. From here, we see that the question is asking for the ratio of adults to boys, so we put it in that exact order. Our answer is 14 to 132. I hope this helps and please don't hesitate to reach out with more questions!

Answer:

[tex]\text{Perimeter: }48\:\mathrm{m},\\\text{Area: }84\:\mathrm{m^2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a triangle with side lengths [tex]a[/tex], [tex]b[/tex], and [tex]c[/tex] is given by:

[tex]A=\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}[/tex], where [tex]s=\frac{a+b+c}{2}[/tex]

Substituting [tex]a=21, b=17, c=10[/tex], we have:

[tex]A=\sqrt{24(24-21)(24-17)(24-10)},\\A=\sqrt{24(3)(7)(14)},\\A=\sqrt{7,084},\\A=\boxed{84\:\mathrm{m^2}}[/tex]

The perimeter of a polygon is given by the sum of its sides. Since the triangle has sides 10, 17, and 21, its perimeter is [tex]10+17+21=\boxed{48\:\mathrm{m}}[/tex].

Answer:

Angle formed by the sector measuring x% will be 126°.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since, sum of all sectors formed in a circle is 100%.

By adding the measures of all the sectors,

x + x + 21 + 9 = 100

2x + 30 = 100

2x = 70

x = 35%

Now we know sum of all the central angles formed at the center of a circle = 360°

Therefore, angle formed by x% = 360° × 35%

                                                    = [tex]\frac{360\times 35}{100}[/tex]

                                                    = 126°

Answer:

l = 1920 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

The radius of circle, r = 8 cm

The central angle is 240 degrees

We need to find the length of the arc. We know that,

[tex]l=r\theta[/tex]

Where

l is the length of the arc

So,

[tex]l=8\times 240[/tex]

[tex]\implies l=1920\ cm[/tex]

so, the length of the arc is equal to 1920 cm.

Answer:

0.924

Step-by-step explanation:

R² = 0.854

R = √0.854

R = 0.924

Hence, the correlation Coefficient of electricity tarrif is 0.924 ; this correlation Coefficient value, depicts a strong positive correlation between machine hours and cost of electricity. And can he interpreted to mean that ; Electricity tarrif increases as machine hours increases and also decreases as machine hours decreases.

Answer:

H0 : μN ≤ μD

H1 : μN > μD

Right tailed

Test statistic = 1.33

Pvalue = 0.097

Fail to reject the Null

Step-by-step explanation:

H0 : μN ≤ μD

H1 : μN > μD

The test is right tailed ; culled from the direction of the greater than sign ">"

Night students :

n1 =30 x1= 3.34 s1 = 0.02

Day students:

n2 = 30 x2 = 3.32 s2 = 0.08

The test statistic :

(x1 - x2) / √(s1²/n1) + (s2²/n2)

T= (3.34 - 3.32) / √(0.02²/30) + (0.08²/30)

T = 0.02 / 0.0150554

Test statistic = 1.328

Using the conservative approach ;

df = Smaller of n1 - 1 or n2 - 1

df = 30 - 1 = 29

Pvalue(1.328, 29) = 0.097

At α = 0.10

Pvalue < α ; Hence, we reject H0 ; and conclude that there is significant evidence that GPA of night student is greater than GPA of day student

Answer:

to find the missing number is all u have to do is understand the problem and silve the problem!

Step-by-step explanation:

paki brainly po

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  300

Step-by-step explanation:

Since nobody failed, the number who passed one or the other was 100%.

  P(O + W) = P(O) +P(W) -P(O&W)

  100% = 80% +70% -P(O&W)

  P(O&W) = 50% = 150 students

If 150 students are 50% of the examinees, then 100% will be 300 students.

Answer:

hope it helps

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation: Because Donald asks a more broad and open question which people could give different answers too

Answer:

1) Isosceles

2) Acute

3) Right angled

4( Obtuse

5) Equilateral

it right answer is Clovis 2.5% it answer

Answer:

Answer is in the picture. have a look

Answer:

Guessing at least one incorrect answer

Step-by-step explanation:

The complement of guessing 5 correct answers on a 5-question true/false exam is-

Guessing at least one incorrect answer because, when 1 or more questions are incorrectly guessed, the event of 5 correct answers can not occur.

Answer:

1. log3 81 = 4

2. 4 3/2=8

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Convert the exponential equation to a logarithmic equation using the logarithm base (3)(3) of the right side (81)(81) equals the exponent (4)(4).

log3(81)=4

or

you can remember this

loga Y= X

so, a^x =y

2. Use the definition of a logarithm,

log

b

(

x

)

=

y

⟹

b

y

=

x

, to convert from the logarithmic form to the exponential form.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Partindo do pressuposto de que você pode ter coberturas duplas e triplas do mesmo item, o cálculo é relativamente simples. Para calcular as combinações possíveis; deve-se multiplicar as coberturas disponíveis pelo número total de coberturas permitidas. Este cálculo é semelhante a como olhamos para diferentes sistemas de contagem de base. Normalmente contamos com decimais (base 10), portanto, o número de combinações, se usar 3 dígitos, seria calculado por 10 x 10 x 10.

10x10 = 100

100x10 = 1000 combinações (0 a 999)

Sua pergunta sobre coberturas de pizza é a mesma, mas assumindo um sistema de numeração de base 12, então 12x12x12 ou 12³

Portanto, 1.728 combinações incluindo 0 (sem coberturas?) E também incluindo 12 ocasiões em que todas as 3 coberturas seriam iguais. Se esses cenários de pessoas forem restritos de modo que você só possa ter coberturas duplas máximas, etc., então essas combinações devem ser removidas (subtraídas do total de combinações permitidas).

Espero ter ajudado você a entender os princípios, então você deve ser capaz de trabalhar a partir disso, de muitas outras soluções semelhantes

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I find this approach the most straightforward of the various ways that trinomial factoring is explained or diagramed.

You want two factors of "ac" that have a total of "b". Here, that means you want factors of 2·50 = 100 that have a total of 25. It is helpful to know your times tables.

  100 = 1·100 = 2·50 = 4·25 = 5·20 = 10·10

The sums of these factor pairs are 101, 52, 29, 25, and 20. We want the pair with a sum of 25, so that's 5 and 20.

The trinomial can be rewritten using these factors as ...

  2x^2 +5x +20x +50

Then it can be factored by grouping consecutive pairs:

  (2x^2 +5x) +(20x +50) = x(2x +5) +10(2x +5) = (x +10)(2x +5)

_____

Additional comment

It doesn't matter which of the factors of the pair you write first. If our rewrite were ...

  2x^2 +20x +5x +50

Then the grouping and factoring would be (2x^2 +20x) +(5x +50)

  = 2x(x +10) +5(x +10) = (2x +5)(x +10) . . . . . same factoring

Answer:

$196.28

Step-by-step explanation:

Original cost: 39 × $8 = $312

Revenue: 32 × $16.19 = $518.08

Return charge: 7 × $1.4 = $9.8

$312 + $9.8 = total cost, which is $321.8

$518.08 - $321.8 = profit

Profit = $196.28

Answer:

C={n : n=i^2 where i belongs to Natural_numbers and 1 <= i <= 5}

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There are a couple of relations that are applicable to these questions.

__

The segment lengths relation tells us ...

  10x = 8×7 . . . . . . products of segment lengths are equal

  x = 56/10 = 5.6 . . . . divide by 10

__

The value of y° is the average of the intercepted arcs:

  y° = (85° +45°)/2 = 65°

_____

Additional comment

This diagram does not have enough information to allow computation of z. We would need to know the intercepted arc, or the length of the secant that meets tangent z.

Answer:

$23.3

Step-by-step explanation:

you can use ratios to solve this:

$6.99/x=0.30/0.100 then cross multiply to get 0.3x=6.99

So, 6.99 divided by 0.3 = 23.3

so the original price is $23.3

Answer:

3,199 approximately

Step-by-step explanation:

to find how much 20% of 15,998 does we multiply 15,998 with 20 and then divide it by 100

15,998 x 20 / 100 = 3,199

Answer:

The answer is "18.087 years".

Step-by-step explanation:

For upper class:

[tex]\mu=15.45 \ years\\\\\alpha=2.98 \ years\\\\[/tex]

[tex]P(Z \leq 1.2)[/tex] from the standard normal distribution on the table:

[tex]P(Z \leq 1.2) =0.8849\\\\x=z_{\alpha}+\mu\\\\[/tex]

  [tex]=0.8849 \times 2.98 +15.45\\\\ = 2.637002+15.45 \\\\=18.087 \ \ years\\[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given function h(x).

Shift left:

Shift down:

Given function is,

→ h(x)

As we shift left,

→ h(x) = h(x + 3)

As we shift down,

→ h(x + 3) = h(x+3)-5

Then the equation is,

→ h(x+3)-5

It is correct answer.

Answer:

[tex]\frac{851}{1000}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we can simply multiply that number by 1000, and divide again by 1000 to get a base fraction:

[tex].851\\\\= \frac{1000}{1000} \times .851\\\\= \frac{1000 \times .851}{1000}\\\\= \frac{851}{1000}[/tex]

851 is a secondary prime, having only two factors, both of which are prime.  Those factors are 23 and 37, neither of which is a factor of 1000, so this is already in simplest form.

Answer:

a) Minimize Z =30 X1 +25 X2+18 X3

subject to following constraints

[tex]1.X1\geq 0.4\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\2.X3\geq 0.15\left ( X1+X2+X3 \right )\\3.X1+X2+X3\leq 150\\4.X3\geq 0.25\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\5.X1\leq 50\\6.X1,X2,X3\geq 0[/tex]

b) Total cost=[tex]30 \times 48+15\times72+18\times30[/tex] = $3180.

c) As the dual price for constraint five is zero hence additional work hours for Lisa won't change the optimum solution.

Step-by-step explanation:  

Step 1:-

a)  

Let's take  

X1 to be the number of hours assigned to Lisa  

X2 to be the number of hours assigned to David  

X3 to be the number of hours assigned to Sarah.  

The objective function is to attenuate the entire cost of the project by deciding an optimum number of hours for every person. the target function is given by -  

Minimize Z =30 X1 +25 X2+18 X3

subject to following constraints

[tex]1.X1\geq 0.4\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\2.X3\geq 0.15\left ( X1+X2+X3 \right )\\3.X1+X2+X3\leq 150\\4.X3\geq 0.25\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\5.X1\leq 50\\6.X1,X2,X3\geq 0[/tex]  

Constraints and explanation:  

1. Lisa must be assigned a minimum of 40% of the entire number of hours assigned to the 2 senior designers.  

2. Sarah must be assigned a minimum of 15% of the entire project time.  

3. The corporate estimates that 150 hours are going to be required to finish the project.  

4. The number of hours assigned to Sarah must not exceed 25% of the entire number of hours assigned to the 2 senior designers.  

5. Lisa features a maximum of fifty hours available to figure on this project.  

6. Non-negative condition.  

Step 2:-  

b)

From the above equations, we get  

The number of hours assigned to Lisa is 48 hours  

The number of hours assigned to David 72 hours  

The number of hours assigned to Sarah 30 hours.  

Total cost=[tex]30 \times 48+15\times72+18\times30[/tex] = $3180.  

Step 3:-

c)  

As the dual price for constraint five is zero hence additional work hours for Lisa won't change the optimum solution.